Doom marauder

Welcome

Hello, Doom marauder, and Welcome to Wikipedia!   

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.

---

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

• Table of contents / Department directory

• The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
• The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

• Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
• Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
• Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

• Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
• The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
• Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

• Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

• Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

• Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
• If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Doom marauder, good luck, and have fun. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 15:12, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

why did you block me

i did not edit anything

Your recent changes

I have reverted your recent changes on Korean War and Vietnam War as I do not think they are useful. If you wish to explain why you think these changes should be retained please do on the Talk Pages for each of those articles. Mztourist (talk) 07:19, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Because in this two war both us and USSR directly fought against each other Doom marauder (talk) 07:26, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Important Notices

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in governmental regulation of firearm ownership; the social, historical and political context of such regulation; and the people and organizations associated with these issues. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

A community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
The specific details of these sanctions are described here.

Broadly, general sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Doug Weller talk 09:47, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Note that your edit at Talk:Misinformation related to the 2020 coronavirus pandemic in India could be seen as violating the Coronavirus sanctions and those for the IPA area. And where is the page you mention when you wrote "We have make a page for Corona jihad because many Islamic terrorists especially from pakistan are tried to use coronavirus as a biological weapon."? Doug Weller talk 10:00, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

June 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Sino-Indian War, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 14:33, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Khruner. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Achaemenid Empire, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Khruner (talk) 09:20, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

About "See also" sections

I ran into a pair of instances where you added entries to the see also section where the terms appeared in the text, but were not linked. As a general rule, it is preferable to link to the article where a reader would encounter the term. WP:SEEALSO and WP:BTW are the relevant policies. Both links were useful. Thank you. BiologicalMe (talk) 15:34, 29 July 2020 (UTC) And please don't make the mistake that I made by linking in a reference instead of the text. BiologicalMe (talk) 18:38, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

Anti-tank mortars moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Anti-tank mortars, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 17:51, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

I was creating a category:List of Anti tank mortar .Can you help me to create this list Doom marauder (talk) 06:35, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

See this link:

https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Anti-tank_mortars

Doom marauder (talk) 06:54, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Corona-jihad

The article Corona-jihad has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to be a term of fleeting existence with no wider or long term implications.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RegentsPark (comment) 01:24, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of De-Sanskritization

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on De-Sanskritization requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://aptitudeamplifier.blogspot.com/2017/03/de-sanskritisation.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 82.132.215.158 (talk) 14:07, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Your pages

Thank you for your contributions. However, you new articles about religions in certain locales are undersourced and underdeveloped. Please add multiple sources to new pages, and make sure you address the topic and not just an isolated instance. For example, in your Jainism in Kashmir article, you mentioned the presence of Jainism in 883-902, but did not include any other information. ‡ Єl Cid of Valencia ^talk 17:27, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

"Corona-jihad" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Corona-jihad. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 6#Corona-jihad until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Vanamonde (Talk) 18:24, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

Jayjg has blocked me for no reason

Jaiyjg you have block a wrong person.I am not sockpuppet of anyone

August 2020

Can someone can unblock me Jayjg has unblock me for no reason Doom marauder (talk) 02:24, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Nittin Das, if you want to be unblocked, you should make the request from your master account User:Nittin Das. Jayjg ^(talk) 15:27, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Doom marauder (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

your reason here Doom marauder (talk) 15:08, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. 331dot (talk) 18:14, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please unblock me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Doom marauder (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have understand my mistake. The problem that I was facing that how to insert link in wikipedia. When I learned to insert link and source . After that I have created doom marauder Doom marauder (talk) 08:20, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

As you were told at User talk:Nittin Das, that is not the reason for your block. As any unblock appeal must be at User talk:Nittin Das, I have revoked your ability to edit this sock account talk page. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:02, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.