User talk:Duncan/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

→

Archive 5

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Duncan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! TheProf07 (talk) 23:46, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Apology

Sorry for reverting your user page! I wrongfully identified it as vandalism. The down side of using a twinkle! Again, Sorry! TheProf07 (talk) 23:48, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Ive restored your edit. TheProf07 (talk) 23:50, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

LNESC

A tag has been placed on LNESC, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of LNESC and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Bearian (talk) 16:14, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Promotion is promotion. We don't make any distinctions based on "good intentions" or on the purpose of the promotional activity. Wikipedia is not a venue for advertising your organization. If the organization is notable, request that some impartial third party create a non-biased article about it. Go here for detailed instructions. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:51, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Indirect DNA damage

Why not just add cite tag? because the creating editor is known for a campaign on this topic and it is his job to provide appropriate citations for material before posting on WP. I am following a strict application WP:V.TheRedPenOfDoom (talk) 22:58, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

One Hit Wonder

Have you actually read what i changed? Its copied straight from the talk page, including editors signatures. Please remove the warning, and revert my changes. Matt (talk) 06:56, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

..Was that a reply meant for me? Matt (talk) 07:00, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Im up late too, rather confused by the whole thing! Sorry about the problem, good luck partolling! Best, Matt (talk) 07:04, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Problem with 24.23.192.183 and his/her edits to Southern Methodist University

{{helpme}}This person keeps placing controversial text in the article regarding the new Library named after Pres. Bush. He/she doesn't cite it, and I have already reverted it twice. I won't play the 3RR game with them. Can an admin please help? I have tried it all as you can see here. ---- Mr. E. Sánchez ^{Wanna know my story?}/ _{Share yours with me!} 22:10, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

3RR warned. Report at WP:AIV if it continues...... Dendodge .. Talk^Help 22:17, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Problem with 92.22.192.115

{{helpme}} This person keeps deleting the categories off articles (seems like he's targeting the English-language series category on all his edits). I've asked him/her to stop as you can see here. Perhaps you'd help me more by telling me how to report it to an admin directly? Thanks! -- Mr. E. Sánchez ^{Wanna know my story?}/ _{Share yours with me!} 23:36, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

• Filing it at WP:AIV would be the best option. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 23:37, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

User boxes

{{helpme}}I hate to keep asking questions, but where can I find User Boxes for my page? Also, how can I group them? Thx! Mr. E. Sánchez ^{Wanna know my story?}/ _{Share yours with me!} 04:37, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Userboxes might help you there. Regards. -- KTC (talk) 04:44, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism levels; Status message

Well, if you look at the source of my userpage, you'll see this:

{{user:M1ss1ontomars2k4/Status}}{{Wdefcon}}

The second transclusion is the transclusion to the Vandalism Level thingy. The first transclusion trancsludes user:M1ss1ontomars2k4/Status, which is where I set my status. On that page, you will find:

{{User:M1ss1ontomars2k4/Status2|away}}

The second part is my status, of course. The first part refers to User:M1ss1ontomars2k4/Status2, which contains the code for making the status message.

As for where I got these things, I really don't remember. The status message is apparently copied from User:Pegasus. The Vandalism Level I probably got from another RC Patroller. --M1ss1ontomars2k4 (talk) 04:37, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

One Dallas Center

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently copied the contents of a page and pasted it into another with a different name. Specifically, you copied the contents of One Dallas Center. This is what we call a "cut and paste move", and it is very undesirable because it splits the article's history, which is needed for attribution and is helpful in many other ways. The mechanism we use for renaming an article is to move it to a new name which both preserves the page's history and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. In most cases, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. If there is an article that you cannot move yourself by this process, follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Requested moves to request the move by another. Also, if there are any other articles that you copied and pasted, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. Accurizer (talk) 18:57, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Recent Reversions and Warnings

Alas! Behold! I am an idiot for making mistakes! Everyone cast your stones upon me for trying too hard to make Wikipedia a better place for guys like 75.14.222.80 and everyone else!

Some of the IP edits you have recently reverted and have given warnings to the IP user for, seem at the least to have been good faith edits on their part if not actual improvements to the article. Eg: [1] IP removing duplicated MBE reference, [2] the Stephen Fry quote might not be capable of being properly sourced, but its certainly widely acknowledged eg- [3] and re New Jersey Devils [4] edit by the IP would appear to be correct [5]. Could you please review these and any similar warnings you have given. Just because edits are by IP does not mean they are vandalism, and anyway don't bite the newbies... :) -Hunting dog (talk) 21:04, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Yes, I would like to add my edit to Ultralight backpacking also, see my talk page for the message. 75.14.222.80 (talk) 03:20, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

ECDSA

Could you go into more detail about how an article on EC-DSA has to be spam? It isn't a commercial product, it's an encryption standard. There's nothing to spam; it's a scholarly subject that has been discussed in CS, encryption and mathematics circles. Celarnor ^{Talk to me} 06:02, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

I just noticed that the current revision has 2 external links to proprietary implementations of ECDSA; are those the reasons that you nominated it for deletion? If so, you'll probably want to look at DEL and BEFORE; knowing that material will help you avoid AfDs for articles that don't belong at AfD in the future; if you believed that those links were problematic (which they really aren't; they provide evidence of commercial implementations of a given open standard, which is fairly regular practice in articles like this). Celarnor ^{Talk to me} 06:06, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Rowdies

You may want to read the article before you wildly accuse others of vandalism. JaMikePA (talk) 01:28, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

71.123.226.51

{{helpme}} What is it called when a user signs a post as if (s)he was a bot and dates it another date. He's been vandalizing and not doing anything productive. You can look at my contributions or theirs. Thanks! Sanjeev Kapoor -- Mr. E. Sánchez ^{Wanna know my story?}/ _{Share yours with me!} 03:55, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

• That's called being plain wrong, and vandalism. The user has been warned. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 03:59, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Buffalo Bill

{{helpme}} Can an admin intervene in Buffalo Bill? Major edit war! Teach me how to report it so I don't use this template?! -- Mr. E. Sánchez ^{Wanna know my story?}/ _{Share yours with me!} 01:31, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Um...why the warning? I was the one rolling back the vandalism. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 01:34, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

• You can file a request at WP:AN if someone keeps edit warring. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 01:37, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

• Thanks. By the way, you might want to start asking your questions at the help desk, or just ask me. Using a whole buttload of helpme templates can get annoying after a while. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 01:40, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

• Likewise. It shows the system's working. I had a feeling I'd raise some 3RR flags trying to fend off one vandal between two accounts or two meatpuppets communicating by phone. Anyway, keep up the good work. Anyone who cares enough about this project to leave concern on my talk page is OK in my book.  :) --PMDrive1061 (talk) 01:42, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Morgentaler

It was a typo. 24.37.126.33 (talk) 20:06, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Harriet Fields

You can just zap microstubs like Harriet Fields on site via speedy deletion. These don't even need to go to AfD. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Chirps•Clams•Chowder)} 23:26, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

• Just tag them for speedy deletion with any of the speedy tags and they'll get deleted quickly by an admin. See WP:CSD. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Chirps•Clams•Chowder)} 23:31, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Naval Mine

I'm surprised that you reverted my edits re. naval mine - which were only visible when someone tried to insert incorrect information. My edits certainly weren't vandalism. I was amused that you think I care about having a large number of edits to my name. For the record, whether I've done 20, 200 or 20 billion edits makes absolutely no difference whatsoever to me. Why you think I'd care about the number of edits I've made is beyond me. Who-did-the-most-edits is strictly for schoolkids.

For the record, I made those edits to the naval mine article to prevent people inserting incorrect information in the belief that it's actually correct. People do that a lot when they see the spelling "fuze" in an item. Some people think that mines have "fuses" when in fact they don't. Fireworks have FUSES and you light them with a match. Mines (and other military weapons have FUZES - which are much more complex devices i.e. contain mechanical and/or electronic components. Fuses will simply burn, whereas fuzes can contain mechanisms which are specifically designed to kill anyone who tries to tamper with the munition or disarm it i.e. an anti-handling device. The dirty little secret of modern sea mines is that some of the fuzes contain anti-handling devices.

So, there's a difference between a fuse and a fuze. The people who mistakenly refer to a mine fuze as being a "fuse" are invariably those who have never served in the armed forces and have never actually held on in their hands. They automatically assume that the term "fuze" is a misspelling, whereas in fact it's a correct and highly specific descriptor. Such people leap in, thinking they're "correcting" a mispelling, whereas in fact they're introducing ambiguity and confusion.

The bottom line is you have now reverted my technically correct version (complete with hyperlinks to the appropriate item) back to an incorrect version. Nice work!

Nabokov (talk) 11:58, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Move of Forrest J. Ackerman

Please reconsider you move of the Forrest J Ackerman article. Ackerman did not use a period after the initial. -- The Red Pen of Doom 22:41, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Thank you! -- The Red Pen of Doom 22:47, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

???

Removal of misinformation is not vandalism. The original section is. 192.25.142.225 (talk) 00:45, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you very much for removing the vandalism from my user page. Your quick actions were greatly appreciated. Alanraywiki (talk) 22:27, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

DO not leave vandalism warnings

I was not vandalising the page merely shifiting the infobox from a candidates to a results section as the results are expected within the hour. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.208.67.100 (talk) 22:41, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

yo nig

sup bro 75.41.204.17 (talk) 06:21, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Hello, anonymous user! ←Signed:→Mr. E. Sánchez ^{Get to know me!} / _{Talk to me!}←at≈:→ 08:05, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Sala Krau District

I just added the reference for Sala Krau District. The district is a subdivision of Pailin, Cambodia.Hardworking (talk) 23:18, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Great! You can remove the {{unreferenced}} tag now. You can replace it with {{refimprove}} so others can help you edit! ——Mr. E. Sánchez ^{Wanna know my story?}/ _{Share yours with me!} 23:21, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

shivraj patil

You have deleted the material for which proper references have been provided

link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shivraj_Patil

Under him as the home minister of India, several terrorists’ blasts have taken place across Indian Cities. Latest being Jaipur1 (7 serial blasts), Bangalore2 (8 serial blasts) and Ahemdabad3 (21 serial blasts) have resulted in deaths of hundreds of Innocent lives.

Not a single person have been convicted till now for these terrorists acts across India.Shivraj patil4 is against any stringent anti terrorist act like POTA and he5 is also against hanging Afzal guru, a master mind of terrorist attack on Indian parliament who has been awarded death punishment by Supreme Court Of India.

5Shivraj Patil feels that those who carry out terrorist acctivities in India are his brothers But nothing seems to shame Shivraj Patil. 5Not even such numbing statistics as the killings, at last count, of 5,900 people and terror attacks in Jammu and Kashmir, Mumbai, Delhi, Bangalore, Varanasi, Ayodhya, Hyderabad Bangalore and Ahmedabad. He appears to believe that his job ends with making an on-the-spot visit to the site of the terror attack and mouthing few meaningless words.

1 http://www.rediff.com/news/2008/may/13rajblast.htm 3 http://www.expressindia.com/latest-news/Blast-toll-revised--21-blasts--more-than-50-dead/341374/ 2 http://www.ndtv.com/convergence/ndtv/story.aspx?id=NEWEN20080058672&ch=7/25/2008%2010:28:00%20PM 4 http://www.rediff.com/news/2004/jun/11pota.htm 5 http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/PoliticsNation/Mr_Shivraj_Patil_go_home/articleshow/3299913.cms Tabusharma (talk) 01:28, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

I replied on your userpage. However, to help my image a bit to not seem like a dummy editor, simply put: wrong editor. All I did was change the tag from UNREFERENCED to REFIMPROVE. ——Mr. E. Sánchez ^{Wanna know my story?}/ _{Share yours with me!} 01:33, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Hiawatha utah

the changes i made were correct, please change them back. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Melissarreynolds (talk • contribs) 23:26, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

:>REPLIED ON YOUR TALK PAGE AS THE BIG YELLOW BANNER ON TOP OF MY PAGE SAYS!

Mr Sanchez, your page says that you are still in High school is that correct? for your info if the other fellow did not help us out on fixing the Hiawatha page you would have been called to court, so from now on you better be careful on how you handle things. 66.111.124.62 (talk) 16:45, 1 August 2008 (UTC) Melissarreynolds

I take that as a legal threat. My educational attainment is none of your concern. I have chosen to display it because I am proud of my work as a Wikipedian at my school level. Being in elementary or having a Ph.D. does not hinder the ability of any Wikipedian in correcting factual mistakes or reverting vandalism. If you have a problem on Wikipedia, use the Dispute Resolution or contact an administrator. Don't make legal threats. ——Mr. E. Sánchez ^{Wanna know my story?}/ _{Share yours with me!} 20:45, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

{{helpme}} Am I wrong, or is what's above a legal threat? ——Mr. E. Sánchez ^{Wanna know my story?}/ _{Share yours with me!} 20:50, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

On the surface, it doesn't appear to be a "legal threat", in the strictest sense. It is however highly inappropriate and downright rude. I wouldn't worry too much about it. If it said "I am taking you to court" that would of course be a different matter altogether. I'm removing the "help" message, feel free to readd it if you would like someone else to look at this. Cheers, Keeper ǀ 76 21:40, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

I wasn't meaning you would be hurt i was meaning that the way you handle things might one day actually get to into court and no one likes that. I wan meaning to give you advise. I would like to apologize if it did come across as threatening i did not mean it to sound that way.Melissarreynolds (talk) 20:17, 4 September 2008 (UTC)Melissarreynolds

My edit on Fascism

i puzzled by your claim that I removed all the info without a reason in the edit summary, I actually did type a reason in the edit summary box. Also I noticed you did not actually revert the edit when you claimed. Bobisbob (talk) 03:42, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

>Sorry, but your reason was invalid. You deleted significant information that is relevant to the article's theme. To clear up the part about the undoing, my template message says "your edit has been reverted", and never says "it was me, ESanchez013, who reverted your edit". The least you could do here is provide a "See Also" link to the article you said already includes the section you deleted. Oh, and, don't go be smart and revert edits more than three times, as it will be tagged for three-revert rule violation. Thanks for your contributions! ——Mr. E. Sánchez ^{Wanna know my story?}/ _{Share yours with me!} 03:51, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

July 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from KPWR. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ——Mr. E. Sánchez ^{Wanna know my story?}/ _{Share yours with me!} 21:12, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Yes I deleted that stuff bc it isnt relevant. Its just a list of concert dates. It isnt in chart form or anything. 70.108.107.87 (talk) 21:18, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Make sure that you list it in the edit summary box. This makes it easier for us to know your reason behind deletes. ——Mr. E. Sánchez ^{Wanna know my story?}/ _{Share yours with me!} 21:21, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

OK. 70.108.107.87 (talk) 00:49, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

My edit on L.A. Guns

You claimed that my edit of the L.A. Guns article was unconstructive and vandalized it, an assertion that couldn't be more surprising and, I believe, wrong. I corrected the article's spelling errors and improved its writing without changing the format or essential information previously presented. If there is any chance I don't understand what you or wikipedia consider unconstructive and vandalism, I am eager to learn. 66.65.165.102 (talk) 04:55, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Sorry if I identified your edit as destructive. I more closely looked at what you did. I hope you are assuming good faith.

This user reserves the right to completely screw up his own edits.

——Mr. E. Sánchez ^{Wanna know my story?}/ _{Share yours with me!} 06:44, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

I did assume good faith, but shouldn't you have as well? I am glad to meet you though, and I'm sure I could learn much about participating in Wikipedia from you. I have made many little edits over years, but didn't even create an account for a long time. Even now, I don't use it. 66.65.165.102 (talk) 16:00, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Yup, I assumed good faith. That's why your warning level was {{uw-delete2}}, which is the most basic level and assumed a good faith edit. (Well, in reality, the most basic is {{uw-delete1}}, but that one says "Welcome to Wikipedia", and you've been welcomed before.) ——Mr. E. Sánchez ^{Wanna know my story?}/ _{Share yours with me!} 00:02, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Marburg72

Please do not keep adding Marburg72s talk page. This user is no longer interested in contributing or having any account with Wikipedia and would like to be deleted permanently due to very rediculous comments from others.Marburg72 (talk) 01:23, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Well, my job is to make sure that the articles on Wikipedia (including your unwanted talk page) are free from vandalism. If you want your page deleted, why not place the {{db-author}} header on your mainspace? Or, see this ——Mr. E. Sánchez ^{Wanna know my story?}/ _{Share yours with me!} 01:25, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

added. http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Right_to_vanish because this website is garbage.Marburg72 (talk) 01:30, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Trevor Enders

If he every played in the major leagues, he is notable. why did you put on the speedy tag. As reviewing administrator, I'm pretty puzzled. I will look here for the answer.—Preceding unsigned comment added by DGG (talk • contribs) 02:28, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Well, though WP:BIO says because he's a MLB player, he's notable, it didn't exactly explain his notability. I'm trying to find the way to explain it. ——Mr. E. Sánchez ^{Wanna know my story?}/ _{Share yours with me!} 02:35, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

It does not have to do so. A article passes speedy delete as long as it makes any claim whatsoever to importance. You may take the article to AFD if you choose, but I think it will be very strongly kept there immediately. It is also possible that you may be considered disruptive, because there is a very strong and very clear consensus that all major league players--even if they played for 1 part of an inning in 1 game, are notable. There's some discussion about minor league players, but the basic guideline is that full time professional players at the highest level of their sport are unquestionably notable--per WP:ATHLETE. The argument is that they will always have sufficient references in the press to show it. If you want to be helpful, go find some and add them. But I very strongly advise you not to make any further nominations such as this.DGG (talk) 02:44, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Incidentally, about some of your other speedy tags: 1/All towns and villages are notable for the purposes of Wikipedia; though it is sometimes contested, it remain the consensus. 2/all buildings on the register of historical places and the equivalents in other countries are unquestionably notable 3/See WP:STUB about the minimum about of information for an article in WP. DGG (talk) 02:58, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

I do understand that. All of those are in good faith. ——Mr. E. Sánchez ^{Wanna know my story?}/ _{Share yours with me!} 18:14, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Len Choa

Hi ESanchez013. Just a reminder that games are not eligible for speedy-delete under CSD A7. I removed the speedy tag. Best wishes, Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 04:18, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Oops. ——Mr. E. Sánchez ^{Wanna know my story?}/ _{Share yours with me!} 20:01, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

August 2008

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Dare to Be Stupid (song) worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. TestEditBot (talk) 16:07, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Whoa. Sorry, BOT, but you're wrong on this one. ——Mr. E. Sánchez ^{Wanna know my story?}/ _{Share yours with me!} 16:08, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Need to let you know...

...that a user named Jman505 is leaving offensive edit summaries about you, as he did on Feist (singer). I didn't see your name on that article, but he probably saw yours (and mine and a few others) when we reverted silly edits he made in the past on Peter Gabriel discography. So it wouldn't surprise me if I'm on his radar too, but at the least you should be aware. Sorry to be the bearer of bad news. BTW, I'm about 99.999% sure Jman505 is the same as 72.224.49.240, who has been blocked for at least a week. Zephyrnthesky (talk) 06:52, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Hmm. That's quite interesting. I concur with your theory on Jman505 being the same as 72.224.49.240 (because of this: 72.224.49.240 (Talk) (11,247 bytes) (jman505: Fix this you fuckin bitches)).

Though, because I'm not an admin, I can't really block him or see if this Jman is using the same IP. And, I'm not the only ESanchez editor on here. I didn't do any reversions on those pages. Makes me wonder why...

I'll look more into it. Thanks for the heads up! Happy editing!. ——Mr. E. Sánchez ^{Wanna know my story?}/ _{Share yours with me!} 07:00, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Unless I'm mistaken, you reverted edits from that IP address on July 21st on the Peter Gabriel discography page and tagged the talk page for vandalism. If not I'm sorry, I just wanted to inform the person he was saying those kinds of things about. Zephyrnthesky (talk) 07:07, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Oh yeah! You're right! I remember! LOL. Sorry, I've done so many edits I don't remember.

And I really appreciate you letting me know about it. Not many editors do. Thanks!! ——Mr. E. Sánchez ^{Wanna know my story?}/ _{Share yours with me!} 07:12, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome. It's not only fair for you to know, but I can tell you're a serious editor. User JaGa posted the early version of this guy's meltdown on the admin vandal noticeboard, but minus the edit Jman made to the Feist page. Wanted you to know that as well. Zephyrnthesky (talk) 07:35, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Re: sock

Already hogtied and gagged. Thanks for bringing it to my attention. Cheers! J.delanoy^gabs_adds 14:11, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Reverting my edits at Blast Off (video game)

I removed the CorenSearchBot notice because I was the moving the article from "Blast Off" to "Blast Off (video game)" in order to make way for the disambiguation page. - ShootinPutin109 ^Talk. 06:36, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Nevermind the above post.- ShootinPutin109 ^Talk. 06:43, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

WP:BITE and templating concerns

While I have had a runin with Einsteindonut, I don't see vandalism here, or in any other edit he made at the JIDF article. I see a content dispute, in which you were a participant. In such cases, it's not appropriate to drop a vandalism template on a new editor. Accusing someone of vandalism is quite a serious charge, and you seem to have made it during the midst of a simple content dispute. I respectfull ask you to consider not doing this in the future. Regards, ^S._D.D.J.Jameson 03:54, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

It wasn't a dispute; I had no ties with that article and was as civil as could be. I'm familiar with BITE; I guess the template just upset the dude. ←Signed:→Mr. E. Sánchez ^{Get to know me!} / _{Talk to me!}←at≈:→ 07:20, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

My point is, what he'd done wasn't vandalism. You shouldn't use that template for other than vandalism, that's all. ^S._D.D.J.Jameson 14:22, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

On the surface, that's what it looked like. He took a lot of stuff off. Was Uw-Delete more appropriate if what he had done was vandalism? Now, we get it wasn't vandalism, so for that, I'm sorry. ←Signed:→Mr. E. Sánchez ^{Get to know me!} / _{Talk to me!}←at≈:→ 22:25, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

RE: How can I violate a copyright I own?

Dear Mr Sanchez,

May I first introduce myself. I am the CEO of Zeejays GoC as well as Tutor4u. I own all companies outright and I am also the chairman. Recently, to promote our activities in promoting higher education we have decided that we need to advertise on the net, like here. If Tesco (for example) can have a space on wiki, then so should we since we have charitable aims and Tesco never has.

So Mr Sanchez, how can I violate my own copyright for Tutor4u? Please explain this as this interests me.

If you still believe you are right, then why isn't Tesco marked for speedy deletion and violating copyright!!!!

Mr Z L Jolin CEO of Zeejays Group of Companies and all subsidarys/Chairman of Zeejays Group of Companies. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ZeejaysUK (talk)20:00, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

First of all, when writing on my talk page, please sign your comments with ~~~~.

Now, first of all, let's look at your text here: "we have decided that we need to advertise on the net, like here.". Let's start off by reading this. *Did you read it?* There's a part there that says we are not your advertising venue. Wikipedia is not a free advertising place. Never was. Is not. Never will be.

Second point. How do I know you own it? For all you know, I could own so many companies around the world. Point being: I can't verify you are the chairman, owner, outrights holder, or anything else.

Third point. Any article introduced as a copy of another website (in this case, the Bot identified it as a copy of http://tutor4u.me.uk/aboutus.html ) is considered a copyright violation on Wikipedia, regardless of who owns the webpage.

And, as for Tesco, if you say it's advertising, you are more than welcome to tag it with {{db-spam}} for an administrator to look at.

Does this answer your question? ←Signed:→Mr. E. Sánchez ^{Get to know me!} / _{Talk to me!}←at≈:→ 20:03, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

I just looked at Tesco, and it is a notable company, giving correct citations, history, and net worth. It is not an advertisement in any way. ←Signed:→Mr. E. Sánchez ^{Get to know me!} / _{Talk to me!}←at≈:→ 20:05, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

RE: How can I violate a copyright I own? II

Mr Sanchez,

1st - When you surpass me, Ill sign. Until then, put up with it 2nd - Why should I listen to a High School Student! 3rd - Millions of companies create encyclopediac pages to explain their charity aims 4th - I have already contacted wikipedia about this and talked to them 5th - I don't have to prove I own Zeejays GoC. I do, and I know (by being the owner) the owner opperates civil recovery for inapporiate use of the companies name. 5th - I like the way you argue the imposible, you would make a valuble asset. What are your career aims?

Mr Z L Jay —Preceding unsigned comment added by ZeejaysUK (talk • contribs) 20:17, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Sir, I am asking you once again to sign your comments on my talk page. It is not a matter of hierarchy or rank (surpass you?), but of policy.

Even if I am in high school, I am following policies as an editor on this project. It's not about "listening to me", but to take my advice as an experienced editor on Wikipedia. I am only trying to help you and your article.

True, companies have encyclopedic pages. They are not necessarily created by the company owners. (I'm sure Bill Gates didn't build the one about Microsoft.)

What do you mean you "talked to Wikipedia"? There is no such thing!

I'm not asking for proof. If you really were an owner of any company, you'd spell "encyclopediac", "opperates", "inapporiate", "imposible", and "valuble" correctly.

Nuclear physics is my major, thanks for asking.

Will we be civil now, "Mister"? ←Signed:→Mr. E. Sánchez ^{Get to know me!} / _{Talk to me!}←at≈:→ 20:24, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

We never where uncivil. My major is business studies and economics, not spelling. I need not know how to spell, I have staff to do that for me. Also why is my article marked for deletion. I spoke to an editor of wikipedia who I know well, just FYI. He suggested doing it this way. ZeejaysUK (talk) 20:46, 31 August 2008 (UTC)Zjay - Happy

I'm not going to question your spelling capabilities.

Your article is being considered for deletion because it is a blatant copyright violation of Wikipedia policies from the webpage http://tutor4u.me.uk/aboutus.html and details the workings of a non-notable organization. It was originally marked for speedy deletion, but User:ZeejaysUK reintroduced the text, making it once again a violation of Wikipedia policies. You are welcome to comment on the deletion consideration. ←Signed:→Mr. E. Sánchez ^{Get to know me!} / _{Talk to me!}←at≈:→ 21:12, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

• Note - I have blocked User:ZeejaysUK as an inappropriate username, and speedy deleted their article as spam / non-notable. Black Kite 23:22, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

CSD tag on Terry N. Taylor

Hey there. I advise you now to reinstate CSD tags that a neutral third editor has removed (i.e. me in this case). The article Terry N. Taylor might fail WP:N but WP:CSD#A7 is not a criteria to correct this. For A7 to fail, it is enough that the article claims a reason for notability and the article does so. Consider WP:PROD or WP:AFD to get such articles deleted. But consider that such fast deletion-tagging might bite newcomers and scare them from making further contributions. Have a nice evening :-) SoWhy 21:16, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

I just saw you wrote me, when I was done writing this. Glad we had this sorted. As I wrote above, be careful with CSD#A7 :-) SoWhy 21:18, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Prod

Please remove your prod. It is obvious that this is intended to be a moving of a section. Your prod is completely unnecessary, nor can you prod the thread as you did not actually put in an actionable prod. Ottava Rima (talk) 00:30, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

>>Moved response to YOUR talk page. ←Signed:→Mr. E. Sánchez ^{Get to know me!} / _{Talk to me!}←at≈:→ 00:31, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Re: Pencil of Doom

Thank you for lettimg me know that the article for Pencil of Doom has the tag for speedy deletion, but I am still writing the article at the minute, and find it hard to understand why it would need to be deleted from Wikipedia. Thamk you. BigBrother1997 (talk) 00:39, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Warning to Liekki

Just a heads up - it appears you left a AFD warning on Liekki's talk page when a CSD warning would've been more appropriate.  -- BeezHive (talk|contribs) 03:31, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Workafrolic

I apologize for submitting what appeared to be a dictionary reference and blatant advertising.

This term, first coined by Richard St John in his presentation to TED, and now being used by others such as Leigh St John (I thought this interesting as I understand they are no relation) is starting to gain wide-spread interest.

In today's changing world where we have people such as Timothy Ferriss promoting "The 4 Hour Work Week" and how we can be millionaires in only a few hours a week - the notion of a "workafrolic" and that you can do what you love, work a lot of hours and still be living your dream life is a trend that is worthy of being cited in this encylopedia.

I did not mean to offend nor promote any business nor person.

Gladysmay1 (talk) 16:33, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Gladysmay1 (talk • contribs) 16:24, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

re the daas beer page

Hi, I wanted to make an informative article...

If article about single companies are truly not allowed, how about:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E.ON

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boston_Beer_Company

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mcdonalds

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Walt_Disney_Company

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_Motor_Company

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fox_Broadcasting_Company

I do not want to break the terms of Wiki, but it really does seem like having an entry for single companies is allowed, or is it only appropriate when the company is a multinational?

There are pages about other beer companies on wiki, and about other companies.

I am not trying to be annoying, I just want some clarification about what is, and what is not allowed. So, how come pages are not allowed that hold information about single companies, except the companies listed above? - There are many more examples on Wiki too. I just want to be sure so that I don't break any of the terms in the future.

I will remove the page now (Am i able to do that?) - Is there any way I can re-work it to be acceptable?

Mike —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kingpin77 (talk • contribs) 18:12, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

First of all, please be sure to sign your comments using ~~~~ (four tildes) when commenting on talk pages.

Secondly, those companies are what Wikipedians call "Notable". This means that they have contributed something that makes them worth inclusion in an encyclopedia. To directly answer your question: no, the company does not have to be a multinational corporation to be included, only that it has received recognition by third parties. Read that article about notability for more information.

Another rule of thumb is to be neutral; that is, not write in a partial tone or be in conflict of interest. For example, I shouldn't write an article about something that I stand strongly for, as I'll probably write it in MY point of view, or for a company I created or work for, as I'd be in Conflict of Interest.

There's not much you can do to make the article not "break the rules" if it's not notable.

I see you introduced the article twice and removed the SPEEDY tag. Please don't do this. It will only give other editors reason to block you and it's a violation of our editing policies. Happy editing! ←Signed:→Mr. E. Sánchez ^{Get to know me!} / _{Talk to me!}←at≈:→ 05:53, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Rewrite on foodboyz.com

The entry for foodboyz.com has been edited and it seems to comply with Wikipedia requirements. If there are any issues contrary to the publication please advise. This entry is intended to follow the pattern of entries of the kind with the difference in this entry regarding the unique implementation of specific design techniques. This entry has been streamlined to only the facts of the site.

Thank you for your time in working with this entry.

Regards,

James Freund <REMOVED>@<removed>.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jfreund602 (talk • contribs) 23:05, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Okay. Someone's nominated it for AfD. And that Manual of Style! All CAPS?! That's always not cool. Another two things:

1) Please sign your comments on by placing the ~~~~ instead of writing one. It's only considered a signature unless it has the four ~(tildes).

2) Try not putting e-mails on any place on Wikipedia. It's accessible to millions of users daily, and we don't want you to be a victim of spam.

Thanks! ←Signed:→Mr. E. Sánchez ^{Get to know me!} / _{Talk to me!}←at≈:→ 23:12, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Comment added by User:Journaldiction

Hello, how is DJ Warrior non-notable???? when I included over 20 refrences, this man was named TOP TEN DJ IN THE WORLD BY ROLLING STONE MAGAZINE, is that non-notable? if you think it is, you must be living 20,000 leagues under the sea sir. Thank You, Preceding unsigned comment added by Journaldiction <- added by me! ←Signed:→Mr. E. Sánchez ^{Get to know me!} / _{Talk to me!}←at≈:→ 23:26, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

I have made an exception and replied on YOUR talk page. ←Signed:→Mr. E. Sánchez ^{Get to know me!} / _{Talk to me!}←at≈:→ 23:27, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

<Moving this guy's comment YET AGAIN!

You simply don't make any sense, why are you attacking me? why are you trying to shut this down? are you bored like that? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Journaldiction (talk • contribs) 00:23, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

FOODBOYZ submission and signature

The entry for foodboyz.com has been edited and it seems to comply with Wikipedia requirements. If there are any issues contrary to the publication please advise. This entry is intended to follow the pattern of entries of the kind with the difference in this entry regarding the unique implementation of specific design techniques. This entry has been streamlined to only the facts of the site. Thank you for your time in working with this entry. Regards, James Freund <REMOVED>@<removed>.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jfreund602 (talk • contribs) 23:05, 12 September 2008 (UTC) Okay. Someone's nominated it for AfD. And that Manual of Style! All CAPS?! That's always not cool. Another two things: 1) Please sign your comments on by placing the Jfreund602 (talk) 23:30, 12 September 2008 (UTC) instead of writing one. It's only considered a signature unless it has the four ~(tildes). 2) Try not putting e-mails on any place on Wikipedia. It's accessible to millions of users daily, and we don't want you to be a victim of spam. Thanks! ←Signed:→Mr. E. Sánchez Get to know me! / Talk to me!←at≈:→ 23:12, 12 September 2008 (UTC Jfreund602 (talk) 23:30, 12 September 2008 (UTC) James Freund <RM>@<RM>.com (hope I got it right this time)

Look, buddy. You need to stop trolling. Add your e-mail on a billboard for all I care. Just don't put it on my talk page. I won't be e-mailing you anytime soon! ←Signed:→Mr. E. Sánchez ^{Get to know me!} / _{Talk to me!}←at≈:→ 23:33, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

I was merely responding to your post and attempting to comply with Wikipedia standards. I had three posts, one of which was yours and responded accordingly. It's a learning process!

Jfreund602 (talk) 23:55, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Need an opinion

Heya ESanchez013!

I have been having a problem with User talk:24.184.206.83.

I was under the impression that the IP was a shared IP, and restored some warnings on the page which I have seen done before .... The editor who owns the IP left a nasty note on my talk page. I deleted it as "nonsense" in my edit summary. I went and checked relevant policy (which is a little grey), but erring on the side of caution, it turns out that editors can lay claim to owning shared IPs and delete almost any material they want. I was getting ready to apologize when I got another angry message left for me, directing me to a message on this editor's talk page. He left a message calling me a hypocrite.

My understanding of WP:CIVILITY is that editors can make comments on the edit, but not the editor. I think this statement is in violation of WP:CIVILITY, but want to be cautious about escalation. I am asking for an opinion. All I want his this editor's name calling removed, and to no longer associate with them. Apology is no longer an option because he has banned me from posting on his page, and to do so otherwise would constitute harassment. This editor's behavior has been very pushy (as you have noted). LonelyBeacon (talk) 16:01, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

He seems to be a little uncivil; he's being careful though. I think you should report him to admins if this keeps up. I've left him a little note just telling him (again) to be civil.

Looks like you and me both have been victims of uncivility recently (see the Journaldiction?). Thanks for asking my opinion; hope this helps! ←Signed:→Mr. E. Sánchez ^{Get to know me!} / _{Talk to me!}←at≈:→ 17:03, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

I appreciate the counsel. I really just want it to end, and the editor has prevented me from doing such. LonelyBeacon (talk) 17:09, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

E,

I've been editing, but I just caught the crossfire between you and this anon. I appreciate your getting involved, but I don't think its worth it. I'm going to issue the apology. He will turn me over for harassment, and I will likely get a 24 hour block. It's clear this won't end until that happens. I hoped he/she would drop it. It has not been dropped. So be it. I was looking for some advice, and I feel bad that you have gotten involved in this. LonelyBeacon (talk) 22:48, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

LOL, getting involved is no problem. He's not causing me any trouble. I really don't think you're harassing anyone either. Let's be the mature editors and ignore it all. Sometimes, that fixes things, ja? ←Signed:→Mr. E. Sánchez ^{Get to know me!} / _{Talk to me!}←at≈:→ 22:54, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

P.S.: It's WP, for goodness' sake! Why argue it to the bone?! And, us, too: we shouldn't let it bother us! I reviewed some of you edits (hope you don't mind) and can safely say you're no vandal. Thanks for helping the project!

I appreciate the kind words. I can take it. I just don't like to see my problems spill over to anyone else. I'm glad this isn't affecting you at all. LonelyBeacon (talk) 23:03, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Just Stop

Stop trying to shut DJ Warrior's page down, stop trying to attack my entry, which is now getting personal, as it does not make any sense that you would continue to attack it as it is 100% OFFICAL. I have requested to wikipedia that you not be allowed to do this anymore to credible pages. Now please, leave me alone, leave my entry alone, and let it do what it do, as anyone else who has knowledge on the entertainment industry and urban entertainment industries know who DJ Warrior is. Thank you. --Journaldiction (talk) 19:33, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Please don't post this stuff about it being "personal" and that you requested Wikipedia that I do whatever. Please be civil! PUT NEW MESSAGES AT THE END OF THE TALK PAGE AND NOT IN BETWEEN NEW MESSAGES!. I don't want to be pushed. I'm being really nice and do not want you to be blocked or my credibility as an editor to be damaged. I haven't edited anything else on your article! Please check the article's history and see who's been editing before judgment. Also, I haven't been active in the AFD since the comment and nomination. You coming to my talk page and attacking me like this is highly unorthodox and simply mean.

I want to let you know a few things in the event that I haven't let you know this before (and this is just to help you out):

1) You wrote the article and then said that you are a partner of his. Under Wikipedia policy, this is called Conflict of Interest. You are partial in your writing.

2) The article reads like a magazine or promotion. That's against Manual of Style, yet another Wikipedia policy.

3) I have been really nice. You say that I've been trying to delete it so badly like I had a grudge on the subject? There's two things I did: Nominate for speedy, which was declined, and then AFD nomination. THAT'S IT!. I've never even heard of the guy before you brought an article here. I love to see new WP articles, because I know we're helping this great project! Unfortunately, this one article just isn't working yet. I don't deny he's a cool guy and a great artist, but there's issues with the article.

4) Please don't take this personally. When my first article was deleted, I was heartbroken! I thought that the editor was just a big mean dude and I also said bad stuff about him on my talk page. But as I looked at his edits, I saw that he was helping. My article was wrong. It was advertisement by definition.

5) You're the first guy I had this problem with. Thank you, despite all the issues. You are helping me to be a better editor.

I hope you stop attacking me. Let others have a say on that article. Thanks for using Wikipedia! ←Signed:→Mr. E. Sánchez ^{Get to know me!} / _{Talk to me!}←at≈:→ 06:02, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Comments by User:24.184.206.83

Hello, Duncan. You have new messages at 24.184.206.83's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

NSLS

Soycaca (talk) 19:21, 16 September 2008 (UTC)September 16th, 2008

Hey, I did not mean to "advertise" for NSLS, but merely to warn college students that this is a FOR-PROFIT corporation and that their interest is primarily to make $, not necessarily to help college students out. I'm just not the best with writing...

I'm sorry if I'm sounding like a bully in any way.

Even good faith contributions can be non-notable. Unfortunately, we can't accept an article that is in good faith trying to warn others of a scam. It was written in the way of an advertisement that promoted a group, and without notability. If you have reliable sources for this group, you can submit your article again (with correct manual of style and citations) or ask for someone else to write it for you (since I take it you probably had contact with these "scammers" and you might be a little biased on the matter, or even a conflict of interest). Please tell me if you need more explanation. ←Signed:→Mr. E. Sánchez ^{Get to know me!} / _{Talk to me!}←at≈:→ 19:33, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

88.5 FM

In regard to this article, while I understand your desire to delete it, can you find a better rationale than "nonsense"? The article is perfectly coherent; it's just unnecessary. I can't justify deleting it as nonsense, but if there were a better reason to delete it than that, I might be able to delete it. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:55, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

By the way, I changed your CSD on Template:RadioByFrequency to a TFD nomination. You can find the discussion here. Kesac (talk) 03:19, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Re: American Laser Centers

Hey, I know the backlog for NPP right now is huge, I'm doing some of these too. Anyways, I saw you CSDed American Laser Centers and I found "American Laser Centers" on goggle returned about 187,000 ghits. I reversed the tag under AGF. Please review the ghits and if you believe my reversal is incorrect, please feel free to let me know. Thanks. - Jameson L. Tai ^{talk ♦ contribs} 00:50, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Oh, jeez. I'm sorry :-(. Thx for rving it! (I guess that's what happens when I haven't eaten anything all day!) ←Signed:→Mr. E. Sánchez ^{Get to know me!} / _{Talk to me!}←at≈:→ 00:52, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

No problem at all! (But please eat something...:D) There's a couple of us doing NPP on #wikipedia-en ^connect. Feel free to join us! :D Have a good evening. - Jameson L. Tai ^{talk ♦ contribs} 00:55, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the invite! As soon as I eat, I will fix my association with IRC exts. Thanks! ←Signed:→Mr. E. Sánchez ^{Get to know me!} / _{Talk to me!}←at≈:→ 00:58, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

You might be interested in this (Scott Slutzker)

Some discussion [6] -Preceding unsigned comment added by Rx StrangeLove

Indeed, it seems you tagged for CSD despite there being an assertion of notability. And while you did attempt to communicate after he removed the CSD tag, it would have been clearer without the red bar. I would have added the hangon tag and left a clear note telling the creator that I had done so and asking him to not remove the CSD tag. And you had the courtesy to add an AFD notice. That I like. I would suggest doing a Google News search before tagging. Many new users don't make it easy to see notability and verifiability. Sometimes they need our help. Cheers, Dlohcierekim 03:41, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

If you want to make a friend....

...see if you can do anything to help JournalDic's article :) BMW(drive) 09:18, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

I did a few things. Thx! ←Signed:→Mr. E. Sánchez ^{Get to know me!} / _{Talk to me!}←at≈:→ 10:15, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Thank You

Hey, sorry about getting off on the wrong foot. Thanks for editing on the article, it was a big help, by the way I moved the entry to DJ Warrior instead of Dj warrior because of the lower case, then just noticed you moved it to his real name, haha. Should I revert it back to his name? Not many essentially know this DJ from his real name, everyone just knows Warrior. Anyways, have a great weekend! :) --Journaldiction (talk) 01:41, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

DJ Warrior

You're right about the capitalization. I moved it back to the old title mainly since there was an AfD going on for the article. —C.Fred (talk) 04:28, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Paulson financial rescue plan

No problem. I will give the article a bit more shape now. The article should develop like the Federal takeover of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac article. Deet (talk) 10:17, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Re Vanessa Hamm wikipage

You wrote asking why I "replaced" your work on that page. My only answer is that there was no db-bio on the page when I was editing it - we must have been working on editing it at the same time. Sorry I got in your way. I will revert it to your edit, OK? Thanks.Raymondwinn (talk) 10:20, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion

I noticed that you tagged the page SS Princess Isabella for speedy deletion with the reason "it is a fictional item that lacks recognition for inclusion". However, "it is a fictional item that lacks recognition for inclusion" is not currently one of our criteria for speedy deletion, so I have removed the speedy deletion tag. You can use Wikipedia:Articles for deletion if you still want the page to be deleted. Thanks! Stifle (talk) 12:34, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Wikivotr

Re this speedy tag. For goodness sake, have you not noticed that wikivotr.com is just a (perfectly legal) copy from Wikipedia? OK, we probably need to bury these monkeys, but at least do it properly! — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 05:54, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion on Site/Domain Addition

Put deletion on hold and responded. I noticed adding pages like this done plenty on Wikipedia. Probably missed some special format. (used other site/domain additions on Wiki as guidelines)

link=User talk:<casbboy>#<TrailerAddict.Com>

Hello, Duncan. You have new messages at [[User talk:<casbboy>#<TrailerAddict.Com>|User talk:<casbboy>]].
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Casbboy (talk) 06:29, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

JFS article

Why did you leave me such a message on my talk page? Did you not see the discussion page on JFS where I've encouraged all users to debate the issue. On the other hand, the user who continually engages in mass deletion of text has not contributed once to the discussion on the issue. Please be fair in the way you treat wikipedia users. Thank you. If replying, leave a comment on my talk page Marlon232 (talk) 12:36, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

If you didn't want to receive a Template message, I'm sorry; I was unable to determine if you were a "regular" or a newcomer without having looked at the history since both your user page and talk page were blank. My first priority was to see what was going on in the page history (not the talk page) and determine why the IP address and you were going back and forth reverting things. If you are worried the page may continue to be vandalized by the addition on text without sources or potential errors, you may want to apply for temporary page protect. ←Signed:→Mr. E. Sánchez ^{Get to know me!} / _{Talk to me!}←at≈:→ 20:30, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Thank you sincerely for your kind reply. I'll consider that course of action. Marlon232 (talk) 22:01, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Hey

Hey Sanchez, somebody deleted DJ Warrior, which does not make any sense as we had it 100% referenced and official. Can we put this right back up? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Journaldiction (talk • contribs) 21:40, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

I wish we could, but we can't or they'll tag it for {{db-repost}}. What we can do next is just request for someone to make it. The AFD for DJ Warrior was closed because majority said delete. I'm sorry that this happened. Once again, we can request it (and more than likely, someone besides us since I'll more than likely be considered a non-neutral party to this, and you once stated that you're his partner, so they'll say you're COI-ing) and an admin may be able to recall the text. ←Signed:→Mr. E. Sánchez ^{Get to know me!} / _{Talk to me!}←at≈:→ 01:50, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

you

u a sock puppet? --Mother Niggle (talk) 00:51, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

A sockpuppet? Me? Nah. I used to play with my socks, though, when I was like 5. I'd draw things on them and make Sock puppets out of them. They're really fun to play with. Here's a picture of one: . But, seriously, on a more serious note: why would I have Wikipedia Sockpuppets? Are you accusing me of being one? Of who? Where's the evidence? Please don't troll on my Talk Page. It's not cool. Thanks. ←Signed:→Mr. E. Sánchez ^{Get to know me!} / _{Talk to me!}←at≈:→ 01:55, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

→

Archive 5