Heyday to you

You all are free to contact me--Heyday to you (talk) 09:34, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Heyday to you, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Heyday to you! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 23:17, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020

Hello, I'm Flyer22 Frozen. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Fawad Chaudhry—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 07:47, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

Thnx Heyday to you (talk) 08:21, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Fawad Chaudhry. Thank you. SuperMarioMan (Talk) 12:31, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

May 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kali Yuga, you may be blocked from editing. --Killarnee (T•1•2) 16:01, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Pablomartinez. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Celeb Jihad—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. PabloMartinez (talk) 16:49, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Mahdi

Hi! Could you explain your Mahdi edits in substance? Is it a simplified version in the same language? Thanks! Juliette Han (talk) 15:46, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Urdu alphabet

Hi, thank you for your contribution to the Urdu alphabet page. But can you please explain why you removed the name in Urdu on the talk page thread about the change? Was is poorly formatted? or was it incorrect? Do you know where we can find the correct name? Irtapil (talk) 10:41, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

May 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Liam Boyce, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Robby.is.on (talk) 09:21, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for your addition to Liam Boyce. I had to remove it again because it still lacked a citation. Wikipedia requires content to be verifiable. Please make sure you include a reliable source when you add stuff. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 12:13, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bundesliga, you may be blocked from editing. --Jaellee (talk) 15:01, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Matt Green (footballer). Mattythewhite (talk) 14:08, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Dattatreya, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. GreaterPonce665 ^(TALK) 14:46, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Oleksandr Zinchenko (footballer), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:29, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

Transfermarkt

Please note that Transfermarkt is not a reliable source. Mattythewhite (talk) 14:17, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Heyday to you! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, User page, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

May/June 2020

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Dashavatara, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 15:26, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Removing sourced content and adding unsourced content… what were you thinking, Heyday to you? Robby.is.on (talk) 15:48, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Wayne Rooney, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. --Stay safe, ◊PRAHLAD^balaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 16:41, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

June 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Cow urine, you may be blocked from editing. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 06:36, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Dayot Upamecano, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Robby.is.on (talk) 11:09, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

You need to include reference when you add content as you've been told countless times. You're lucky not to have been blocked yet. Robby.is.on (talk) 11:27, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

Ok Heyday to you (talk) 11:28, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

Excuse the harsh tone of my message but it's frustrating to see you haven't really been taking advice on board. Robby.is.on (talk) 11:32, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

How can you say this Heyday to you (talk) 11:46, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

You repeatedly added content without including a reference and just now you used Transfermarkt as a source despite being told it's not reliable. Robby.is.on (talk) 12:23, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

It is reliable. This website tells all the player's latest statistics. Heyday to you (talk) 12:24, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

Check it out if you don't believe me Heyday to you (talk) 12:25, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

I know Transfermarkt very well. But it's not considered a reliable source here at Wikipedia because much of its content is user-generated. This evaluation is the result of discussions at WP:Footy, so it represents the consensus of football editors at the English Wikipedia. Robby.is.on (talk) 12:40, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

Why would you place a warning on the Talk page of an editor who hasn't edited since 2016? Robby.is.on (talk) 21:27, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

It was my 6 year old brother,not me Heyday to you (talk) 03:33, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

He did this, he knows how to operate wikipedia Heyday to you (talk) 03:36, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Heyday, it doesn't matter. You are responsible for all the edits made through your account. Please see Wikipedia:My little brother did it for more. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 04:38, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

I am serious bro Heyday to you (talk) 04:47, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

It is not a bluff Heyday to you (talk) 04:48, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

You also added a warning on my page??8Dodo8 (talk · contribs) 08:26, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

I was attempting to use sandbox,but couldn't figure it out Heyday to you (talk) 09:02, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Talk page vandalism

Please refrain from abusing warning or blocking templates. Doing so is a violation of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Thank you. Drat8sub (talk) 05:34, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

You vandalised the Sunil Chhetri's page by removing his awards. That's why I warned you Heyday to you (talk) 05:59, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 12:02, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Heyday to you (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I always tried to contribute judiciously to Wikipedia,but my edit source would be either unreliable,or the edit would be not good. Now I realise my mistake. So next time I will look for better edit source before editingHeyday to you (talk) 13:13, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This does not address your blatantly disruptive edits. Also, frankly, it does not convince me you understand WP:RS and WP:CITE. Yamla (talk) 13:47, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

AN/I notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Robby.is.on (talk) 08:17, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

WP:CIRCULAR

Please read our policy on circular references. Wikipedia (nor it's mirrors) cannot be used as a source for itself, as you did here. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:16, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Adding sources

Hi there - Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. You didn't provide a source for your changes to the Frédéric Sarah article, but I have found one and added it for you. Please try and remember to include sources yourself with future edits. Please let me know if you have any questions. GiantSnowman 14:55, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at David Abraham (footballer). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. GiantSnowman 18:24, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

Your figure seemed to be made up, given it was contradicted by stats sites. GiantSnowman 11:48, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Heyday to you! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Wikiproject History, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

Thanks and Martín Aguirregabiria

Hi. Thanks for the barnstar. Your caps update at Martín Aguirregabiria was not good:

• The number of appearances was wrong,
• you didn't update the timestamp.

Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 08:06, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

The problem is that the stats had previously not been updated since March 2019 as indicated by the timestamp, so you added +1 to a number that was correct in March 2019. Compare your change to mine and see the "club-update" parameter. "club-update" indicates as of which date the stats are correct. Robby.is.on (talk) 08:27, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

Don't worry. You know better now.

122.177.155.197 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) looks very much like you having logged out of your account. You shouldn't try to deceive other editors here by logging out and editing with your IP address. That will get you blocked. See Wikipedia:Sock puppetry. Robby.is.on (talk) 09:23, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

a barnstar

		The Hinduism Award
		I am your neighbour. You have done a good job in mythology related articles.122.177.155.197 (talk) 08:09, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you

		The Black Lives Matter Barnstar
		For drastically improving BLM page with small but mighty edits.Silver play button (talk) 15:07, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

Obvious sock is obvious. Robby.is.on (talk) 21:29, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

What do you mean? Heyday to you (talk) 04:32, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

Who else would create an account for the sole purpose of giving you a barn star???--Quisqualis (talk) 07:06, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

I don't have any idea about it. Heyday to you (talk) 07:08, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Heyday to you, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. The creeper2007^Talk! 19:56, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

@Heyday to you: Hello there, just so you know, Your name is cleared for this case above. But, these accounts do check to a similar IP. Thank you! The creeper2007^Talk! 17:51, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

June 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Kortney Hause, you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 19:41, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Infobox timestamps

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. Welcome to Wikipedia! I just wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions were not quite right. When updating statistics within the infobox of a footballer, please make sure you update the timestamp at the same time, so that both readers and fellow editors know when the information was last updated.

You can do this by replacing the existing timestamp within the |club-update= or |pcupdate= parameter for club stats, or the |nationalteam-update= or |ntupdate= parameter for international stats. For articles that use a DMY date format, use five tildes (~~~~~), or for MDY dates, use {{subst:mdytime}}. This will generate the specific time the update was made.

If you have any questions about this, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you, Mattythewhite (talk) 09:33, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

June 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Phil Jagielka. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:21, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Heyday to you! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Barnstars, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:04, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

Heyday to you (talk) 14:04, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

June 2020

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Joël Matip, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mattythewhite (talk) 13:14, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for competence issues and disruptive editing.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 13:36, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Hope to see you in the future

Heyday to you, although we welcome younger people, when it comes, for example, to biographies of living persons, it entails adult decisions with real legal ramifications, which we as a project are liable for. Wikipedia is more than having a social media-like account (userboxes, etc.). It's about wide scale publication of sourced information with encyclopedic standards. But I want to encourage you to join us again in a few years. More good nature volunteers are always welcomed enthusiastically. Which, in the future, I hope you become. El_C 14:09, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Heyday to you (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I've always tried to contribute judiciously to Wikipedia. If you see my edits,you'll see that nothing is offensive or disruptive in my edits. Just adding 'veteran' word before an experienced player doesn't mean that it is disruptive. I constantly update stats of players as I see that they're being ignored. Not only me,but other user also constantly receive warnings if they update player's stats. I also tried to provide references in infobox but then I would receive message by Mattythewhite that it is not correct format to provide source inside infobox. Please check my contributions. Even if my edits are vandalism or disruptive,I never do them on purpose. I am only a teenager. Out of approximately 350 edits,very few may be disruptive that too before I was first blocked by Materialscientist. I always provide good sources in my edits. But live updates to player's stats is not my cup of tea. Please give me a last chance,I'll try to enrich pages with info.Heyday to you (talk) 15:03, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Welp, this tells me you need to stop editing for at least six months, be a teenager, and come back when/if you are able to contribute constructively. --Deep fried okra (schalte ein) 16:18, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I never do them on purpose — Heyday to you, competence being required is the point. No one is implying you're editing in bad faith. El_C 15:15, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Block evasion

This user has engaged in block evasion as Ram muhammed singh silva, working toward a WP:CBAN under WP:3X. They used that account to launch personal attacks. --Yamla (talk) 10:14, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

I have never done this. Look at my contributions. Also IP addresses could be same depending on modem. My apartment has a single modem for all residents, that's why you guys might have been deceived by IP address similarity. Nothing offensive has been done on my side. I never evaded any blocks. You may show me proofs for the allegations you're rubbing on me. You may show which personal attack was done by that account on behalf of me which shows abusiveness. Personal attack is far too ahead of the allegations on me. You may mention me what personal attack was done from my side. No breach of policies was committed from my side. Heyday to you (talk) 12:53, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

You have taken my case from my unintentional edits to a far more serious case. Heyday to you (talk) 13:21, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

I will not tolerate such false claims on me. You have taken this matter too far. I don't have any other account which lead me into sockpuppetry allegations. Heyday to you (talk) 13:27, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

IP addresses can be same,if of same network. Heyday to you (talk) 13:29, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Sorry, but checkusers know more about such matters than you or I ever will, and they see more than you might think. Sorry it came to this. My advice would be to. 1) set preferences so you don't see talk page notification in your email. (I'm AGFing that that is how a user that was advised to stay away for 6 months knew about this latest wrinkle). 2) stay away for 6 months without creating any other accounts or editing w/o being logged in. 3) Edit constructively elsewhere in the Wikimedia projectscape. 4) come back in 6 months with a fresh perspective and improved skills/judgment. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:52, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Why 6 months? The block is indefinite. Is there any limit. Heyday to you (talk) 16:03, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

You need to reread the note from El-C and the block notice and my decline. Indefinite is not infinite. After 6 months of staying away you may be ready to edit. Now, no. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:29, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Now the last question,will the block be lifted after 6 months? Heyday to you (talk) 16:43, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

If your appeal convinces the reviewer that it has merit. El_C 16:55, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Wait a second, why was heyday banned for socking, there wasn't an investigation! The creeper2007^Talk! 00:25, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

User is not banned for socking. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:15, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

User is not banned at all. The user is blocked, under WP:CIR. Subsequently, the user engaged in confirmed block evasion. --Yamla (talk) 01:16, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Sorry everyone, I was too used with the word ban(from gaming). The user page of heyday said that there was a case of socking tho. The creeper2007^Talk! 01:25, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

The creeper2007, Heyday was blocked for competence issues and disruptive editing. After their block, there is Checkuser evidence that Heydey created another account to evade their block, hence the "sockpuppet" notice on their user page. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 13:26, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Shouldn't someone change the suspected socking noice to a confirmed socking notice? and what warranted a cu?The creeper2007^Talk! 19:42, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

I checked contributions of my 'so called' sockpuppet suspected account. It doesn't has any element of block evasion. Heyday to you (talk) 02:51, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Still I am ready to co-operate Heyday to you (talk) 04:33, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Every time you edit, with this account or any other, or not logged in, you reset the 6 month timer. Please find something non Wikipedia related to do. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 06:07, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

That account was created 8 days ago and I was blocked 6 days ago. So I didn't attempt to evade any block Heyday to you (talk) 15:39, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Every time you edit, it resets the clock. I will make this easier to you for adhere to. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:44, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

It doesn't matter when you created your other account. It was used AFTER this account was blocked; therefore, you attempted to evade your block. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 15:49, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

June 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for WP:CIR issues and disruptive editing. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.   --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:54, 30 June 2020 (UTC)