User talk:Guerillero/Archives/2016/April
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Guerillero. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The Signpost: 1 April 2016
- News and notes: Trump/Wales 2016
- WikiProject report: Why should the Devil have all the good music? An interview with WikiProject Christian music
- Traffic report: Donald v Daredevil
- Featured content: A slow, slow week
- Technology report: Browse Wikipedia in safety? Use Telnet!
- Recent research: "Employing Wikipedia for good not evil" in education; using eyetracking to find out how readers read articles
- Wikipedia Weekly: Podcast #121: How April Fools went down
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:39, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
A bit of courtesy wouldn't hurt
It think the way you spoke towards me on the talk section of the Punk rock article could have been kinder. In no way was I trying to be contentious or out of line in any kind of way--I've gone the extra mile to avoid controversy there for the last few years and intend to remain as non-controversial as possible. In this instance I was only suggesting a slight change in wording, that I felt was a reasoned request, and I kept my comments brief. People have a right to go to the talk page about issues--it is constructive. In no way were you obliged to agree with my suggestion--but you could have lodged your disagreements in a better way. Contrast your response there with Ghmyrtle's. He disagreed--but in a courteous and respectful manner and gave a rationale which I could respect (and I do recognize and respect your work--I just don't like the way you have spoken to me on a couple of occasions). Normally, I wouldn't mind an editor responding in a brusque manner--I've seen instances of people being much more extreme. But, as an administrator, I hold you to a higher standard and expect better from you than that. I think that you have a responsibility to fair and objective--and supportive to to other editors in your capacity. And, I think that if you look at my work over the last few years, you would find a lot there to like--and would see that there is a lot more to what I'm about here than what you might have assumed based on when I was a brand new editor. In the last year I have been working on a large expansion of the garage rock article and pushed it up to GA in November--my hope is that we can get it up to FA in the next year or so. I've been working on an expansion of the Wrecking Crew article, the Democratic party article, and others. I've worked on numerous projects and written over 100 articles, I think I have a good track record for accuracy and credibility in my contributions, so I think I have a right to get better treatment from an administrator. I say this in a spirit of good will and could only wish you the best in saying this. Garagepunk66 (talk) 02:36, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Garagepunk66: I have been up to my eyeballs in irl work for the past week. I will have a longer response for you in a day or two, but you are right. I was coming from a place of frustration based on past conduct. I will try to not do this in the future. --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 02:59, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
- Oh, no problem at all. I'll be the first to admit that I was a bit headstrong when I first arrived at Wiki--I hope that I have "mellowed" out a bit. By the way, I really appreciate all of the great things you do here at Wikipedia. Best of luck! Garagepunk66 (talk) 03:21, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
The Signpost: 14 April 2016
- News and notes: Denny Vrandečić resigns from Wikimedia Foundation board
- In the media: Wikimedia Sweden loses copyright case; Tex Watson; AI assistants; David Jolly biography
- Featured content: This week's featured content
- Traffic report: A welcome return to pop culture and death
- Arbitration report: The first case of 2016—Wikicology
- Gallery: A history lesson
The Signpost: 24 April 2016
- Special report: Update on EranBot, our new copyright violation detection bot
- Traffic report: Two for the price of one
- Featured content: The double-sized edition
- Arbitration report: Amendments made to the Race and intelligence case
POTD notification
Hi Guerillero,
Just to let you know, the Featured Picture File:STS-134 launch 2.ogv is scheduled to be Picture of the Day on May 16, 2016. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2016-05-16. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:52, 29 April 2016 (UTC)