Grandtesla

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Grandtesla (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I believe I was wrongly identified as a sockpuppet of User:Sadifan. I have not engaged in any form of sockpuppetry and have only edited in good faith, abiding by Wikipedia's policies. I request a review of the evidence presented in the case, as I believe it may be a mistake. I am committed to constructive contributions and ask for an opportunity to continue doing so. Thank you. Grandtesla (talk) 21:23, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Duplicate request. 331dot (talk) 21:29, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock|I believe this block is a mistake because I am not User:Sadifan, nor have I used multiple accounts inappropriately. I understand that Wikipedia does not allow sockpuppetry, and I have always tried to contribute in good faith. I kindly request a review of the evidence and ask for the opportunity to contribute positively to Wikipedia in the future. Thank you. [[User:Grandtesla|Grandtesla]] ([[User talk:Grandtesla#top|talk]]) 21:38, 21 October 2024 (UTC)}}

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Gegu has been accepted

Battle of Gegu, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 16:47, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Sochi has been accepted

Battle of Sochi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

UserMemer (chat) Tribs 13:48, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Sadifan per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sadifan. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Izno (talk) 21:18, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Grandtesla (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I believe I was wrongly identified as a sockpuppet of User:Sadifan. I have not engaged in any form of sockpuppetry and have only edited in good faith, abiding by Wikipedia's policies. I request a review of the evidence presented in the case, as I believe it may be a mistake. I am committed to constructive contributions and ask for an opportunity to continue doing so. Thank you. Grandtesla (talk) 21:23, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

 Confirmed sockpuppetry. This deliberate and malicious time wasting is tiresome. Yamla (talk) 21:30, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Grandtesla (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I believe this block is a mistake because I am not User:Sadifan, nor have I used multiple accounts inappropriately. I understand that Wikipedia does not allow sockpuppetry, and I have always tried to contribute in good faith. I kindly request a review of the evidence and ask for the opportunity to contribute positively to Wikipedia in the future. Thank you. Grandtesla (talk) 21:40, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 23:36, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Grandtesla (talk) 21:40, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

One open unblock request at a time, please. Like your other sockpuppets, you are abusively making multiple simultaneous unblock requests. --Yamla (talk) 21:55, 21 October 2024 (UTC)