User talk:Hameltion/Archive 2

Main page: User talk:Hameltion

Your GA nomination of Amos Singletary

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Amos Singletary you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Eddie891 -- Eddie891 (talk) 15:41, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Amos Singletary

The article Amos Singletary you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Amos Singletary for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Eddie891 -- Eddie891 (talk) 22:21, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sacheen Littlefeather, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Santa Fe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:03, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Ryan Watts (politician)

Hello! Your submission of Ryan Watts (politician) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 23:27, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Silent Sam

Nice work on that most recent edit! The page is more helpfully organized and your added information is useful. GorillaWarfare (talk) 04:02, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Fantastic work promoting Katka Zupančič to the Main Page! Very interesting and well-written article. MX (✉ • ✎) 05:36, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

hello

can you help me — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:C5B0:9330:D8AA:AA30:E3D3:864A (talk) 07:56, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Hameltion. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Creation of Nat Vazer

Speedy deletion nomination of Nat Vazer

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nat Vazer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Blackswan19 (talk) 09:22, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Dear Hameltion,

Thank you for your work and effort on the page of Nat Vazer.

I am under the impression this does not meet Wikipedia's guidelines and the person in question does not have a credible claim of significance.

However, I hope to be proved wrong.

Please feel free to contest the speedy deletion proposal and/or drop me a line.

Many thanks, Blackswan19

toggle ref check

Hello, just a note to say that User:Lingzhi2/reviewsourcecheck has been update to add the option to toggle it on or off.

The installed script will add a tab to the drop-down tab at the top, located between the 'watchlist star' and the search box (using the vector.js skin). The tab toggles between "Hide ref check" and "Show ref check" with displaying the errors as the default option. Please do drop me a line if you have any problems or suggestions. Tks. ♦ Lingzhi2 (talk) 15:20, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

• Sorry to bother you again. After the addition of a toggle option in the tab atop the page, one editor requested a revised version in which the toggle link appears in the "Tools" section of the page's left sidebar. So now there are two versions of this tool. If you prefer the links in the Toolbar section on the side, the slightly altered script is named User:Lingzhi2/reviewsourcecheck-sb.js (just add "-sb" before the ".js"). Finally, both versions should now also store the page state (whether reference errors/warnings are "hidden" or "shown"). The state persists between page loads and between the browser closing and reopening (unless cleared by the user, for example by deleting data in your browser's cache etc.). Huge thanks to User:Evad37 for much coding help. If you have any questions or problems, please drop me a line. Thanks again. ♦ Lingzhi2 (talk) 08:19, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Great job on Shane Gillis! A very informative and well written article. TheAwesomeHwyh 17:52, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Autopatrolled granted

Hi Hameltion, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "Autopatrollers" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Beeblebrox (talk) 21:50, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

Many thanks! Hameltion (talk, contribs) 23:34, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Kay Hagan

On 29 October 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Kay Hagan, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Davey2116 (talk) 20:12, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Ryan Watts (politician) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ryan Watts (politician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Watts (politician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 19:56, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Spanish writers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Galicia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:25, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

New message from Narutolovehinata5

Hello, Hameltion. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Carla Herrero.
Message added 03:56, 17 November 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 03:56, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Face Your Fear, Curtis Harding album cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Face Your Fear, Curtis Harding album cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 21:12, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Soul Power, Curtis Harding album cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Soul Power, Curtis Harding album cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:48, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Polish tennis coaches

A tag has been placed on Category:Polish tennis coaches indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:16, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Medvedev–Tsitsipas rivalry

The article Medvedev–Tsitsipas rivalry has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per tennis project and Wikipedia guidelines, I don't think this is a legitimate article-worthy rivalry. If it's a rivalry : According to WP:NRIVALRY, rivalries are not inherently notable. "We can only have articles about tennis rivalries if there is significant media coverage about the rivalry. For example, great rivalries like Agassi–Sampras or Federer–Nadal warrant an article, but articles about rivalries like Agassi–Rafter and Federer–Hewitt have been deleted by the community. If in doubt, consult WP:TENNIS before creating a new rivalry article."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fyunck(click) (talk) 08:11, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Medvedev–Tsitsipas rivalry for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Medvedev–Tsitsipas rivalry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Medvedev–Tsitsipas rivalry until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fyunck(click) (talk) 20:06, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

Precious

mostly articles

Thank you for quality articles about, such as Martha Isabel Ruiz Corzo, David S. Pumpkins (2017), Chang and Eng Bunker (2018 expansion), Maranda Curtis (2019) and Amos Singletary, for presenting mostly creations on your user page, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

You are recipient no. 2824 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:39, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

I'm touched, thank you Gerda. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 17:47, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Sofie Dossi

Hello! Your submission of Sofie Dossi at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Flibirigit (talk) 23:33, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Sue Galloway

@Hameltion So I have to ask because I find it curious. I started the BLP article on Sue Galloway Sandbox: Sue Galloway on February 28 and was going to move it to the mainspace on March 6th. To my surprise you published one on the very same day. The BLP has been in show business for over 20 years and never had an article here at WP. Is it just a coincidence that at the very same time - down to the day - that while I was writing my article on Galloway, you were also? It is odd because not only are the references exactly the same as mine (in the same exact order, no less) - even used the exact same amount of times inline; but the categories are also exactly the same - in the same order. It took me numerous days and countless hours to compile all this information on a subject that is not very well represented online and yet you seem to have created an article in one day without a draft. Is this correct? Maineartists (talk) 22:27, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

@Maineartists: Wow, yeah that is a strange coincidence. Didn't know your draft existed, didn't realize I was scooping someone - sorry! I recognized her in a movie on TV and was surprised she didn't have an article so I got to it. As you alluded to there aren't that many sources out there, so makes sense there would be overlap in them. I missed a few details (education, etc.) I see now in your draft that I'll probably add to the live article unless you get there first. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 00:28, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

So you are seriously saying that you constructed a full BLP article with sparse online sources in exact order and precise numerical sequence inline citations along with categorical linkage also in exact sequence on the very same day that I was going to publish with the same layout and no draft history to show in a sandbox history construct that all of this was mere coincidence? Errors in your article would prove haste and not careful research. Maineartists (talk) 00:41, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Yes, it definitely seems strange, but just want to make totally clear I did not scavenge your draft to scoop you. Re the similarities, the sourcing overlap seems to be just four refs (Serial Optimist, Fast Company, Culture Map, CBS News) which come up fairly high on google, and though the categories are basically identical that seems to mean we were both just diligent. What are you referring to in the last sentence about errors? Again I am sorry this looks thievish and mean of me, but honestly I didn't know your draft existed until three hours ago. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 01:57, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

@Hameltion:Actually, the sources referenced are eight in total, not four. Please compare the article and my sandbox: 8. Not to mention each inline citation usage for each reference: exact same number. This is not coincidental. 1. Berkowitz, Joe a b c d e 2. UCB and TGS 2 ab 3. ABOUT a b c 4. Thomasian, Deborah a b c d 5. Bumgardner, John 6. Demko, Mark 7. The Coolest Part 8. Lutz, John. Not to mention the categories: 11 in total in exact same order. This is not coincidental. Where is your sandbox draft for this article? Errors: i.e. "Years active 2005-present." Galloway started in 2002 as your article states. Maineartists (talk) 03:03, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

I'm not following now - sources 2, 3, 6, and 8 don't seem to be in your sandbox page, and the sets of categories (though very close) aren't the "exact" same. But regardless, any patterns here genuinely are coincidences. Please stop accusing me of stealing from your sandbox; the simultaneity is surprising to you and to me. To your other points, I keep most of my drafts as text files, but I didn't use one for this article since I published it the day I started it. The 2005 in infobox is probably a typo. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 03:54, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Copyeditor's Barnstar
	for your extensive copy editing of the Mafeje affair FuzzyMagma (talk) 12:52, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

I wonder if I can stretch your kindness to Mafeje article himself. I dared to try an promoted to GA status and an editor (rightly) ripped me a new one. I amended all of these comments and almost doubled the text since then but it will be great to have someone to copy-edit (again, as I did copy edited just few minutes before posting this) FuzzyMagma (talk) 14:07, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

@FuzzyMagma: Thanks, yes I can look it over later today. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 15:54, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

@FuzzyMagma:  Done Mostly did WP:MOS and grammar fixes. For the future, see MOS:CURLY and especially MOS:CAPS, and check out {{rp}} which may be preferable to <sup></sup> for citations. WP:SUMMARY style in the spun-off section is quite well done. The section with research and ideology is pretty long, and kind of scattershot/repetitive (and maybe relies too much on primary sources), but reads fairly well. The article overall is probably still a ways away from GA, but great resource nonetheless. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 21:02, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

@Hameltion many thanks, I truly appreciate you efforts .. I will comb through your comments and edits, and try to learn something or two. I will try to make the research and ideology section more succinct. I might over did tbh!

again, many thanks FuzzyMagma (talk) 21:26, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Copy-Paste

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Draft:Hermanos Gutiérrez a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Hermanos Gutiérrez. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:03, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

@Robert McClenon and Izno: I see that the history merge has already been performed, but I might suggest that it be undone because the two pages don't actually share any history. I did know about the draftspace page while writing my first draft (unlike the strangely similar coincidence in Sue Galloway above) but didn't take anything from it except the image and one new-to-me ref. Didn't know whether or how to mark someone else's old draft when superseding it (it still doesn't redirect if that's the ideal thing). Hameltion (talk | contribs) 14:54, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

The one time I pause before history merging and then do it anyway. Sigh.

I am pretty sure I agree with Hameltion here. @Robert McClenon Izno (talk) 21:59, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

"Clippy"

See Office Assistant; it was never named "Clippy". jp×g 22:38, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

@JPxG: Hm, didn't know that. Could be rephrased to reflect the common name ("known as Clippy"). Hameltion (talk | contribs) 00:24, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Reversion

I don't know what happened here, I did not intend to revert your entire edit! Please accept my apologies. jp×g 09:37, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

@JPxG: No worries, it definitely seemed accidental! Hameltion (talk | contribs) 13:51, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

This is kinda late but...

As for the Saint Omer hook, French cinema is one of the very neglected topics here on the English Wikipedia. Merci! BorgQueen (talk) 16:10, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Dana Powell

Hello @Hameltion:, could you please create an article for American actress and comedian Dana Powell, who appeared credited in more than 55 film and television projects and is best known for appearing as recurring character Pam Tucker on the TV sitcom Modern Family? Votbek (talk) 20:57, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Hi @Votbek: Sure I can help. She seems likely to be notable; though she borderline passes WP:NACTOR with her biggest appearances on Modern Family and Clipped, I've fairly quickly found three good sources for WP:GNG: profile, shorter but still substantive profile, and video profile. Do you know of any other good sources I should use to start? I'll work on posting a first draft shortly while watching Game 7. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 21:36, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Tom Nowicki

Hi again @Hameltion:, thank you for help me create an article for actress Dana Powell, now could you please help me again to redo the article for American actor Tom Nowicki?, I know that this article got deleted at AfD just a few years ago, which I would like need some help to find better sources of notability for the article. Votbek (talk) 04:05, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Hey again @Votbek. This name gets 38 hits on Wikipedia which is promising. But haven't found much more sourcewise than the two profiles (archive) mentioned in the AfD (which are fairly substantive) besides this brief coverage (archive) of his wrestling career (as Lord Larry Oliver). For the purposes of WP:NACTOR, his biggest role seems to be on a forgotten show about roller derby. Let me know if you turn up any more sources, but the AfD result seems to be justified. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 04:54, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Hi again, so for the moment I found this one that contain some information but it's possible that this same information is more complete on another source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Votbek (talk • contribs) 05:51, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Yeah, that's a dupe of his WP:IMDB entry, which is not a WP:Reliable source nor contribute to notability. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 14:52, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

But, it would be possible to redo the article? Votbek (talk) 17:25, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

@Votbek: I'm not too eager myself with only two good sources, but you could start writing a draft if you think it's possible to find more of quality. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 17:39, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Ok, I already started a draft here, you can put the sources, information and filmography you already have and that we can find later for to be summited, also it would be of great help you can find a image for the draft Votbek (talk) 18:10, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Also, I found this video on YouTube of the actor, it is possible to do a screenshot? Votbek (talk) 22:08, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

@Votbek: No, it's not appropriately licensed for use on Wikipedia. See c:Commons:YouTube files for more info. I looked earlier and didn't find any Creative Commons images of Nowicki. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 22:14, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Gerrit Graham screenshot

Hi @Hameltion: are any of tese two videos [1] [2] are appropriately licensed for use on Wikipedia by c:Commons:YouTube files for a screenshot for actor Gerrit Graham? Votbek (talk) 15:20, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

@Votbek: No, they're not. Note on the Dana Powell video below the description where it says Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed) And when searching on YouTube, you can narrow the results with Filters → Features → Creative Commons Hameltion (talk | contribs) 17:18, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Ok, thank you, but how about these two [3] [4] I found on Flickr?, they show to have similar licenses to this one [5] and this one [6] that are on Commons.Votbek (talk) 18:20, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

No, see c:Commons:Flickr files for what's acceptable from flickr (and note the comment about "revoking licensing" at File:Simon Rex 1.jpg). Suggest you read Wikipedia:Finding images tutorial and c:Commons:Licensing as a primer. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 18:45, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Sorry; correction, It's seems that only this one [7] can go to Commons by {{cc-by-2.0}} as it seems to have similar license to this one [8] that is now in Commons. Votbek (talk) 18:49, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

@Votbek: I'm not an expert, but I don't think so. See the difference at c:Commons:Flickr files between Attribution and Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licenses. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 18:54, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Finally, I don't know if any of this images here [9] from page 1 to 5 have the license to go Commons, if doesn't please tell me were I could find one cause I'm a big fan of his. Votbek (talk) 19:11, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

@Votbek: Nope, looks like no free images on Getty. And don't see any online with a quick search, but you could always try to produce an illustration or ask for permission from an existing copyright holder if possible. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 19:36, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Well thank You, at least could you please help me complete this Wikidata Infobox I am working in? Votbek (talk) 21:31, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

@Votbek: I'll let you get that started, just try to emulate the Wikidata of similar topics, and leave blank any fields you don't have a source for. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 21:55, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Miranda May

Hello again, @Hameltion:, do actress Miranda May who currently stars on the Disney Channel sitcom Bunk'd passes WP:NACTOR notability to do an article? If does, could you help me please? Votbek (talk) 13:01, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

I already found this [10] and [11] Votbek (talk) 13:23, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

Hey @Votbek. Doesn't seem to pass NACTOR by the letter (just one significant role instead of multiple), but with this profile and some interviews there may be enough sources. Feel free to get a draft started (hopefully with a bit more content than last time). The first link you gave is not usable, it's just a cookie cutter air time listing.

Also, I looked at the page history for the item you mentioned on Wikidata, are you using this account to edit Wikidata and Commons? Hameltion (talk | contribs) 13:49, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

Nop, it's a friend of mine, I asked him to help me. Votbek (talk) 14:23, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

Ah, no worries then. His history on this wiki just struck me. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 14:49, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

Meanwhile, could you please help me to find a photo or a screenshot of her to Commons? Votbek (talk) 01:25, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

Not finding anything, sorry. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 02:26, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

YSAC page correction

Hey there, I'm just getting the hang of Wikipedia and have never edited so I thought I'd reach out. I think you created the page for You Suck at Cooking. I noticed something that is incorrect.

"You Suck at Cooking parodies the cooking tutorial genre of videos such as BuzzFeed's Tasty web series"

This article points out that YSAC started the channel six months before Tasty existed (and implies he may have started the genre of hands only food videos).

https://www.washingtonpost.com/arts-entertainment/2019/03/12/this-lo-fi-cooking-youtube-channel-is-antidote-hyper-stylized-food-instagram/

It seems more likely that Tasty based their style off of his videos as there are quite a few similarities and he had millions of views before they began. Slowpotato (talk) 16:22, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

@Slowpotato: Welcome to Wikipedia and thanks for the correction. You're right about the chronology. I think I had wanted to mention Tasty as an example of the genre rather than as an inspiration, but I've made an edit to try to avoid getting too into the weeds there. Of course feel free to edit the page yourself too. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 17:05, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Patricia A. Goldman has been accepted

Patricia A. Goldman, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 13:39, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Casey Johnston

Hello! Your submission of Casey Johnston at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Morgan695 (talk) 19:05, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Patricia A. Goldman

On 29 July 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Patricia A. Goldman, which you created and nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 13:15, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

Bonnie Aarons, sorry about that

Sorry, I did look at the diff, but only noticed the short description part of it. So, actually, thanks for being the person to finally provide a source. Largoplazo (talk) 21:29, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

@Largoplazo: Hameltion (talk | contribs) 21:48, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

Sep 20: Wikimedia NYC Annual Election Meeting

September 20: Annual Election & Members Meeting

You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our Annual Election & Members Meeting, with in-person at Prime Produce in Hell's Kitchen, Manhattan, as well as an online-based participation option. The Members' Meeting is similar to other WikiWednesday meetups, except that its primary function is to elect a new Board of Directors. We will elect five board seats. After being elected, those elected can potentially appoint more seats. We will also have a fun WikiWednesday! Election info: To run for election or to vote, you must be a dues-paying member of Wikimedia New York City, having renewed in the past 12 months. Voting will be both online, via emailed ballots from the ElectionBuddy service, and in-person. The poll will be open for the 48 hours between 8pm EDT on September 18 and 8pm EDT on September 20. For additional information, please consult the Election FAQ. Meeting info: Wednesday, September 20 Annual Election & Members Meeting (optional RSVP on-wiki). 6:00 pm – 7:00 pm (Open Hour) 7:00 pm – 9:00 pm (Wiki Salon) (Prime Produce, Hell's Kitchen, Manhattan) Also online via Zoom All attendees are subject to Wikimedia NYC's Code of Conduct. In addition, to participate in person, you should be vaccinated and also be sure to respect others' personal space, and we may limit overall attendance size if appropriate.

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:03, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Zach Bryan image / caption

Hey,

I generally don't mind the edits people make overriding mine, but the image caption edit you made on the Zach Bryan article didn't make sense, so I reversed it. You are welcome to change the image and caption again, it's just easier for me to undo it rather than edit it back to the original. Akyyka (talk) 19:59, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

@Akyyka: Looks like I missed the word at; restored. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 20:02, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

Ilene Woods edit

Thank you for pointing out that the date of birth is in the cited source. For some reason I did not see it there. I appreciate your correction. I still don't see the birth name in the cited source, though, so I am going to add a "Citation needed" tag for it. Eddie Blick (talk) 00:46, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Footballer RMs

All your proposed RMs are heading for mass opposition and rejection. I advise you to refrain from any further to save everybody further wasted time. GiantSnowman 15:19, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

@GiantSnowman: I'm not eager to attract mass opposition either, lol, so yes I'll hold off. I was interested in considering alternatives to longish titles, but I see that's not an ambition shared by soccer-focused editors. (WP:NCSP#Association football (soccer) could explain the consensus more clearly.) I'll admit to ignorance re Talk:Eric García (footballer, born 2001), where the positions are quite overlapping, but I disagree that "deep ignorance" is a fair charge at the other three, where there's room for good faith other interpretations. I hope you'll take another look at Talk:Paul Mullin (footballer, born 1994) in particular. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 17:11, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Delanie Sheehan‎

Looks like you got lucky! Not the picture hook, but it did get moved into Q5. When you look at the Weenink DYK, it may look a bit daunting. Reach out if you wish; I'm happy to walk you through. Here's good; I'm temporarily watching your page. Schwede66 01:05, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Yep, glad it worked out. I should avoid using the icon that moves the template to DYKNA, yeah? Will get to tomorrow. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 04:47, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

The Vatican Rag

Hi, thanks for creating the above article. What does 'According to a former hungry i bouncer' mean? Regards, JACKINTHEBOX • ^TALK 01:03, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

@JackintheBox: The hungry i is the club where the song was first recorded. A bouncer works club security. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 01:39, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

Thanks, I should have read the sentence before that one JACKINTHEBOX • ^TALK 00:49, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

Women's biographies

Hi there, Hameltion, and thank you for increasingly devoting your editing time to creating women's biographies, many of which are detailed enough to deserve a B-class rating. It seems to me you would be a useful member of WikiProject Women in Red where we are trying to chip away at the gender gap on Wikipedia. If you are interested, you can sign up under "New registrations" on Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/New members. I look forward in any case to many more articles about women. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 10:22, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

Thanks Ipigott, I've used WiR lists for ideas before (Katka Zupančič, Sofie Dossi, etc.). Just watchlisted Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Events. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 17:08, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

~ ~ ~ Merry Christmas! ~ ~ ~

Hello Hameltion: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, --Dustfreeworld (talk) 15:07, 25 December 2023 (UTC)