Dragonwarrior146

April 2020

Hello, I'm Paleontologist99. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to 2020 Massachusetts Democratic primary have been disallowed by an edit filter because they did not appear constructive. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page, which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Also feel free to ask for assistance at the Help Desk whenever you like to. Thank you. Paleontologist99 (talk) 02:52, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Vaselineeeeeeee^★★★ 17:08, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Provinces and territories of Canada. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Vaselineeeeeeee^★★★ 17:08, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Dragonwarrior146, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Dragonwarrior146! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:11, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at United States. Favonian (talk) 20:55, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Wikaviani. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:Favonian that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 21:04, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Acroterion (talk) 21:22, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

I wasn’t making personal attacks. I was only adding credible accurate info to different Wikipedia pages. A lot of pages include bias and wrong info. Every time I edit with accurate info, someone deletes it. It’s just frustrating. Dragonwarrior146 (talk) 21:28, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

You were removing sourced information and submitting vague or unsourced material, then attacking editors who objected. You're blocked. If you do that again, you will be blocked for longer or permanently. Acroterion (talk) 21:32, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

How was I attacking editors. I’m confused. Where are your sources. Dragonwarrior146 (talk) 21:38, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

You attacked Favonian for reverting you. Twice. [1] [2]. Don't lecture experienced editors about sourcing and errors when you're the one without sourcing, who's introducing errors into articles and blanking sections. Acroterion (talk) 21:46, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

South America

Please do not blank materials from the WP:LEAD of South America (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). The material has sources and there's no clear WP:POV issues with it. Use the article's talk page to discuss anything you see as POV. EvergreenFir (talk) 20:05, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

October 2020

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to 2020 United States presidential election in Iowa, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 19:24, 13 October 2020 (UTC)