GodNey

don't remove template sandbox solar power is art pop and it's ambient bruh

March 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Lady Gaga, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. There's WP consensus to use 30em (default) for reflists. Could you clarify why you changed certain articles to be explicitly 25em instead? DMacks (talk) 10:15, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hi GodNey, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users—please check it out! If you have any questions, you can get help from experienced editors at the Teahouse. Happy editing! Kleinpecan (talk) 18:33, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Missing edit summaries

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision diffs
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! isento (talk) 16:22, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Please do not create speculative redirects

Hi. I see you created Mood Ring (Lorde song) as a redirect to Lorde discography, but there is no content at the article about a song called "Mood Ring". At this point, it is speculation. Please either insert a mention of the song using a reliable source, or the redirect can be nominated for deletion. You should not create redirects unless you intend to add a discussion of the song at the target article. I see you cited WP:CRYSTALBALL in an edit summary on another article—creating speculative redirects without official confirmation and no mention where you've pointed it to is certainly a violation of that too. Ss112 00:12, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Solar Power (song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Solar Power (song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solar Power (song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

--LivelyRatification (talk) 00:46, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

"Mood Ring (Lorde song)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Mood Ring (Lorde song). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 11#Mood Ring (Lorde song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Ss112 05:07, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Why have you recreated this redirect? It was deleted per a discussion that you chose not to participate in whatsoever. Do not recreate deleted redirects unless they are officially confirmed and sourced at the target article. This is considered disruptive and I'm sure repeated instances of doing this will get you reprimanded in some way. Stop creating speculative redirects not mentioned at the target. It's not a hard thing to follow. Ss112 06:56, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GodNey (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Caught by a colocation web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is 94.130.124.118. GodNey (talk) 15:26, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Confirmed proxy. Please disable your proxy and wait a full 24 hours for the block to clear. Yamla (talk) 15:49, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Lady Gaga

What was wrong with my sourcing of IMDB could you explain? IMDB Is a more valid source then some used on the page, so I am confused. Thank you. Magnumb22 (talk) 19:09, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

April 2022

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits a summary may be quite brief.

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Especially when editing featured articles, like Meghan Trainor. NØ 11:31, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Kindly

Please explain why users are finding conflict with you and why are you making things difficult?Pictureperfect2 (talk) 11:01, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Hey

Hey, just wanted to drop by and say that you're doing a great job out here. Cheers! :) Krimuk2.0 (talk) 08:01, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Your edit to Lewis Strauss

Hello there I reverted your recent edit because this article is about Lewis Strauss rather than an actor who played him in a movie. Awards this actor has won are best put in the article about the actor and the movie. Happy to discuss on the Talk page of the Strauss article. Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 00:51, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

salam

lotfan safhe karbari: Mojtaba2361 ro be halate ghabl bargardanid. zaheran aan karbar kharabkar be khatere hamin kar ha ghat dastrasi shode bud va baz edame dad (https://fa.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D9%88%DB%8C%DA%98%D9%87:%D8%B3%DB%8C%D8%A7%D9%87%D9%87%E2%80%8C%D9%87%D8%A7/block&page=%DA%A9%D8%A7%D8%B1%D8%A8%D8%B1%3AW7070) mamnun az shoma (in payam ro ham pak konid 188.253.95.199 (talk) 16:56, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

salam mojadad. pm bande dar common ro didid? baz ham kharbkari shode dar page man eslah konid. sepas — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.237.186.84 (talk) 15:24, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 19 November 2024 (UTC)