Drjump!

July 2022

Hello, I'm Hey man im josh. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Politics seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:58, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

October 2022

Hello, I'm Denniss. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Stranger Things have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Denniss (talk) 10:46, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Stranger Things, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Fieryninja (talk) 17:59, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at TomSka, you may be blocked from editing. Fieryninja (talk) 18:02, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Quinton Reviews moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Quinton Reviews, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs some explanation of the topic with citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Josey Wales ^Parley 18:38, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Quinton Reviews (October 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Quinton Reviews and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 20:25, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Drjump!! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 20:25, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

October 2022

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:38, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Quinton Reviews (October 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curbon7 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Quinton Reviews and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curbon7 (talk) 13:12, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

Top of the Scot Pops

Dear Drjump!, You (wrongly) linked to the DUTCH TV programme TopPop under the text of Top of the Scot Pops in Top of the Pops (for the second time now, after my correction). What's the purpose? Vysotsky (talk) 15:40, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

-- Yamla (talk) 20:36, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

December 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Quinton Reviews. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 16:48, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Wikipedia:Teahouse. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Theroadislong (talk) 17:00, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Why did you link these spam pages? Do you have any connections to the websites? Please answer before making any further edits. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 17:10, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

I would never insert spam links, I was trying to help a user out. Drjump! (talk) 17:33, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. You're very close to a block, yet again. Please listen to the advice you're getting at the Tea House. Star Mississippi 02:54, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Quinton Kyle Hoover. Theroadislong (talk) 14:05, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

What do you mean? I did NOTHING, I just made a proper article. Drjump! (talk) 14:08, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Why don't you read this edit again? - David Biddulph (talk) 14:14, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Quinton

Hey, I don't recall ever collaborating with you on writing the Quinton Reviews article. I saw after creating it (from my userspace) that there was a poorly sourced draft that someone had made, but I didn't use that draft as a basis for my own article whatsoever, my writing and research for the current article was 100% my own. It's not appropriate to take credit for something someone else did just because you happened to independently have the same idea. I mean, not that I can stop you or anything, or that I even particularly want to, the content's all free use under Creative Commons and I specifically marked my own contributions as public domain, so I guess you can mirror the article on your own site or profile and say you created it if you like... but it's still kind of a bad look, y'know? Not to mention that your adding any credit at all into the article text is just inappropriate anyway. silvia (User:BlankpopsiclesilviaASHs4) (inquire within) 18:43, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

I said the idea was revived by someone because I abandoned it, not that we collaborated on it. Drjump! (talk) 17:55, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dystopia Daily (December 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by UtherSRG were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dystopia Daily and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

UtherSRG (talk) 18:08, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dystopia Daily (December 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by UtherSRG were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dystopia Daily and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

UtherSRG (talk) 22:48, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jack Pop (December 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by HitroMilanese were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jack Pop and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 05:47, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Huggbees has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Huggbees. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 18:18, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Copying licensed material requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you have added Creative Commons licensed text to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Draft:Quinton Reviews (American web series). You are welcome to import appropriate Creative Commons licensed content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Compatibly licensed sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any Creative Commons content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 03:02, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

December 2022

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  UtherSRG (talk) 14:24, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Ok, thanks for blocking me. I'm done, I quit Wikipedia. So much for Blue Peter, this "disruptive editing" misinformation has awarded me. I no longer will edit here, instead I'll start my own Wikipedia. It looks like the Teahouse has become Conglom-O from Rocko's Modern Life. Have a lovely month knowing you won't hear from me anymore. Drjump! (talk) 14:42, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

If Blue Peter is your source of WP-info, Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors may be of some help. Maybe not. WP has a learning curve, but it can be fun. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 16:44, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

i was saying that my first article was blue peter. but thank you, i would like to be unblocked. Drjump! (talk) 16:53, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Please read the guide to appealing blocks as requested above, then follow the directions to request being unblocked. Your inability to read and follow directions is one of the reasons you have been blocked. - UtherSRG (talk) 17:09, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

@Drjump! Your first article was Blue Peter? Odd, the logs don't show your username in the article hustory. David10244 (talk) 04:18, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

I had edits that got messed up, so I didn't get the chance to finish. Drjump! (talk) 13:25, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

@UtherSRG I would personally like to be unblocked, my poorly sourced content was unintentional and I worked hours on Draft:Quinton Reviews (American TV series). Drjump! (talk) 15:59, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

You have been instructed how to request unblock twice in this thread. Read it and you will find out how to proceed. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 16:02, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

More unsourced edits; FINAL WARNING

Just a couple of days separated from your one month long block, and you're at it again adding unsourced content here and here. Both of these edits are flat wrong, and you've provided no citation to support either of them. I am reverting your change to IFC (American TV channel), as it is blatantly obvious you are incorrect. The whole point of Lady A changing their name was to drop "antebellum" from their name, not abbreviate it. If they were abbreviating it, they would still upholding the term "antebellum" which they are trying to move away from.

This sort of editing can not and will not be tolerated on this project. You can either choose to conform to our standards here on reliable sourcing or you can find yourself the recipient of an extended block. You absolutely MUST consider this a FINAL WARNING before a very long duration block is applied to your account.

If you have ANY questions about this, ask. NOW is the time to ask. No more warnings will be given. --Hammersoft (talk) 02:56, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Ok, to prevent myself from getting banned, I will leave Wikipedia. At least someone will fulfill my work for me. Thank you for making me feel welcome. I will send my work and opinions elsewhere.

Yours, @Drjump! Drjump! (talk) 13:15, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Nobody is telling you to leave. Nobody. The point is you keep adding material that is unsourced, and frankly is blatantly obviously wrong. All we're asking you to do is provide sources for your changes. The case point above with Lady A is a perfect example. It's blatantly obvious the group was trying to move away from the term "antebellum", and not make "A" an abbreviation. Yet, you insisted...without a source...that it was an abbreviation. It's really simple. Provide a source, keep editing. You ARE welcome here. But, please keep in mind this is a serious project. Your opinions on articles are not welcome. They are welcome on talk pages, but not on articles. --Hammersoft (talk) 14:15, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

My apologies, I'm just trying to be careful, but IFC did drop it for the network only. Blockbuster IS back though. Drjump! (talk) 14:20, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

With the cite I provided for IFC, it's clear it was a name change, not an acronym. --Hammersoft (talk) 14:54, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Hey, what'd u do?

I see you have a 9 year block, what happened. Sirhewlett (talk) 15:23, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Oh, nothing. That was a glitch. Drjump! (talk) 01:11, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Reliable sources

Youtube is almost never a reliable source and, in general, you shouldn't even be linking to youtube. See WP:YOUTUBE. Please ensure you don't use youtube for citations and please be really careful when considering whether to even link to the site. -- Yamla (talk) 10:24, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

As you clearly still don't understand WP:RS after all the blocks and all the efforts we've put in to point you in the right direction, I'm afraid I have blocked you indefinitely. --Yamla (talk) 11:11, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

Wait, what did I do wrong? When will this expire. Drjump! (talk) 14:14, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

If not, I will delete this entire account. I wish you all the best of luck. Drjump! (talk) 14:14, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

Oh! The Blockbuster one, It was a true source that wasn't YouTube. Please unblock me. Drjump! (talk) 14:16, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

In what way do you believe https://www.thedailymeal.com/ meets the criteria outlined at WP:RS?!? The block is indefinite. --Yamla (talk) 14:32, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

It was an official site. And because it was a BAR, it's technically food news. Drjump! (talk) 14:59, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

You clearly don't understand our policies and guidelines after months of effort where numerous people tried to help you. Perhaps you should take a break and come back in a few years, after a substantial number of successful, sourced edits on another site somewhere. You are, of course, free to contest your block here. You know how. --Yamla (talk) 15:01, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

A few years? Why not months? How many years? Drjump! (talk) 15:49, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

It's fine. I will temporarily close this account. Wikipedia:Sleeper account I'm done. And if I ever make an alternate one, it will be for a legitimite use and not an evasion, I would still like an answer to my question, I wish you all the best of luck. This sucks. Drjump! (talk) 15:52, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

Blocks apply to the person. Until this account is unblocked, you (you personally) are not permitted to edit here, nor are you permitted to set up another account. This block is indefinite. There is no set number of weeks or months or years. --Yamla (talk) 16:58, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of indefinite for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

UTRS appeal #68313

was declined by another admin. User has threatened to WP:SOCK to WP:EVADE their block. -- Yamla (talk) 15:04, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mihail (musician) (February 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Twinkle1990 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mihail (musician) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Twinkle1990 (talk) 05:26, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Huggbees

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Huggbees, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Twinkle1990 (talk) 09:49, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Dystopia Daily

Hello, Drjump!. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dystopia Daily, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Quinton Reviews (American web series)

Hello, Drjump!. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Quinton Reviews (American web series), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:BobbyBroccoli (YouTuber)

Hello, Drjump!. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:BobbyBroccoli (YouTuber), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:04, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:BobbyBroccoli (YouTuber)

Hello, Drjump!. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "BobbyBroccoli".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:22, 1 April 2024 (UTC)