User talk:Daniel/Archive/91
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on User talk:Daniel. No further edits should be made to this page. For a list of archives for this user, see User talk:Daniel/Archive.
This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Please direct any comments to the current talk page. |
Contents
- 1 The Signpost: 06 May 2013
- 2 The Signpost: 13 May 2013
- 3 The Signpost: 20 May 2013
- 4 Happy First Edit Day
- 5 User Unblock
- 6 The Signpost: 27 May 2013
- 7 The Signpost: 05 June 2013
- 8 The Signpost: 12 June 2013
- 9 The Signpost: 19 June 2013
- 10 Central Coast Mariners FC
- 11 The Signpost: 26 June 2013
- 12 The Signpost: 03 July 2013
- 13 The Signpost: 10 July 2013
- 14 The Signpost: 17 July 2013
- 15 The Signpost: 24 July 2013
- 16 DYK RfC
- 17 The Signpost: 31 July 2013
- 18 The Signpost: 07 August 2013
- 19 The Signpost: 14 August 2013
- 20 WP:FOUR RFC
- 21 The Signpost: 21 August 2013
- 22 The Signpost: 28 August 2013
- 23 The Signpost: 04 September 2013
- 24 The Signpost: 11 September 2013
- 25 The Signpost: 18 September 2013
- 26 Talk:David_Herzog
- 27 RE: Julia Mora
- 28 The Signpost: 25 September 2013
- 29 Symbol Technologies
- 30 The Signpost: 02 October 2013
- Technology report: Foundation successful in bid for larger Google subsidy
- Featured content: WikiCup update: full speed ahead!
- WikiProject report: Earn $100 in cash... and a button!
- News and notes: WMF–community ruckus on Wikimedia mailing list
- WikiProject report: Knock Out: WikiProject Mixed Martial Arts
- Featured content: A mushroom, a motorway, a Munich gallery, and a map
- In the media: PR firm accused of editing Wikipedia for government clients; can Wikipedia predict the stock market?
- Arbitration report: Race and politics opened; three open cases
- Foundation elections: Trustee candidates speak about Board structure, China, gender, global south, endowment
- WikiProject report: Classical Greece and Rome
- News and notes: Spanish Wikipedia leaps past one million articles
- In the media: Qworty incident continues
- Featured content: Up in the air
Happy First Edit Day, Daniel, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! :) |
Regarding Tz1993 (talk · contribs), I appreciate you taking the time to investigate the user's request to be unblocked, as I was on hiatus at the time of the request. There wasn't much time to comment on the block log as to why the username was blocked due to a user creation bot that was creating hundreds of bogus accounts within seconds of each other. At the time, either the username format or the IP used, was the same or similar to the bot, hence the vandal bot block. It's unfortunate that the user was blocked due to the similarity of the accounts. I had to block so many accounts that day that I was also accidentally blocked, by another admin because of the mass confusion, that assumed my account was hijacked as well. It was a bad day for all involved. I just wanted to leave a note as to the reasoning behind the block, since I was unable to be reached, I understand your removal of the block; as shown in this revision. Thanks again. «»Who?¿? 06:53, 26 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
- News and notes: First-ever community election for FDC positions
- In the media: Pagans complain about Qworty's anti-Pagan editing
- Foundation elections: Candidates talk about the Meta problem, the nation-based chapter model, world languages, and value for money
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Geographical Coordinates
- Featured content: Life of 2π
- Recent research: Motivations on the Persian Wikipedia; is science eight times more popular on the Spanish Wikipedia than the English Wikipedia?
- Technology report: Amsterdam hackathon: continuity, change, and stroopwafels
- From the editor: Signpost developments
- Featured content: A week of portraits
- Discussion report: Return of the Discussion report
- News and notes: "Cease and desist", World Trade Organization says to Wikivoyage; Could WikiLang be the next WMF project?
- In the media: China blocks secure version of Wikipedia
- WikiProject report: Operation Normandy
- Technology report: Developers accused of making Toolserver fight 'pointless'
- Featured content: Mixing Bowl Interchange
- In the media: VisualEditor will "change world history"
- Discussion report: VisualEditor, elections, bots, and more
- Traffic report: Who holds the throne?
- Arbitration report: Two cases suspended; proposed decision posted in Argentine History
- WikiProject report: Processing WikiProject Computing
- Traffic report: Most popular Wikipedia articles of the last week
- WikiProject report: The Volunteer State: WikiProject Tennessee
- News and notes: Swedish Wikipedia's millionth article leads to protests; WMF elections—where are all the voters?
- Featured content: Cheaper by the dozen
- Discussion report: Citations, non-free content, and a MediaWiki meeting
- Technology report: May engineering report published
- Arbitration report: The Farmbrough amendment request—automation and arbitration enforcement
In case you don't spot it from your watchlist, Central Coast Mariners FC has been nominated at WP:TFAR but I think the article needs considerable work to bring it back up to FA standards. I've left some issues on the article's talk page that need to be addressed. Thanks, BencherliteTalk 11:53, 25 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
- Ta. Replied there. Daniel (talk) 12:58, 25 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
- Traffic report: Most-viewed articles of the week
- In the media: Daily Dot on Commons and porn; Jimmy Wales accused of breaking Wikipedia rules in hunt for Snowden
- News and notes: Election results released
- Featured content: Wikipedia in black + Adam Cuerden
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Fashion
- Arbitration report: Argentine History closed; two cases remain suspended
- In the media: Jimmy Wales is not an Internet billionaire; a mass shooter's alleged Wikipedia editing
- Featured content: Queen of France
- WikiProject report: Puppies!
- News and notes: Wikipedia's medical collaborations gathering pace
- Discussion report: Snuggle, mainpage link to Wikinews, 3RR, and more
- Technology report: VisualEditor in midst of game-changing deployment series
- Traffic report: Yahoo! crushes the competition ... in Wikipedia views
- Arbitration report: Tea Party movement reopened, new AUSC appointments
- WikiProject report: Not Jimbo: WikiProject Wales
- Traffic report: Inflated view counts here, there, and everywhere
- Dispatches: Infoboxes: time for a fresh look?
- Featured content: The week of the birds
- Discussion report: Featured article process governance, signature templates, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Square Enix
- Traffic report: Most-viewed articles of the week
- News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation's new plans announced
- Featured content: Documents and sports
- In the media: Wikipedia flamewars
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Religion
- Discussion report: Partially disambiguated page names, page protection policy, and more
- Traffic report: Gleeless
- Featured content: Engineering and the arts
- Arbitration report: Infoboxes case opens
- As a listed DYK participant, you are invited to contribute to a formal Request for Comment on the question of whether Good Articles should appear in the Did You Know? slot in future. Please see the proposal on its subpage here, or on the main DYK talk page. To add the discussion to your watchlist, click this link. Thank you in advance. Gilderien Chat|Contributions00:20, 1 August 2013 (UTC)Reply
- Recent research: Napoleon, Michael Jackson and Srebrenica across cultures, 90% of Wikipedia better than Britannica, WikiSym preview
- Traffic report: Bouncing Baby Brouhaha
- WikiProject report: Babel Series: Politics on the Turkish Wikipedia
- News and notes: Gearing up for Wikimania 2013
- Arbitration report: Race and politics case closes
- Featured content: Caterpillars, warblers, and frogs—oh my!
- Arbitration report: Fourteen editors proposed for ban in Tea Party movement case
- Traffic report: Greetings from the graveyard
- News and notes: Chapters Association self-destructs
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Freedom of Speech
- Featured content: Mysterious case of the grand duchess
- Discussion report: CheckUser and Oversighter candidates, and more
- News and notes: "Beautifully smooth" Wikimania with few hitches
- In the media: Chinese censorship
- Featured content: Wikipedia takes the cities
- Discussion report: Wikivoyage, reliable sources, music bands, account creators, and OTRS
- WikiProject report: For the love of stamps
- Arbitration report: Kiefer.Wolfowitz and Ironholds case closes
There are two WP:RFCs at WP:FOUR. The first is to conflate issues so as to keep people from expressing meaningful opinions. The second, by me, is claimed to be less than neutral by proponents of the first. Please look at the second one, which I think is much better.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 06:25, 20 August 2013 (UTC)Reply
- Recent research: WikiSym 2013 retrospective
- WikiProject report: Loop-the-loop: Amusement Parks
- Traffic report: Reddit creep
- Featured content: WikiCup update, and the gardens of Finland
- News and notes: Looking ahead to Wiki Loves Monuments
- Technology report: Gallery improvements launch on Wikipedia
- Recent research: WikiSym 2013 retrospective
- WikiProject report: Loop-the-loop: Amusement Parks
- Traffic report: Reddit creep
- Featured content: WikiCup update, and the gardens of Finland
- News and notes: Looking ahead to Wiki Loves Monuments
- Technology report: Gallery improvements launch on Wikipedia
- News and notes: Privacy policy debate gears up
- Traffic report: No accounting for the wisdom of crowds
- Featured content: Bridging the way to a Peasants' Revolt
- WikiProject report: Writing on the frontier: Psychology on Wikipedia
- Arbitration report: Manning naming dispute case opens; Tea Party case closes ; Infoboxes nears completion
- Technology report: Making Wikipedia more accessible
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Indonesia
- Featured content: Tintin goes featured
- Traffic report: Syria, celebrities, and association football: oh my!
- Arbitration report: Workshop phase opens in Manning naming dispute ; Infoboxes case closes
- WikiProject report: 18,464 Good Articles on the wall
- Featured content: Hurricane Diane and Van Gogh
- Technology report: What can Wikidata do for Wikipedia?
- Traffic report: Twerking, tragedy and TV
We get many confused posts like that at Wikipedia:Help desk. {{HD/GKG}} was made for the purpose. The posters rarely mention that it's actually about something they saw at Google and not at Wikipedia. Some of the posts are about wrong spouses and other errors in Google's data fields after the Wikipedia excerpt. I'm not on OTRS but I imagine there would also be many posts there so I hope the OTRS volunteers are aware of the issue. When help desk posts look likely to be about this, I make a Google search to see whether Google's search page contains the alleged Wikipedia error. PrimeHunter (talk) 23:44, 20 September 2013 (UTC)Reply
- It was only 12 minutes from my above post to the next very likely example: Wikipedia:Help desk#Kulvinder Ghir. The Google search Kulvinder Ghir says "Partner: Blandine Martin". PrimeHunter (talk) 00:08, 21 September 2013 (UTC)Reply
- It's amazing how much trouble the Google and Facebook mirroring causes everyone. Absolute minefield for people not being able to understand that we don't control these websites. Oh well, thank goodness we've got templates to help us with some quick links! Daniel (talk) 01:00, 21 September 2013 (UTC)Reply
Not really. If you consider it necessary it can be like this. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 04:11, 21 September 2013 (UTC)Reply
here is some up to date content about more
http://www.prlog.org/12228459-julia-haydee-mora-maza-beauty-queen-2013.html please update her page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mia0000 (talk • contribs) 00:44, 27 October 2013 (UTC)Reply
- Traffic report: Look on Walter's works
- WikiProject report: Babel Series: GOOOOOOAAAAAAALLLLLLL!!!!!
- Featured content: Wikipedia takes the stage
I noticed you've worked on the Symbol Technologies page in the past, so wanted to alert you to a discussion I'm starting on the talk page. Thanks! GRUcrule (talk) 16:41, 2 October 2013 (UTC)Reply
- Aside from the "discussion" which is being initiated for unknown reasons, why did you revert contributing edits by an IP address that were recently referenced. I understand it was tagged (by an unknown again) but other than that most of the inclusions were fully referenced. One reference needed an updated link but much of it seemed legally referenced... Stevenmitchell (talk) 13:18, 3 October 2013 (UTC)Reply
- Discussion report: References to individuals and groups, merging wikiprojects, portals on the Main page, and more
- News and notes: WMF signals new grantmaking priorities
- Featured content: Bobby, Ben, Roger and a fantasia
- Arbitration report: Infoboxes: After the war
- WikiProject report: U2 Too