Employee1450

Muhammad

Please don't attach honorifics to Muhammad's name, as you did in Muhammad in Islam. Read carefully WP:PBUH for guidance. Thanks. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:00, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

Followup: I notice you've done this in many articles. Stop now. This is considered disruptive. You risk your account being blocked. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:01, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

i`m complying now

Citations

Wikipedia cannot cite Wikipedia, as you did in edit. Please use wikilinks if needed. Citations should always be to external reliable sources. Thanks. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:06, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

I will comply i`m new

Book article moved to draft space

I have moved your book article to draft space at Draft:Jerusalem in the Qur'an because it shows no evidence of being ready for main article space. It is written in a promotional tone which is not appropriate for an encyclopedia, and has no citations to independent secondary sources that demonstrate the book merits an article on the English Wikipedia.

Please review Wikipedia:Golden rule for a brief overview of what is expected in a new Wikipedia article.

Please also see WP:NBOOK to learn about inclusion criteria for book articles.

When you are confident that your draft complies with editorial guidelines and policies, use the box at the top to submit it for review. Don't move it back to main article space until a reviewer has approved it. Thanks. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:39, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

Tariq Jameel

Dear Employee1450, you must stop editing in this fashion. Try to learn how Wikipedia actually works and what its key policies are. Wikipedia requires citations to reliable and authoritative third-party sources. Two good sets of Wikipedia guidelines that I have found really useful can be found HERE, regarding verifiability and HERE, regarding the need to maintain a neutral point of view. Please also read Wikipedia's Manual of Style and the policy against using social media as citations. George Custer's Sabre 06:53, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

I will comply to all rules i`m learning

Speedy deletion nomination of Jerusalem in the Quran

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Jerusalem in the Quran, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Csgir (talk) 12:44, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

i will compile correctly

World Federation of Islamic Missions moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, World Federation of Islamic Missions, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Britishfinance (talk) 13:32, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

I`m compiling the article soon. Regards

Disambiguation link notification for January 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Muhammad Iqbal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kashmiri (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

I wanted to link to a page that was not disambigious To make it historically enriched. This person was a Kashmiri I merely linked the Text to Kashmir , i case people want to know more about it

Recent edit to Muhammad Abdul Wahhab

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Muhammad Abdul Wahhab, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 09:53, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

I will add the proper citation Regards

Speedy deletion nomination of Bulbul Shah

Hello Employee1450,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Bulbul Shah for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Britishfinance (talk) 17:14, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Employee1450, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Bulbul Shah have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:08, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

I will take proper notice from future about this, i`m learning to write articles

Why the calligraphy?

Why are you adding calligraphic renderings of people's names to articles, as you did at Murrah ibn Ka'b? —C.Fred (talk) 20:35, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Please explain how adding these images is beneficial to the articles. We do not put up random calligraphy of other article subjects. —C.Fred (talk) 20:50, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Please check any article on islam and its personalities , it is noted to that there is always a calligraphy associated to the picture. Check Muhammad and Islam , I`m merely adding the same to articles that don`t have

January 2019

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Abd Manaf ibn Qusai, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Removing an image of the subject is disruptive. —C.Fred (talk) 20:52, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Abd Manaf ibn Qusai, you may be blocked from editing. Wikipedia is not censored. We do not remove images just because certain groups find them offensive. Further, there is no reason this particular article should have its image removed when many other Islam-related articles feature images of the subjects. —C.Fred (talk) 21:31, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing, which has not ceased in spite of the many civil notices and warnings given on this talk page.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~Anachronist (talk) 23:36, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

I would agree to unblock if you agreed to a topic ban, never again editing any articles related to Muhammad or Islam. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:36, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Employee1450 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Well the image i removed was historically in accurate and religiously offensive to Muslims, Ask any wikipedia Muslim Admin, Employee1450 (talk) 00:12, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

That implies if unblocked, you'd edit in the same manner again. As such, we'll have to leave you blocked. Yamla (talk) 00:13, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Employee1450 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Well you want Wikipedia to be historically inaccurate be it. stick any painting to any article and block people who correct the mistake. The Person whose image was removed has no painting under his name. The painting is completely incorrect and biased.i was merely keeping wikipedia free from incorrect information as i`m specialised in the history of islam and personalities related to it. Please check the authenticity of the painting associated to the person. Employee1450 (talk) 00:19, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Wikipedia is not censored, as this project is meant to amass a collection of all human knowledge. Much content here is offensive to one group or another, and removing it all would leave little behind and defeat that purpose. If certain images offend you, you can suppress their display(see WP:NOSEE). If certain content offends you, you should not view it. Until you indicate that you understand this and tell what constructive contributions you will make, you will not be unblocked. As noted by the blocking administrator, you will likely need to agree to a topic ban on Muhammad and Islam in order to be unblocked. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 02:01, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Here's a hint: You were not blocked for adding paintings. See all the notices here on this page. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:56, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Employee1450 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Okay i was blocked for removing this image https://web.archive.org/web/20070724025006/http://ds.kb.se/?mapp=5&fil=draktbok/137v

from this article

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abd_Manaf_ibn_Qusai

Points to be noted

The website used is not available anymore from which the image is taken, the source can`t be verified.

The image can`t be accounted to be correct, anywhere on the internet or Books

Offensive to Sentiments

Misinformation of History,

Historically inaccurate Completely

Note

The image was taken randomly from the Online Swedish Library and associated to the person without proper citation and verification

All my efforts were to enrich wikipedia content and make it a source of proper knowledge on the internet.

Thank You Regards

If i`m accused of any other mistakes i`m learning to edit here i have been here for few days. Hope you don`t ban people who learn to write articles Employee1450 (talk) 07:51, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Simply repeating your insistence on removing that image for religious reasons is not getting you an inch closer to being unblocked. If you want to rethink your *approach* to handling dispute rather than just continuing the dispute here, WP:UTRS is still open to you. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:12, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Talk page access revoked due to WP:IDHT. --Yamla (talk) 12:13, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Here's another hint: You were blocked for engaging in many different disruptive activities, not just removal of an image. Again, see all the notices you have received above. Your appeal in UTRS should describe your understanding of why you were blocked, what you intend to do in the future, and agree to refrain from edits pertaining to Islam or Muhammad. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:55, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Jerusalem in the Qur'an

Hello, Employee1450. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jerusalem in the Qur'an".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 17:51, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:World Federation of Islamic Missions

Hello, Employee1450. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "World Federation of Islamic Missions".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 08:03, 16 July 2019 (UTC)