Your submission at Articles for creation: Ramesh Awatarsing (March 31)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
-Liancetalk/contribs 21:27, 31 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, HappyMauritius! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -Liancetalk/contribs 21:27, 31 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

April 2019

edit

  Hello, I'm Merlin04atschool. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to List of radio stations in Mauritius have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Merlin04atschool (talk) 17:05, 30 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: HappyMauritius (May 14)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.
Theroadislong (talk) 18:47, 14 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

BTV (Mauritius) moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, BTV (Mauritius), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 12:41, 20 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:BTV (Mauritius) has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:BTV (Mauritius). Thanks! CASSIOPEIA(talk) 12:42, 20 May 2019 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Roshi Bhadain, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Minister and And (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:31, 1 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: BTV (Mauritius) (June 3)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bkissin was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Bkissin (talk) 18:36, 3 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Kirti Choudhary

edit
 

The article Kirti Choudhary has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of satisfying either WP:NACTOR or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GSS (talk|c|em) 18:30, 19 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Avi Gopee moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Avi Gopee, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John from Idegon (talk) 17:25, 23 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mauritius Broadcasting Corporation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Best FM (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 00:40, 27 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shalini Runnoo (July 5)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Worldbruce was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Worldbruce (talk) 22:26, 5 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Urvashi Gooriah has been accepted

edit
 
Urvashi Gooriah, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Dial911 (talk) 02:34, 22 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bessika Bucktawor has been accepted

edit
 
Bessika Bucktawor, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 16:48, 22 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Article on Sandeep Maheshwari

edit

Hello HappyMauritius.The Title of the new article you created On Sandeep Maheswari is incorrect.It seems you put an extra i because you were not allowed to create the article with exact title — Preceding unsigned comment added by A Seeker of Truth (talkcontribs) 09:25, 1 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hello A Seeker of Truth, I have created the article Sandeep Maheshwari as it have enough notables articles, I did notify the administrator on his talk page to move/rename the this page to the original one, if need be to delete; I apologise if there is any mistakes on my end. Can you please advise, if the page is worthy for inclusion or if there is not enough press articles to support the required Sandeep Maheshwari page...please advise, thank you...?

Nomination of 100% Citoyens (Mauritius) for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 100% Citoyens (Mauritius) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/100% Citoyens (Mauritius) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 05:21, 2 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Sandeep Maheshwarii for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sandeep Maheshwarii is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandeep Maheshwarii until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. WBGconverse 17:32, 8 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Serenity Gate

edit

It is not remotely clear to me what you were doing with these edits. Serenity Gate (Mauritius) has nothing to do with Serenity (2019 film) as far as I can see. I have reverted your edits. --Yamla (talk) 15:00, 17 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Oh. I see the connection. Okay. You are welcome to reintroduce your edits if you wish, though Serenity Gate (Mauritius) currently needs a lot of work and a lot more appropriate sourcing. --Yamla (talk) 15:02, 17 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Abeydhanand Beejan concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Abeydhanand Beejan, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:25, 13 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Draft:BTV (Mauritius) concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:BTV (Mauritius), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:26, 20 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Avi Gopee concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Avi Gopee, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:39, 24 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Shalini Runnoo concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Shalini Runnoo, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 6 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Abeydhanand Beejan

edit
 

Hello, HappyMauritius. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Abeydhanand Beejan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! HasteurBot (talk) 06:01, 13 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:BTV (Mauritius)

edit
 

Hello, HappyMauritius. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "BTV".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! HasteurBot (talk) 13:00, 20 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Avi Gopee

edit
 

Hello, HappyMauritius. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Avi Gopee".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 17:30, 23 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Radio Plus (Mauritius), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Radio Plus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 1 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of TikTok Awards Night (Mauritius)

edit
 

The article TikTok Awards Night (Mauritius) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of significance

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 04:23, 2 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of BDO Mauritius

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on BDO Mauritius requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Lopifalko (talk) 17:46, 4 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Shalini Runnoo

edit
 

Hello, HappyMauritius. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Shalini Runnoo".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 09:29, 6 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Siza Roy concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Siza Roy, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 9 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Siza Roy

edit
 

Hello, HappyMauritius. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Siza Roy".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. kingboyk (talk) 18:55, 9 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Kushal Awatarsing

edit

I wasn't the one who prevented creation, so I wouldn't be willing to enable it without a discussion at deletion review first. Normally I'd suggest you create a draft at Draft:Kushal Awatarsing to demonstrate that it meets the usual inclusion criterion, but even that was once deleted Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Kushal Awatarsing and its' creation prevented. So, this is a toughie. I suspect you're gunning for the impossible, but if you're truly gung-ho, I suggest you find three very good sources, and present them at Deletion Review to get an endorsement on unprotecting the Draft. WilyD 13:20, 24 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

WilyD, I understand, I really regret that. I would better follow your instructions and try to improve on gathering more notable sources and then propose to review at deletion Review. Thanks for your advice Willy, i appreciate it. HappyMauritius (talk) 14:08, 24 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
It's a tough situation when an article has been spammed in the past, it creates a lot of negative priors on it. So, best not to waste any more time than necessary. I don't love the use of WP:THREE, but I think it accurately reflects the attitudes one is likely to encounter. Cheers, WilyD 15:03, 24 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yanish Engutsamy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Radio Plus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:23, 26 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Anupma Singh moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Anupma Singh, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Praxidicae (talk) 17:29, 27 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anupma Singh (June 9)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MapleSoy were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
MapleSoy (talk) 05:10, 9 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Avi Gopee moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Avi Gopee, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.

The above is boilerplate. This isn't. There is absolutely no showing whatsoever of notability. The 3 sources I sampled didn't even mention the subject of the article. John from Idegon (talk) 19:47, 14 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vrushali Chavan (June 21)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Hitro talk 06:44, 21 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:Mauritian Reality Shows has been nominated for renaming

edit
 

Category:Mauritian Reality Shows has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Fuddle (talk) 02:29, 28 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Harshani Mahadoo for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Harshani Mahadoo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harshani Mahadoo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - The9Man (Talk) 07:25, 29 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:Mauritian Radio Personalities has been nominated for renaming

edit
 

Category:Mauritian Radio Personalities has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Fuddle (talk) 21:49, 2 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:00, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Anupma Singh

edit
 

Hello, HappyMauritius. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Anupma Singh".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:19, 10 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Vrushali Chavan

edit
 

Hello, HappyMauritius. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Vrushali Chavan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:16, 22 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Avi Gopee

edit
 

Hello, HappyMauritius. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Avi Gopee".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 09:52, 28 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Vrushali Chavan

edit
 

Hello, HappyMauritius. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Vrushali Chavan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:34, 22 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Sherry Singh for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sherry Singh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sherry Singh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Celestina007 (talk) 19:06, 10 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Kili Paul moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Kili Paul, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DMySon (talk) 12:35, 18 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Kushal Awatarsing

edit

I don't think it'd be a problem to unprotect the page for a draft; the previous draft was created by a banned user and possibly by the subject, so I think it's best to start any draft completely from scratch. WilyD 13:28, 19 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

@WilyD: Thank you so much can you please proceed with unprotection so that i can start working on it from scratch. HappyMauritius (talk) 11:19, 20 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
You should be able to create a draft now. WilyD 21:21, 21 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thank you @WilyD. HappyMauritius (talk) 07:33, 22 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kushal Awatarsing (January 22)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Idoghor Melody was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 11:45, 22 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kili Paul (January 25)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Slywriter was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Slywriter (talk) 15:41, 25 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Polyeco moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Polyeco, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 13:24, 4 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Ehraz Ahmed for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ehraz Ahmed is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ehraz Ahmed (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

The Aafī on Mobile (talk) 07:15, 25 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

May 2022

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  MER-C 18:32, 27 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Unblock

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HappyMauritius (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I totally understand why i was blocked, and i promise not to make same mistake again. I will in the future make sure to review all required informations, news articles, writing style and reliable sources before working on an article. Could you please unblock me so that i can continue to contribute with all the required rules as mentioned within Wikipedia guidelines. Thank you, HappyMauritius (talk) 20:57, 27 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Stale unblock. You can make a new one if you want. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:19, 14 June 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please list all of the articles you have created and, for each one, specify whether or not you were paid for working on those articles, and by whom. I'm meaning this in the broad sense. If you were an employee of any of these companies, even an intern, that would count. This page can help you come up with your list. Please also tell us how you would adhere to WP:COI and WP:PROMO going forward and what you would work on, now that you know you won't be unblocked to continue advertising/spamming. --Yamla (talk) 21:07, 27 May 2022 (UTC)Reply


I agree should have been more careful while addressing an already discussed deleted article and promise to go through the required guidelines and cross verify all news articles and sources before proceeding to submit for review for any article that i would be creating in the future.

I apologise for the mistake done, and understand that I need to go through all the required guidelines including notability, verifying sources and going through WP:COI and WP:PROMO and all other guidelines before submitting an article for review. I mostly create articles based on Mauritius and Mauritian personalities, it was my first time trying to edit an article outside of what i normally create, and i understand and realise that i need take double precautions before proceeding to edit any articles especially if it has already been adddressed at deletion review earlier. HappyMauritius (talk) 21:42, 27 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Are you indicating you were paid to create those 26 articles? You haven't been clear on this point. Which articles were you paid to create, and by whom? Why on earth haven't you gone through WP:COI and WP:PROMO yet, given that you've been blocked? We expect you to do so before requesting an unblock, so please do so immediately and let us know how you plan to adhere to them, and whether or not you plan to continue creating articles for payment. Why are you talking about articles that have gone through deletion review, when that's not really relevant to your block? --Yamla (talk) 21:47, 27 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
For that matter, are you explicitly okay with us deleting all the articles you have created in violation of WP:COI and/or WP:UPE? --Yamla (talk) 21:48, 27 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
Planet FM (Mauritius) - I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article.
Wazaa FM (Mauritius) - I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article.
Jardin Balfour (Mauritius) - I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article.
Reform Party (Mauritius) - I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article.
Parti Malin (Mauritius) - I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article.
Roshi Bhadain - I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article.
MBC 3 (Mauritius) - I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article.
Hamari Bahu Silk - I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article.
Shakeel Mohamed - I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article.
Urvashi Gooriah - I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article.
Bessika Bucktawor - I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article.
Plateforme Militante (Mauritius) - I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article.
Sandra Mayotte - I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article.
Subhasnee - I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article.
TikTok Awards Night (Mauritius) - I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article.
Yanish Engutsamy - I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article.
Lockdown in Mauritius - I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article.
Patrick Assirvaden - I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article.
Lockdown Island - I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article.
Brandon Spinelly - I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article.
Rishon Bhadain - I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article.
Bruneau Laurette - I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article.
C'est La Vie (Mauritian TV Series) - I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article.
Guillaume Domingue - I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article.
Darren L'activiste - I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article.
Dev Sunnasy - I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article. HappyMauritius (talk) 21:50, 27 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
This list is not complete. Additionally, you will need to address what is wrong with (many/most of) these articles. --Yamla (talk) 21:56, 27 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
Kili Paul - I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article. I started writing about this person as he is widely known worldwide for his videos, sources available does not meet notability hence was rejected.
Polyeco - I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article. Is a company involved in the Wakashio incident in the indian ocean. It does not meet notability and needs more reliable sources before it's accepted.
Sherry Singh - I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article. He is the ceo of Mauritius Telecom, since being ceo is not enough for inclusion in wikipedia, it needs more reliable sources before it's accepted.
Avi Gopee - I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article. He is a mauritian radio personality, since there not much article speaking about the subject it needs more references and reliable sources, before it's accepted.
Ehraz Ahmed I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article. He has mostly promotional articles and is not yet ready to be accepted, it has only once source aljazeera which is acceptable and still needs more reliable sources for it to be accepted.
Anupma Singh - I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article. She does not have enough references and reliable sources, before it's accepted.
BDO Mauritius - I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article. BDO already has a main page company and BDO mauritius is not needed for a separate page.
Vrushali Chavan - I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article. She does not have enough references and reliable sources, before it's accepted.
Harshani Mahadoo - I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article. She does not have enough references and reliable sources, before it's accepted.
Draft: Kushal Awatarsing - I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article. There's only mentions in article about the subject it needs more references and reliable sources, before it's accepted. HappyMauritius (talk) 22:14, 27 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kili Paul (July 26)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Akevsharma was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.
Akevsharma (talk) 01:12, 26 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Kili Paul

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Kili Paul, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Akevsharma (talk) 01:14, 26 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

July 2022

edit

Hello, HappyMauritius. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. I'm sorry, but a page you created  Draft:Kili Paul has been deleted as meeting one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects of articles must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources which are unconnected with the subject and which provide verifiable information. Someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. Please see WP:CORP for subjects that are groups or companies or organizations. Please see WP:ANYBIO for subjects who are people.

Also, encyclopedia articles must be neutral in tone and not use language that promotes or advocates for a subject, or tries to cast the subject in a favorable light. Please see User:Deepfriedokra/promo for examples of content to avoid. Sometimes creators of promotional/advocational content are bewildered that it is considered such. If one has been trained to write such content, or if one has spent some time writing such content, one may simply be blind to non-neutral phrases or styles.

A common assumption is that the prohibition against promotional editing applies only to businesses or organizations. Anything can be promoted, including a person, a non-commercial organization, a point of view, etc.

CV's/resumé's are by their nature promotional. Writing about oneself or any connected subject is discouraged as the connection can make objectivity difficult. Information on avoiding advocational content and common pitfalls is here and here, however be aware that these are not exhaustive.

New article creation can be difficult, but the Article Wizard can help you. The new user tutorial can help you avoid future problems. You can also ask for help at the TEAHOUSE and on IRC chat

Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:38, 26 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Dev Sunnasy moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Dev Sunnasy, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 13:01, 5 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Dev Sunnasy

edit

  Hello, HappyMauritius. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dev Sunnasy, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:01, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Lockdown in Mauritius

edit
 

The article Lockdown in Mauritius has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Questionable notability, unreliable sources, and I can't find anything about it on google.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Born25121642 (talk) 08:11, 22 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Polyeco

edit

  Hello, HappyMauritius. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Polyeco, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:00, 30 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Polyeco

edit
 

Hello, HappyMauritius. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Polyeco".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 00:14, 28 April 2023 (UTC)Reply