User talk:Graearms/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mental Illness in Ancient Rome has been accepted

Mental Illness in Ancient Rome, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gusfriend (talk) 05:12, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Substance Abuse in Ancient Rome has been accepted

Substance Abuse in Ancient Rome, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gusfriend (talk) 12:38, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for the new articles

I enjoyed reading your first two articles. Good work! 😁👍  Tewdar  21:55, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Surgery in Ancient Rome has been accepted

Surgery in Ancient Rome, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gusfriend (talk) 10:12, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gynecology in Ancient Rome has been accepted

Gynecology in Ancient Rome, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gusfriend (talk) 07:29, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Nav template or Infobox

Now that there are a number of medicine related pages for Ancient Rome I was wondering if it might be time for a nav template or Infobox to start to link them all together? Apart from anything else it would help tie them together and provide a nice context. Gusfriend (talk) 07:50, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

I will consider created or using a new template. Thank you for making me aware of this.

There is a good page at Wikipedia:Navigation template which has a bit of a discussion of the different options.Gusfriend (talk) 11:56, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for telling me about this.

@Gusfriend: I have created a new navigation template here. What should I do now?

DYK nomination of Gynecology in ancient Rome

Hello! Your submission of Gynecology in ancient Rome at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BuySomeApples (talk) 22:21, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Surgery in ancient Rome

On 19 June 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Surgery in ancient Rome, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that ancient Roman surgeons used materials such as bran and ashes to heal burns? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Surgery in ancient Rome. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Surgery in ancient Rome), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Gynecology in ancient Rome

On 20 June 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Gynecology in ancient Rome, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that ancient Roman gynecologists believed that menstrual blood could be used to drive dogs insane? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Gynecology in ancient Rome. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Gynecology in ancient Rome), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dentistry in ancient Rome has been accepted

Dentistry in ancient Rome, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cerebellum (talk) 10:08, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Renato D. Alarcón has been accepted

Renato D. Alarcón, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gusfriend (talk) 09:21, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Dentistry in ancient Rome

On 4 July 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Dentistry in ancient Rome, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the ancient Romans made toothpaste with human urine? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Dentistry in ancient Rome. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Dentistry in ancient Rome), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:03, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andrew E. Skodol has been accepted

Andrew E. Skodol, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Slywriter (talk) 21:32, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mining in ancient Rome has been accepted

Mining in ancient Rome, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gusfriend (talk) 01:05, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Leslie Morey has been accepted

Leslie Morey, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— The Most Comfortable Chair 01:06, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Mining in ancient Rome

On 1 August 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mining in ancient Rome, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Roman slave miners would rather die than work in the horrible working conditions of the mines? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mining in ancient Rome. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Mining in ancient Rome), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Taxation in ancient Rome has been accepted

Taxation in ancient Rome, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Artem.G (talk) 18:49, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Banking in ancient Rome has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Banking in ancient Rome. Thanks! Artem.G (talk) 19:01, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Puticuli has been accepted

Puticuli, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gusfriend (talk) 07:06, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

You may want to link to it from pages such as Potter's field and possibly a section at Mass grave. Gusfriend (talk) 07:12, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Poverty in ancient Rome has been accepted

Poverty in ancient Rome, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gusfriend (talk) 07:44, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

I approved the article because believe that there is (more than) sufficient sourcing information via the books in the bibliography even if not every statement of text is directly supported by an inline citation (which is perfectly acceptable see WP:REF). Having said that, some readers, and possibly some editors, will think that text without an associated in line citation is unsupported. If you get a chance you may want to add a few more in line citations to help ease their concerns. Gusfriend (talk) 07:55, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Original Barnstar
		Thank you so much for your efforts on expanding information on ancient Roman history on Wikipedia!★Trekker (talk) 17:28, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Taxation in ancient Rome

On 14 August 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Taxation in ancient Rome, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that taxation may have played a part in the fall of the Roman Empire? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Taxation in ancient Rome. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Taxation in ancient Rome), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:03, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 11,001 views (458.4 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of August 2022 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 03:34, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Vacation in ancient Rome has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Vacation in ancient Rome. Thanks! asilvering (talk) 02:44, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Art collection in ancient Rome has been accepted

Art collection in ancient Rome, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gusfriend (talk) 06:27, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of ancient Roman speeches has been accepted

List of ancient Roman speeches, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gusfriend (talk) 09:49, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

Article could do with an introductory paragraph especially if you could come up with some text on the role of oratory in Roman public discourse. It would also be great if the table was sortable so that you can order by orators (see WP:SORT). Gusfriend (talk) 09:53, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

A Barnstar for you

		The Epic Barnstar
		Thank you for your excellent work on new Roman articles. Gusfriend (talk) 10:00, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Banking in ancient Rome has been accepted

Banking in ancient Rome, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 16:07, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tributum soli has been accepted

Tributum soli, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hitro talk 08:47, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vicesima libertatis has been accepted

Vicesima libertatis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Spudlace (talk) 19:33, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Poverty in ancient Rome

On 27 August 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Poverty in ancient Rome, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the poor of ancient Rome were compared to dogs by the Roman writer Martial? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Poverty in ancient Rome. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Poverty in ancient Rome), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 5,729 views (477.4 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of August 2022 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 19:31, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Citron tables

Your hook for Art collection in ancient Rome is now in the DYK queue and due on the main page shortly. But what is a "citron table"? This is not mentioned in your art collection article nor the article on citron as far as I can see. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:36, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

@Cwmhiraeth: I believe Citron is actually Tetraclinis. As states in these quotes:

"The case of citron tables is particularly interesting. We know that they were already a sought-after object on the collecting market during the early Imperial Era thanks to information provided about them by Plinius (naturalis historia xiii.91–98), a source more generally appreciated for information on cultural and artistic trends (Isager, 1991; Carey, 2003). From a passage of Book xiii it emerges that in the 1st century ce the type of wood known in Latin as citrus, which we can today identify as thuya articulata, a variety of Coniferae Cupressacae to be found in North Africa but also in Malta and on the Iberian Peninsula, had already been in use for a long time to construct highlyvalued tables which appealed particularly to male taste."

And from the article Tetraclinis:

"The wood, known as thuya wood, citron wood, and alerce."

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ordines (ancient Roman) has been accepted

Ordines (ancient Roman), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

LordPeterII (talk) 20:06, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

@Graearms: Hey, randomly stumbled over your submission, and it's the first one I could accept since becoming an AfC reviewer. Nice :D

Anyway, I've a few suggestions for it: Weave it into Social class in ancient Rome a bit, so it's no longer an orphan. Also, that article mentions the Ordines were related to the census in some way – maybe mention that in the stub, as currently while it's clear who was an Ordine (not sure what the singular is), but not what that meant, i.e., what consequences did it have if one was part of the Ordines? Prestige, lower taxes, expanded voting rights? There probably could be more written about them. But that's just a suggestion, and you may leave it to someone else; you're doing enough work for Ancient Roman coverage on Wikipedia already ^^ --LordPeterII (talk) 20:16, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Art collection in ancient Rome

On 31 August 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Art collection in ancient Rome, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Pliny used the term insania to describe a Roman art collector's love of citron tables? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Art collection in ancient Rome. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Art collection in ancient Rome), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Oldham (psychiatrist) has been accepted

John Oldham (psychiatrist), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— The Most Comfortable Chair 15:47, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Larry J. Siever has been accepted

Larry J. Siever, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— The Most Comfortable Chair 15:52, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Titulus pictus

On 5 September 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Titulus pictus, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Romans would advertise their goods with a type of inscription known as Titulus pictus? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Titulus pictus. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Titulus pictus), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Vanamonde 00:03, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 5,305 views (442.1 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of September 2022 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 05:33, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Banking in ancient Rome at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step III of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 19:33, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Banking in ancient Rome

On 12 September 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Banking in ancient Rome, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that temples served as banks in ancient Rome? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Banking in ancient Rome. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Banking in ancient Rome), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:03, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 5,330 views (444.2 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of September 2022 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 03:46, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Animals in ancient Greece and Rome has been accepted

Animals in ancient Greece and Rome, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 14:06, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Humiliores and Honestiores has been accepted

Humiliores and Honestiores, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 17:27, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Animals in ancient Greece and Rome

On 19 October 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Animals in ancient Greece and Rome, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Plutarch believed that animals were more virtuous than humans? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Animals in ancient Greece and Rome. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Animals in ancient Greece and Rome), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tourism in ancient Rome has been accepted

Tourism in ancient Rome, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 13:37, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Curatores aedium sacrarum et operum locorumque publicorum (November 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Curatores aedium sacrarum et operum locorumque publicorum and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 05:18, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Toys and games in ancient Rome has been accepted

Toys and games in ancient Rome, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

gobonobo ^{+ c} 18:40, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Tourism in ancient Rome

On 10 November 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Tourism in ancient Rome, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the ancient Roman tourist destination of Baiae was infamous for its hedonism? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tourism in ancient Rome. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Tourism in ancient Rome), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:42, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 4,813 views (424.7 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of November 2022 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 05:06, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Toys and games in ancient Rome

On 15 November 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Toys and games in ancient Rome, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Roman emperors Augustus and Claudius may have had an affinity for gambling? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Toys and games in ancient Rome. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Toys and games in ancient Rome), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Baking in ancient Rome has been accepted

Baking in ancient Rome, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 19:00, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Baking in ancient Rome

On 20 January 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Baking in ancient Rome, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the wealth of bakers in ancient Rome may have contributed to them receiving a negative reputation? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Baking in ancient Rome. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Baking in ancient Rome), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

-- RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 7,427 views (618.9 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of January 2023 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:27, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Onager (weapon)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Onager (weapon), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 03:09, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Mount Bibele is a very good page. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 02:36, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Mount Bibele

On 31 March 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mount Bibele, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the site of Mount Bibele is home to a necropolis with 171 tombs? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mount Bibele. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Mount Bibele), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Aoidh (talk) 00:04, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ducenarius has been accepted

Ducenarius, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

bonadea contributions talk 11:19, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Biarchus has been accepted

Biarchus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

bonadea contributions talk 11:37, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Curatores aedium sacrarum et operum locorumque publicorum

Hello, Graearms. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Curatores aedium sacrarum et operum locorumque publicorum, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:16, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Lunula (amulet)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Lunula (amulet), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:48, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Weddings in ancient Rome

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Weddings in ancient Rome, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 19:19, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: EndeavourRx has been accepted

EndeavourRx, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BuySomeApples (talk) 20:37, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Battles in the Spanish Civil War (July 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikieditor019 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Battles in the Spanish Civil War and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thanks, Wikieditor019 (Talk to me) 16:28, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Graearms! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Thanks, Wikieditor019 (Talk to me) 16:28, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: In Eutropium has been accepted

In Eutropium, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

asilvering (talk) 23:42, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Graearms. Thank you for your work on In Eutropium. User:Schminnte, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for this article. You may wish to expand the article using this source.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Schminnte}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Schminnte (talk • contribs) 18:55, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anguane has been accepted

Anguane, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 06:30, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

ASPD

Hi Graearms, when you have a bit of time, would you mind taking another look at your recent edit to Antisocial personality disorder? There is some stuff at the bottom that definitely shouldn't be there. I would just clean it up myself, but I'm not sure if you intended to use it somewhere else; I'm also not sure if the deletion of the section Disregard for safety and lack of responsibility was intentional or not? Otherwise, the copyediting looks good – thanks for your work! :) Jhvx (talk) 14:34, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

@Jhvx: I have removed the out of place edits from the article. I have also restored some of the section Disregard for safety and lack of responsibility. I removed the original section because I found it to contain little information not covered elsewhere in the article and to contain irrelevant legal distinctions. I recognize now that I should have incorporated this into the edit description. Graearms (talk) 20:28, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

Perfect, thank you! And I don't object to the removal at all, I just wasn't sure if maybe you had intended to reuse some of the content but then forgot about it or something. But it looks good now! Jhvx (talk) 21:01, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

Promoting to prep

Hi there, are you new to promoting DYK hooks to prep? I'm asking because we need to have room in the last prep for hook shuffling; the following spots must be kept free:

• lead hook
• one non-picture hook

Not sure where that's written down, but that's what we need to be aware of. Schwede66 00:16, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

@Schwede66: I am new to promoting hooks. I have only promoted a few beforehand. Thanks for informing me of my mistake, I will avoid making it in the future. Graearms (talk) 18:37, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

In that case, welcome to the inner DYK team. This project has a lot of rules and conventions; don’t be put off if you don’t get everything right all the time. Thanks for helping. Schwede66 17:50, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Birtrange Castle has been accepted

Birtrange Castle, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Qcne (talk) 09:35, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aquihuecó has been accepted

Aquihuecó, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 18:24, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Noapara-Ishanchandranagar (October 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Noapara-Ishanchandranagar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 20:06, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Buya, Eritrea has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Buya, Eritrea. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:09, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Buya, Eritrea has been accepted

Buya, Eritrea, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:09, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Sacambaya River

On 27 October 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sacambaya River, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that according to legend, the Sacambaya River houses treasure hidden in a cavern by Jesuits? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sacambaya River. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Sacambaya River), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Aoidh (talk) 00:03, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

DYK for In Eutropium

On 7 November 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article In Eutropium, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the ancient Roman poem In Eutropium criticized the politician Eutropius for holding a "feminine" triumph? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/In Eutropium. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, In Eutropium), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Curatores aedium sacrarum et operum locorumque publicorum has been accepted

Curatores aedium sacrarum et operum locorumque publicorum, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Reading Beans (talk) 04:43, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

Archive 1

Archive 2