Welcome!

edit

Hello, Gowthamaprabu, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Sun Pictures did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome.  Ravensfire (talk) 15:48, 11 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Minor edits

edit

Please see WP:MINOR for when to tag your edits as minor. Cheers! Jeraxmoira (talk) 20:24, 19 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

October 2023

edit

  Hi Gowthamaprabu! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at List of Tamil films of 2023 that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Jeraxmoira (talk) 07:52, 20 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Unreliable source

edit

Sacnilk.com is considered an unreliable source, per WP:ICTFSOURCES. So other sources using Sacnilk box office are also unreliable, as per WP:FRUIT. Thanks. NaanReady (talk) 03:19, 23 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

S. U. Arun Kumar

edit

Hi Gowthamaprabu, per WP:FILMOGRAPHY: Do not add future projects until filming has begun as verified by a reliable source. Jeraxmoira (talk) 15:32, 28 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

List of Indian films of 2023

edit
Please kindly refrain from disruptive editing by reverting edits with consistent BO figures from reliable sources. Thanks Audit Guy (talk) 06:58, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

January 2024

edit

  Hello, I'm Archer1234. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, George Maryan, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  — Archer (t·c) 07:30, 9 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Hi Gowthamaprabu! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Thavamai Thavamirundhu that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you.  — Archer (t·c) 07:31, 9 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm CNMall41. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Joe (2023 film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. CNMall41 (talk) 08:10, 17 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Joe (2023 film), you may be blocked from editing. This addition after you were already reverted is puzzling. Where did you get the information for Think Music or the track lengths when it only mentions the name of the five songs? CNMall41 (talk) 20:46, 17 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Shamna Kasim.  — Archer1234 (t·c) 18:24, 28 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Singapore Saloon (January 19)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robertsky was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
– robertsky (talk) 00:17, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Gowthamaprabu! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! – robertsky (talk) 00:17, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Naam Iruvar Namakku Iruvar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cook. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:48, 30 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks

edit

Good work in adding cast information. DareshMohan (talk) 23:20, 8 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on List of Tamil films of 2024

edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of Tamil films of 2024, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:32, 16 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

February 2024

edit

  Hi Gowthamaprabu! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Sathish that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you.  — Archer1234 (t·c) 18:13, 25 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Sathish.  — Archer1234 (t·c) 18:14, 25 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Ghilli, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Please see WP:NOINDICSCRIPT. CodeTalker (talk) 04:53, 26 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Tamil films of 2025 (April 22)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CanonNi was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
'''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 13:37, 22 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Lesa Lesa

edit

When is the name Colonel Rajasekhar mentioned? I had seen the film so I was just curious. DareshMohan (talk) 18:24, 18 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Just before the intermission, where Radharavi leaves the hospital after visiting Shaam, a person begins a conversation with Radharavi were he himself introduces as Colonel Rajasekar. Gowthamaprabu (talk) 02:06, 19 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Tamil films of 2025 (July 23)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CFA was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
C F A 💬 00:08, 23 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hats off!

edit

Just saw your recent plot and cast edits to Thangalaan, Mazhai Pidikkatha Manithan and Demonte Colony 2. They speak of quality. It must be hard to remember an entire movie's plot -- not sure how you do it but great work. DareshMohan (talk) 07:02, 17 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your kind words and appreciation. I'd like to know, is it that too early to add the plotline within a couple of days of release? Gowthamaprabu (talk) 12:02, 17 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Also, a kind request to look into Pechi, Jama, Boat pages as well, as i felt difficulty to trim them to the specified limit. I snap the important scenes to remember the continuity and some crucial details. Thank you Gowthamaprabu (talk) 12:13, 17 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
never too early to add plot upon release. I am trying to take Wikipedia:Wikibreak to be more productive 🤣. Technically my edits too are original research (against Wiki policy) such as adding unsourced character names. I would also like to take photos of end credits, etc. but that is just odd to do and is also original research. I wish I could edit like Kailash and do sourced edits only. DareshMohan (talk) 21:57, 18 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
wish you success in all your future endeavours 😝. as you mentioned, everyone know its obvious and a fact but proofs and references are 🥵 Gowthamaprabu (talk) 17:56, 23 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Sharanya Turadi Sundarraj

edit

Curious why you created this page under that title when there was previously one under Sharanya Turadi. CNMall41 (talk) 01:47, 20 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

created a new page Sharanya Turadi Sundarraj with an entirely different content from the that of Sharanya Turadi which has been deleted and hence didnt contact the user who deleted Sharanya Turadi, furthur it directly translated from Sharanya Turadi Sundarraj which has been updated to relevance. Thank you Gowthamaprabu (talk) 18:10, 23 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Tamil films of 2025 (August 25)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sohom Datta was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Sohom (talk) 02:58, 25 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Deletion of reputable sources

edit

Gowthamaprabu, do not delete reputable references from the article. Thank you.

Please stop. If you continue to delete content and indulge in edit warring as you did at Thangalaan, you may be blocked from editing. Tamilcontent1 (talk) 12:05, 30 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

I must clarify that the citations I removed from the Thangalaan article, such as MSN and Zoomtv, did not meet Wikipedia:Reliable sources criteria. My intention was to update the worldwide gross box office value to ₹100 crores, as officially announced by the film producer Studio Green on X, rather than the inaccurate range of ₹70-100 crores cited by User:Tamilcontent1 with an outdated source (Dated: 28.08.2024) from Pinkvilla. I expect your edits to have accuracy and adherence to Wikipedia's standards in future edits. Thank you. Gowthamaprabu (talk) 13:33, 30 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kozhipannai Chelladurai (September 6)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 12:23, 6 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Okay..:) Gowthamaprabu (talk) 15:28, 7 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

September 2024

edit

  Hello, I'm CNMall41. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Mahanadhi (TV series), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Two different pages this was done on. I am wondering if a citation is needed, where did the content come from? I would think the information came from a particular source. Can you advise? CNMall41 (talk) 22:10, 8 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have added the content in three different pages regarding the 9th Annual Vijay Television Awards which was already telecasted in the National television Star Vijay and also uploaded on the official YouTube channel of the same.
I'm looking for a proper reference to be cited and hence I request you to not remove the contents which I have added. As an immediate response I will be able to add the YouTube video link of the award ceremony. Gowthamaprabu (talk) 02:03, 9 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
So basically you are adding original research and then looking for a reference to support. Wikipedia works the opposite. We look at sources and then implement what they say. It would not be appropriate to continue adding in the manner in which you are. --CNMall41 (talk) 02:17, 9 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
To be more clear, YouTube is what you are using to create the original research and is not a reliable source. Please do not keep adding this. --CNMall41 (talk) 02:50, 9 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Okay. Dont remove them until a suitable reliable source is added Gowthamaprabu (talk) 03:06, 9 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
No. Do not add them until a suitable source is added. Not sure how to be much clearer. If you have an issue with Wikipedia guidelines, you can always start a discussion on the talk pages per WP:ONUS. --CNMall41 (talk) 03:11, 9 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Siragadikka Aasai (TV series). FINAL WARNING ON THIS. CNMall41 (talk) 03:12, 9 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

So, how is it possible to add the video link as a reliable source? Gowthamaprabu (talk) 03:15, 9 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
You can't. This seems to be a WP:CIR issue at this point. There isn't more I can do to help here. Do not add it back without a RELIABLE secondary source. --CNMall41 (talk) 03:55, 9 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
All good. 👍👍 Gowthamaprabu (talk) 04:49, 9 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
It does concern me that the same information is now being added by an ip. Are you by chance editing while not logged in?--CNMall41 (talk) 17:57, 9 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
No. I'm in search for a source which is unavailable at this point. Please proceed blocking the ip 2409:408D:3C1D:1FFE:0:0:D4CB:8E04 which has done what i did earlier. Gowthamaprabu (talk) 18:31, 9 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
And there is quite a lot of difference between what I was trying to add and the one which was added through the ip address Gowthamaprabu (talk) 18:35, 9 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
There is not "quote a lot" of difference but it is what it is. I have replied to your question on my talk page as well. --CNMall41 (talk) 03:21, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Done. Received your reply Gowthamaprabu (talk) 03:35, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ponni (TV series). This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. You have been warned numerous times in the edit summaries, on your talk page, and my talk page. If you wish to introduce WP:FANCRUFT, you will need to start a discussion on the talk page per WP:ONUS. There are previous discussions where there was consensus to not add these. Do as you will but I won't have any additional discussions here, only reporting should you choose not to use ONUS. CNMall41 (talk) 05:47, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Maybe you are technically superior and a veteran, but you being concerned about this only page Ponni and I have also added character descriptions for some of the Television serials, which all remain till now.
I repeatedly asked you to not add any of such character descriptions but only to add the their relationships, which is common in almost all the television serial pages. But, you are concerned about my edits only in this page.
You term in edit war and i exactly dont know the reason for repeated deletion of only my edits when similar contents do exist in the similar pages. And the way you are being rude towards beginners like me is also highly frustrating and please proceed in blocking if you feel so. Since you have been a long part here, its easy to suppress the so called good faiths. Thanks Gowthamaprabu (talk) 05:55, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
I think you are only understanding what you want to and playing the victim. These concerns were discussed on my talk page after you left a notice. Again, see WP:OSE and feel free to clean up those other pages should you choose. --CNMall41 (talk) 05:57, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Even if someone else has added the same content, since it is an original content, the way you comment saying "It is funny!" and question me for which I'm completely not responsible?
I cited the similarity of contents in similar such pages, but you tried hard to immediately revert only mu edits but other pages with the same content still remain. My simple and humble question is, if it is available in other pages, why only my edits are being reverted is completely not understandable? Gowthamaprabu (talk) 05:58, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
The answer to your question is even more "simple and humble" than the question. See WP:OSE (third or fourth time I mentioned this). To make it clear, issues may exist on other pages but just because they do does not mean we are allowed to do the same to other pages. And, cleaning up one page does not require the cleanup of all pages. So again, as discussed on my talk page and here, feel free to clean up those pages if you choose but I no longer wish to discuss something ad nauseum. --CNMall41 (talk) 06:16, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply