Harkenbane
I noticed you were new, and wanted to share some links I thought useful:
- Wikipedia:Tutorial
- Wikipedia:Help desk
- M:Foundation issues
- Wikipedia:Policy Library
- Wikipedia:Utilities
- Wikipedia:Cite your sources
- Wikipedia:Verifiability
- Wikipedia:Wikiquette
- Wikipedia:Civility
- Wikipedia:Conflict resolution
- Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
- Wikipedia:Pages needing attention
- Wikipedia:Peer review
- Wikipedia:Bad jokes and other deleted nonsense
- Wikipedia:Brilliant prose
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures
- Wikipedia:Boilerplate text
- Wikipedia:Current polls
- Wikipedia:Mailing lists
- Wikipedia:IRC channel
Feel free to contact me personally with any questions you might have. Wikipedia:About, Wikipedia:Help desk, and Wikipedia:Village pump are also a place to go for answers to general questions. To read up on the latest wikinews, have a look at the Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost. You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, like this: ~~~~.
(Sam Spade | talk | contributions) 21:16, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Wild Horse
editI moved you recent additoon to the talk page, see my comments there. It is a rather unusual claim, not because I would not like it. -- Kim van der Linde at venus 02:55, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
- I am dyslectic, so please do not use spelling errors as a motivation but content arguments. -- Kim van der Linde at venus 18:31, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
Hi. I've reverted your recend changes. You did not use any edit summary, and removed a good "source" tag without submitting one. please be mroe carefull in future edits. --Procrastinating@talk2me 21:04, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
Heritability of IQ
editYou were right, I was mistaken, my apologies. I have restored your comments.
I agree that the Heritability article is not about race. But the issue is relevant to the Race and Intelligence article. In fact, I think that one problem with the Race and Intelligence article is that it makes claims about heritability that do not mesh with what is in the Heritability article.
User:Jagz issued an RfC on the Race and Intelligence article: whether it complies with NPOV. I would be grateful ff you would read over the article and the RfC comments and add your own. Thanks, Slrubenstein | Talk 12:35, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)