User talk:hmwith/October09
| 2007 | <<
|
<<
|
<<
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
|||||||||||||
| 2008 | •
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
|||||||||||||
| 2009 | •
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
|||||||||||||
| 2010 | •
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
>>
|
>>
|
>>
|
>>
|
>>
|
>>
|
>>
|
>>
|
RE: Request
Thanks, bud! :) Master of Puppets - Call me MoP! :D 14:43, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
spam
I know that you've been interested in these issues in the past. Wikipedia:WikiProject Administrator — Ched : ? 04:22, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
Word count of evidence
[The following was copied here from the user's talk page to have the whole conversation in one place for archiving purposes]:
Your evidence is currently over 1000 words, which is the limit. Please shorten it ASAP to the most important material that makes your points, or excess may be removed. Also, make sure the titles make specific points rather than just saying they're replies. hmwith☮ 22:21, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
- My main evidence is under 1000 words and stops at the "Arab Cowboys behavior at other related places" part. Those two after are responses to NF and cactus.--Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 22:21, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
- I'm just counting your section, and Microsoft Word 2007 word count puts the content in Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Asmahan/Evidence#Evidence presented by Supreme Deliciousness at about 2000 words. hmwith☮ 22:28, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
- Are you also counting the "Response to account Nefer Tweety" and "Response to CactusWriter" sections? --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 22:30, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, you put that on the evidence page as part of your evidence. hmwith☮ 22:31, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
- Its not really my evidence, its my responses to they're evidence.--Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 22:44, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
- If it's not evidence, it doesn't belong on the page. Here, I'll move it to the talk page and link to it. hmwith☮ 22:58, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
- It is responses to they're posts, would it be alright to put it in collapse so people can click on show if they want to read it? --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 23:05, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
- If it's not evidence, it doesn't belong on the page. Here, I'll move it to the talk page and link to it. hmwith☮ 22:58, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
- Its not really my evidence, its my responses to they're evidence.--Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 22:44, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, you put that on the evidence page as part of your evidence. hmwith☮ 22:31, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
- Are you also counting the "Response to account Nefer Tweety" and "Response to CactusWriter" sections? --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 22:30, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
- I'm just counting your section, and Microsoft Word 2007 word count puts the content in Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Asmahan/Evidence#Evidence presented by Supreme Deliciousness at about 2000 words. hmwith☮ 22:28, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
Asmahan case
Hey. I just saw that FayssalF was moved to the inactive arbitrators list. What does that mean to the Asmahan case? — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 17:38, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
- FayassalF can no longer to be the clerking arbitrator, but John Vandenberg is taking up this case. It should continue normally. Cheers, hmwith☮ 18:43, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 07:07, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
Media bias in India
Hi HmWith, There is a need for article that gives a picture of different types of bias displayed by the media. This is a serious issue where a small group of individuals push their own agenda. There is research being done but the results are not fully available online. If you can revert the delete or point to deleted version, I will edit it offline and provide references. This is a serious issue people of India are waking up to and it deserves a write up in Wikipedia. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raguks (talk • contribs)
- I moved this comment to my talk page, as it seems that you accidentally added it to the archives. As for Media bias in India, I restored the article in order to generate a discussion on whether or not it should be deleted at WP:Articles for deletion/Media bias in India. Feel free to take part in the discussion. hmwith☮ 18:37, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
Clerk for recall
Ottava Rima wishes to initiate a recall effort against me. I need an impartial clerk per Lar's/my criteria, and I don't remember offhand having dealings with you before. Are you available?--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 20:30, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
- I'm pretty busy with RL at the moment (as you can see by my few edits lately), so I don't think I can commit the time to this. However, if you can't find anyone else, let me know. Best of luck, hmwith☮ 20:47, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
- Will do. Thanks! --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 20:51, 28 October 2009 (UTC)