User talk:Graearms/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of battles in the Spanish Civil War has been accepted

List of battles in the Spanish Civil War, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 21:15, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Hirbemerdon Tepe

On 15 November 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Hirbemerdon Tepe, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the site of Hirbemerdon Tepe was initially inhabited in the Chalcolithic and continued to be populated until the Ottoman Empire? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hirbemerdon Tepe. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Hirbemerdon Tepe), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:02, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Halo-gravity traction device has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Halo-gravity traction device. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:53, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Halo-gravity traction device has been accepted

Halo-gravity traction device, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:54, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pierre Stagnara has been accepted

Pierre Stagnara, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 19:50, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bos buiaensis has been accepted

Bos buiaensis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 17:54, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Altar of Consus has been accepted

Altar of Consus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ca ^{talk to me!} 23:27, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tanusius Geminus has been accepted

Tanusius Geminus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 21:50, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Biarchus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

New message from Narutolovehinata5

Hello, Graearms. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Pierre Stagnara.
Message added 11:27, 18 December 2023 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 11:27, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

Graearms, the nomination has been marked for closure. If you wish to prevent the nomination from closing, you must respond there immediately. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:10, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Buya, Eritrea

Hello! Your submission of Buya, Eritrea at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 04:30, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but I have rejected the hook. ~ Pbritti (talk) 03:52, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Curatores aedium sacrarum et operum locorumque publicorum

Hello! Your submission of Curatores aedium sacrarum et operum locorumque publicorum at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Z1720 (talk) 19:04, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

Merry Merry

★Trekker (talk) is wishing you Happy Holidays! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user Happy Holidays, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Happy holidays}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

★Trekker (talk) 11:19, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Curator aedium sacrarum et operum locorumque publicorum

On 6 January 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Curator aedium sacrarum et operum locorumque publicorum, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the curator aedium sacrarum et operum locorumque publicorum was responsible for the upkeep of public works and buildings in ancient Rome? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Curatores aedium sacrarum et operum locorumque publicorum. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Curator aedium sacrarum et operum locorumque publicorum), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Schwede66 00:02, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Faliscan language, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Morphologically, Ardea and Borghetto.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:49, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

Thank you

A panoramic POV of the Raticosa pass

...for creating the page Raticosa pass. 86.177.202.135 (talk) 15:22, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Noapara-Ishanchandranagar

Hello, Graearms. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Noapara-Ishanchandranagar, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:06, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Noapara-Ishanchandranagar

Hello, Graearms. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Noapara-Ishanchandranagar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:10, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Tourism in ancient Rome

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Tourism in ancient Rome you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of UndercoverClassicist -- UndercoverClassicist (talk) 19:23, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tourism in ancient Rome, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bath and Spas.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Tourism in ancient Rome

The article Tourism in ancient Rome you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Tourism in ancient Rome for comments about the article, and Talk:Tourism in ancient Rome/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of UndercoverClassicist -- UndercoverClassicist (talk) 19:01, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Poverty in ancient Rome

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Poverty in ancient Rome you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Iazyges -- Iazyges (talk) 07:02, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Byzantine economy invitation

Hi there Graearms, I don't think we've had the pleasure.

Some other editors and I have been working to fix up the Byzantine empire article, an old FA which has deteriorated. Given your exemplary work on the Poverty in ancient Rome article, would you have any interest in taking a look at the Byzantine Empire#Economy section? We're trying to review sections and oftentimes rewrite them when necessary. I'm thinking it could probably cover more ground and be a more cohesive section overall; obviously, we're still very weary of the article being too long. Any interest in this? Aza24 (talk) 21:44, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

I would indeed be interested in working on this article. Graearms (talk) 22:02, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Glad to hear! Keep us updated on the talk page when you have a moment. Aza24 (talk) 23:39, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Byzantine economy

Hey Graearms

I appreciate your contribution to the Byzantine Empire article. Much more informative! I plan to source check later but some initial feedback:

• see if you can find another 2-3 quality sources. Kaldellis (2023) and Treadgold (1997) have done narrative histories so are two you can consult. The Laiou Cambridge book was something I had my eye on so glad you used this. Maybe you can consult Oxford, like the chapter in The Oxford Handbook of Byzantine Studies by Alan Harvey.
• try to get every sentence cited, at minimum. 2-3 per sentence is actually what @AirshipJungleman29 and I have tried to do with the sections we've worked on. That's harder to do with these specialist sections but the above mentioned sources will get you over the line maybe not for every sentence but most.
• the use of "Byzantine" a little over used. I get around this by referring to it as the "Empire". For neutrality reasons also, I try my best to avoid terms for the inhabitants as "the Byzantines" and you'll see we've done this in the article review to date.
• we're using SFN and SFNM for referencing, could you convert to this? If you need help let me know.
• Otherwise, it reads well. Once I read the sources, I might have additional feedback but what I will be checking is CLOP and also how closely aligned to the source you are.

I look forward to seeing how you deal with rest of this section. If you want to draft this in your user space and want feedback as you go feel free to ping me. Biz (talk) 22:51, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Kingdom of Yam

Hello, Graearms. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kingdom of Yam, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:06, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Poverty in ancient Rome

The article Poverty in ancient Rome you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Poverty in ancient Rome for comments about the article, and Talk:Poverty in ancient Rome/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Iazyges -- Iazyges (talk) 22:45, 28 July 2024 (UTC)