User talk:Helldiver2496

A belated welcome!

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Helldiver2496! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

If you have questions, just use this link to ask for help; a volunteer will visit you here shortly!

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! 〜 Adflatuss • talk 21:57, 21 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

May 2025

Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Hello, I'm Largoplazo. An edit that you recently made to Wikipedia community seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Largoplazo (talk) 22:57, 21 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at The Precinct (video game), you may be blocked from editing. —tony^{st (talk)} 01:42, 24 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Sorry about that. Helldiver2496 (talk) 01:43, 24 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

August 2025

Latest comment: 18 hours ago21 comments10 people in discussion

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make a disruptive edit to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at Apollo 13.

Please review WP:OVERLINKING - FlightTime (open channel) 18:34, 14 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Sorry about that. Helldiver2496 (talk) 18:47, 14 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:53, 14 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Helldiver2496 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

Request reason:

The following request was written through the unblock wizard.

Can you explain, in your own words, what you were blocked for?

I was blocked for not being here to build an encyclopedia.

If unblocked, what edits would you make and what (if applicable) would you do differently?

I will be more contribute to the accuracy of articles and fixing minor errors and spelling/grammar mistakes. I would not try and do major changes which could hurt an articles integrity and or contents.

Is there anything else that may be helpful to your unblock request?

I am sorry for any edits that may have hurt an articles integrity other than that Thank you for hearing me out on this appeal.

Helldiver2496 (talk) 01:48, 7 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

This doesn't really demonstrate that you understand what was wrong with your editing. 331dot (talk) 08:59, 7 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Helldiver2496 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

Request reason:

The following request was written through the unblock wizard.

Can you explain, in your own words, what you were blocked for?

I was blocked for not being here to build an encyclopedia. The reason I think I was blocked is that I was making grammar edits that were actually harmful instead of helpful to articles and adding information that wasn't needed for the article.

If unblocked, what edits would you make and what (if applicable) would you do differently?

I would add more information to articles but make sure they add something to an article and would also provide sources. I would also fix grammar but be more cautious and research whether the grammar was actually wrong or not, so it doesn't hurt the articles integrity.

Is there anything else that may be helpful to your unblock request?

Thank you for hearing out my appeal.

Helldiver2496 (talk) 21:27, 7 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been pending for more than two weeks with no response to questions raised during that time. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially address these questions.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information.

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Looking at your edits, it seems you were overlinking. Could you commit to not doing this in future? PhilKnight (talk) 05:29, 8 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

@NinjaRobotPirate: okay extending some rope? voorts (talk/contributions) 22:45, 18 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Uhhh... am I the only person on Wikipedia who thinks what was going on in The Precinct (video game) was crazy disruptive? The vast majority of this person's edits are either bordering on vandalism, or they're so incompetent that they're disruptive. And you guys are focusing on a bit of overlinking? Well, if that's the only thing you see wrong, go right ahead and unblock. Why not, right? It's not going to affect my life any if this person makes edits like Special:Diff/1286225698/1291861855 and fills up article histories with self-reverts. I mean, who am I to stand in the way of someone who wants to "be more contribute to the accuracy of articles". Clearly, this is someone who should be rewriting article leads about touchy subjects on English Wikipedia. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:07, 19 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Ok. @Helldiver2496: could you please discuss what was going on with your editing at The Precinct (video game). voorts (talk/contributions) 03:48, 20 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Helldiver2496 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

Request reason:

The following request was written through the unblock wizard.

Can you explain, in your own words, what you were blocked for?

For not being here to build an encyclopedia for overlinking.

If unblocked, what edits would you make and what (if applicable) would you do differently?

I would not overlink and would make grammatical edits and add new parts to an article.

Helldiver2496 (talk) 21:11, 8 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Please only open one unblock request at a time. If you need to answer a question, do so by replying to the other editor on your talk page. voorts (talk/contributions) 22:44, 18 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Helldiver2496 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

Request reason:

The following request was written through the unblock wizard.

Can you explain, in your own words, what you were blocked for?

I was blocked for overlinking on articles and "not being here to build and encyclopedia".

If unblocked, what edits would you make and what (if applicable) would you do differently?

I would not overlink at all and would likely just try to fix spelling and grammar mistakes and expand some articles.

Helldiver2496 (talk) 01:05, 20 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

At this point, it's clear you are just trolling and unblocking you would therefore be a mistake. Yamla (talk) 09:55, 20 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Helldiver2496 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

Request reason:

The following request was written through the unblock wizard.

Can you explain, in your own words, what you were blocked for?

I was blocked for over linking and "not being being here to build an encyclopedia"

If unblocked, what edits would you make and what (if applicable) would you do differently?

If i were unblocked I would try to improve Wikipedia overall like helping expand smaller less known articles and help fix grammar and spelling mistakes.

Is there anything else that may be helpful to your unblock request?

Nothing at all thank you for hearing me out.

Helldiver2496 (talk) 02:23, 21 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Procedural decline: duplicate request. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:30, 26 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Helldiver2496 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

Request reason:

The following request was written through the unblock wizard.

Can you explain, in your own words, what you were blocked for?

Overlinking and not being here to build an encyclopedia.

If unblocked, what edits would you make and what (if applicable) would you do differently?

I would try to fix grammar issues and expand on articles.

Is there anything else that may be helpful to your unblock request?

N/A.

Helldiver2496 (talk) 04:33, 26 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

You have not yet addressed your edits at The Precinct (video game) as previously instructed. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 17:26, 7 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Stop opening multiple requests. It does not help your case and in fact throws your request back at the bottom of the unblock queue. If you continue opening duplicate requests, talk page access will be revoked. voorts (talk/contributions) 12:16, 26 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Helldiver2496 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

Request reason:

The following request was written through the unblock wizard.

Can you explain, in your own words, what you were blocked for?

Overlinking and making harmful edits.

If unblocked, what edits would you make and what (if applicable) would you do differently?

I would generally try to improve grammar and expand upon articles to improve Wikipedia and I would not be a troll and overlink and make random useless edits.

Helldiver2496 (talk) 18:15, 19 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

It looks like you are not even reading the reasons why your previous requests were declined. The declined requests above don't show any real attempt to understand or reflect on why you were blocked.

I am declining this request, and since any unblock request (even a carelessly written one) takes time and effort from an administrator, I will also remove your access to edit your user talk page. bonadea contributions talk 10:04, 7 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

September 2026

Latest comment: 18 hours ago1 comment1 person in discussion

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. bonadea contributions talk 10:06, 7 September 2026 (UTC)Reply