User talk:FoCuSandLeArN/Archive 26

Latest comment: 8 years ago by HasteurBot in topic G13 Eligibility Notice
Archive 20Archive 24Archive 25Archive 26Archive 27Archive 28Archive 30

Also your contact information scanner sucks.

If anyone can bypass it as easy as I did why is it even there in the first place?

Lookie here this is my email domain--> minerzep and then you just add the at symbol for at, and I'm at gmail. The dot com gmail. There ya go. Loophole found. You probably won't be able to patch that up, will you? For email adresses it's pretty simple--just ban every reference to gmail, yahoo, firemail or whatever without a request to a mod. It'll add complexity to the process but that's how a patch works. To patch phone numbers you would have to use an algorithm that will reference each string of seven numbers (No matter the separation) to the universal phone book whatever that is. You'd have to make that process more efficient because I don't know how it works. And there you have it the hole I found has been patched. Mostly. You just have to apply it. YukinonKanade (talk) 19:11, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

@YukinonKanade: Wikipedia is not a place to present your theories. Please do not use it for such purposes. On a personal note, I suggest you see a Psychiatrist. Regards, FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 19:22, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Radha

How much you know about Radha. Have you read all books that I listed. You cannot single decide Radha tattva unless you have collected all references. You should not delete my article. You cant decide about it by yourself.

Huh? FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 15:16, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Congratulations from STiki!

 
The Anti-Vandalism + STiki Barnstar
 

Congratulations, FoCuSandLeArN! You're receiving this barnstar because you recently crossed the 1,000 classification threshold using STiki. We thank you both for your contributions to Wikipedia at-large and your use of the tool. We hope you continue your ascent up the leaderboard and stay in touch at the talk page. Thank you and keep up the good work! West.andrew.g (developer) and Orphan Wiki 17:58, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

G13 Eligibility Notice

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 03:00, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Oldest people

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Oldest people. Legobot (talk) 00:16, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Not necessarily vandalism

You reverted the blanking of Palermo window on the world, claiming it was either a test or vandalism. Not necessarily. When a new user creates a page and that page is nominated for deletion, as was the case here, the new user will often blank the page. This is commonly seen as a good faith attempt to delete that page, recognizing that they have done something wrong. In this case, it is common to simply place the {{db-author}} on the page to allow it to be speedily deleted. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:35, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

@WikiDan61: Yes, I see your point, but I approached the problem differently by reinstating the PROD. Two ways of reaching the same objective - which in this case entails the deletion of said page, and subsequent notification for the user not to do it again. As you know, the low level warning is mild enough for a new editor, and he has been welcomed as well. I didn't see any need for further involvement at this stage. Best, FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 19:08, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

?

For a CEO of a large corporation, you sure do cover alot of topics and try to keep as much information as possible from reaching the light. Wyonjek13 (talk) 15:36, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

@Wyonjek13: CEO? What on earth are you on about? FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 19:08, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

G13 Eligibility Notice

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 03:00, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

January 2016

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Civil defense may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • by Public Law 103-160 in 1993 and largely repealed by Public Law 103-337 in 1994.<ref name=")2009">{{cite book|author=Nuclear Regulatory Commission (U S )|title=Nuclear Regulatory Legislation|
  • * [http://www.sebev.co.uk SEBEV Search and Rescue] (originally a Civil Defence team in the UK

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:02, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jeanette Dousdebes Rubio

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jeanette Dousdebes Rubio. Legobot (talk) 00:12, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Draft: Andri Steinþór Björnsson

Dear FoCuSandLeArN,

Thank you for your review of the draft submission on Andri Steinþór Björnsson. The page has now been edited to include multiple additional references. Dr. Björnsson is a notable figure in psychology, both within Iceland and internationally. Having written books and hosted a series of radio shows on science, it seems clear that he should be considered notable. Having reviewed Wikipedia pages on other Icelandic scholars I find that Dr. Björnsson's achievements are certainly not less notable than those of his peers.

Please let me know which particular aspects of the page need clarification in your opinion, it has already been edited to further emphasize Dr. Björnsson's notability and multiple references added.

Best,

thorvard 00:21, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi FoCuSandLeArN-

Thanks for your guidance! I was trying to improve the page to show that LPO is not limited to offshoring to India. There are companies here that do that too. Any advice is appreciated.

LawDocsXpress is the company I am trying to cite as the example of the US-based talent pool.

MegrossATL (talk) 21:15, 15 January 2016 (UTC)megrossATL

@MegrossATL: unfortunately what you tried to add to the article was both highly promotional and unencyclopaedic. At Wikipedia we require the addition of information to be notable and supported by reliable sources. No external links are to be placed in-line either. Best, FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 23:37, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

G13 Eligibility Notice

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 03:00, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:ShadowsCommons

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:ShadowsCommons. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

G13 Eligibility Notice

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 03:01, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Campus sexual assault

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Campus sexual assault. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ásatrú in the United States

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ásatrú in the United States. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Exposing to the right

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Exposing to the right. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi! As you see I am new to editing wikipedia. Would it be more appropriate to add textual information to the body and link to the video in references? Or is it not allowed at all to link to videos? I just believe that I have information to share and I want to do it in a manner that is allowable. Thank you! Insectopia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Insectopia 2015 (talkcontribs) 21:05, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello there! You can add content to the article along with appropriate references. The video in question could be a nice addition to the external links section, perhaps? FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 21:10, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

CGCIS

Thank you for creating the CGCIS I submitted. I also have a picture of the agency Seal and want to know how to submit this for the stub. Any help is appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VicFury (talkcontribs) 21:33, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

It seems the stub was merged with CGI, which already has a seal. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 22:12, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Edits

Out of common curtsey and respect, please DO NOT revert edits that are not Clear violations of policy. This would include, but not be limited to, edits that run contrary to your personal opinion, but do not seem to constitute vandalism as per this Wiki's policy. Thank you. 72.192.72.19 (talk) 03:32, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

G13 Eligibility Notice

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 03:00, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Panagiotis Kone

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Panagiotis Kone. Legobot (talk) 04:32, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

RfC on Campus Sexual Assault

Hello. As you have previously provided comment on the discussion in his article, I invite you now to please review and provide comment (if any) to the proposed alternatives located here. Thank you. Scoundr3l (talk) 07:03, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Emmanuel Lemelson

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Emmanuel Lemelson. Legobot (talk) 04:33, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

WiBrugherio

Hi, I have translated Cascina Guzzina, could you reviewed it? There is also Cascine in Brugherio in need of review. Thanks for your great help as always! FrOsmetti (talk) 11:09, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

removal

all sources are cited ... please explain why it was removed

Your edits: 1) did not include references; 2) the references you've provided here are not reliable; 3) it is written unencyclopaedically. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 14:59, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Mam Tor

I think that "Mam Tor" = "mother hill" is essentially English (though it may be Old English) - "Mam" is still used a (Northern?) diminutive for "mother" and "tor" is a standard geographical term for a hill or rocky outcrop, so I'm not sure there's much to clarify. This page claims that it's "from the celtic language spoken in these parts during the Iron Age" but that sounds speculative; since the words are still more-or-less current in modern English I'm not sure such a claim is necessary. Dave.Dunford (talk) 16:43, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

The fact that "mam tor" is said to mean mother hill is obviously implying that it's another language or an obscure use of English. If it is used in the modern style of English as you say, that sentence needs to be amended to something like mam tor (English "mam" - mother, "tor" - hill). We needn't clarify English - as a corollary, we should clarify obscure expressions. This is an encyclopaedia, not an English country brochure. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 16:58, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Citations

I don't know how to put citations in, can you source this?

Ramalingam Shanmugam (2013), INFORMATICS ABOUT FEAR TO REPORT RAPES USING BUMPED-UP POISSON MODEL, American Journal of Biostatistics 3 (1): 17-29

For what I wrote? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.30.8.199 (talk) 16:48, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

I've added a somewhat modified version of your contribution. Thank you. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 17:01, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Mention on Campus Sexual Assault ANI

Hello. You were mentioned in the following ANI Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Talk:Campus_sexual_assault_RfC. You are not the subject of the incident report, but you were quoted. Thank you, Scoundr3l (talk) 22:22, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Drafts

Hi! can you help me with these drafts? seems legit) Draft:MassRoots, Draft:Microtrac

thanks!--27century (talk) 03:22, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

G13 Eligibility Notice

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 03:00, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Biographies of living persons

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Biographies of living persons. Legobot (talk) 04:33, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

G13 Eligibility Notice

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 03:00, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Edit filter

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Edit filter. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Yeoman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Frisian language. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

hello may i know what contributions u r expecting in the wildlife of india page since u removed the high res image of tiger i added in the page ,which is not off topic too... i believe.thanks.

Chicago Blackhawks

Sir did you read poem Blackhawks org. Liked in Honor and dedication to their Championship Stanley Cups....Why not let people Read.. And is tandem of Blackhawk tradition...thanks us navy congressional vet cal shummon

I'm sorry, but Wikipedia is not a suitable place for your poem. Best, FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 14:38, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

DRN Case filing of dispute at Paul Singer (businessman) - Where's the most recent dispute?

Hey Focus, where is the most recent location where this dispute was discussed? At DRN, we have a rule that only recently discussed disputes will be accepted. If you could please provide the most recent location that this dispute was discussed at and post that to the DRN case discussion section, that would be appreciated. Otherwise we will have to close your case as being unready for DRN moderation. You can always refile if discussion kicks up again. Cheers, Doctor Crazy in Room 102 of The Mental Asylum 04:06, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

@Drcrazy102: Hello there! I believe the most recent discussion is located in the NPOVN archives. Where do I need to place the link? Thank you for the heads-up! Cheers, FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 18:08, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Hey Focus, I think I placed that link in the Discussion section (here) but you've probably seen that now, haven't you? Cheers, Doctor Crazy in Room 102 of The Mental Asylum 01:01, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Thank you, Drcrazy102. When completing the form I provided the Talk page link as petitioned, but wasn't aware it had to be the latest discussion available. Perhaps the form needs to be tweaked in order to avoid confusion? Cheers, FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 01:06, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Most cases are straight off the talkpages, so it isn't really needed. It is usually the odd cases, such as this, that have far more recent discussions on other pages. Perhaps a tweak may be needed but likely not. I'll look into it. Cheers, Doctor Crazy in Room 102 of The Mental Asylum 01:08, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Appreciated, FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 01:10, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

G13 Eligibility Notice

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 03:01, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Catalonia

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Catalonia. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Added info to card stunts wiki page

Did you delete it?

I have no idea what you're referring to. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 11:21, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Edits to syntactic ambiguity

Is there any way to create a paragraph in that edit with the meaning I used with it being acceptable for Wikipaedia? When my parents tell me jokes, I sometimes don't get it because I was born after the event they think is funny. Same with other things older than yourself or when you began to remember events as a toddler. 50.65.138.9 (talk) 14:52, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

What you added has nothing to do with syntactic ambiguity. You stated something obvious, which doesn't need to be added again. In future, make sure your additions are verifiable. Regards, FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 15:23, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Your Arrogant Undoing of My Mandie Edits

@1969redsled: You own the rights to the texts, congratulations! It has nothing to do with your recent edits to the article. Please desist with your vandalistic blanking. You blanked a bibliographic list of the series twice. This is an encyclopaedia. We're not publishing your books, we're publishing publically available fact (such as the titles of books), so stop your nonsense. Best, FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 16:51, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

G13 Eligibility Notice

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 03:00, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jeremy Corbyn

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jeremy Corbyn. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Artist name

Hello, you just deleted my entry of my artist name which included citations to two discog pages for validation of commercial release history and a listing for one of my 3 appearancez on BBC's 1Xtra for notability. I've checked out the wiki page on notability and am unsure to why this entry was deleted. Can you please explain or re-instate it?

thanks

Hello there, whoever you are. I deleted a list entry which you introduced for a non-notable individual. Disambiguation pages serve the purpose of directing readers to appropriate Wikipedia articles. Your entry doesn't exist on Wikipedia, thus it has no use for a disambiguation page. Best, FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 01:41, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Undoing of my revision

I think you missed the revision I was trying to correct as I had seen the Jimmy McMillan page contained only the phase "I am the king of booty" so I just undid this change. Please do not try to construe it as vandalism as it was exactly what I was trying to fix. When I went into the revisions I could not see the version that I had seen when i initially accessed the page for unknown reasons.

Best regards

Your edit was the exact opposite of what you're saying. You deliberately introduced "Booty King". You've been warned; do not do this again. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 01:42, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biographies

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biographies. Legobot (talk) 04:37, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

G13 Eligibility Notice

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 03:00, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Just saying

WP:AGF. Have a nice day. Palosirkka (talk) 15:51, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Impossible when you state that a former President can't read. You've been warned. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 15:57, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Kerry Committee Report

Hi FoCuSandLeArN

I should have included my reasons for the Kerry Committee edit -- I had been going over them with someone else until we mutually agreed on each but failed to include them in a comment for others. First, I don't know the Wikipedia convention, but in most citation formatting styles, omitted sentences (as opposed to mere words/phrases) mandate 4-period ellipses in quotations, not 3; and the cited material does omit several sentences. Second, having consulted the original source, the quotation is rather misleading as it stands without an "amongst other connections"-oriented clause because the cited material includes a list of several points, whereas the quoted sentence suggests that the TOTALITY of "links" covered by the Report are various sorts of "payments," rather than that the payments are just merely one such link of many; the fact that the Report speaks of "Payments," in plurality, reinforces this. Even with the ellipsis, the quotation could easily be misconstrued in this way, e.g. by assuming the omitted material is merely incidental prose rather than substantive content (i.e. more links).

I will revert the edit and mention all this as a public comment. Let me know what you think of it then. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by NAS Ohio (talkcontribs) 21:29, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

I reversed your edits because of formatting issues, not content. Best, FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 22:04, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

I'm sorry to late in writing a reply

Hello, I'm Adikys666.Content that I have changed had two.The first is that Kuniaki Kobayashi is announcer.The second is that Kimihiko Ozaki is announcer.Kobayashi Kuniaki is caretaker of players dormitory and New Japan Dojo now.Kimihiko Ozaki is the ring announcer not the announcer.

Sources of information that Kobayashi is a caretaker of players dormitory and NJPW Dojo.→ttp://www.njpw.co.jp/news/detail.php?nid=10829(Please by adding the "h")

Sources of information that Ozaki is a ring announcer.→ttp://www.njpw.co.jp/match/card.php?e=990(Please by adding the "h") — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adikys666 (talkcontribs) 22:25, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

I'm not sure I follow, but if I understand correctly, if you have good quality sources for your changes, go ahead and make them. Thank you, FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 23:18, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

G13 Eligibility Notice

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 03:00, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:United Kingdom general election, 2015

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:United Kingdom general election, 2015. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Thanks

I used to love this website but now it's the absolute worst website ever. I just found out that you can't trust it cause the information might not be true, which is why I trust other websites, now, not this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Neonhorseranch (talkcontribs) 19:59, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Edit of First Fleet page

Thank you for your message.

My edit was not a mistake. I have implemented the concern of a number of editors and others regarding the implication that the introduction of smallpox to the Sydney region was a deliberate policy of the British Admiralty in sending the First Fleet to New South Wales. Despite the truth that smallpox was introduced, there is no evidence of a deliberate action.

What is more likely is that certain elements of Australian society have decided to introduce strident activism in their claims and this whole topic has slipped under the radar. There is NO academic evidence that it was a deliberate policy and this was discussed at some length on Wikipedia's talk page in 2013.

Due to the obvious discrepancy in the information, it is prudent to delete the entire entry related to deliberate smallpox introduction and suggest that it be moved to a separate page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Outback1964 (talkcontribs) 11:30, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Thanks again for your contribution. Do you have knowledge about the topic? If so, I suggest you contribute on the topic's page or the topic's talk page and debate the issues, rather than being a police officer on technicalities.Outback1964 (talk) 11:43, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

January 2016

  Greetings. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard, did not appear to be constructive. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. You aren't helping yourself or anyone else at DRN by stating that it is obvious what is new. It isn't obvious. Provide a civil and concise summary of what is new and so why moderated dispute resolution is in order. If you can't do that, your request for moderated dispute resolution will be closed. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:21, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

@Robert McClenon: I beg your pardon? FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 11:52, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

On PAREF Southridge School edit

(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PAREF_Southridge_School)

Hi. I am a part of this institution, and I had tried to edit the following page of our school. However as I am trying to improve the contents of our wiki page, it seems that my edits are being removed, and I do not know why.

On The Afternoon School history content PAREF Southridge has an Afternoon School Unit, which is our scholarship program. Should you want to verify, please check on our websites, http://www.southridge.edu.ph and/or http://afternoonschool.webs.com.

Please let me know how I can help you improve The Free Encyclopedia with facts that are updated and still not on the wiki page. Thank you.


Wisconsad (talk) 12:53, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Your edits were promotional and unreferenced. For information to be added to an article, it needs to be both relevant (of encyclopaedic value) and notable, per coverage in independent and reliable sources. It also, very importantly, needs to be written in a neutral tone and language. If none of this can be attained, it's best if you didn't edit the article, most of all because you have a conflict of interest. Best, FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 13:24, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

G13 Eligibility Notice

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 03:00, 31 January 2016 (UTC)