User talk:H2g2bob/Archive 3

More sources

On Simon Wessely you added a {{moresources}} tag, yet you did not clarify on the talkpage what kind of sources you are looking for. This makes the presence of a tag a bit troublesome. Would you consider requesting sources on the talkpage first, and only adding a box then these are not immediately forthcoming?

I have responded to your questions on Talk:Simon Wessely too. If you are willing to mediate informally, an RFM could perhaps be avoided. JFW | T@lk 10:18, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Ryan Ly

Yeah, I don't care if it's deleted right away, but I don't know how to delete it... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ramiki (talk • contribs) 04:24, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Simon Wessely and sources of criticism

Hi Physics Dave (If you don't mind me calling you that. Great Name!)

I'm not trying to canvass you backchannel or anything like that! But I wondered whether you had had a chance to look at the long entries on the talk page of the above yet. I have also begun a new section setting out what I think should be done and how this differs from JFW, to try and simplify things a bit. I'm feeling that the atmosphere on that page is becoming more and more acrimonious. I and MEAgenda have resolved in good faith not to edit the page because of our Conflict of Interest, and have worked very hard at trying to maintain NPOV even though we both have openly stated POVS of our own, but I feel our good faith is not being returned, especially as the Gibson Report remains in place. I do think my proposal needs to be considered as a first step. Thanks for taking the time to look at this whole issue. Angela Kennedy 17:53, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Adminship?

Hi. I was perusing through your contributions and thought you would make a good administrator here. Interested? —Wknight94 (talk) 03:39, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Eva cross explosion.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Eva cross explosion.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:21, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

O well hello there

I just noticed that you're a fan of mine on slashdot. Hello o_o --ffroth 04:25, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Image:FSM Pirates.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:FSM Pirates.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. +mt 16:02, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

José Galisteo

I'm not sure that tag is the best solution at this point. There are 13 sentences, and 9 inline citations. Yes, the subject is not happy that we have written it, but he has not said the information is untrue. Please read the article, refs, and perhaps enter the discussion before tagging it so. Jeffpw 18:35, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

I completely understand, and am glad I wasn't crabby in my message to you. It's sad when you go from being a fan to being an adversary. I've given him the OTRS information, so he has a place to go where they can look at all the evidence and take appropriate action if required. He's emailed me 3 times now, and has now said he will be writing it himself, with help from his fan club. I'm glad you (presumably) now have it watchlisted--hagiography is not what we're after on Wikipedia. Jeffpw 19:02, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:FSM Pirates.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:FSM Pirates.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:03, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

FreeLife

I think your approach here is generally very constructive, and it would be appreciated if you could swing by the talk page and inject some more common sense. Your line by line on the company's email is exactly the right way to do this, I think; address the stated concerns direclty, courteously but with an appropriate filter of WP:NPOV. Guy (Help!) 10:29, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Another Firefox search engine plugin

At Wikipedia:Help_desk/Archives/2007_August_22#ExtraWP_help_.28Firefox_search_engine_plug_in_need.29 you were able to help me create a search engine plugin. Could you create me another one for http://online.wsj.com/public/us ?--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:LOTD) 00:33, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

might wanna look again at the hitz radio article. certainly new information (And proper sources this time!), have become available. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Random9999 (talk • contribs) 15:11, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Nixon head sign.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Nixon head sign.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:42, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:Penis ethnic.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Penis ethnic.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image with an unknown source or an unknown copyright status which has been tagged as such for more than 7 days, and it still lacks the necessary information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[Talk:Image:Penis ethnic.jpg|the article's talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Nburden ^(T) 15:20, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:Penis form.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Penis form.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image with an unknown source or an unknown copyright status which has been tagged as such for more than 7 days, and it still lacks the necessary information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[Talk:Image:Penis form.jpg|the article's talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Nburden ^(T) 15:21, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Simple English Wiktionary

Hi! I was wondering if you could check out a couple of issues here regarding privilege/status changes over on Simple English Wiktionary? I'm user:Tygartl1 there. Thanks so much! · Tygrrr... 21:17, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Actually, I don't want bot status. Wenli and I are waiting for sysop status and Wenlibot and Monobot are waiting for bot status. Please fix this, I don't like my edits being hidden... :-) · Tygrrr... 18:58, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Another request for you. Could you please change my name on SE Wiktionary to Tygrrr so that it will match my usernames on other wikis? Thank you. · Tygrrr... 20:32, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Could you pop over to SE.wikt and have a look at this: <http://simple.wiktionary.org/wiki/Wiktionary:Administrators#User:Brett>. Thanks!--99.239.156.122 (talk) 14:19, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Michael Palin - Pole to Pole

I left this message over on Commons, but I thought I should let you know here as well. Regarding the world map you created for Pole to Pole, could it also include Estonia, Belarus and Ukraine in addition to Russia? I started editing the map myself, then I found that the color scheme I had chosen didn't match yours exactly, and since you had chosen your scheme to span several Palin travel series, it's probably better for you to edit the maps yourself. -- Brhaspati\^talk/_contribs 02:56, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

PCG

Thanks for putting the staff writers in the show/hide box, makes it a little easier to read and much easier to align. At last we can stick the infoboxes in their respective (UK/US) sections as opposed to having them stretching down the side. Realigning the article like that was my original intention, thanks for fixing it for me. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 17:57, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Centralized TV Episode Discussion

Over the past months, TV episodes have been redirected by (to name a couple) TTN, Eusebeus and others. No centralized discussion has taken place, so I'm asking everyone who has been involved in this issue to voice their opinions here in this centralized spot, be they pro or anti. Discussion is here [1]. Even if you have not, other opinions are needed because this issue is affecting all TV episodes in Wikipedia. --Maniwar (talk) 02:35, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Frank LaGrotta BLP is under administrative review, please comment at the noticeboard

Thanks, riverguy42 aka WNDL42 (talk) 00:42, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Barry Wellman

Dave, some anon IP appears to have a grudge against Barry Wellman. Perhaps someone whose paper was rejected, and figures that Wellman must have been the critical referee. In my opinion, the Barry Wellman article is perhaps the best one we have of a major contemporary sociologist, and I can't understand why it's necessary to pick at it simply because Wellman may have worked on it himself. Actually, the way I look at it, it's good for WP to have people like Wellman here, and we should try to avoid creating a hostile environment for them. Anyway, just trying to explain why I have a different opinion than you. I understand that articles should not be self-promotional, but Wellman really is an important academic, and the article doesn't exaggerate his importance.--Anthon.Eff (talk) 20:59, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Wrong. No rejected articles. Just can't stand self-promotion on what is supposed to be an impartial encyclopedic entry. It just goes against the spirit, and regardless of the "importance" of the individual it is not appropriate for them to edit their own entry in a way that turns it into a CV as opposed to an encyclopedia entry. 64.171.57.60 (talk) 06:25, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:BLPC/doc

A tag has been placed on Template:BLPC/doc requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 20:40, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Hignfy bruce cards.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Hignfy bruce cards.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 18:38, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

infoboxes

hello there. it you, as i, just don't see the argument prohibiting infoboxes. i support you. the arguments opponents consistently give are their personal subjective judgments over whether they "look good" or not, with no real thought given to 'the reader.' yes, i support you.--emerson7 18:49, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Biographical infoboxes: Explaining why they aren't used for classical musicians

Hi. We'd be grateful if you didn't place biographical infoboxes on the pages of classical musicians. Popular artists are of course OK, just not classical ones.

The guideline at the at the Classical Music project says: "Current consensus among project participants holds that the use of biographical infoboxes is often counterproductive on biographies of classical musicians, including conductors and instrumentalists." This was written after a centralized discussion in which many editors took part (see archives).

The bio infobox used for Simon Rattle was one specifically designed for popular musical artists' (e.g. 'associated acts' etc.) not classical musicians. If you look at Wikipedia:WikiProject Musicians/Infobox you will see this is "used on a non-classical musician's or musical ensemble's page" . Thank you for your cooperation. -- Kleinzach (talk) 06:26, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Simon Rattle

You have been quoted by user Kleinzachon on the talk page for Simon Rattle, so I wonder if you might like to contribute to the discussion there. It is about the use of an infobox. Snowman (talk) 14:07, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Deletionpedia

Now that bit about 'deletionpedia' was far more interesting than e-valid. To share and discuss it, I've opened a thread at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Deletionpedia. --Tikiwont (talk) 20:42, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

SVG think tank

Hello, I noticed on commons your annouce about http://ccgi.dbatley.plus.com/world_map.html . I really thanks you : we really need more SVG development here.

Afterwhat I have one good and one bad news :

• the bad one, is that your script will become shy if he meet what "Arthur" made : http://gunn.co.nz/map/ ;
• the good one, is that I hope get this "Arthur" leading a team of SVG relate programmers.

Please can you say more about your coding abilities, I'm looking for volunteers to expand the SVG tools lists. Are you interested ? what are your coding abilities ? Will you have free time to write scripts ? etc. : all this informations are welcome on this table.

Regards, Yug 18:00, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

... for sorting out the Leeds Children's Holiday Camp. PamD (talk) 22:58, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Deletionpedia

Great work on Deletionpedia! You probably get this question a lot, but why are certain pages not included? Also, it would be cool if the talk pages could be revived as well... Chin Chill-A Eat Mor Rodents (talk) 18:27, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

I would like to email you sometime, if I may. In reference to the site, I think it would also be cool to have a forum where users can give suggestions for improvements, etc. Chin Chill-A Eat Mor Rodents (talk) 21:14, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

I hope you didn't take your site down because of the bad legal advice people were giving, by the way. I'm pretty sure you're protected by the fact that you do not manually add these pages, but merely automatically archive posts written by others. It's not much different than a google cache, which courts have ruled does not impose a liability on google. Chin Chill-A Eat Mor Rodents (talk) 17:45, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/March 23, 2004

Hi Bob - the March 23 article is covered by a larger discussion that's been going on at Wikipedia talk:Centralized discussion/Removal of many individual date articles. Thought you might like to have a look at that before the AfD discussion goes any further. Grutness...wha? 02:09, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Osprey

Hi H2g2bob: I reverted the recent edit you made to the Osprey article, because the species, genus (Pandion) and family (Pandionidae) articles are one and the same; the latter two are redirects. (This is because the Osprey is the only species in both the genus and the family.) Self-referencing articles via redirects cause all kinds of problems, and should be avoided! : ) Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions about this... MeegsC | Talk 22:07, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Hitz radio unsigned logo.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Hitz radio unsigned logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:20, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for your help at the help desk, I left a follow up question if it's not too much trouble. (moving the search box to below the toolbox). –xenocidic (talk) 01:51, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

		The da Vinci Barnstar
		For your excellent work in creating Wikipedia:WikiProject User scripts/Scripts/Re-order menus in response to my help desk request, a tool that will save me countless hours of unnecessary scrolling, I award you the da Vinci Barnstar! So long, and thanks for all the scripts. –xenocidic (talk) 14:14, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

You beat me to it, but I second the award! 42. – ukexpat (talk) 15:36, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the help

I really enjoy contributing, and I especially enjoyed finding a page such as Gian Pyres that was a stub. I am trying to do the best I can to make it a great page, and appreciate your advice.

Shawn Crapo (talk) 01:40, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Image:TypicalHumanPenisScale.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:TypicalHumanPenisScale.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. You said it Dad (talk) 17:55, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Eurovision template

Sorry, me, the one who requested the optional fields, reverted because I just wanted the fields to be optional, not the whole infobox to look different. Sure, your way is a lot easier to use and edit, but that's not what the WikiProject Eurovision wants the box to look like. Grk1011 (talk) 14:21, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. I think there is only one or two articles that would have blanks for any of the fields anywat, so unless someone has some advanced knowledge, I guess its gonna stay like it is. I just don't like how the title "floats" in the infobox template version. Its not a very appealing template. Grk1011 (talk) 14:51, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, i like that better, but one last thing, is there anyway to put it in a blue line? Grk1011 (talk) 15:48, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks so much, it looks great! Grk1011 (talk) 15:56, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Sycamore merge

Hi! Looking at the diffs I think it was you who suggested in June that Sycamore and Sycamore (disambiguation) be merged. There's two of us now commenting on this at Talk:Sycamore (disambiguation) (just to confuse things I've changed names since I first commented). Would you care to join in the discussion and make the case for merging? ϢereSpielChequers 20:23, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

UnPlug Plugin not supported by new version of firefox... ;(

Hey H2g2bob,

I just want to ask are you working on a new UnPlug addon for the new version of firefox? The old doesn't work with the new firefox. Thx n. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.200.122.185 (talk) 14:53, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:IndyMac Bank logo.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:IndyMac Bank logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:22, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

~

It's all very well giving me a warning for PA. But are you completely oblivious to the user streona. Seriously POV pushing has a COI. Accuses everyone on the discussion page of being BNP,Nazi and or racist I mean I was called a hardline racist for simply telling him to grow up and get used to people having different opinions. Streona fails NPOV, declares himself anti-fascist, has said he hates the BNP. The archive contains his numerous rants including an early one where he threatens to create mounds of dead BNP members. He baits other users with insults and slurs and has been referred to as trolling on other articles. Seriously has Wikipedia no ability to block him from editing the page. Would it be appropriate for someone with a interest in attacking this party to be contributing to it (I mean you can't get around this happening its a wiki but he is open about it).

This is one reason I don't create an account with wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.168.3.132 (talk) 03:29, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Reply

I have taken exception not to be being told that others have a different viewpoint, but to being told that I should leave England and move elsewhere for supporting mixed race relationships as well as having a mixed race child. Mr. 58 seems to have a long memory for someone who only logged on a few days ago, but he obviously uses different anonymous identities. I have not to my knowledge been referred to as a troll (except on Conservapedia, quite wrongly as it happens. Mr. or Ms. 58 etc. has claimed that the Australian government wants to force him/her to have sex with non-Europeans in order to have brown babies, which will dilute racia; purity, yet s/he objects to being called a "hardline racist". If thjese are his/her views, then why is that an insult. Were the BNP to take power in the UK I do believe there would be violence and I for one would resist, along with many others. If other contributors cannot stomach my put-downs after calling me a "multi-cult fascist", threatening me with being tried for treason, or calling me a "twit", then perhaps they should not make such personally abusive attacks. I have obviously been more effective by keeping within wiki guidelines than outside of them. I fail NPOV but I am not an article on wikipedia. So does MartinUK, who is also quite open in his sympathy towards the BNP and to racism, but I can respect that. --Streona (talk) 11:36, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Spirited Away Train.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Spirited Away Train.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:44, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Template:Infobox Country/doc

I see you're the last person to edit this template; could you take another look? The person who edited the page right before you is a serial vandal, hoaxer, and puppetmaster, but they mix this with legit edits too, and I don't know enough about the syntax of the template and its use to know if their edits to the page were good or bad. If you could take a quick look and see if their edits were good or bad, I'd appreaciate it. Thanks. --barneca (talk) 20:22, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Thank you! --barneca (talk) 00:37, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Piracy is a crime - Unskippable Anti-Piracy track.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Piracy is a crime - Unskippable Anti-Piracy track.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:06, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:ErectHumanPenis.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:ErectHumanPenis.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:ErectHumanPenis.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dillard421 ^{(talk • contribs)} 07:41, 15 October 2008 (UTC)