D’Azur
Add your message below and sign it. I will answer on this page.
Abitur after twelve years
editThe latter seems better to me, but they should both be fine!...... Dendodge .. TalkHelp 14:00, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Gesamtschule am Gluckenstein, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Humboldtschule (Bad Homburg). It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 06:44, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Alexander-von-Humboldt-Gymnasium, Schweinfurt
editA proposed deletion template has been added to the article Alexander-von-Humboldt-Gymnasium, Schweinfurt, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process.
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.
Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
editHello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.
On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true
. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false
in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.
For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.
Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 18:25, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
Swiss flag
editHi. I see that you changed the version of the flag in the Switzerland article. I would be interested to know your opinion about a proposal I made at WT:CH#Swiss red to use only one version of the flag in all our articles. So far, only a few people have participated in the discussion; hence, any additional input would be helpful there. mgeo talk 21:57, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
- Hello. It’s simple to explain. The official red is the lurid red, you can see it on the website of the Federal Authorities of the Swiss Confederation (and for example here). The discussion about the right or wrong red is unnecessary. — PsY.cHo, 14:08, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
- Ok, I see. Personally I have no problem with either versions of the flag and I'd be happy to use the official one in every article for the sake of consistency (although I remember having reverted you a long time ago). The problem now is that there are several editors (including the one who reverted you a few days ago) who are arguing that the pantone version is better, and since you seem to disgree with that, you may want to give your reasons on the project's discussion page. I think that would be really helpful, if we want to reach a consensus and finally end this long running, slow-burning flag edit war. mgeo talk 23:15, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
- Please see Talk:Switzerland/Archive 1#Edit war: colour of the Swiss flag and coat of arms. Thank you. — PsY.cHo, 13:24, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
- Ok, good! There are many articles using the Swiss flag on wikipedia, so logically the discussion should be held on the project main discussion page (which I also linked from wiki project flags), I hope you understand. mgeo talk 16:31, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
- Please see Talk:Switzerland/Archive 1#Edit war: colour of the Swiss flag and coat of arms. Thank you. — PsY.cHo, 13:24, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
- Ok, I see. Personally I have no problem with either versions of the flag and I'd be happy to use the official one in every article for the sake of consistency (although I remember having reverted you a long time ago). The problem now is that there are several editors (including the one who reverted you a few days ago) who are arguing that the pantone version is better, and since you seem to disgree with that, you may want to give your reasons on the project's discussion page. I think that would be really helpful, if we want to reach a consensus and finally end this long running, slow-burning flag edit war. mgeo talk 23:15, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
Files missing description details
edit- File:Humboldtschule (Bad Homburg).svg
- File:Gesamtschule am Gluckenstein.jpg
- File:Philipp-Reis-Schule.svg
- File:Schloss Einstein.svg
are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.
If the information is not provided, the images may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 09:44, 14 April 2013 (UTC)Better source request for File:Philipp-Reis-Schule.svg
editThanks for uploading File:Philipp-Reis-Schule.svg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:06, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
Better source request for File:Humboldtschule (Bad Homburg).svg
editThanks for uploading File:Humboldtschule (Bad Homburg).svg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:06, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
Better source request for some of your uploads
editThanks for your uploads to Wikipedia. There is an issue with some of them, specifically:
You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the images because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the images, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image files themselves. Please update the image descriptions with URLs that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 23:17, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
editHello, PsY.cHo. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Protected edit request on 26 August 2017
editThis edit request to User:Despairing has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please delete this broken redirect. – Train2104 (t • c) 19:05, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
- Done deleted via U2 — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 19:45, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
editHello, PsY.cHo. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
editArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
The article Friedrich-Dessauer-Gymnasium, Frankfurt has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Does not seem notable enough for an article
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -Asheiou (they/them • talk) 02:58, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Friedrich-Dessauer-Gymnasium, Frankfurt for deletion
editA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Friedrich-Dessauer-Gymnasium, Frankfurt, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Friedrich-Dessauer-Gymnasium, Frankfurt until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Gesamtschule am Gluckenstein.jpg
editThanks for uploading File:Gesamtschule am Gluckenstein.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:19, 16 March 2024 (UTC)