Cweinbl

<-- #REDIRECT User talk:Charles S. Weinblatt -->

Your accounts and user pages

Please see User talk:Charles Weinblatt. JohnCD (talk) 19:33, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Charles S. Weinblatt.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:30, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

• Another one of your uploads, File:Charles S. Weinblatt.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:18, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Charles Weinblatt for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Charles Weinblatt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Weinblatt until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:51, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Charles Weinblatt

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Charles Weinblatt requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. SSSB (talk) 21:55, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Cweinbl/Charles Weinblatt

A tag has been placed on User:Cweinbl/Charles Weinblatt requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:40, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Charles S. Weinblatt

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Charles S. Weinblatt requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Wgolf (talk) 00:11, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

Deletion review

Hi, if you want to recreate Charles Weinblatt under any title (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Weinblatt), you should first ask the deleting admin, Sandstein, for advice, then unless he suggests otherwise proceed to Wikipedia:Deletion review (scroll down for instructions). That is worth doing only if you have new material to add and/or new independent reliable sources. Please don't keep recreating the article otherwise.

Another option, if you have independent, reliable sources, is to create a draft and work on it at Draft:Charles Weinblatt, then submit it to Wikipedia:Articles for creation, where another editor will review it. Again, you should contact the deleting admin to ask whether that is worth doing.

I hope this information is helpful. SarahSV ^(talk) 05:04, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Charles Samuel Weinblatt

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Charles Samuel Weinblatt requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Weinblatt. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GPL93 (talk) 23:55, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

September 2019

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 15:01, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

I did NOT write the original article. One day, about 20 years ago, I discovered the Wiki page about me when I saw that there was an additional Facebook page in my name that I did not create. I saw that it was gleaned from Wikipedia - a page that I had never before seen. Someone at Wikipedia created a page in my name, which I saw via Facebook. Since then, I've attempted periodically to make the page more accurate with minor additions. Again, I discovered the original page in my name. I did not create it. After that, I attempted to make it more accurate and relevant.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Cweinbl (talk • contribs) 14:01, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Cweinbl. The Wikipedia guideline on autobiographies was not highlighted here because of any original article. Rather, your editing history shows that you have used three different accounts to create multiple new versions of the article in the main space and on various user pages (in December 2008, September 2009, February 2010, June 2010, September 2011, April 2019, May 2019 and September 2019). Problems with self-promotion have been pointed out to you previously. Please note that WP:Autobiography also provides guidance on addressing problems in articles written about oneself. See WP:AUTOPROB. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask here or at the Help Desk. Regards. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 16:13, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

E-mail messages from Wikipedia

You got an e-mail about my edit because it was to a page which is on your watchlist. You can edit your watchlist by clicking on the "Watchlist" link in the upper-right-hand corner of the page while you are logged in. You can also tell it not to send you notification e-mails. See Help:Watchlist for details.

In your e-mail to me you also spoke of the Wikipedia article about you, Charles Weinblatt. As the earlier comments on this page explain, it has been deleted according to a standard Wikipedia procedure. While I understand that having a Wikipedia article about you probably would improve your book sales, Wikipedia's editorial rules can't take such interests into consideration. While someone else might or might not be able to dig up some sourcing and write a neutral article about you, you have a conflict of interest in writing an article about yourself. I'd suggest you abandon your attempts to re-create the article, and focus on writing good books; the more well-known you become as an author, the more likely someone unconnected with you will spontaneously write an article about you and be able to have it accepted.

You'll get a similar response from all the more experienced editors (we are familiar with this situation, which happens all the time, and we all know the standard rules developed for it). I'd strongly suggest that you not ask a string more people to undelete your article. All edits here are public; everyone will be able to see them, for all time. Although you sent me an e-mail, it was trivial for me to find a lot of previous comments made to you (because I know the system; there is a bit of a learning curve, although we try to keep it low). Generally, if someone writes you a message, it is a good idea to read the pages that they link to from it; often the answer to your issue is on those pages.

We are almost all volunteers here, and volunteer time is a valuable resource. You've used a lot of volunteer time trying to do something which you probably really should not have done. Everyone is being fairly polite about this because it is a common beginner mistake; as long as they are honest, polite, and wiling to learn, we try to help new editors here.

If you'd like to work on other articles, where you don't have a conflict of interest, you would be very welcome. You could ask for suggestions on what to work on at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject History, for instance. Wikipedia:Teahouse will help you with queries about editing (but please don't ask them about your own article too). HLHJ (talk) 01:14, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

Help me!

For years, I had a page on Wikipedia WHICH I DID NOT CREATE and it included my University of Toledo administrative career (I was director of a division that I created at the behest of the University trustees), plus my retirement career as a multi-published author of fiction and non-fiction, including published by a major American university for fiction. This link, which I also did not create, (https://enacademic.com/dic.nsf/enwiki/11521800/Charles_Weinblatt) is a very similar version of that Wikipedia page. Here's another one which I did create: https://en.everybodywiki.com/Charles_S._Weinblatt. I am also the owner of a blog, http://cweinblatt.wordpress.comBold text,  that helps novice authors learn how to become published , how to create a viable publishing proposal and how to promote and market a book.

Please help me with... Without my knowledge or approval, my Wikipedia page, which existed for years, was removed less than a year ago. That's despite the fact that I continue to be incrementally traditionally published, most recently by Texas Tech University Press for fiction (my novel with multi-national sales, "Jacob's Courage: A Holocaust Love Story.Italic text'' I also have acquired a talented and well-connected literary agent, Nancy Rosenfeld: Principal AAA Books Unlimited 3060 Blackthorn Road Riverwoods, IL 60015 847-444-1220 - Office Line 847-607-8335 – Fax Line 847-945-0315 - Direct Line mailto:nancy@aaabooksunlimited.com http://www.aaabooksunlimited.comItalic text

My biography was published by Marquis Who's Who in America,Italic text Who's Who in American EducationItalic text and Who's Who in the Midwest.Italic text As a University of Toledo director, I was appointed by University President Dan Johnson to the committee post of "'Outreach & Engagement.Italic text"

Please help to return my page to Wikipedia, as it was for so many years. For the longest time, I was told that Wikipedia is a viable source for someone like myself, with significant careers in academia and as a multi-genre published author. I'm happy to help in any possible way. I was also very proud to say that Wikipedia had published my biography, before it was abruptly removed.

Cweinbl (talk) 23:21, 25 February 2020 (UTC) Charles S. Weinblatt

You have been given answers to this above. The article about you(not "your Wikipedia page") was deleted per the result of this discussion. The subject's permission is not required to either delete or create an article, as Wikipedia summarizes what independent reliable sources state. It was determined that you do not meet Wikipedia's special definition notability. 331dot (talk) 23:33, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of User talk:72.241.162.193

The page User talk:72.241.162.193 has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done for the following reason:

misplaced request

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 331dot (talk) 23:30, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Cweinbl/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Cweinbl/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 20:50, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Cweinbl! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 20:50, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Cweinbl/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Cweinbl/sandbox, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
• It appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. (See section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GPL93 (talk) 21:25, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Charles Weinblatt

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Charles Weinblatt, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It appears to be a test page. (See section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
• It appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Weinblatt. (See section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.  GILO   A&E⇑  23:11, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Charles S. Weinblatt.jpg

The file File:Charles S. Weinblatt.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Uploaded for Charles S. Weinblatt. No other use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 15:16, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Charles Weinblatt

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Charles Weinblatt requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Weinblatt. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Pichpich (talk) 23:53, 16 January 2024 (UTC)