Danyzack02
Danyzack02, you are invited to the Teahouse!
edit
|
Hi Danyzack02! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 8 March 2021 (UTC) |
This edit here is the 4th or 5th time you have called me homophobic. That is 100% inaccurate (if you bothered to look at my edit history, you would see I regularly remove dating histories from the article of many celebrities, both straight and gay), and a major violation of WP:NPA. I suggest you immediately revert your completely inappropriate, disruptive edits that have added dating histories to at least two articles and apologize to the various other editors who you have also unfairly slandered as "homophobic" for following WP:NOTGOSSIP, along with ceasing your edit warring. If you don't, you will likely be reported to WP:AN3 as you are clearly not here to improve the project. —Joeyconnick (talk) 18:18, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
April 2021
edit
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at Miles Heizer and Connor Jessup. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Some1 (talk) 18:52, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
Your recent editing histories at Miles Heizer and Connor Jessup show that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Some1 (talk) 18:53, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
May 2021
edit
Hello, I'm Paper9oll. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Eurovision Song Contest 2011—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 16:12, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
edit | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |