User talk:EtienneDolet/Archive 5

Rollback

edit

Hello Proudbolsahye. User:Nyttend has granted rollback for your account. Please see my comment on your rollback request, since due to the nature of your work you might find yourself using rollback in controversial areas, which is tricky. Also, I'd suggest that if you expect to be working on disputed topics, it is better to set up bot archiving for your talk page. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 17:42, 2 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

FYI, Ed, Proudbolsahye and I already chatted about this, but you didn't see it because the conversation's already been archived; see the bottom of User talk:Proudbolsahye/Archive 4. Nyttend (talk) 19:34, 2 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
Nyttend, thanks for your comment. I wanted to be sure Proudbolsahye was aware of the rollback rules since he is active on WP:ARBAA2 topics, where hot disputes can occur. He himself is not in any trouble there. Rollback is safest to use with conventional vandalism. EdJohnston (talk) 19:43, 2 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Better source request for some of your uploads

edit

Thanks for your uploads to Wikipedia. There is an issue with some of them, specifically:

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the images because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the images, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image files themselves. Please update the image descriptions with URLs that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 03:09, 3 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Files missing description details

edit
Dear uploader: The media files you uploaded as:

are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 04:44, 3 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
 
Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted
Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Hovhannes Aivazovsky - The Ninth Wave - Google Art Project.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 01:50, 4 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Clarence Ussher

edit

Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 08:02, 5 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vardges Sureniants, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Line drawing (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 5 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of Vardges Sureniants

edit

  Hello! Your submission of Vardges Sureniants at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! NinaGreen (talk) 00:35, 6 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Serj Sarkisyan

edit

Merhaba, Türkçe Vikipedi'de Serj Sarkisyan maddesinin taraflı olduğu iddia edilmektedir. Maddenin tartışma sayfasında bu mevzu tartışılmakta. Sizin bu konudaki fikrinizi duymak isterim. Bunun için biraz zaman ayırabilirseniz çok mutlu olurum. Saygılar...-Esc2003 (talk) 17:38, 6 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Tesekur ederim Esc2003. Ama o kadar tartistiniz ki ben okuyunca kayboliyorum. Ben malesef Turk wikipedia'da edit yapmiyorum. bi kere yapmistim ve profesyonalsizligini hosuma gitmedi. Her neyse, ben hep sanirim ki inglizce maddeler zaten Turk wikipedia icin iyi bi ornek olur. Mesela eger Inglizce maddesi tarafsiz olursa orda niye olsun ki? Saygilarimla, Proudbolsahye (talk) 18:20, 6 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
Maddede Karabağ meselesine ve Türkiye ilişkilerine fazla yer verildiği için taraflı olduğu iddia ediliyor. Ben ise İngilizcede bu konulara daha çok verildiğini söyledim onlara. Madde sizce taraflı mıdır değil midir? Bunu belirtseniz... -Esc2003 (talk) 18:35, 6 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
Tesekur ediyorum dogru nedenleriyle tartistigin icin. Malesef cok gec kaldim Esc2003 tartismaya, yoksa bi yorum verirdim. Iste bunun icin Turk Wikipedia'sinda ne yorum yaparim ne edit yaparim. Turk wikpediasinda o kadar sorun goriyorum ki kafam doniyor. Orda hesabim bile yok ve heralde olmiyacak. Proudbolsahye (talk) 18:48, 6 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Witnesses and testimonies of the Armenian Genocide, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Turkish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 12 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of Vardges Sureniants

edit

  Hello! Your submission of Vardges Sureniants at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! NinaGreen (talk) 00:44, 14 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Rollback of edit on Armenian_Genocide

edit

I noticed that you rolled back my clarification of which holocaust the article was referring to and wondered why. I know that most references to 'Holocaust' are assumed to mean the Jewish but should we really be requiring the reader to make an assumption. What is wrong with specifically stating? kimdino (talk) 22:37, 14 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Because the event is not formally known as the "Jewish Holocaust"...it is known as the Holocaust in and of itself per name of the article and the general consensus of Wikipedia. Proudbolsahye (talk) 05:52, 15 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Faik Ali Ozansoy

edit

Gatoclass (talk) 14:17, 18 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Witnesses and testimonies of the Armenian Genocide, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages German and Estonian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 23 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Vardges Sureniants

edit

The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Ruth A. Parmelee

edit

  Hello! Your submission of Ruth A. Parmelee at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! ColonelHenry (talk) 16:51, 27 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

  • I approved it as GTG, adding four words to the hook just for clarification of context. At the QPQ for the railway division, I added an ALT1 there...a note for future reference, when writing and reviewing DYK hooks, the goal is to pack an interesting detail but to make sure there's reason and context for it to be interesting. Detail does that--and a well-written DYK hook has a lot of detail in a small space. It's an power to lure them in. It's a tasty Amuse-bouche to prepare you for a larger entrée. Be exacting with a review, and ask the question "why should you (or in general, a reader) care to know more?" since that is the difference from having an ignored article and one that might interest people. --ColonelHenry (talk) 17:29, 6 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Recognition- Doğu Perincek Case

edit

Hey, it's important to know supreme human rights case. Why to ignore it? Thanks. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Armenian_Genocide_recognition&oldid=prev&diff=588243117 --Kafkasmurat (talk) 20:32, 29 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

I don't doubt its importance. But I do believe that the verdict is not related to Armenian Genocide recognition. Court cases like this are more suitable for the Armenian Genocide denial article than any other article. You still haven't fully addressed as to how a court case that allows the denial of the Armenian Genocide can relate to the recognition of it. Yet, you have already copied and pasted the same information in three different articles ([1][2][3]). I would like to remind you to please, Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point in a WP:BATTLEGROUND type of way. You have already been warned and logged for supervision under WP:AA2. I sincerely want you to consider the repercussions of your actions. Please remember that this is an arbitrarily covered area. Proudbolsahye (talk) 20:49, 29 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
I did this because all three articles mentioned punishment. The case was relevant before reversal and why is it irrelevant now? That's not fair. And It's no battleground. I have hundreds of edits with other languages and just can't stand to be called murderers because of this matter. Turkish people don't know about it. That's just stupid monarchs and never systematic killing of a next door neighbour.--Kafkasmurat (talk) 21:53, 29 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
Well, I am surprised it was there. We just ran into that and it is now removed. The entire trial of a person who denies the genocide is irrelevant to the international recognition of the event itself. If you see a correlation, please refer to the talk page. Proudbolsahye (talk) 22:01, 29 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
Hey, i'm blocked for this. Who is happy now? It's a sad thing effecting my views on voluntary works. Thanks. --Kafkasmurat (talk) 11:39, 31 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Happy New Year Proudbolsahye!

edit
 
Happy New Year!
Hello Proudbolsahye:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve the encyclopedia for Wikipedia's readers, and have a happy and enjoyable New Year! Cheers, Alex2006 (talk) 19:54, 1 January 2014 (UTC)Reply


 


Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year 2014}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.
Thank you very much! I wish you a happy new years as well with many more happy edits. Proudbolsahye (talk) 20:26, 1 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Ernest Yarrow

edit

Harrias talk 08:02, 7 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Ruth A. Parmelee

edit

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:01, 10 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Armenian Americans, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Women's Auxiliary Army Corps (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 12 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Special Barnstar
You have been editing and making huge contributions for such a long time (the numerous DYKs are impressive!), and I wanna award you this barnstar and I hope you continue your great work. Երևանցի talk 18:40, 13 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

I removed Yosarrian because he clearly states in Catch-22 that he is Assyrian. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Penguins53 (talkcontribs) 04:36, 15 January 2014 (UTC)Reply


Many Assyrians were also deported and hanged on April 24, 1915 (Red Sunday). Why did you remove it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Penguins53 (talkcontribs) 02:29, 15 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Witnesses and testimonies of the Armenian Genocide, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:27, 19 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Wave book

edit

Fixed it, I guess it gets the "good to go". Much thanks for reviewing it. Ethically (Yours) 09:32, 23 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

[unreliable source?]

edit

Merhaba. Bunu geri almışsınız. Şu maddede aynı kaynak için şablon dururken, bahsi geçen maddede bulunmuyor oluşu sizce de garip olmaz mı? Aynı değişikliği diğer maddede niçin yapmadığınızı merak ettim. --Esc2003 (talk) 08:29, 30 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

O zaman o maddeteki şablonu ordanda çıkartmalıyız. I don't think Konullu's opinion, a user who has been topic banned for POV editing, should be taken into serious consideration. Étienne Dolet (talk) 09:53, 30 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Witnesses and testimonies of the Armenian Genocide, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 3 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Krikor Torosyan

edit

Materialscientist (talk) 03:18, 6 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Yarrowd.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Yarrowd.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:08, 9 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Frederick G. Coan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Wooster
Witnesses and testimonies of the Armenian Genocide (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to American

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 10 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Ping

edit

This is a ping to let you know I've read your review of the DYK nomination of Salmson S4. Rcsprinter (warn) @ 12:54, 10 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Maps_of_Turkish_geographical_name_changes

edit

I need your feedback on this request from you Maps_of_Turkish_geographical_name_changes. --Goran tek-en (talk) 14:13, 11 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Armenian genocide

edit

I certainly do not dispute the fact of the genocide. I think my reference to "debate" concerned its scale, in view of the existence of a number of estimates. The position taken by the Turkish government is contrary to historical fact, but perhaps it is not right to visit on the present Turkish people and government the sins of their forefathers. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:03, 15 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of 1988 Spitak earthquake

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1988 Spitak earthquake you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Secret -- Secret (talk) 01:40, 20 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Frederick G. Coan

edit

The DYK project (nominate) 11:08, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Warning for Sabiha Gökçen

edit
 

Your recent editing history at Sabiha Gökçen shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Maurice07 (talk) 12:39, 26 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Karekin Khajag, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Akulis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 27 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Talkback

edit
 
Hello, EtienneDolet. You have new messages at Stefan2's talk page.
Message added 14:42, 27 February 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

Stefan2 (talk) 14:42, 27 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Image Castadre.png

edit

Hi there, I have raised a discussion on whether a higher-than-standard resolution image might be justifiable in the case of File:Cadastre.png. The discussion is here, you might want to weigh in. Cheers, James086Talk 23:34, 28 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Re:A candidate for FA

edit

Hi there. I'm afraid I don't know anything about Armenian history, so I can't really comment on the content, but this article is significantly longer than a lot of FAs. In principle, an article of any length can be an FA if it is a comprehensive look at the subject. The thing I must say is that, as far as I can see, you haven't actually edited the article. This can cause problems for a number of reasons, not least the fact that you may be unfamiliar with the source materials. You really need to discuss the prospect of sending this to FAC with the regular editors, rather than going ahead and doing it yourself. In terms of the article itself, it contains a large further reading section; can I ask why, if these are reliable sources, the information they contain has not been incorporated into the article? If they offer valuable further information, I suspect a FA would include that information. If you have limited experience with FAC, you may want to send this article to peer review and asking a number of editors who may be interested (especially if they have some FAC experience) to take a look. I hope this is helpful! J Milburn (talk) 11:06, 2 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

J Milburn Thank you for your honest opinion. Your explanation really helped me understand what FA criteria entails. I'm familiar with Armenian history a bit so I'm always up for the challenge. As for the further reading section, some of the items listed there are in fact used as references. I found this quite odd as well. The Further Reading section must be separated into a References section. I am considering sending the article for Peer Review. Thanks so much for you genuine help and suggestions. Étienne Dolet (talk) 07:36, 3 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of 1988 Spitak earthquake

edit

The article 1988 Spitak earthquake you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1988 Spitak earthquake for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Secret -- Secret (talk) 19:40, 3 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Sarkis Minassian

edit

Thanks for another contribution Victuallers (talk) 08:02, 4 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of 1988 Spitak earthquake

edit

The article 1988 Spitak earthquake you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:1988 Spitak earthquake for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Secret -- Secret (talk) 16:11, 4 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your help with this. And to answer your question: Yes, for the most part the article uses a citation system with summaries of the newspaper or journal articles and the references at the end of each paragraph. That article was a lot of work to put together a couple of summers ago, and was fun to do, but have had plans to do another round with it as far as cleanup goes. Thanks for helping with it, Dawnseeker2000 04:23, 5 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

The article is comprehensive and so it does have that going for it already, but this would be my first, and I'd have to refresh myself on all the requirements. I was writing well when I expanded the article two summers ago, but that's probably not representative of my overall writing style. I think I just got lucky with the in depth articles that were used as sources. So yes, I can definitely get the bulk of the information on into articles, and that one really does tell the story well, but I don't know how well I can do the fine tuning that's necessary for that level of quality. Seriously, I've never touched an FA, but maybe this would work if we did it together. I'm certain I couldn't do it alone. So yes, you've peaked my interest, so maybe we should consider it.

I had been looking at the article for some time and realized that the "aftershocks" section was a bit wordy and struggled to just get to the point, so I've got a major copy edit of the article in a sand box that I'll probably post this weekend. That will make me feel a bit better about having reached the GA status. Cheers & thanks again, Dawnseeker2000 03:07, 7 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Dawnseeker2000 There's only one way to find out :) I'll nominate it soon. Étienne Dolet (talk) 00:34, 8 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK for National Commission for Civic Education

edit

Thanks for your first review. I have done the expansion now, could you please do another assessment of the DYK. I must have missed the 1500 characters criteria. Thanks once again. CrossTempleJay  → talk 09:19, 5 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Levon Marashlian, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Glendale Community College (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, 10.4.0.34 (talk) 09:02, 6 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

 
Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted
Your nomination for featured picture status, File:T'oros Roslin (Armenian, active 1256 - 1268) - Canon Table Page - Google Art Project (6915047).jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 04:50, 7 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Karekin Khajag

edit

The DYK project (nominate) 16:02, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

POV in the...

edit

Selamlar. Şuradaki yorumunuzu gördüm. Bu maddeyi de zenginleştirebileceğinizi tahmin ediyorum. Ermenilerin Türkleri katletmesi, Ermeni Katliamı (veya soykırımı, adına ne denilirse denilsin) gerçeğini ortadan kaldırmaz. Şu köşe yazısını okuyabilir, şu videoyu da izleyebilirsiniz. Bunlar kaynak değil elbet ama sizi harekete geçirmeye yetecektir. Ermeni tarihi ile ilgili katkılarınızın insanlığa hizmet adına olduğuna, emeklerinizin milliyetçilik adına olmadığına inanmak istiyorum. Saygılar... --Esc2003 (talk) 18:26, 8 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Esc2003 Oldu olmadı demiyorum. Ama o maddenin epeyi sorunları vardı ve sevindim ki artık yavaşca çözuliyor. Kaynaksız idaalarla doluydu. Sorun benim şahsi düşündüklerim değildi. Saygılarımla, Étienne Dolet (talk) 19:24, 8 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thanks

edit

Thank you very much for your barnstar. --CeeGee 07:44, 9 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Wan King Path

edit

I've responded to your concerns on the Wan King PAth DYK. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 09:50, 10 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Levon Marashlian

edit

The DYK project (nominate) 16:07, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Witnesses and testimonies of the Armenian Genocide, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Persian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 23 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Smbat Byurat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 1 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nellie Miller-Mann, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Goshen and Elkhart (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 12 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Template:Did you know nominations/Czech Radio

edit

Hi, I have replied at Template:Did you know nominations/Czech Radio regarding your query. Thanks, C679 07:47, 15 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of Seta Dadoyan

edit

  Hello! Your submission of Seta Dadoyan at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Drmies (talk) 03:59, 17 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

@Drmies: I appreciate the thorough review. Please see my comment on the template. Thanks once agin. Étienne Dolet (talk) 04:50, 17 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
@Drmies: [4] Quick question: what do you think of this source? Étienne Dolet (talk) 04:55, 17 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
Sorry, can't use that--it's the publisher's site. The "editorial reviews", those are really blurbs; they're nice to have on your back cover but you can't really cite those. I was asked one time to write one of them, and I hope no one ever cites it. No, try JSTOR and the MLA for solid reviews, or slip Crisco a $20 bill to see if he can find you some. Drmies (talk) 05:03, 17 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
Drmies Update: I added some reviews. Check it out. Étienne Dolet (talk) 06:03, 17 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of Nellie Miller-Mann

edit

  Hello! Your submission of Nellie Miller-Mann at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! AshLin (talk) 08:39, 17 April 2014 (UTC)Reply