User talk:Courcelles/Archive 114

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Littleolive oil in topic Thank you
Archive 110Archive 112Archive 113Archive 114Archive 115Archive 116Archive 120

You've got mail

 
Hello, Courcelles. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 17:11, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

I've dug for this, and I don't have it... resend? Courcelles (talk) 02:26, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Open UTRS request

Bonjour mon ami! If you have a moment would you please take a peak at UTRS 15741? It's regarding a Checkuser block of yours from a few months ago. Just curious as to whether you have any input you can leave there (or you can email me if it's private of BEANSY-y). Cheers, --Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 19:59, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

@Ponyo: Does this still need looking at? I've been unwell for a few weeks, so it likely has gone on without me. Courcelles (talk) 21:51, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Hmmm, I haven't had a chance to log in to UTRS since last week, but I'm guessing it's still there. Sorry to hear about your health, I'll send you chicken soup-laden get-well wishes.--Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 21:53, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
It's still there. It's for User:cavalierman--v/r - TP 21:47, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Ahh, I know who that is... I'll post internally. Courcelles (talk) 21:51, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Took me three tries to get my darned password reset. Finally got one that worked. Commented, though I think his contributions make it fairly obvious. Courcelles (talk) 22:00, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Now that you have a shiny new password, the other unblock request in the Checkuser queue is also related to one of your CU blocks...--Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 23:01, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Commented, though you didn't really need my input on that one ;) Courcelles (talk) 23:07, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
I seem to remember warning you ages ago that I am lazy. I think you're now starting to understand the gravity of the situation.--Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 23:09, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Indeed, I do remember! Courcelles (talk) 23:10, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
I'm exhausted from thinking back so far. I'm off in search of a chaise lounge and a glass of sauvignon blanc.--Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 23:16, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
When you find them, let me know. I'll be right there! Courcelles (talk) 02:26, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 May 2016

16:19, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #211

Sunday June 5: Women in Jewish History Edit-a-thon

Sunday June 5, 12-5pm: Women in Jewish History Edit-a-thon
 
 

Join us for a full Sunday of social Wikipedia editing at the Center for Jewish History (drop-in any time!), during which we will create, update, and improve Wikipedia articles pertaining to Women in Jewish History.

All are invited, with no specialized knowledge of the subject or Wikipedia editing experience required.

Expanding coverage of Jewish women on Wikipedia makes these women and their creations discoverable, addresses the gender bias on Wikipedia in a positive way, and works to correct imbalances archival collecting practice and institutional projects that have historically silenced women's narratives.

A training session on editing Wikipedia will be held at 12:30 pm. Experienced Wikipedians will be on-hand to assist throughout the day. Please bring your laptop and power cord; we will have library resources, WiFi, and a list of suggested topics on hand.

Light refreshments will be provided.

Make edits! Ask questions! Be bold!

Time: 12:00 pm – 5:00 pm
Location: Center for Jewish History, 15 West 16th Street (between 5th and 6th Avenues), New York City, New York 10011

Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues! --Pharos (talk) 15:01, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

P.S. Stay tuned / sign up early for our June 15 WikiWednesday and other upcoming events.

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

20:51, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #212

June 15: WikiWednesday Salon and Skill-Share NYC

Wednesday June 15, 7pm: WikiWednesday Salon and Skill-Share NYC
 
 

You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" evening salon (7-9pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop at Babycastles gallery by 14th Street / Union Square in Manhattan.

Featuring special guest presentations on Wikipedia Asian Month and Wikipedia Club at Ohio State University.

We will include a look at the organization and planning for our chapter, and expanding volunteer roles for both regular Wikipedia editors and new participants.

We will also follow up on plans for recent (Art+Feminism! AfroCrowd!) and upcoming edit-a-thons, and other outreach activities.

We welcome the participation of our friends from the Free Culture movement and from all educational and cultural institutions interested in developing free knowledge projects.

After the main meeting, pizza/chicken/vegetables and refreshments and video games in the gallery!

7:00pm - 9:00 pm at Babycastles gallery, 137 West 14th Street

We especially encourage folks to add your 5-minute lightning talks to our roster, and otherwise join in the "open space" experience! Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues! --Pharos (talk) 01:38, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

P.S. Stay tuned / sign up early for our AfroCrowd June calendar, June 29 Pride Edit-a-thon @ MoMA, and July 15 Wiknic @ Central Park, among other upcoming events.

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

This Month in GLAM: May 2016





Headlines

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

The Signpost: 05 June 2016

Restoration of Gustav Magnusson

Hi, can I get Gustav Magnusson restored to my userspace please. The associated AfD is Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gustav Magnusson. (I have the feeling I already asked for this but forgot to follow up, if that's the case sorry lol)--Prisencolin (talk) 02:03, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Admin The Wordsmith's comments re: "...the ineptness of many current Arbs..." is certainly casting aspersions

Given the seriousness of this Rfc at User talk:The Wordsmith/GMORFC the ongoing threats to sanction participating editors seem to ring hollow in light of supervising admin The Wordsmith's astonishing comments regarding ArbCom members. The comment, which by any definition "casts aspersions," raises a number of questions that call for immediate answers, given the self-created deadline for comments.

The questions, which I hereby put directly to The Wordsmith, are as follows:

  • Exactly which ArbCom members are you referring to, when you describe them as "inept?"
  • In what way are these current community-elected ArbCom members, as you term them, "inept?"
  • Do you have diffs to support this sweeping claim, and can you produce them? If not, why not?
  • Since the thrust of this extraordinary Rfc seems to be to prevent "casting aspersions," in the Talk pages of GMO articles (as well as precedent-establishing proposed "locked in" multiple article wording regarding GMO safety) is this not exactly what you are doing in the past 24 hours towards members of the Arbitration Committee? Does this not disqualify you immediately from further participation?

To all concerned: I will post the above subsection on the Talk pages of current ArbCom members, per The Wordsmith's declaration, despite substantial objections, that they will be locking down the page a few hours from this posting, making further timely discussion on this page impossible. Jusdafax 11:03, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

I admit I missed the GMO case, so, I'm coming at tis with little awareness of it, but I'll read. Courcelles (talk) 03:16, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
Please note that this same message was posted to the talkpage of every active Arbitrator, and active discussion is going on at at least three of them. EDIT: Drmies, Kelapstik and Opabinia regalis are the pages with active discussion. The WordsmithTalk to me 03:20, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Wednesday June 29: Wiki Loves Pride Edit-a-thon @ MoMA

Wednesday June 29, 6-8:30pm: Wiki Loves Pride Edit-a-thon @ MoMA
 

Join us for an evening of social Wikipedia editing at the Museum of Modern Art Library's second annual Wiki Loves Pride Edit-a-thon, during which we will create, update, and improve Wikipedia articles pertaining to LGBT art, culture and history.

All are invited, with no specialized knowledge of the subject or Wikipedia editing experience required.

Also featuring a lightning talk by CUNY students at the La Guardia and Wagner Archives on a project to document local 1980s HIV/AIDS activism on Wikipedia.

Experienced Wikipedians will be on-hand to assist throughout the day. Please bring your laptop and power cord; we will have library resources, WiFi, and a list of suggested topics on hand.

Time: 6:00 pm – 8:30 pm
Location: Dorothy and Lewis B. Cullman Education and Research Building at MoMA, 4 West 54 Street - between 5th/6th Ave, New York, NY 10019
Please note that this entrance is one block north of the main 53rd Street entrance, closer to 5th Avenue.

Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues! --Pharos (talk) 21:03, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

P.S. Stay tuned / sign up early for our Sunday July 10 Wiknic in Central Park and other upcoming events.

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

19:14, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #214

Books & Bytes - Issue 17

  The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 17, April-May 2016
by The Interior, Ocaasi, UY Scuti, Sadads, and Nikkimaria

  • New donations this month - a German-language legal resource
  • Wikipedia referals to academic citations - news from CrossRef and WikiCite2016
  • New library stats, WikiCon news, a bot to reveal Open Access versions of citations, and more!

Read the full newsletter

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:36, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 June 2016

18:41, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #213

You got mail

 
Hello, Courcelles. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 04:10, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

15:42, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #215

Wikidata weekly summary #216

The Signpost: 04 July 2016

19:45, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Sunday July 10: WikNYC Picnic @ Central Park

Sunday July 10, 3-8pm: WikNYC Picnic
 
 

You are invited to join us the "picnic anyone can edit" in Manhattan's Central Park, as part of the Great American Wiknic celebrations being held across the USA. Remember it's a wiki-picnic, which means potluck.

3–8pm - come by any time! The picnicking area is the southwest section of the Great Lawn, north of the Delacorte Theater, just inside the park at Central Park West between 81st & 82nd. Enter the park at West 81st St.
Look for us by the Wikipedia / Wikimedia NYC banner!
Subway: 81st Street – Museum of Natural History, C Line  

We hope to see you there! --Pharos (talk) 14:55, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

15:14, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #217

Hi

Hello Courcelles. Your name was mentioned in the deletion of the Gulf Coast Community FOundation Page-- 22:39, 14 October 2015 Courcelles (talk | contribs) deleted page Gulf Coast Community Foundation (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gulf Coast Community Foundation closed as delete) -- Would it be possible to get a better understanding of why this page was deleted and how we can reinstate the page to reflect content that is a reliable source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Efuro (talkcontribs)

Any new article would have to be using better sourcing, and most importantly not read as a press release from the organization. Courcelles (talk) 16:22, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi Courcelles. Your name was mentioned in the Category Revdel admins. Would it be possible for you to revdel this revision? Thanks. Xender Lourdes (talk) 10:54, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Hello! Please add a link on the Leo Frank to the "Leo M. Frank vs. The State of Georgia" appeal, a primary source, located at http://cdm.georgiaarchives.org:2011/cdm/compoundobject/collection/adhoc/id/5297. Also, the second appeal "Leo M. Frank vs. The State of Georgia" is located at http://cdm.georgiaarchives.org:2011/cdm/compoundobject/collection/adhoc/id/6271. Jwilkes73 (talk) 19:21, 20 June 2016 (UTC)jwilkes73

If you think edits need to be made, please make them yourself. Courcelles (talk) 01:30, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

User:Jytdog

You archived that user's talk page to avoid discussion there of his recent block. The case is said to be under the jurisdiction of ArbCom, but I cannot find it in ArbCom-related pages. If and when a case is initiated there, it would be very helpful for you to provide a link to it on User:Jytdog's talk page. Thanks. Edison (talk) 21:44, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

It is under the jurisdiction of arbcom merely by being an oversightblock, and has been under active discussion since about 5 minutes after GorillaWarfare placed the block on both arbcom-l and oversight-l. Jytdog asked that the drama not happen on his talk page., though, of course, drama is inevitable in this. Courcelles (talk) 21:54, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
Are "arbcom-l and oversight-l" some secret fora, or can the ordinary editor or administrator see what is going on when a long-term productive editor is indefinitely blocked? Apparently you are able to see the discussions, as an "oversighter" and a member of ArbCom. This should be discussed publicly as soon as possible. If it is transferred from ANI and from the editor's talk page to ArbCom, further discussions should not occur in secret. Perhaps a COI editor who uses his real name should not be shocked when an administrator points out the connection. Perhaps the admin should not be indef blocked. If we have no right to discuss this at ANI, then it is incumbent of the ArbCom to have a prompt and accessible discussion, so that other administrators know what is expected of them in similar cases of blatant COI editing. See for example my pointing out of a possible COI at [50]. Is that over the line? Should I just ignore apparent COI edits? Edison (talk) 03:13, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
I also disagree with your closing of the discussion. The discussion was active, but I understand why it was done. Jytdog asked that it be closed and you did so, per IAR. Since we normal users will not ever be able to see arbcom-l or oversight-l, we are able to discuss on Wikipedia only. I'd request that you unprotect the page and allow us to continue our discussion, especially on Jytdog's page since he would at least be able to view the page and possibly respond by email (not saying anyone would proxy for him, but it would at least get his side of the story known). KoshVorlon 11:31, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
KoshVorlon, the page was not protected per IAR, it was was protected per the user's request (see WP:UPROT), and the reasons were clearly stated there by Courcelles. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 12:00, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
I saw the reason, and I'm familiar with UPROT, and I'm aware that users can ask for their page to be protected and it will be done as long as a need exists. As I didn't see a need, I assumed you used IAR. I'm not grousing at Courcelles for it, like I said, I understood he protected Jytdog's page on his request. KoshVorlon 12:44, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
the overall question (IMO) is where can this be discussed now (and BTW, does the community have an opinion in what happens to Jytdog?)--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:00, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
Ozzie10aaaa, Jytdog has been consistently deleting MEDR cited content that I have contributed to the encyclopedia. As for a discussion of whether or not he should be unblocked do a editor interaction query and view the results. He has consistently harrassed me for about a year. Please do not restore access to his talk page for him. Barbara (WVS) (talk) 03:35, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
As far as I know, Ozzie10aaaa , the ultimate decision is made by the oversight committee, because they have access to data that is private for the rest of us. That being said, the ideal place to discuss is on Jytdog's page so he can at least be aware of what's being discusssed. KoshVorlon 16:03, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
as of now, we have "nowhere to talk"--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 17:53, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
There are places such a discussion could be held, one is being held on Wikipedia talk:Harassment in general terms, but when we hold a long conversation on a user talk page where the user is blocked without talk page, we're basically spamming their email box with message after message for a conversation they can't participate in. If his talk page access is restored, it should go without saying the talk page itself should be unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 00:17, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: June 2016





Headlines

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

12:01, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #218

The Signpost: 21 July 2016

19:54, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Request

Hi Courcelles, can you take a look at the recent edits to the GA Abby Wambach article? I've tried reverting or editing where necessary, but wondering if protection would be better. Thank you. Hmlarson (talk) 06:20, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

@Hmlarson: Protection is one option. Blocking the troll is another -- done. Courcelles (talk) 23:19, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
  Hmlarson (talk) 00:05, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
Anytime. Courcelles (talk) 22:17, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #219

Wikidata weekly summary #220

21:48, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 August 2016

Rangblock of

This user is affected by (Redacted) and is asking for exemption at UTRS. I'm a little hesitant to give a new user an exemption; given the edits, do you have any concerns? OhNoitsJamie Talk 03:28, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Looking at this UTRS also. t's a hardblock and that range is pretty big, but those edits are pretty advanced for a new user. OTOH, he just got caught in it and the block is two weeks old. Katietalk 13:33, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
Do as either of you sees fit. I've been away visiting a sick relative, and am quite literally dressing for the funeral (and then the journey home), so I'll be happy to stand behind anything y'all think is best. Courcelles (talk) 18:08, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
Sorry to hear that, Courcelles. Thanks for taking the time for a quick response. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:07, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
I've set the block to anon. only. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 09:35, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

15:41, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #221

This Month in GLAM: July 2016





Headlines

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

19:37, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #222

August 17: WikiWednesday Salon and Skill-Share NYC

Wednesday Auugust 17, 7pm: WikiWednesday Salon and Skill-Share NYC
 
 

You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" evening salon (7-9pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop at Babycastles gallery by 14th Street / Union Square in Manhattan.

Featuring special guest presentations on WikiVerse and Bringing Wikipedia to the Last Mile.

We will include a look at the organization and planning for our chapter, and expanding volunteer roles for both regular Wikipedia editors and new participants.

We will also follow up on plans for recent (UN Women!) and upcoming edit-a-thons, and other outreach activities.

We welcome the participation of our friends from the Free Culture movement and from all educational and cultural institutions interested in developing free knowledge projects.

After the main meeting, pizza/chicken/vegetables and refreshments and video games in the gallery!

7:00pm - 9:00 pm at Babycastles gallery, 137 West 14th Street

We especially encourage folks to add your 5-minute lightning talks to our roster, and otherwise join in the "open space" experience! Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues! --Pharos (talk) 23:20, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

P.S. Prep for our chapter elections next month in September (and add your candidacy!): Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Elections

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

The Signpost: 18 August 2016

Thank you

Thank you for removing the content on my talk page.

My former place of employment was known to the arbs in the first T M arbitration where no sanctions were handed out. I have also experienced off WP harassment in the past. However, this last attack illustrates for me how poorly our COI functions and the license some editors feel they have been given by that COI policy in AE and on talk pages. I consider the post on my talk page not only outing and harassment but a threat since an attempt was made to identify an address accurate or not. This is a serious issue both personally and in my mind for Wikipedia and at this point I am not sure how to deal with it. Best wishes and Thank you.(Littleolive oil (talk) 19:46, 18 August 2016 (UTC))

More attempts to out [88](Littleolive oil (talk) 20:09, 18 August 2016 (UTC))

Gone. I'll need to not be on a tiny phone screen to do any further conversing. Courcelles (talk) 20:14, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for your help.(Littleolive oil (talk) 20:20, 18 August 2016 (UTC))

21:18, 22 August 2016 (UTC)