User talk:hmwith/August07
| 2007 | <<
|
<<
|
<<
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
|||||||||||||
| 2008 | •
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
|||||||||||||
| 2009 | •
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
|||||||||||||
| 2010 | •
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
>>
|
>>
|
>>
|
>>
|
>>
|
>>
|
>>
|
>>
|
"Get well soon"
| Gifts | Uplifting messages |
|---|---|
| File:AlmondFlower.jpg | Get well soon! Hope you're feeling better soon, take care! umdrums 14:50, 26 July 2007 (UTC) |
|
Ditto, dear Hayley... Rest a lot, and get well soon! Much love your way! :) Phaedriel - 08:43, 28 July 2007 (UTC) |
|
That's a big smile from me, hope you get well soon! Peacent 15:58, 28 July 2007 (UTC) |
|
A flower for you, my friend. Get well soon! --wpktsfs 19:58, 28 July 2007 (UTC) |
|
Sorry, couldn't resist :) I had no knowledge of your surgery but it's good to see you've got through it well enough to be able to get back on the internets. I hope you recover soon, and continue to grace Wikipedia with your awesome presence! Best regards, - Zeibura (Talk) 18:36, 29 July 2007 (UTC) |
|
Davnel03 has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Get well soon! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Davnel03 16:13, 1 August 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
I, too, hope you get well soon. As we discussed above, when you're feeling better I would like to nominate you for adminship. WaltonOne 16:52, 1 August 2007 (UTC) |
| Sorry about the repetition (I'm sure you get the point by now :D) but anyway, best wishes with the after-surgery stuff, and get well soon!
Kind regards, | |
| Just noticed your message about surgery... I'm glad to hear that you're doing well ("well" being a very relative phrase here). Here's hoping you'll make a full recovery sooner rather than later. As an aside, I'm incredibly impressed by Image:N12453669 32127896 9556.jpg; that's true dedication to Wikipedia right there, turning a bad situation into an opportunity for the project. Three cheers, my dear. ;) EVula // talk // ☯ // 18:38, 2 August 2007 (UTC) |
Vandalism accusations
Please don't make bad faith accusations of vanalism like you did against 75.180.8.55. Jason Harvestdancer | Talk to me 17:41, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
- Assume good faith on my part, friend. I just gave the generic 1st level warning using VW for removing sourced content without any reasoning or mention on talk page. I just hoped that, in the future, this user will now know more about how Wikipedia works. There was a discussion on the talk page, and the edit actually ended up being valid, but it took a long discussion to get there. A user removing sourced content from articles for no apparent reason sometimes seems like vandalism at first glance. Political articles get very heated, at times, and users must be wary of edits and make sure consensus is met be making big changes. Random deletions of facts with no discussion usually get reverted in the circumstances, especially removing of something that has been in an article for a while (this is a hypothetical situation). I'll try to use a different template for future similar circumstances in other articles. I will apologize to the user as well. Happy Wikying, hmwith talk 17:52, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
- The removal of content template might have been better, but removal of content can be considered vandalism, and I just cant see what all teh fuss is about! Just thought it might be worth noting that that IP went on to vandalise shortly afterwards aliasd·U·T 10:38, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, I meant to use that one, but I just accidentally clicked the first generic one. OOPS! I"m usually really good about that. Admitted mistake by me. Thanks for putting in your word though. =) hmwith talk 15:13, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
- I figured that was the case, I just didn't see why such a fuss was made about it all :) Aw well, get well soon, and cheers for watching Recent Changes aliasd·U·T 15:22, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
- Haha, thanks. Yeah, I was surprised about all of the "fuss" as well. I think it has to do with the edit concerning a presidential candidate. People get very heated with anything political here, naturally. hmwith talk 15:30, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
- Assume good faith on my part, friend. I just gave the generic 1st level warning using VW for removing sourced content without any reasoning or mention on talk page. I just hoped that, in the future, this user will now know more about how Wikipedia works. There was a discussion on the talk page, and the edit actually ended up being valid, but it took a long discussion to get there. A user removing sourced content from articles for no apparent reason sometimes seems like vandalism at first glance. Political articles get very heated, at times, and users must be wary of edits and make sure consensus is met be making big changes. Random deletions of facts with no discussion usually get reverted in the circumstances, especially removing of something that has been in an article for a while (this is a hypothetical situation). I'll try to use a different template for future similar circumstances in other articles. I will apologize to the user as well. Happy Wikying, hmwith talk 17:52, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Another RfA?
Hey Hayley...I know you've just had surgery and are still recovering, but after all that is out of the way, do you think you're ready for another RfA? I looked over #1, and I personally think (as someone who opposed then) that you've addressed the issues raised. Have a think about it, and give me a yell :) Giggy Talk | Review 22:01, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
- Well, thank you. I've tried to address all issues, and enjoyed doing so, of course! I know that Walton was interested in nominating me, so maybe a co-nom or something is in order. It doesn't matter to me. There were a few people who offered to nominate me, but whoever wants to do it... can. =) Contact him and see who wants to make the first move. Another week or so for me to be able to adequately address concerns and optional questions (I'm not checking Wikipedia every few hours like usual quite yet). I appreciate you contacting me, and I look forward to what's upcoming. Cheers! hmwith talk 23:33, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Walton is on holidays until August 14...if you like, I'll write a nom up some time in the next few days, leave him a note, and you can accept around August 15 after he's written up a co-nom...if that's all OK with you :D Giggy Talk | Review 23:41, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
- Sounds wonderful! I'm only afraid that some people will oppose due to lack of current inactivity. hmwith talk 23:43, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
When you've been sick? Rubbish...they'd be mad! Giggy Talk | Review 23:49, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
- Haha, without researching why I haven't first, they might. Hey, I've seen people oppose for more absurd reasons! You never know, but let's give it a go! (unintentional rhyme) hmwith talk 23:51, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/hmwith 2 - Done! You can wait for Walton, or answer the questions now, or whatever. Good luck :) Giggy Talk | Review 00:07, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
- I'll wait for Walton, and then I'll answer the questions, and get this on the road! =) Thanks! hmwith talk 17:48, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
Tsk tsk...editing my userpage :P When will you learn? Giggy Talk | Review 22:28, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
- Luckily I'm online (I'm on holiday and editing from a public computer, hence why I'm using my alternate account) so I'll add a co-nom now. Good luck! Waltonalternate account 13:54, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Alright, when I'm ready in a few days here, I'll post the acceptance. =) hmwith talk 21:53, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks!
Thanks for the support on my RFA, I'm looking forward to it! --AW 15:11, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Being There (magazine), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as articles for deletion. If you can indicate how Being There (magazine) is different from the previously posted material, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on Talk:Being There (magazine) saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we request you to follow these instructions. Calton | Talk 14:41, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your comment
Thank you for your comment on my RfA, which was successful. LyrlTalk C 00:41, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
Your RfA
Probably best to wait a few weeks. Apart from anything else, RfA is so stressful that I really wouldn't advise you to undertake one right after recovering from surgery. I'm sorry to hear that you had a bad relapse; I was a little worried about you, seeing as you weren't editing, and I hope you're feeling better now. My advice is, try to ease yourself back into the routine of editing, and don't worry about the RfA for the time being. WaltonOne 17:13, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Agree with Walton. Put it up when you feel ready - my nom mentions your lack of activity, so anytime is fine. Giggy Talk 01:07, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
- I've just added my co-nomination, as I promised you a month or so ago that I would co-nominate you! :) Acalamari 21:26, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
- Very interesting indeed! I've got to say though, you're better on facebook than wikipedia - more pics to look at! ;-) Ryan Postlethwaite 21:32, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
- Haha, yeah, we've been documenting the surgical results. You can see the "out of it"-ness in my face if you look closely. I have absolutely NO idea what's going on, haha. However, it would have been interesting to see an article I would have attempted to write during that time. hmwith talk 21:42, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
- It took me long enough, but I added my co-nom as well. :-) IronGargoyle 23:25, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks! I'm looking forward to this! hmwith talk 00:24, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- Haha, yeah, we've been documenting the surgical results. You can see the "out of it"-ness in my face if you look closely. I have absolutely NO idea what's going on, haha. However, it would have been interesting to see an article I would have attempted to write during that time. hmwith talk 21:42, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
- Very interesting indeed! I've got to say though, you're better on facebook than wikipedia - more pics to look at! ;-) Ryan Postlethwaite 21:32, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
Secret Hidden page!!!
I have been searching for your secret hidden page for a couple days now!! It is really hard! Kudos for making such a hard page, but I will find it eventually!! While I search for yours, you should try to find mine. It's not that hard, but it will let people know I have one when you find it! Flamingtorch372 16:58, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
- I've tried looking for it... but it's just impossible to locate. I give you props for hiding it so well. Maybe if I got a hint....... -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 23:26, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
- Hint? Look above and beyond... hmwith talk 00:24, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- Hey, thats a new hint! It used to be think outside the box! lol. And yes, I have tried looking for it. It is extremely difficult, but I know I will find it sooner or later. Flamingtorch372 21:09, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- Man YOU are a PRO. I still can't find it. Would it help if I mention I'm a Coldplay fan? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 23:58, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- Hint? Look above and beyond... hmwith talk 00:24, 31 August 2007 (UTC)