User talk:Davidgoodheart/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Speedy deletion nomination of Disappearance of Gary Hayward

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Disappearance of Gary Hayward requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Mandavi (talk) 22:01, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Sorry

Hello. I'm very sorry that I was not able to support you when Disappearance of Gary Hayward was up for deletion. You left a message on my Talk page at 00:18 and the article was deleted less than 2 hours later at 02:16. Please don't think that I ignored your plea. This morning I took a train trip to another suburb for lunch and at around 00:18 - 02:16 I was somewhere out in Henderson or on my way back towards home via the train and bus. I had cellphone access to the internet, but didn't think the deletion would be acted on so fast and intended to reply later. It's unfortunate that the time window from your request to deletion was so short and I was more or less out of wifi range between train stops at the time. Akld guy (talk) 04:38, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

@Davidgoodheart and Akld guy: This can likely be restored to draft space via WP:REFUND if you think it can be improved up to quality standards and a credible claim of importance is made. -- Dane ^talk 04:47, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

@Dane: I can't comment on whether it can be improved because I never saw it before it was deleted! Akld guy (talk) 04:53, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

OK ...

... so what are those problems? Daniel Case (talk) 06:43, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Bambi Hall

Don't use YouTube for sources. It is not a suitable source.Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 06:34, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Also, it is not a career highlights section. It's just a career section. You put her highest ranking in the PWI Top 50 in the championships and accomplishment section.Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 06:48, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Make sure to read over WP:VIDEOLINK before using a video as a source. Careful consideration needs to be taken when using a video as a source. Make sure when sourcing you actually source something and not just a search result.Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!}

Third generation in second generation category

Ted DiBiase Jr. Is a third generation wrestler, grandfather Iron Mike DiBiase, but his dad belongs in the 2nd gen cat.  MPJ-DK  14:21, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Rocky

Dude, Peter is Rocky Johnson's father-in-law, not his father.★Trekker (talk) 01:22, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Categories

We can't have a category like "First generation X", that doesn't work. It's doubtful even the second or third generation categories will be allowed to be kept. They've been deleted before.★Trekker (talk) 07:19, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Please reply on your own talkpage when someone contacts you. It's impossible to have a conversation on two different talkpages.★Trekker (talk) 07:23, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

@*Treker: I know this is a later response, but regarding this category that I made: I was thinking of this as being more along the lines of First generation wrestlers who have children who are wrestlers, not simply just "First generation wrestlers". Also regarding the other categories that I made that weren't good had to do with dead people as I was trying to come of with an alternative to living people. So even though some of the categories seemed or were bad, there a was specific reason to why I created them that way. Davidgoodheart (talk) 01:05, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Category:First generation professional wrestlers has been nominated for discussion

Category:First generation professional wrestlers, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. —swpb^T 18:08, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Paige Renkoski

Many thanks for your work on the article Disappearance of Paige Renkoski.

I didn't have time to do much more than start it. I'm really happy to see the expansion. Kestenbaum (talk) 23:47, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Response

Hello, Davidgoodheart. You have new messages at Fishhead2100's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Licorice McKechnie

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Licorice McKechnie, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ghmyrtle (talk) 16:39, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

RE: Giving and getting info

Hi. It has been a few days since I replied to you on my talk page, and you never responded. Did you have a specific question about a specific article? If I can help you or give you more info, I will. My original reply to your comment was: "The very nature of Wikipedia is that other people can change, merge, or delete your articles and unfortunately sometimes that means your hard work goes down the drain. If you have a question about a specific article, please link to it, and I can probably give you more information". Nikki♥311 21:27, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Categories, again

Please always add categories to the categories you create. Don't leave them just floating around leading nowhere like you've done so far with the wrestling stable membership categories, ok.★Trekker (talk) 11:06, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Freddie Blassie religion

David, you forgot to put Freddie Blassie was a Christian. Alexmason317 (talk) 09:51, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

David

David are political views and religious views off limits for profiles of people on Wikipedia. Alexmason317 (talk) 17:53, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

WP:INTDABLINK

Per this edit, please see WP:INTDABLINK. bd2412 T 17:33, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Thank you for your updates on Disappearance of Federico Tobares and for your outstanding contributions on articles about missing people! Your work in this area is greatly appreciated. ComputerJA (☎ • ✎) 00:36, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Please do not categorize BLP subjects when references suggest otherwise

Please do not categorize BLP subjects within the WP categories of "People with Asperger syndrome" or "People on the autism spectrum" when source-link references state or suggest that the subjects are not diagnosed as such. Self-diagnoses and personal identification aren't enough to categorize them.73.131.228.245 (talk) 12:26, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

I've reverted you (IP 73.131.228.245) at Dan Aykroyd as it appears to be adequately referenced. I suggest you begin a discussion on the article talk page rather than unilateral "warnings" hidden in articles and warnings on user talk pages, as you don't have the authority to do so. If it's a WP:BLP concern then by all means make your case at the noticeboard, but this is not the way to go about it, particularly since the Aykroyd article is referenced. freshacconci (✉) 15:09, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Rick Rude

Rood was his real name, do not change it to Rude outside of his character.★Trekker (talk) 21:24, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Paul Roma

I disagree he should be in that category. Categories are supposed to be defining (per Wikipedia:CATDEFINING) and Roma isn't defined by his time as a jobber. An example of someone defined by their career as a jobber would be Dusty Wolfe, or Barry Horowitz. If the category includes everyone who ever did jobs in their career it would include almost every wrestler who ever lived and be useless. GigglesnortHotel (talk) 13:58, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Disappearance of Linne Dominelli

Hi,

In the 'Disappearance of Linne Dominelli' article you created, you have her DOB ambiguously listed as Jan. 22 and Sep. 4, 1950. Which is correct? Best regards, Davidgoodheart. --Kieronoldham (talk) 23:23, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

List of missing people

Hi. Sorry to contact you out of the blue, Davidgoodheart. This is a missing persons case in Britain which still is revived in the news occasionally, and which you may wish to add to the above article. Regards. Kieronoldham (talk) 21:22, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

WP:A7 on redirects

Hi David. You've replaced redirects for Joanna Yeates, Melanie Hall, etc. Although the redirects were left by page moves, that doesn't warrant their removal, particularly when they are used by many incoming links (see Special:WhatLinksHere/Melanie_Hall, for instance). A7 appears inapplicable: they are valid redirects to an article of (presumed sufficient) notability that is principally about the subject of the redirect, and that is sufficient indication of notability for the redirect. Is there something I'm missing? (cf RFD#DELETE)^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 06:54, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

(KSFT has been reverting)^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 06:56, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

See also the discussion on my talk page. KSFT^(t|c) 06:58, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

The Harts

All of the Hart siblings were/are dual citizens, therefore both Canadian/American categories should apply to them. The grandchildren I'm not sure about. Stu only had Canadian citizenship, Helen I'm also unsure of.★Trekker (talk) 01:39, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for all your hard work, especially the Alois Brunner page. Quis separabit? 05:09, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Category:Deceased American Celebrities has been nominated for discussion

Category:Deceased American Celebrities, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 21:30, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Category:Deceased American musicians has been nominated for discussion

Category:Deceased American musicians, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 21:32, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Disappearance of David Guerrero

The article Disappearance of David Guerrero has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet WP:NCRIME.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Power~enwiki (talk) 05:45, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Hi, this is a creditable article which you can find a lot of stories about on the internet and YouTube, so it DOES make Wikipedia's criteria of credibility. Davidgoodheart (talk) 23:03, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Disappearance of David Guerrero for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Disappearance of David Guerrero is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disappearance of David Guerrero until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sitush (talk) 16:31, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Death of Aisling Symes

Reverted your edit Akld guy (talk) 07:30, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Disappearance of Eldor Alfred Pearson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Disappearance of Eldor Alfred Pearson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disappearance of Eldor Alfred Pearson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sitush (talk) 12:23, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Disappearance of Carlease Simms for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Disappearance of Carlease Simms is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disappearance of Carlease Simms until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sitush (talk) 15:20, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Disappearance of Eldor Alfred Pearson) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Disappearance of Eldor Alfred Pearson, Davidgoodheart!

Wikipedia editor Chris troutman just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

This article makes no claim of notability, which indicates it should not have been written. Please chime in at the deletion discussion.

To reply, leave a comment on Chris troutman's talk page.

@Chris troutman: Hi, I know this is a really late response, but I just only really saw this post now. I wanted let you know that you are right about this. I have now learned not to make articles like these from now on. When this article and others like this that I created were up for deletion I didn't vote to keep them, since I knew that they weren't keep worthy. Davidgoodheart (talk) 23:03, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Learn more about page curation.

Chris Troutman (talk) 15:28, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Disappearance of Carla Losey for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Disappearance of Carla Losey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disappearance of Carla Losey until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 03:08, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry

I recommended that you brush up on notability guidelines and instead you start socking. Please stop making more accounts because I will just remove them now. I suggest you go over to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Davidgoodheart and ask for leniency. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 01:18, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

@Davidgoodheart: These sure are suspicious accounts in their activity. If these are your alternate accounts, I'd recommend coming clean now otherwise you could be blocked indefinitely from the project. -- Dane ^talk 01:36, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Disappearance of Linne Dominelli for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Disappearance of Linne Dominelli is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disappearance of Linne Dominelli until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 00:37, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Bambi Hall Picture

You haven't put any information on the picture for permissions and author information. You are seemingly claiming it as your own and put it in the public domain. So you need to rectify that or it could be put up for deletion. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 21:52, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Read WP:IDP. It will give you everything you need to know. You didn't post any information as to where and when it was taken, who the photographer is, etc.. Give that a look. Also, look at Template:Information. You need put on the right information on the template. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 13:42, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Archived Page

Hi David, Per your request, I've archived your talk page to User talk:Davidgoodheart/Archive 2. If you'd like to learn more about automatic archiving, check out User:Lowercase sigmabot III/Archive HowTo. -- Dane ^talk 01:50, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

DRV

Hi, I've reverted your set of edits at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2017 October 16. You need to put up individual nominations for each and every AFD close, that you want to challenge, in the exact format specified at Wikipedia:Deletion review#Steps to list a new deletion review. Also, DRV does not deal with AfDs that are underway. Thank you! Winged Blades of Godric^{On leave} 08:19, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Halloween cheer!

Happy Halloween!

---

Hello Davidgoodheart:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve Wikipedia, and have a happy and enjoyable Halloween!
    – Linguist^unEins^uno 18:51, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Send Halloween cheer by adding {{subst:Happy Halloween}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.

Speedy deletion nomination of The Shadows (professional wrestling)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Shadows (professional wrestling) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Feedback 05:12, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of The Shadows (professional wrestling) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Shadows (professional wrestling) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Shadows (professional wrestling) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Feedback 10:12, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Davidgoodheart. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Sortkeys on Murder of Adam Walsh

Just curious why you are removing the category sort keys from Murder of Adam Walsh? Now the article is going to come up under M versus W in the Category. Seems like it will be hard to find that way --Klaun (talk) 20:26, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

@Klaun: I see their purpose now, and have restored them. Davidgoodheart (talk) 20:46, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Great. The fact that the pipe operator is overloaded for categories can be a bit confusing. --Klaun (talk) 20:51, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

★Trekker (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Merry Christmas, hope you're having a relaxing time during this period and that next year will be even better for us all here.★Trekker (talk) 13:38, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Mysterious Disappearances

Why do you keep re-adding subjects that did not mysteriously disappear? Most of these people are known to have been killed, it is simply a matter of the body never being retrieved. Others are people who were known to be kidnapped, which is also not a mysterious disappearance. Edward321 (talk) 05:36, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

@Edward321: Hi, I am sorry, but I do not see things the same way you do, if we don't know their whereabouts that to me is a disappearance. But I will not keep re-adding them, it's just too much hassle, and it's not worth fighting for. When I learn how I will make some independent wikis Davidgoodheart (talk) 05:50, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Category of WWF/WWE World Tag Team Champions

I made changes to the category. I moved it to WWF/WWE World Tag Team Champions as WWF/WWE World tag-team champions wasn't correct. Unless the WWF/WWE listed the World Tag Team Championships as World Tag-Team Championship, than by all means have it as WWF/WWE World Tag-Team Champions. But since they don't, it was wrong. I moved all the article to the proper category, but you still have lots to add.Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 06:12, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

There are still tag teams missing from that category who can be added. Take a look at the template and check.Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 06:36, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Disappearance of Brandi Wells for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Disappearance of Brandi Wells is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disappearance of Brandi Wells until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 20:39, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Kelly Wilson (comedian) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kelly Wilson (comedian) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelly Wilson (comedian) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. EricEnfermero (Talk) 07:05, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Your recent message to Cullen328

Hi. Just wanted to let you know I reverted your recent edit at User:Cullen328. I'm guessing you just screwed up and put it on his userpage instead of his talk. It's still in the history there if you wish to repost it to the right place, but I've pinged him here, so maybe you can discuss your problem with him here. John from Idegon (talk) 01:33, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Thank you, John from Idegon. Davidgoodheart, I see no evidence that you are being harassed, and unless you have very solid evidence, I recommend against pursuing any such claim. I agreed with you about Disappearance of Brandi Wells, but that is a borderline case, and those who support deleting the article are acting in good faith and are making relevant points. You are not yet well-versed in our notability standards or what constitutes a reliable source. I saw you arguing at another AfD that a YouTube video establishes notability, which is obviously false. Spend more time developing your skills and less time complaining about "harassment" by your fellow editors who are acting in good faith. Also, communicate through user talk pages, not userpages. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 01:59, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Cullen328, see this monster of a thread for some background here. This has been going on for a long time. Davidgoodheart, I'll repeat what myself (and many others) told you there: Wikipedia's standards on which topics are notable enough to justify an article are much higher than you think, and it's not harassment when people try to ensure that Wikipedia policies are followed. Please follow the advice I repeatedly give you and actually read Wikipedia's definition of 'notability' and Wikipedia's definition of 'reliable source', neither of which says what you think they say. ‑ Iridescent 19:34, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, Iridescent. You are patient, helpful and thorough. I had actually read that thread, but had forgotten about it. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 20:06, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Archive urls

I saw your edit to Brian Pillman recently, please don't remove archive links form refs. They're pretty good to have.★Trekker (talk) 23:24, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

To add, you should always keep both the archive and original url, use the prameters |url=, |archive-url= and |archive-date= to make it work.★Trekker (talk) 23:27, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

>Spelling

Please do not Americanize Commonwealth spellings, especially when the article deals with a Commonwealth country. You did this here. It is not allowed. WP accepts all English spelling standards. Thank you. Kelisi (talk) 05:49, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Categories

Ok, I know for a fact that I have told you this before, don't make dead end categories like you did with Category:The Dangerous Alliance members. Also, don't make categories for stuff with less than 5 articles for it.★Trekker (talk) 04:30, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Disappearance of Cleashindra Hall for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Disappearance of Cleashindra Hall is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disappearance of Cleashindra Hall until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bneu2013 (talk) 05:10, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Disappearance of Tammy Rothganger for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Disappearance of Tammy Rothganger is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disappearance of Tammy Rothganger until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bneu2013 (talk) 05:45, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Disappearance of Susan Smalley and Stacie Madison for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Disappearance of Susan Smalley and Stacie Madison is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disappearance of Susan Smalley and Stacie Madison until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bneu2013 (talk) 05:57, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Note

This is blatant canvassing; informing an editor you know will vote a certain way with such a bias statement is as obvious as it gets. I know you are already well-informed about canvassing. And, on another issue, this is not appropriate neither. You cannot bypass other voters to assert your own opinion. I have had to correct you on that before. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 04:40, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

@TheGracefulSlick: Hi, I do not consider that to be blatant canvassing, since people have informed me when their articles were up for deletion, and never asked me to vote, when I did vote it was due to my own judgement, and not because they asked me to. Also objecting to my article being deleted is fine as everyone has a right to vote on the issue. Davidgoodheart (talk) 05:11, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

It is canvassing. Stop pretending it is not; I am reporting it, so lying does you no good. And, as for my second point, please actually read what I wrote: You cannot bypass other voters to assert your own opinion. Voting is fine, but skipping over other voters before you is not. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 17:54, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

@TheGracefulSlick: Why does it matter where you place your "vote"?★Trekker (talk) 18:03, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

Basic etiquette *Treker: Do not reorder comments on the deletion page to group them by keep, delete, or other. Such reordering can disrupt the flow of discussion, polarize an issue, and emphasize vote count or word count. Not to mention that David is technically tampering with another editor's comment by reshuffling it. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 18:15, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

I don't really think that qualifies as "etiquette" by my standards, but the actual reason from the quote makes sense.★Trekker (talk) 18:30, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

@TheGracefulSlick: I have moved my vote to the bottom of the page, and this issue of me objecting to the deletion of articles might not last longer, as I will be making independent Wikis in the near future. Davidgoodheart (talk) 22:35, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

You have been saying that for months despite the advice of experienced editors. It would be much easier to simply brush up on WP:V, WP:NOT, and maybe even WP:EVENTCRIT--if you are feeling ambitious--instead of running into trouble while writing about such a sensitive subject outside the protections of Wikipedia. You may believe editors are nominating "your" articles for deletion because they are "pesky" and "ill-informed", but they are displaying their knowledge of notability guidelines and acting fairly for each unique situation.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 22:41, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

@TheGracefulSlick: I know I have been saying that for months, but the reason I haven't yet is because I do not yet know how to just yet, but tomorrow I am having someone who will show me how to make some private wikis, and yes I do have concerns about libel issues, so I won't publish any sensitive articles online, so hopefully it will be safe. The way I feel about others viewpoints about what is notable, and what should not be included is my own viewpoint, and there are a wide variety of viewpoints out there, and everyone has a right to their own, and to express their opinion, so I am sorry if what I stated may have seemed a bit demeaning, but I am feeling a lot of frustration as of late and some of it showed in my messages. Also I consider myself an experienced editor who does know a lot about certain topics, and I do consider myself also quite knowledgeable, so I think that my opinion should also count as well. Davidgoodheart (talk) 23:40, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

I'm sorry to tell you, but you do not get to have different opinions on what notability and extensive coverage or reliable sources are. Why are you so insistent on doing this even when people have told you that you might endanger yourself and others?★Trekker (talk) 06:49, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

@*Treker: I know that this is a late response, but just like you I didn't think that it mattered where you placed you vote at an AFD. But when I messaged a Wikipedia administrator he told me that it is custom to keep all comments at the bottom of the page. The reason that he gave is that it makes sure of the chronological flow of the discussion, which makes it easier to follow. He also said only to leave comments above you if you are pinging someone or responding to a comment. So Grace was right about this after all. Davidgoodheart (talk) 23:21, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Category:Professional wrestling jobbers has been nominated for discussion

Category:Professional wrestling jobbers, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. — Moe Epsilon 21:56, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Giant (disambiguation), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paulo César da Silva (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles.(Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Wilda Benoit

The article Wilda Benoit has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability for one event. The event itself is not notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Marvellous Spider-Man 15:20, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Wilda Benoit for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wilda Benoit is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wilda Benoit until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. FirefoxLSD (talk) 10:05, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 24

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Kidnapping of Jessica Ridgeway (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Abducted

Married (disambiguation) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Married at First Sight

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Melanie Melanson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Melanie Melanson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melanie Melanson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 12:58, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

Mistake?

Care to reinsert my comment you removed? Thanks. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 20:20, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

@TheGracefulSlick: Hi Grace, yes it WAS a mistake, as I did not mean to do that, and I have now restored it. Also I like that fact that you said you feel for the family of the missing girl, compassion is a great emotion to have. Davidgoodheart (talk) 20:32, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

Part of the reason I nominated it actually was because I feel for this family. Unless something like this is notable--and I believe I thoroughly demonstrated why it isn't--should there be an article? Most families wouldn't want their daughter to be included on Wikipedia, so we can focus on what (presumably) lead to her death. I know you had the best of intentions, but Wikipedia is not a memorial, and I do not believe this is the kind of memorial a family would want anyways. You are entitled to your keep! vote. I just wanted you to understand that I came at this with good intentions for this girl and Wikipedia. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 20:50, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Roddy Piper, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Black Belt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:01, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Hulk Hogan's Rock 'n' Wrestling

The issue is the sourcing not the wording. I suggest you read the conversation Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard#Hulk Hogan's Rock 'n' Wrestling to understand. - Galatz^Talk 13:11, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eklutna Annie, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stab (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Bambi Hall

It's cool you want to expand her article. But you added information that you were told by Verne Siebert. That's all fine and well. But how do you plan on sourcing that? Besides, you didn't even list the promotion this took place in. You need to cut down on the amount of independent promotions in the lead section. You don't need to list every promotion she has ever worked for. Not necessary. Just list the main ones. You don't need to list the ones she worked for once. Not necessary. The purpose of the lead section is to summarize things. The career section is for listing career items like major matches, title wins, and what not. A lot of work needs to be done on the article.Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 11:54, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

@Davidgoodheart: I see you haven't addressed any of these issues. Work needs to be done on her article, I can help.Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 23:21, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Hi

Oh, DYK is Did You Know section. It is presented at the main page of Wikipedia. Articles are nominated and then evaluated and if successfully passed it will appear at the DYK section. I hope to nominate the article in a day or two. You can otherwise take a look at Wikipedia:DYK for more information. Thank you for your assistance.--BabbaQ (talk) 12:46, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

If you find time for it could you help me by at least taking a look at the article about Morris A. Young. Any help is appreciated. Cheers.--BabbaQ (talk) 07:34, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kidnapping of Amber Swartz–Garcia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Iron Sheik and Nikolai Volkoff, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2×4 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

About your username change request.

You requested to change to Davidgoodheart, which is same as your current username.

But if you trying to change it to davidgoodheart, than it's also not possible as MediaWiki always capitalise the first letter of usernames, but you can use template {{lowercase}} to show it in lowercase on your userpage and talk pages.

Or if you are trying something else, please reply. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 07:39, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hubert, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Étienne Hubert (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hubert, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hubert Nelson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Leif Axmyr

On 12 October 2018, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Leif Axmyr, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. BabbaQ (talk) 20:22, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

@BabbaQ: Hi, if I come across anything I will let you know. Also the fact that he was released from jail after receiving a life sentence after being denied parole 11 times is an indication that Mark Chapman who killed John Lennon in 1980, who has been denied parole 11 times may still have a chance to be released from jail. Davidgoodheart (talk) 22:40, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

I have done a complete re-write on the article about Lisbeth Palme. As she was the main witness to one of the most noted murders in history I thought you might want to take a look. BabbaQ (talk) 19:45, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

@BabbaQ: Hi, very impressive indeed. I have now made some edits to it as well. I had taken a short break from editing since I was feeling very frustrated for multiple reasons, and today was the first time that I made any edits in days. I may be taking another two day break from editing, as I need time to relax and take care of things as well. I will say that things may be looking up and when I contact you next I will likely be feeling better and ready to edit some more. Davidgoodheart (talk) 21:45, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

List of suicides

@Davidgoodheart: Hi, David. I have removed the method of suicide you included when you added Brian Christopher to the List of suicide article, because the source you cited makes no mention of it. As you know by now, having been editing Wikipedia for a few years, Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources explicitly cited in the article text in the form of an inline citation, so if you want to re-add that method, please do so only if you can accompany it with such a citation. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 05:18, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

@Nightscream: Hi, I have added this source now It claims he hanged himself, but often people will try to make theories about some other thing that could have happened. Davidgoodheart (talk) 08:35, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

David, why did you make these edits? These edits consist of:

removal of overlinking of The New York Times in a citation, when that term is already wikilinked further up

removal of the dead link tag on Nicola Ann Raphael, when the cited source in question is indeed down or dead, and the re-addition of the text" - News|" in the title parameter of the citation for that entry, which I had removed

Reversion of my correction of the capitals in the name of the website PWWinsider.com in Brian Christopher, and the addition of a second, redundant closing tag

User:Nick Gurr 7777's correction of the method of May Brooklyn's suicide, per the cited source, also without any edit summary or rationale Nightscream (talk) 17:52, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

@Nightscream: That's odd, I know it says my name above those edits, but I did not make those edits. Could someone have access to my password do you think? Why else would my name be listed above those edits, I know I did not make them. Davidgoodheart (talk) 00:06, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

Okay, I figured it might have been a mistake, but I wasn't sure. It happens. Anyway, thanks again for adding the cite for whatshisface. ;-) Nightscream (talk) 01:31, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

@Nightscream: Thanks, I need certain info and instructions on how do certain things on Wikipedia and help with certain edits, things that I do not know yet how to do. Could you please help me out? Davidgoodheart (talk) 01:41, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

Yes, absolutely. :-) Nightscream (talk) 02:31, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

Great! I will get back you soon. I had previously asked you to fix some external links for me, but they have been taken care of. Have a good remembrance day! Davidgoodheart (talk) 09:21, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Renaming a page

The "Move" tab at the top of every Wikipedia page, be it an article, category, etc., is what you use. In this context "Move" means "rename". Nightscream (talk) 14:22, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Barnstar

	The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
	Thanks for your extensive contributions (and diligence) over such a wide range of topics. Always appreciated. Kieronoldham (talk) 22:57, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Davidgoodheart. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Davidgoodheart. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Merging

The instructions on how to do that is at Wikipedia:Merging. Happy Holidays. :-) Nightscream (talk) 21:41, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year

	Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year
	Hi Davidgoodheart, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas and a very Happy and Prosperous New Year, Thanks for all your help and thanks for all your contributions to the 'pedia,    –Davey2010 Merry Christmas / Happy New Year 01:43, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Holiday reciprocation

Thank you for the kind wishes David. Have a happy holiday season and all the best for 2019. Akld guy (talk) 01:47, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019!

Hello Davidgoodheart, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019. Happy editing, Walk Like an Egyptian (talk) 06:30, 25 December 2018 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Seasonal Greetings!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019!

Hello Davidgoodheart, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019. Happy editing, ★Trekker (talk) 15:16, 25 December 2018 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Be careful to not slip you too!★Trekker (talk) 15:16, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

Happy New Year!

Davidgoodheart,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
BabbaQ (talk) 12:47, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Happy New Year, Davidgoodheart!

Happy New Year!

Davidgoodheart,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
★Trekker (talk) 00:56, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Same to you. :)

Happy New Year!

Davidgoodheart,
You too have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and sincere thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. All the best to you.
Kieronoldham (talk) 01:04, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Edit summaries

Hi Davidgoodheart. Thank you for your updates on the biographies of people in the Mexican Drug War. I noticed you updated several articles and did not provide edit summaries for your changes, so I have a few questions about them. The articles in question are Vicente Zambada Niebla, Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán, and Luis Fernando Sánchez Arellano. Why are you adding "missing people" categories for these individuals? I understand they were being sought by law enforcement, but they weren't "missing" in the traditional sense of the word (the right word would be "fugitive", and there are specific categories for that). Consider the fact that authorities had evidence of their criminal activities, and that these individuals worked with other people in organized crime, so they weren't "missing". MX (✉ •✎) 05:02, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

@MX: Hi, I thought that being wanted by the law as not knowing where they were and escaping from prison would classify as "missing", but if that is not the right phrase for that I can except that. Thanks for letting me know this and I won't do that again for fugitives. Davidgoodheart (talk) 07:35, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Look

..at these articles.. I created Von Sydow murders. And contributed to Christine Schürrer and Anders Eklund.--BabbaQ (talk) 00:19, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

@BabbaQ: Very interesting and well written. Thursday I am getting help with my computer, I will talk to you then. Take care! Davidgoodheart (talk) 07:49, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

This might interest you. Since the editor was harsh on you some time back. BabbaQ (talk) 10:39, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

@BabbaQ: How do you feel about this? I don't agree with her viewpoints, but I do feel that it's bad that she wanted to leave, and I usually think it's wrong to gloat, and in this case it surely is. Davidgoodheart (talk) 23:22, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

I hope you understand that TGS had used sockpuppets to influence different articles etc. The editor had received so many chances over the years and the community could not take any more of the users disruptive behaviour if not including the editors great article work. This was not a case of viewpoints any more. It was a case of a editor abusing other editors even threatening one off Wikipedia as included in the discussion that led to the editors block. I hope you did not leave the message at TGS talk page without fully understanding that situation. --BabbaQ (talk) 00:30, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

@BabbaQ: I now understand and removed the message that I left her, also please check out my recent message to you on your talk page. Davidgoodheart (talk) 00:37, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bobby Lashley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Different Strokes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Nancy Benoit

No, that's different. Chris Benoit, it has been officially determined, that he killed his family and then himself. He can't be prosecuted because he's dead, obviously. Had he lived and been acquitted it would have been the same thing as the Simpson case. But since the perpetrator is dead, we can accept the official verdict and consider it solved (just like Murder of Jane Britton). Daniel Case (talk) 05:49, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

@Daniel Case: Thanks Daniel for your quick response and this information! Davidgoodheart (talk) 04:40, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of fugitives from justice who disappeared, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chihuahua (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

Break

Hi, I am going to be honest with you. You and I need a Wikibreak from each other. I took a look at the latest 1000 edits on my talk page and a low estimate is that you have written about 600 of those edits. I have also responded back and written on your talk page several times etc. This is a Wikibreak that is needed between us. Today it is the 20 March, you should not write to me or contact me in any way until at least after midnight on the 21 April. And the same goes for me of course. That is a month in which we should both focus on doing our own edits. I fear that we will be too co-dependent on each other otherwise. Do not take this as criticism or me not wanting to have contact with you. Take care and let’s keep in touch in a month or so. Bye. BabbaQ (talk) 11:53, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

Bassett Road machine gun murders

Please do not move anything to do with this crime including Ronald Jorgenson into the List of fugitives from justice who disappeared. Jorgenson was not a fugitive, but was on parole for his earlier crimes. Akld guy (talk) 04:51, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

@Akld guy: Okay, thanks for letting me know this, also please check out my recent additions to the List of fugitives from justice who disappeared. The article is very viewed and can use all the additions that it can get. Davidgoodheart (talk) 05:21, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

A Barnstar for You

		The Invisible Barnstar
		For six years of service to the project with over 36,000 edits. Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:51, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

Category:WWF European Champions has been nominated for discussion

Category:WWF European Champions, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. TM 22:14, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Disappearance of Brittanee Drexel

On 25 April 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Disappearance of Brittanee Drexel, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that while investigating the case of Brittanee Drexel, who disappeared 10 years ago today, the FBI brought federal charges against someone who had already served state probation for the same crime? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Disappearance of Brittanee Drexel. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Disappearance of Brittanee Drexel), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Pavlos Kouroupis

Hello, I completed a review at Template:Did you know nominations/Pavlos Kouroupis, and noted one question. Please respond there if you're able to help. I look forward to seeing this nomination on the main page. Thanks! Flibirigit (talk) 04:44, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

@Flibirigit: Hi, I did not add all that info to the Pavlos Kouroupis article so I don't know the answer to that. Please ask the editor who added that info for that answer. Davidgoodheart (talk) 04:52, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

Request for help

You need to follow up for your request in Editor requests. Eschoryii (talk) 08:05, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

A Dobos torte for you!

7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it. To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

7&6=thirteen (☎) 15:39, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

Deletions

Hi, I just wanted to let you know that I hope you don't let your recent deletion nominations get to you and discourage you from editing. You're a very nice and diligent Wikipedian and it makes me sad to see that you're experiencing issues with finding notable subjects to write about.★Trekker (talk) 00:54, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

@*Treker: I know that this is a late response, but I would like to say thank you as you have given me inspiration to keep editing even though I have often really felt like giving up. Davidgoodheart (talk) 22:24, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

List of unsolved deaths

Hi. I noted you are extensively populating this article as of late (which is naturally expanding in length). I have just added two Wiki. Commons images to separate sections. As extensive sections do not currently have any form of imagery, if a few more images were added, it may help the reader to navigate the article and maybe encourage more contributors? Best regards,--Kieronoldham (talk) 02:33, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

@Kieronoldham: Hi, I like the fact that you noticed my work. I figured why not add all the articles that exist to the list that can be added. I like the images that you have added and yes adding images may encourage more contributors as well. If you want to add images great. Images are one on the few things that I do not know yet how to do. You could help me out by adding sources to the articles that do not yet have them. That would make my editing job a lost easier as adding articles is really all that I can do right now. Davidgoodheart (talk) 03:17, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

You are welcome. You have contributed close to double the amount of edits I have on Wikipedia. Searching Wikimedia Commons for relevant images esp. in areas where imagery is scarce is beneficial for articles of this length. I could search for sources. In fact I may do. Regards,--Kieronoldham (talk) 03:42, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

Quick FYI

Hi David. If you are going to restore archived material on someone else's talk page you should explain what you are doing and why in the edit summary. Thanks for your work on the project. -Ad Orientem (talk) 19:02, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Articles

Perhaps the articles Murder of Anita Cobby and Dominique Dunne might interest you. I created the article about Hilda Nilsson, it might interest you as well. Take a look when you got time for it. --BabbaQ (talk) 21:06, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

I have nominated the article about Kenneth Gärdestad to possible GA status review. --BabbaQ (talk) 23:53, 4 August 2019 (UTC)