User talk:Gogo Dodo/Archive 12

Archive 5

←

Archive 10

Archive 11

Archive 12

Archive 13

Archive 14

Archive 15

Happy New Year!

A cat to ease all of your troubles		Happy New Year!
		Hey there, Gogo Dodo! Happy new Gregorian year. All the best for the new year, both towards you and your family and friends too. I know that I am the only person lonely enough to be running this thing as the new year is ushered in, but meh, what are you going to do. I like to keep my templated messages in a satisfactorily melancholy tone. ;) Congratulations to Coren, Wizardman, Vassyana, Carcharoth, Jayvdb, Casliber, Risker, Roger Davies, Cool Hand Luke and Rlevse, who were all appointed to the Arbitration Committee after the ArbCom elections. I am sure I am but a voice of many when I say I trust the aforementioned users to improve the committee, each in their own way, as listed within their respective election statements. Now, if you'll excuse me, I'm off to update the 2009 article, heh. Best wishes, neuro(talk) 00:49, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

Galib is wishing you a Happy New Year. This card promotes WikiLove and hopefully it has made your day much better. Best Wishes and Happy Editing!

Best To Reply At My Talk Page. Thanks.

Just Stopping by. Yours Truly, M.H.^{True Romance iS Dead} 15:16, 1 January 2009 (UTC) .

Pashtun soapboxer, again

My friend with the Pashtun hangup is at it again - [1] [2], and vandalized my userpage as well [3]. He's contesting his block at user:Moconner, and has been denied by two admins. In addition to his home DSL IPs, he's also used an Apple store in Houston and an airport wifi connection in Amsterdam. Given his persistence, do you think you could semi-protect his favorite targets - War in North-West Pakistan and War in Afghanistan (2001-present)? There have been a couple of others, but these articles get hit most often. I would ask at RFPP, but I'm pretty sure they won't due to the low level of activity. If you've got any other suggestions on how to deal with this, I'd love to hear. Thanks! // Chris ^{(complaints)•(contribs)} 21:23, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:03, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Reinstating Rees Associates, Inc.

Towards the end of last year, I tried to add our firms historical profile to Wikipedia. I have to admit, I was ill informed as I added several likes to our site causing you to flag me as blunt advertising. I have to clearly state that was not my intention. For that matter, could you please reinstate our title (Rees Associates, Inc.). I believe our firm has a rich history that could add value to the Wikipedia community. Your help will greatly be appreciated.

Thank you.

Webmaster Rees Associates, Inc. www.rees.com webmaster@rees.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.227.131.226 (talk) 15:16, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Gogo Dodo is on a break right now. The article in question, Rees Associates, Inc., was deleted for being blatant advertising. The article lacked any sources and was written like an advertisement. I imagine you are the user who created the page (User:Kristina.dover). If so, you can try to write a more neutral, sourced article in a user sub-page, such as User:Kristina.dover/sandbox that abides by our policies. If you choose do so, I will review it and see if it is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 21:14, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

External Links

Hi Gogo. Re. your edit at Currency bill tracking, I'm at a bit of a loss to see why you removed link re. a patented device to track currency and the obvious surveillance implications on the basis of WP.EL RashersTierney (talk) 19:17, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:23, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

re:

Hope it was a good Christmas for you. :) — neuro^(talk) 04:52, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

It is GOOD to see you.

Thanks for the welcome-back.  :) I was getting tired of blowing the whistle and not being able to do much more than that about a problem. Hope everything's OK on your end! As for me, I'm going to try and keep the promise I made to myself to do more editing and less patrolling. Thanks again! --PMDrive1061 (talk) 16:09, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Survivor: Tocantins

Maybe this needs to be protected. I've already spoken with a different admin but I think it should be pitched to you as well. This is becoming alot more prevalent on this page and I doubt if it will be slowing down anytime soon.--EmperorofPeopleEverywhere (talk) 06:16, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:24, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

The Wild Mercury Sound

Please can I request a copy of " The Wild Mercury Sound " page which was nominated for deletion. Regards Cotty21 (talk) 17:32, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:14, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Jamie Winchester

thank you for keeping wikipedia up-to-date. I am happy to add the required information listed in a7 for theJamie Winchester article, but how can i retrieve the page i made? The significance of the article and the person obviously is his fame in Hungary (as the link to the Hungarian page showed). -- Inmongolia (talk) 09:59, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:21, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Would the current version at User:Inmongolia/Jamie Winchester do? -- Inmongolia (talk) 07:03, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:14, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

User Tedhead2k violation of 3RR rule

Hi

User:Tedhead2k has repeatedly violated 3RR rule by reverting the contents of this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mcmaster&action=history even though he states it is subjective content, there is no discussion about it and no consensus reached. 144.214.156.104 (talk) 08:53, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

The phrase that is being removed is a peacock phrase and I agree with its removal. While the two of you should not have edit warred over the issue, Tedhead2k is correct that the phrase is subjective. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:17, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

attack page?

Why was that considered an attack page when explaining a burch amount? Lance —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nick485 (talk • contribs) 18:51, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:55, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

While I would agree it is somewhat slanderous it is all done in good fun. I would like to keep it up for a couple days if I could. I could have 30 police officers swear to its usage. Anyway I understand if your policies prohibit it. Thanks Lance Nickerson —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nick485 (talk • contribs) 19:30, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:21, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Sixteenth note

Thanks...I deleted the wrong freaking article...*facepalm*--Smashville^talk 23:39, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:42, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

71.246.98.35

Hi

Are you going to deal with all his edits ?--Chaosdruid (talk) 06:31, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:34, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Apologies - I meant the reporting him part - just didn't explain it in my previous post sry --Chaosdruid (talk) 06:36, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:38, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Thought it was vandalism - sry if it wasn't --Chaosdruid (talk) 06:39, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:42, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Cool - I leave it in your capable hands ! --Chaosdruid (talk) 06:43, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

If you read all of those edits you just undid, they were totally legit. You just undid info that makes navigation and retrieval of newsworthy and notable information easier. That’s colloquially know as cutting off your nose to spite your face. I was unjustly blocked for violating a rule I did not violate, that wikibully MastCell just didnt like the cited legit edits I made. --Fodient71.246.98.72 (talk) 07:08, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

If you just wait out your block or request an unblock, you wouldn't be having this problem. Using uncivil edit summaries is not going to get you unblocked. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 16:58, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Message from BBN Chuck

stop deleting my page —Preceding unsigned comment added by BBN Chuck (talk • contribs) 05:06, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:12, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

thats Bull i can find like 100 pages on here that advertise things such as

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avgn The Angry Video Game Nerd add

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coca-Cola coke add http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pepsi pepsi add

if thats not advertisement so don't tell me that advertising is allowed on Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by BBN Chuck (talk • contribs) 05:18, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:21, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Message from PlutoniumCarrot

I tried to create a new article for the word Nubcake, but I recieved a message that said I was vandalizing. I do not agree with that because this is an artice I submitted myself, and my addition of a reference was not vandalism. If I am improperly creating a new article, please tell me that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by PlutoniumCarrot (talk • contribs) 19:19, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:24, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

User:Oldpeoplegodumb42

This user just attacked you pretty badly. They don't seem to have any good faith edits at all. Blockworthy yet? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 01:00, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:37, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

I don't think you have to be a resident of Wackyland to smell this sock.Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 05:15, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:43, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

That IP

Thank you for dealing with that idiot. I've been trying to get his internet pulled from various ISPs now, as he's been vandalizing here for over two and a half years now. He always seems to find a new IP, but this is the first time he's actually used one twice.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 09:33, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:35, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Michael Gambon, again

Hello again Gogo Dodo. I wanted update you about the situation on this page that you helped with a few months ago. When the protection came off the IP's from Spain went back to their old ways of messing up the page. Then a short period of cooperation ensued where they seemed to acknowledge some of our edit summaries and then made some constructive changes. Now, unfortunately, they are back to linking incorrect items, putting lists in the wrong chrono order, putting in unsourced material, etc. If you feel that you could semi-protect the page again for a couple of months (or whatever you are comfortable with) it would be much appreciated. One other thing to be aware of, when the page is protected they have a tendency to put there preferred version on the talk page. Other editors and I revert this. I know that protecting talk pages is not the favorite way to go. However, if you can semi-protect it also they might finally get the message that their edits are not in the best interests of wikipedia. Any help that you can give will be appreciated and thanks for your time. MarnetteD | Talk 20:58, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:08, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

hearing links

I'm confused as to why you are removing my external links. Do you want me to instead upload and cross-reference information? It's a very much related foundation, and I would like people to be able to easily acces additional information from another source. Such as stories, or additional information where it is lacking. I'm linking in order to fill in gaps in wikiknowledge. More and more these days, College professors are suggesting the use of Wikipedia external links and references as the springboard for research and writing. Profcitrus (talk) 20:00, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:26, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

sorry, thought I was contributing

I guess it would not be advertising since I do not work for the company. I just know from past research that they are the oldest and largest in the industry, so I though it would be a good addition to the article. Thanks! Won't happen again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Webxsposure (talk • contribs) 21:49, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:59, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Stian Barsnes Simonsen

Could you please restore this article about this Norwegian TV-presenter? Several articles link to it. --Bensin (talk) 22:23, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:30, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Re your message: Then could you please restore it so I can build further on it? --Bensin (talk) 22:32, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:47, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Ok. Thank for your quick response. --Bensin (talk) 22:50, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Please, help

with this page http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Central_Asian_Shepherd_Dog&limit=250&action=history

USACASNATIONAL you blocked about a year ago is back to attempts to edit the same article under IP address user 74.78.175.98

I checked the IP, it is clearly a match. Thank you, --Afru (talk) 01:25, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:54, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Merit World

I know that this would be considered advertising, but I was wondering why it is okay for other companies to have Wikipedia articles? I looked up home depot and there are pictures and links and tons of information on who they are. Is there a certain way I have to go about getting the website recognition? Would it be okay to post an article without direct links to the website? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Webadvisor09 (talk • contribs) 01:33, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 02:35, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Emperor Penguin

Are you kidding? You just deleted the entire article without even a semblance of a debate or anything? Really not cool, that's how you drive away editors. Mbroderick271 (talk) 01:44, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 02:38, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

According to the fifth criteria, the group is notable. The group has released two or more albums on an independent label that has been around for many years with numerous acts that have substantial Wikipedia pages. Now, if you will reconstitute the page we can close the matter. Mbroderick271 (talk) 03:06, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Can you please block him, see my talk page history.--Iamawesome800 Talk to Me 03:32, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Replied on our talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:16, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Article deletions

You has deleted two articles that has been written by me, and as Subjet A7, for solve this problems, with references, we can remake the articles again? --AchedDamiman (talk) 17:49, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:35, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Perfect, but, can you put in User:AchedDamiman/Channii the deleted article Channii and in User:AchedDamiman/Dorothy_Valentine the info in Dorothy_Valentine then I can put the references in these pre-articles. Waiting your answer -AchedDamiman (talk) 16:17, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:17, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Perfect, I was added references to Afrobeta and Cuci Amador, I will add more references, also I will add references to the 2 previous articles. Thanks Gogo Dodo for help me in the edition of these articles (because arent my fields and is some difficult for me write articles about singers). -AchedDamiman (talk) 23:38, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Ok, but what do you think about Mandy Ventrice ? I cant see the notabillity guidlines in this article, I will work for put these guidlines in User:AchedDamiman/Afrobeta but exist one great number of singer´s or band articles without this guidlines, also if one artist isnt so famous is equal one artist, I will talk with other editors, admins, about this Politic or in the Meta, I am new in the music articles but I am not new in the Wikimedia Foundation, I said Thanks for your help but now I dont know if this is "help". --AchedDamiman (talk) 17:51, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:13, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

My good page

I made this page St Joseph's School, Mabiri.

Please don't let it get deleted.

Should it be marked as a stub.

If so could you please mark it.

Thanks

Your Wiki friend

De Mattia (talk) 05:40, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

PS Should I add an infobox on the page later on???

Thanks

De Mattia (talk) 05:48, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:47, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

The school

it was a little bit big but u deleted a lot of it

why???

De Mattia (talk) 04:30, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:11, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Another good one

I also made this page The Lithgow Plot.

De Mattia (talk) 03:35, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Please tell me any appropriate changes/additions that should be made.

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:51, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I love money 3

Speedy does apply when it is the same content and still a copyvio. Perhaps I should've used G12 instead. - Mgm|^(talk) 23:52, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:44, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Korean baseball players

Right now, with the exceptions of Bong Jung-Keun and Koo Dae-Sung, it seems all South Korean baseball players who have played in Major League Baseball have the family name last, as they are known by in the United States (complete list here). Could you move Bong Jung-Keun to Jung-Keun Bong and Koo Dae-Sung to Dae-Sung Koo or should the other articles be moved to the same as these two? Really I just want all the article names to be consistent. Jackal4 (talk) 16:15, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:41, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Dealing with people who consistently recreate speedied articles

Hi Gogo Dodo, first of all I'm impressed, many things I've CSDed or ARVed today has been handled by you. I have an informational question about dealing with people who recreate articles that have been speedied many times. I refer specifically to User:Biochemistrystudents's constant recreation of A7ed Penny gilmer and Penny Gilmer. Is that liable to ARV for a temporary block or perhaps a ban for Vandalism. On the one hand it was clear that it immediately failed WP:N and the user was at least four times recreating a CSD'd article, but on the other the user kept recreating it, perhaps wanting to apply a holdon tag. How should we deal with something like this? Is there a templated warning that exists for this? Thanks, Valley2city^‽ 01:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:49, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Nebula

Hello... sorry to disturb, but I was just curious as to what happened at Nebula. The page popped up on my watchlist as having reverts by you and Versus22, but both edits show as null and there is nothing in the "deleted" list. (I don't need to know what was reverted, but I'm just checking to see if something was oversighted or if there is a problem with the log.) Thanks in advance. --Ckatz^chat_spy 20:36, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:58, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the quick reply - I appreciate it. Cheers. --Ckatz^chat_spy 18:24, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Deleting links

I felt that the link I put in my article(s) was relevant. If you are god, and know better, then so be it.

Saucer McSauce ```` —Preceding unsigned comment added by Saucerman (talk • contribs) 05:47, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:10, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Deletion of the "Hans Linten" Page

Hallo,

You have just removed our freshly made page from wikipedia. I know that it's a less flattering biography of Hans Linten, but this page is made with his cooperation. All the words in the text are written by me and Mr. Linten himselve. Please, don't censor this! Because Mr. Linten is currently producing his autobiography, we want him back in the spotlights.

With kind regards,

Doris Jan Minters,--Dorisjanminters (talk) 21:04, 17 February 2009 (UTC) in name of Hans Linten —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dorisjanminters (talk • contribs) 17:26, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:58, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Nice to have you back.

No need to answer. Just saying hi.  :) --PMDrive1061 (talk) 19:06, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Martha Shaw

Hi,

I teach at Shorter College and did revise the material from the Shorter College website for Martha Shaw, not that anyone would mind if I lifted it exactly from the webpage, as it is advertising a faculty member. Do you see what I mean?

Could the Martha Shaw page be un-deleted? After it was deleted the first time, I did revise it; but, as I say, no one at Shorter would care if it were lifted precisely from the webpage.

Thank you.

Matterhorn3 (talk) 01:59, 20 February 2009 (UTC)Carmen Butcher

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:04, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Stub rating on Ilmington

Could you plase visit Ilmington and if nessacery remove the stub rating.

Thanks

De Mattia (talk) 08:06, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:21, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank-you for removing it. I know that I could have done it but I didn't know if it was still stub material. I suppose that it will get a rating now.

What are the ratings? Are they Low, Med, Good, Featured. And what is with the quality rating

Thanks again

De Mattia (talk) 08:25, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:32, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks 4 telling me but i dont know how to indent the whole thing

De Mattia (talk) 08:45, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:42, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Message from CheesyBroccoli

Sorry mate, I had put this in the wrong section "Why was my article deleted? I was in the process of creating a very honest and professional page about a specific type of fetish. Im not quite sure how to work all the functions, but I'm improving and I want to make that page an honest and real wikipedia page" - CheesyBroccoli

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:16, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

in addition

there are many pages of sex fetishes on here, so I dont see why this legitimate one gets deleted. It wasnt nonsense or spam, it was just incomplete, if you want to archive the page, and let me work on it later thats fine, but its just wrong that the entire thing got deleted. There are way worse pages on here that need tending too, and I just dont see why a real page that has a few bugs to get worked out of it gets the can because it seems silly at first glance.

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:34, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Noodle Box

Hello Gogo Dodo

I see that you have reverted our Noodle Box entry back to its original format

I am both the founderand director of The Noodle Box P/L and was forced to make the changes due to extreme slander and allegations of fraud

If you could look at the history of this page on 14th Feb at 06.41 to 15th Feb 00.11 several entries were made - and some thankfully were taken down

If you read the edits you will see that there are some serious allegations made

Is there anyway that we are able to find out who the user Noodlebox is

We are almost certain that the entry came from within our Franchise group

Please, when you have time could you let me know what steps I can take to investigate this matter further

You can contact me directly if you like

Thanking you in advance for your time

Warm regards

Josh James

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:31, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Rodenburg Collapse

Hi,

I am new to adding material to Wikipedia. I have been asked by my boss, the administrator of the Victoria Super Mario Circuit, to add some information on wikipedia in regards to our circuit. I am trying to upload my first page, but I keep getting a message that says it has been deleted.

Please Advise. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kartmaster (talk • contribs)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:13, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Tom Ford

how do you update wiki pages?

Also, I know for sure that Tom Ford: that New York Times website did not say that he begged her for a job everyday. it mentions nothing of that sort. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arrowoftruth (talk • contribs)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:52, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

vandalism 4 and more

Hi Dodo, you recently blocked 78.34.58.208 for vandalism (I don't know for how long). Perhaps you could consider making that a longer vacation, consider subsequent acts of vandalism--this, this, this, this, this, this, this, and this rather uncivil statement (oh, and this one). I think we are dealing with a slightly less than constructive editor. Thanks! Drmies (talk) 15:21, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:16, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

I see you clobbered a Mascot Guy sock...

Just when I thought he had quieted down, too. Any chance of running another checkuser on it and imposing a rangeblock for a couple of months again? We're entering our fifth year with this...person. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 15:26, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Andrew Picken

The editors you dealt with last August about the Andrew Picken/Andrew Douglas Picken page were single-purpose accounts who were really trying to replace it with an article about a non-notable Australian businessman. See User talk:SatuSuro#Andrew Picken undeleted, and a message I will write at the talk page of the Picken article at some stage, for more information on this. I've reverted the article back to the version about the literary figure. Graham87 02:43, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

:(

why do you keep deleting my pages about my best friends?? mean man —Preceding unsigned comment added by Solskater (talk • contribs) 18:43, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:50, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

AAAAAAAh Cmon

its fine its not like any1 is gonne look at it. i made it for school. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jackjack1010 (talk • contribs) 19:03, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Message from Wrist Instability

My information is correct.

I went to both Big Gay Out 2004 & 2005 in Finsbury Park, I'm Gay & live in London & got tickets from Virginmega stores, now Zavvi.Co.Uk

I am also a member of Faceparty.Com & prove facts & I've been onto Company House in The Uk & have all the Company House information on Faceparty.Com costing me £32.00p

I also have 270 photo's of The FP HQ Mushroom Party on: 20-12-2008 which lasted 2 days & included sleep overs http://reynolds1984.multiply.com/photos/album/17/THE_FACEPARTY_PARTY_ON_SATURDAY_20TH_OF_DECEMBER_2008_

All profits from 88500 text services costing £1.50p go back into FP Partie & Events.

• Official site
• Disco Junkie - Site
• - Pride London Parade and Big Gay Out - Guardian Site
• Photos Show The Faceparty.Com Logo, Proving Big Gay Out 204 & 2005 Was Set Up & Run By Faceparty.Com

• Photos Show The Faceparty.Com Logo, Proving Big Gay Out 204 & 2005 Was Set Up & Run By Faceparty.Com

• Photos Show The Faceparty.Com Logo, Proving Big Gay Out 204 & 2005 Was Set Up & Run By Faceparty.Com

• Photos Show The Faceparty.Com Logo, Proving Big Gay Out 204 & 2005 Was Set Up & Run By Faceparty.Com

• The annual Big Gay Out event is a festival sponsored and organised by Faceparty, “the biggest party on earth”. Big Gay Out and Faceparty support sexual freedom and equality and the festival will play host to 30,000 people —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wrist Instability (talk • contribs) 08:12, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:25, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Sorry are you a FP Member???...>>> NO YOU AREN'T.

So you can't state what's correct, Where I can & so many other FP Members.

Stop being a hater & control freak from America.

Wrist Instability (talk) 08:32, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:36, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Dried fruit

Hey Gogo (if I may; if not, Dr. Dodo?), thanks for reverting this act of spamming. The user is a repeat offender, by now; care to apply a more serious warning? Thanks, Drmies (talk) 19:10, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:44, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, Professor Dodo! Drmies (talk) 01:43, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Italy-Malta relations

May I ask you the reason for your revert? I was undoing an undiscussed, and non-supported merge - not deleting content, which you'll see was returned to Pro-Italian Maltese. If you did not realise this, I would be very grateful if you could revert again. If of interest, the request for page protection I filed is here. Cheers Geocourrier (talk) 18:16, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

I agree with Geocourrier. BTW I am not Geocourrier, as you can verify if you wish by CU. All this mess has been created by the "hate toward everything italian" of PiccoloModificatoreLaborioso, who now uses even a french name probably because of that rejection. --Right2 (talk) 15:55, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

drookie98

I have been informed that Random.Person219 is drookie98. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mclarenaustralia (talk • contribs)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:17, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

If you look on his userpage it has drookie98 in the Aliases section. Mclarenaustralia (talk) 07:24, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:28, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

I didn't know until he filled it in. Mclarenaustralia (talk) 07:32, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:37, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

I said I was informed that it was him, I didn't said if I thought it was true or not. Mclarenaustralia (talk) 07:47, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Re: Mike's Day Off

Lucky you finally did. It's been about ten months since I've seen the episode, so my memory of it is somewhat fuzzy now. The only dilemma was why only this year and not the year it was produced. Because it seemed to me that it followed the rerun of the 200-jobs lookback episode. Also, did you see the episode in 4:3? All I know is that the show switched to 16:9 after the 100 Jobs Special. - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 08:30, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:13, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Why have you reverted my edit on Mike's Day off? Its not aired yet. Can not find proof of that anywhere!? Kalistorm (talk) 01:26, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:30, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Where did it air? Link? Kalistorm (talk) 01:33, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:42, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

James Teej

Hi, I am not sure as to why the James Teej article is seen as advertising or whatever else is has been deleted for. Pls adivse me as to how I should change this. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ecraigon (talk • contribs) 05:19, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:23, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Message from Julianathomas

Thanks for your help and advise.

Julianathomas (talk) 05:58, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

deleting article

new to wikipedia confused to why our article/page on our band keeps getting deleted maybe you can help we looked at other band sites and added what we thought was enough to start our article Apparently we are doing something wrong. Appreciate the help

(67.117.172.234 (talk) 20:03, 5 March 2009 (UTC))Carbon 9

The article was deleted because it was blatant copyright infringement. The article also does not establish why the band is notable enough for inclusion on Wikipedia per the notability guideline. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:54, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

OnMobile

Re. declined speedy for OnMobile

A related, very similar speedy was agreed; I don't see this company is notable, and specifically I don't see how this article can be cleaned up to make a valid entry without starting from scratch.

As you decided to decline the speedy, will you be checking all the links to see what portions of the facts they support, or will you be listing the article for AfD?

From a quick glance, I see that there is a long list of awards, which is not supported by a reference; the article, therefore, acts as an advertizement for the company concerned; the mere fact it appears on wikipedia serves to promote the organisation.

Do you believe that the article will be edited to create useful content? Or will nobody bother, and it will sit here promoting the company, thus abusing the principles of wikipedia?

I realise that, technically, it might be possible to find sufficient notability in some obscure financial news item, but I fail to see the value in keeping the article. I would ask you to consider WP:COMMONSENSE, ie what value will this article add to wikipedia.

I hope this doesn't sound too accusatory; that's not my intention. I hate spam, I hate spammers, and I'm fed up of spending hours checking obscure reference links, flagging articles as unreferenced, removing spam links, etc etc, just for an anonymous IP to pop in and reinstate them or put yet another odd reference in, which takes time to follow, and often there is a WP:SRS at the end of it.

Thanks for your time reading this - again, apologies for a bit of a rant,

--  Chzz  ►  09:46, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:25, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Please feel free to put back any parts that you feel are referenced with a suitable reliable source.

Thanks, --  Chzz  ►  19:49, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

On the above article, you have just reinstated the following fact;

"60-70% p.a revenue growth"

Please could you tell me where the reference is for this information,

Thank you. --  Chzz  ►  19:55, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:03, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

I'm sorry that you felt my edit summary was inadequate; I genuinely believed that the information I removed was the non-referenced portions of the article. My question above was a genuine one, and I think it's clear that there are no supporting references for either that specific information, or almost all of the other assertions in the article. Following your reversion, I have removed some specific segments of the article, in separate edits, with full comments in the edit summary and further information in the article talk page. If you do have any further objections or suggestions regarding the edits, I would appreciate it if you could discuss them in the talk page, especially prior to any further reverting. Regards, --  Chzz  ►  21:16, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:03, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for helping me out!

KSWarrior8 (talk) 18:02, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Thank you

re the reverting of vandalism on my userpage. LessHeard vanU (talk) 21:12, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

No problem. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:15, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for protecting the hoax article Ashlie Michelle Cebak from recreation

I was taken in by it and spent 2 hours giving it a copy-edit... THEN realized the thing was probably fake... THEN got verbally abused by the creating editor.

I'll be a bit more leery before investing time in young articles. :)

Thanks for doing the admin thing, too. :) Have a great weekend! :)sinneed (talk) 22:46, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 02:53, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

WQA notification

You may want to check out WP:WQA in regards to the comments made by your new friend WLaccount (talk · contribs). However, I probably should have went straight to ANI on this right away, as this is starting to spiral. MuZemike 08:42, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Disregard all that. I'm going right to ANI. MuZemike 08:47, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:55, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Message from 121.96.122.156

i think this is still important, even with the season having no mutinies as of yet. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.96.122.156 (talk) 08:50, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Perhaps, but I think the method you used only with the wording is a bit klunky. I recommend bringing it up on the article Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:53, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

excuse me?

have you been in ohlkahoma? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aidyman7 (talk • contribs) 15:58, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

i forgot to sign on the subject "Excuse Me?". i will sign NOW. Aidyman7 (talk) 16:00, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 16:03, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

whoops

sorry ... missed that part. Good catch. — Ched ~ ^(yes?) 05:26, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:32, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

I'll get there ;) .. was the 4im warning to User talk:ScHoOlThAtFoOl for the 2 edits they did to White supremacy a proper use of that warning? — Ched ~ ^(yes?) 05:35, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:40, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

CloseXFD.js

Hi there. I feel a bit bad for bothering you again but I thought you might allow me to. I'd like two improvements to the CloseXFD script you have written. First of all, it would be nice if the "close" link would appear on log-subpages as well for those XFDs that use them, for example on Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 March 4 or Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2009 March 3. That would make using it much easier. As for the other improvement idea, a bit complicated I guess, it would be great if (if one chose "delete") the script could open new windows/tabs with the deletion page and the reason prefilled (e.g. [[Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2009 March 3#Template:The Mysterious Cities]]) for each page linked by templates like {{tfdlinks}} in that section. It would be great if you could consider this. Regards SoWhy 09:57, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Adding the close link to the FfD and TfD sub-pages should be easy enough since I would expect them to be like the AfD sub-pages. I'll look into it. As for the second request, I'll have to think about it. The problem isn't opening the tabs and inserting the right deletion reason. The problem is parsing the deletion discussion to figure out which articles/files whose tabs I need to open. With the section being a potential mess of anything and everything added to it, I'm a bit worried about parsing the wrong thing. That's why I'm also very leery about automatically deleting anything. One false parse and a very wrong deletion can occur. =\ One other thing I want to do is restore a Close link into the individual AfD sub-pages. I wanted the Close link on the AfD sub-page the other day when I followed the AfD link on the article to close the AfD as speedy delete, but then had to go search around the daily sub-page to find the Close link. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:42, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

FFD and TFD don't behave like AFD, there is not a page for every nom but for every date with the nominations as sections. But it's like the layout on the main page, so it should be easy to do. As for the second thing, my request was not to auto-delete those things but to open a window with the deletion reason prefilled because it's quite annoying to have to manually create that section link. The deletion itself should still be manually. As for the links to parse, at least at TFD there is {{tfdlinks}} that should be only used to list the nominated template. Regards SoWhy 11:34, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Nvm the latter thing, I forgot that {{tfdlinks}} has a special delete link for that ;-) SoWhy 11:57, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Adding the close link to the FfD and TfD date sub-pages shouldn't be a problem. Everything is clean to parse, so it shouldn't be a problem. As for the second request, I understand what you are asking, it's how to get there without making a mistake that is the problem. Opening the tab and filling the form out is easy, it's figuring out to open with the tab that is the problem. I'm having some difficulty explaining what the problem is, but I'm trying to work out the programming issue in my head. I'll see what I can do. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:37, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

reply

I got your reply.

Thanks for the info that your friend is on wikibreak. I have requested a deletion review. Geo Swan (talk) 09:25, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:16, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. I appreciate the restoration. In his article Pountain said:

"I was permitted an appeal, but it was disposed of in about two minutes and then the piece was gone."

I thought maybe User:Tiggerjay might have left a reply on the talk page, but there is no sign of that. Geo Swan (talk) 08:27, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Message from Boba Jango

Those grey rectangles annoy any casual reader, they aren't necessary. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Boba Jango (talk • contribs) 01:08, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Globally

Hey there, I saw your spammer warning note on Globally's talk page from 5 March. I removed some more Globally links from the San Clemente, Mission Viejo, and Laguna Niguel articles a few minutes ago. Since you left the final warning on their page a couple weeks ago, this is just a heads up if you need to / want to follow up on it. Townlake (talk) 15:04, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:42, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Saw the reply; thanks. Heads up - new account, similar name, same purpose. Townlake (talk) 15:39, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:52, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Vandalism on "John Adler"

I just wanted to say thanks for stepping in and reverting Larueness's edits. Larueness and a number of other new users have no edits other than this persistent vandalism to the John Adler article (I suspect sockpuppetry). In any case, it is very frustrating that they keep re-adding this "teabag incident" under the Controversies section, as it is completely unreported by reliable sources, unconfirmed, and possibly a hoax. My request for temporary semi-protection of the article was denied. Since you are an administrator, I was hoping you could block the offending users. (I'm unfamiliar with the procedure for that, as I've never had to deal with such a problem during my time on Wikipedia -- until now, that is.) Thanks. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 14:56, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:51, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Nick Adams

Hey why do u keep deleting my page about Nick Adams? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Xtremenick (talk • contribs) 17:46, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:49, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Message from EnigmaKH

You must be a robot. —Preceding unsigned comment added by EnigmaKH (talk • contribs) 17:57, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

delete wittygraphy

Hi you just deleted my article. I saw many other smaller social networks w/ a similar page thus I am wondering what is the qualifying critetria, thank you Heidi —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wittygraphy (talk • contribs) 04:44, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:48, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Why Did You Delete the Hero Cruz?

Please explain as the SOA and many in SF plus the FBI would like to have this page.

Jon —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.157.35.2 (talk) 05:09, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

The article was deleted because it does not establish the notability of the person. Additionally, the article had issues related to biographies of living persons. Any criminal activity should reported to the local authorities, not posted on Wikipedia. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:42, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Hi, Gogo Dodo. Thanks so much for your concern and care wrt this entry. Please help me understand what we need to do to get this entry back up. I'm new to the structure of wikipedia and definitely need help/guidance ... cognitonium (talk) 15:11, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:38, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

OK, I have permission to show you some private documents. We prefer to fax them to you. cognitonium (talk) 22:11, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:59, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

We also have several newspaper articles. One of them is Military Media, hard copy only. cognitonium (talk) 15:49, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:58, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

We also have video footage of 3 interviews on Univision, and 1 on Telemundo. Looks like I would use the Press Release template for those -- cognitonium (talk) 06:15, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:17, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Hi, Mr. Gogo Dodo.

I concur with your deletion of the Cruz page. He is a fraud, and any legitimate special operations solder can tell simply by looking at his absurd photographs, which we have downloaded and safeguarded.

Mr. Cruz has been referred to the POW Network, where his name and photograph have already been enshrined on one of their Walls of Shame. We will be referring him to the Assistant Attorney's Office, and to the Inspector General of the Veteran's Association. Mr. Cruz is in violation of multiple Stolen Valor statutes, and it is quite possible that he is drawing VA benefits under fraudulent circumstances.

For those who wish to see the original page in its pristine form, all that they need to do is search on Google and view a cached page.

Estéban (talk) 15:43, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

you are wrong

i will make 9 clicc again why because i am putting it up u have no right 2 put it down i dont care what yo own on the site delete everone else's pages then because as long as theres a computer in america 9 clicc will be posted —Preceding unsigned comment added by J648 (talk • contribs) 22:30, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Ford Europe

Several users including yourself are intent on reverting my edit and accusing me of vandalism and disruption. That article is in a terrible state. But if you want to leave the article full of unreferenced nonsense then fine, I won't bother making any improvements to it. Fordline (talk) 19:25, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Deleting content is no improvement. If you want to question certain statements you can add {{fact}}-tags to the article. Also, you can discuss serious issues on the article's talkpage. --Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 19:31, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for indefinitely blocking that person who repeatedly vandalized "The Brady Bunch"

Thanks for indefinitely blocking that person who repeatedly vandalized The Brady Bunch. Is nothing sacred? :)

That is a comforting show in a scary world. Imagine if some young people had read that stuff.

Good job. LA Movie Buff (talk) 22:51, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:55, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

My post

why delete my article, i spent 3 hours on it my dads gonna go mad —Preceding unsigned comment added by M 1132 (talk • contribs) 22:56, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:01, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Message from Xtremeskater007

I'm sorry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Xtremeskater007 (talk • contribs) 23:17, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Perplexed by your Non helpful deletions

I have been trying to add some interesting and factual information to my son-in-laws living bio page. (Senator Beau McCoy). Rayc helped me by getting a photo I had taken during the innauguration onto the page. Needless to say I don't know much about this cyber experience. I put in some facts about Beau that my own memory can attest to; and yet I found these things online. The first time you deleted I figured it was because there was no proven reference cited. I did not know how to do this, but I found the "Link" symbol and knew what that was, so I put the pieces back in and then put in links to where they were found online (news stations, newspapers, online groups, and the senators own webpage). Yet you deleted them all again. SO are you totally offended by Beau's political stands and beliefs? Are you doing this for personal reasons? It would seem if I simply have made a mistake in citing references you could send me an e mail or 'talk' and tell me what to do...of just do it by editing the links to what they should be? I'm trying my best...for a grandmother who doesn't do much but read e mail online, I thought I had done pretty well. Anglswings6510

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:33, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Deletion "Asian Medical Students' Association"

Hi there, I am Peter, the current Secretary of Promotion and Publication (an Executive Committee) of Asian Medical Students' Association-www.amsainternational.org I've posted articles about AMSA International but was deleted because of on 05:28, 16 September 2008 by you, because of (G12: Blatant copyright infringement). I need to clarify that AMSA International is a student-led, non-profit, non-political organisation. We're just like other international students organisation, and have been linked by several article (e.g, International Federation of Medical Students Association). And since I'm an official of AMSA, I have the right to copy sentences from our website.

Could you please restore it, made an article of it, or explain what should I do?

Thanks heaps, ‎ Peter Wijaya (talk) 18:24, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:40, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

can u not delete my article erosion of privacy

first of all cause its not finished

second of all its for an ITM school assignment. which we have to make it look like a wiki artcile n i found it easier to create on then print screen n make one in dreamweaver

thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Geeorgia (talk • contribs) 00:46, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:48, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Republic D-T

Hi, I was creating a page with the name of Republic D-T I want to keep it in Wikipedia Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Runetri250 (talk • contribs) 00:59, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:02, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

HEEEEEY!!

quit doing that! everyone likes pepsi! it should be heard! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Inthe614 (talk • contribs) 07:11, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

'god' are you?

Well Mr. 'god'..is it? Neutral? Politics is not neutral and neither are we. We have beliefs and passions, emotions, ideals etc. I was a Democrat for a while, then an Independent. I changed to the Republican party after meeting Senator McCoy in real life, following him for over a year on TV, in newspapers, and hearing speeches. I don't read campaign fliers so YOUR prejudice is showing. By totally obliterating all of my posts, you showed your own biased viewpoint. I also have met US Senator Johanns, Governor Heineman, Shane Osborne, and Chuck Hagel to name a few. I have nothing positive to say about Hagel so I won't post anything to be polite and unoffensive. The others I am not moved by enough to post anything. But Senator McCoy is special and I wanted to let others know a bit about him. I used sources but they weren't good enough for you. Even McCoy's own words about what motivated him to get into politics and how he encourages children to follow their dreams and work hard...were not worthy enough for you to allow to be put on Wikipedia. Again...your prejudices continue to show. I find you and your 'editing' offensive. You don't try to teach, you don't talk with the person whose posting you disagree with, you are no help at all. You are egotistical too. I am thankful there are others on Wikipedia who are willing to help newcomers, teach them, and aren't so completely mean spirited. I hope you are very proud of yourself and get off on your 'power' to delete other's thoughts and words and opinions. Anglswings6510 (talk) 18:05, 22 March 2009 (UTC)Anglswings6510Anglswings6510 (talk) 18:05, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

hi

hi Aidyman7 (talk) 20:01, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Laura Wins Game

How exactly did this article fit under G1, if I may ask? FingersOnRoids♫ 22:55, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:59, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

If I may humbly request, please try to be a little more strict on CSD's. I already had a prod on there, because I knew it didn't fit G1, because it was clear what it was about, a nonnotable madeup game. Nothing's more bitey than a speedy delete on a good faith, albeit silly, article. FingersOnRoids♫ 23:03, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:05, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

That'd be a good solution. I want the author to know that it's community consensus that the article should not exist, and that we have a process in deciding what deserves inclusion, and that bending the rules is not the way we do things around here. Thank you, FingersOnRoids♫ 23:07, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:09, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

The Auld Triangle

The Auld Triangle is an actual (rather large) musical triangle. No images available, probably because it is inside a prison. However, the pub "The Auld Triangle" does used an actual triangle rather than a gallows as its symbol:

http://www.auld-triangle.de/auld_triangle_logo.gif

The gallows in Mountjoy does not look like this:

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3067/2961807596_ed0d007ffa.jpg?v=0

But more like this:

http://www.yorktownsquare.com/img/20070804__0959648400_001__189077~2_Gallery.jpeg

except larger, cleaner, the floor goes all the way round the trap door, and has no windows in the walls.

Bunreachtnaheireann (talk) 14:03, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:48, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

My apology's

I am using an anti vandal spell checker my intentions were good. I will be more careful next time. I appreciate your comments and will take notice to future possible mistakes. Best, otisjimmy (talk) 20:53, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:56, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Jessica A

I noticed this article was recreated 3 times in the past 30-40 minutes. Might this need a bit of salt if it's recreated again? Wildthing61476 (talk) 21:01, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:06, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

someone else re-blocked me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Didn't you unblock me? Because someone else blocked me. It was SO annoying. I was about to make a page on psychotic polar bears( which deleted for lack of info, even though I put that if anyone had more information to add it). It seems as if it was the user Hersfold who blocked me because he thought that I was the same person who caused the block, but didn't I create my file alot earlier. Also, do you know how to put a picture on an article. That might have saved my article on psychotic bears! Unfortunately I forget to tell them that I was still editing it. If you have anything to say, please post it on my talk page. --Iamfurry (talk) 02:44, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:55, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Bio Info

Bio info is left in the band and song section, making your restrictions selective to my entries. All information published is verifiable from the school, county and the band. Censorship is un-american. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomassi00 (talk • contribs) 01:26, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:30, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

No...

That's the facts, it's not defamatory and documentation has been supplied to back up the statement. So... you stop, and as a matter of fact, I think you know where you can stick your silliness. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomassi00 (talk • contribs) 01:43, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Your edit to the "Vasily Grigoryevich Zaitsev" article

Hey, I recently added some information to the afore mentioned article and you removed it. I agree with your decision to revert it to back the way it was, I got the information from a Russian site that was translated and some of it was translated incorrectly. However, I readded this information with a better interpretation of the information. Thank you for keeping the information in this article correct.

Terminus14 (talk) 02:42, 27 March 2009 (UTC)Terminus14

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:14, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

New contributor

Hello. Thanks for sending me the links and updating me on the policies. It was certainly not my intent to publicize a specific website, though I was added links to several articles that went to the same external website. This was only because I found some good entertainment related articles on those sites. I will, however, slow down some and spread the wealth more. I plan to contribute a lot more, specifically to television and entertainment related pages, because that's where my interest lies. I'm also anxious to learn how to use mediawiki so that I may start my own wiki at some point.

Again, thanks for letting me know why I was flagged and accept my apology for any links I posted that might have not been appropriate.

AstroJones (talk) 22:14, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:19, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

External Links

I just wanted to gain some clarification. I understand that External Links are not intended to encompass the many mentions of an article across the web, but in the case of articles about Television series, is it appropriate to link to a review of the series that I find adds more to the concept of the show? AstroJones (talk) 22:20, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:25, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Reply from ZooFari

Reply: No problem :) Cheers, ZooFari 23:16, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Christopher Conger

Hello Godo Dodo,

My name is Christopher Conger, I had Conger-site as my page, I have just returned from Europe and found that my page was gone! I have no idea whatsoever in what to do about this, and am asking for your help in this matter, please. God, it's so strange to find other people messing with your work, and your page. It makes me sick! I don't know what to do in tryng to re-locate my page. Please help me! If I did any wrong doings whats-so-ever, let me know... Please help me... Thanks a lot, Christopher D. Conger of Conger-site —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.198.234.254 (talk) 11:29, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

The article was moved to Conger Family of America by another editor and has been proposed for deletion because of a lack of notability. The lack of notability is because the book and your family does not meet the notability guidelines for books and for groups, respectively. I also see that your original account was blocked. I would recommend that you review the conflict of interest guideline. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:27, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Tee Hee

Fun to be back. :) I've actually never really quite left. Wikipedia has always long been in my browser toolbar. Only real time I wasn't on here for weeks on end was when my old laptop crashed and I had to wait until getting a new one. Then went around making gnomish edits to Random Articles . . . then I came across a page that used to be a redirect but was now a non-notable promotional article. Which demanded an AFD, so I kind of got pulled back in. :) -WarthogDemon 06:07, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Why not just add to it or edit it?

Hi. I’m just wondering why it was deleted instead of edited or added on. Why does it have to disappear?! Why do the other home developers get to stay but not the ones I added?! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Punkymonkey987 (talk • contribs) 18:04, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:08, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome

I'm new at RC page and still feel a bit tentative about reverting edits to users' talk pages. Still, I took a chance on the edit to yours. Glad you're ok with it. I'm always looking for guidance, so if you ever see me headed for trouble please speak up. See ya 'round. Tiderolls 18:42, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:52, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Vandalism warnings

I see your point and agree wholeheartedly. I like to see if they'll get bored after that first attempt...usually it leads to a warning anyway. I'm warning more, though, just to keep up with those that are making multiple edits. When I see a 3 or a 4 I know it's someone that knows the score. Thanks for your advice. Tiderolls 19:03, 31 March 2009 (UTC)