User talk:Hurrygane/Archive 1

Archive 1

For Euro 2016 section, can you put up a photograph with Ronaldo with the trophy? It's a very important trophy and I think it should be highlighted — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aavelarx (talk • contribs) 01:14, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Welcome

Hello, Hurrygane, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! clpo13(talk) 18:04, 1 December 2015 (UTC) Getting started Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Help directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Gianluigi Donnarumma

@Hurrygane: I did not delete the section, I just merged it into the Milan section. It is clearer this way because some information may belong in both sections and wouldn't be right to be included in one section or another. This way it is one place and easier to follow. By the way, I think that is enough about his "reception", you only need so much before it becomes redundant. Regards, Vaselineeeeeeee (talk) 17:22, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

That's alright! Hurrygane (talk) 16:37, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

January 2016

Greetings. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Lionel Messi, did not appear to be constructive and has been or will be reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Awards for soccer players should not include website or magazine awards. Only sourced awards from official soccer agencies. All awards for foxsoccer.com have been removed as they are against consensus. Shreerajtheauthor (talk) 22:56, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

April 2016

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Qed237 (talk) 15:07, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

The "show preview" button is right next to the "save page" button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Qed237 (talk) 15:09, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

UEFA Euro 2016 statistics

There is no point in continuously adding and removing names from the top speed and saves list when they were previously mentioned in the reference. By that logic, only 5 names should be on the goalscorers and assists lists at any given time. I think names that are already there should be left alone until UEFA releases full lists in the reference (which they should do as with previous Euros), at which point more complete lists can be made. Davykamanzi → talk • contribs • alter ego 21:21, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

(edit) Since the top speed and saves lists can never be properly tracked using the reference, it would probably be better to get rid of them altogether or at least until UEFA releases full lists. Davykamanzi → talk • contribs • alter ego 21:24, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Understood. Hurrygane (talk) 21:31, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Portugal v Iceland (UEFA Euro 2016)

The article Portugal v Iceland (UEFA Euro 2016) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable individual match, all the important details are already covered at UEFA Euro 2016 Group F#Portugal vs Iceland, with only additions failing WP:NOTNEWS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:24, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Third place medals in EUROs

You might want to open a discussion rather than edit war over the medals. Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football might be the best place for the discussion. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:26, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Odsonne Edouard

The article Odsonne Edouard has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable as he has yet to play in a professional league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kante4 (talk) 11:01, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of José Gomes (footballer, born 1999)

The article José Gomes (footballer, born 1999) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable. Has not played in a professional league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kante4 (talk) 11:02, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of José Gomes (footballer, born 1999) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article José Gomes (footballer, born 1999) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/José Gomes (footballer, born 1999) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kante4 (talk) 12:44, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Odsonne Edouard for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Odsonne Edouard is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Odsonne Edouard until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kante4 (talk) 12:46, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of José Gomes (footballer, born 1999)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on José Gomes (footballer, born 1999), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sir Sputnik (talk) 13:06, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Odsonne Edouard

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Odsonne Edouard, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sir Sputnik (talk) 13:10, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Portugal v Iceland (UEFA Euro 2016) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Portugal v Iceland (UEFA Euro 2016) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Portugal v Iceland (UEFA Euro 2016) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joseph2302 (talk) 06:34, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Hurrygane, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Cold Water (song) has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 02:17, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Hey! There's not a question about it; I could've improved the article. No reason to delete the whole thing without my permission! These type of roadblocks make me want to give up on Wikipedia. Spent hours and hours on that page. As it seems, now I have to start from the scratch again. — Hurrygane 15:14, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

You might want to try looking at the article history. Diannaa only removed plagiarism, someone else redirected the article. Ian.thomson (talk) 12:28, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Odsonne Édouard

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Odsonne Édouard, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sir Sputnik (talk) 13:09, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

The page was previously deleted because Édouard didn't own any professional experience to his name. Since then, he has signed a professional contract with PSG. Moreover, Odsonne Édouard has joined their first-team squad for the pre-season and 2016 ICC. — Hurrygane 19:48, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Odsonne Édouard for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Odsonne Édouard is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Odsonne Édouard (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:44, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

"Sloppy" sources

Sources don't have to be formatted with a citation template, but I do appreciate your efforts to cite sources with a template. SLBedit (talk) 18:05, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Team North America (ice hockey), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peter Chiarelli. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Hurrygane. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Blue-throated macaw

It's not about photo quality. The infobox invariably has a full body shot while close ups can appear either in the text or in a gallery. I strongly disagree with your editGreg5030 (talk) 05:04, 18 December 2016 (UTC).

Speedy deletion nomination of Jake Oettinger

Hello Hurrygane,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Jake Oettinger for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Okamialvis (talk) 15:41, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Auston Matthews

Regarding him being the fastest Leaf to score 25 goals, that is impossible, as Dave Andreychuk had 25 in 31 games in 1992-93 after being traded to the team. And if they want to count from the start of the season, Rick Vaive had his 25th in the Leafs 41st game in 1981-82. That is obviously faster than Matthews, so I'm guessing either Mirtle or the Elias Sports Bureau got mixed up. I emailed Mirtle regarding this, see what comes of it. Kaiser matias (talk) 11:58, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Thank you. After reading the first sentences from your message, I instantly thought you should contact Mirtle per WP:NOR. Hurrygane (talk) 12:08, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Well as was pointed out to me in his reply, I should take more care in reading over things. The wording from the article is weird (why he doesn't just use the phrase "rookie" is odd) but he's correct, and I was not. Kaiser matias (talk) 18:38, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Délicieuse Musique) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Délicieuse Musique, Hurrygane!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for taking the time to create this article - it's appreciated. Could you please look it over and see if you can address the issues raised in the improvement tags? Thanks in advance for any help you can offer. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 14:04, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Block notice

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

--DashyGames (contribs) 15:49, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dmitri Osipov (ice hockey, born 1996)

The article Dmitri Osipov (ice hockey, born 1996) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails to meet notability guidelines, i.e. WP:GNG/WP:NHOCKEY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GiovanniSidwell (talk) 22:12, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

European Sportsperson of the Year

added links pointing to Leta, Fena, Efe, Belga, Hina and Lusa

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Adam Ruzicka for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adam Ruzicka is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Ruzicka until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ravenswing 19:12, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Jake Oettinger for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jake Oettinger is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jake Oettinger until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ravenswing 19:16, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Juuso Välimäki for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Juuso Välimäki is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juuso Välimäki until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ravenswing 19:16, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Elias Pettersson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elias Pettersson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elias Pettersson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ravenswing 19:18, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Nico Gross for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nico Gross is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nico Gross until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ravenswing 19:20, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Eric Semborski for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eric Semborski is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Semborski until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ravenswing 19:25, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

About Martunis

Hi there. I'm Felix and i'm Indonesian. I was following every news when tsunami happened because it fulfilled the media for about 2 months. And I found the evidence that Martunis was found with no.10 fake shirt usually sold by hawkers like in this news outlet: https://www.brilio.net/olahraga/ini-kabar-martunis-korban-tsunami-aceh-yang-jadi-anak-angkat-cr7-160720w.html He was given no.1 shirt by Portuguese players when he and his father attended invitation from Lisbon. Thank you anyway for your concern and contributions to this article. Cheers.

I honestly don't care. Go out there and make your contribution. But don't undo my edits unless you have a valid source AND NOTE attached to your claim. Don't twist sources. Hurrygane (talk) 10:23, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

About Pummelfee

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Pummelfee a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Qed237 (talk) 16:50, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

June 2017

This is your only warning; if you create an inappropriate page again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Qed237 (talk) 16:51, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Chubby fairy

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Chubby fairy, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Qed237 (talk) 16:53, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Blocked

I've blocked you for 31 hours for creating two attacking redirects aimed at Mario Götze. See WP:GAB for your appeal rights.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:12, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Ronaldo

Hey, I see on Ronaldo's first paragraph that it says he has won 21 trophies. Since the 2002 supertaca was added can you now change it to 22 titles won Aavelarx (talk) 19:10, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

@Aavelarx: I will do it on Tuesday. I'm currently requesting to be unblocked. Hurrygane (talk) 14:32, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Ronaldo

Ronaldo won 22 trophies. Can you update his first paragraph where it only has 21

Aavelarx (talk) 19:13, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

@Aavelarx: I will do it on Tuesday. I'm currently requesting to be unblocked. Hurrygane (talk) 14:32, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Hurrygane (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

After I had decided to create redirect pages for Pummelfee and Chubby fairy, I realised they could be deemed as offensive. Therefore, I checked out if there were redirect pages for Wacko Jacko and Man U. My findings encouraged me to proceed. Even though some supporters find "Man U" extremely disturbing and disrespectful, it has never been under discussion. So, I thought these "two attacking redirects aimed at Mario Götze" would be okay as well.



While creating the redirect page for his nickname, I decided to use hidden text to support my view. In the hidden text I explained my actions briefly. According to Philip Oltermann of The Guardian "Pummelfee or “chubby fairy” is the nickname his Dortmund team-mates gave him after he struggled to lose weight following an injury". Moreover, Oltermann understands that it may seem harsh "but it also spoke of admiration".



Personally, I'm a huge fan of Götze. I did not intend to violate your policies but I understand that my behaviour might have seemed snooty and inappropriate. Therefore, I apologize.

Accept reason:

Thank you for the explanation and the apology. Generally, you shouldn't be creating a redirect with a name that isn't mentioned in the target article. Whether those nicknames are noteworthy enough to put in the article is not for me to decide, but it sound dubious. Notwithstanding, the block was for a personal attack, and I can see that you did not intend to do that. I will therefore unblock you. Bbb23 (talk) 14:44, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Semi-protection of List of career achievements by Cristiano Ronaldo

You know I'm not an admin, right? Article protection requests should be placed at WP:RFPP. – PeeJay 20:10, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Cold Water (song)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Cold Water (song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 21:21, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Cold Water (song)

The article Cold Water (song) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Cold Water (song) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 09:41, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

André Silva (footballer)

Hello there, from Portugal,

how about now, do we have a compromise please? You do realize you left the source #30 with one display and all the others from UEFA or FIFA with another, i equalled them all now (by the way, no need for publisher field AND website/newspaper, either one or the other is enough).

Attentively, happy editing --Quite A Character (talk) 21:19, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Délicieuse Musique

The article Délicieuse Musique has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet WP:CORP or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 15:53, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Anttoni Honka

The article Anttoni Honka has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Boleyn (talk) 16:02, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

I've tagged it for deletion, but it gives you a week to add a source. All biographies of living people need WP:INLINECITED sources from the start. External links are usually friendly suggestions, rather than sources. Please do not create unref articles, like this and The Best FIFA Goalkeeper, as the WP:BURDEN is on the creator to verify all information they add. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 16:06, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Are the external links at Jerry Turkulainen actually your sources? If so, can you change the heading from 'External links' to 'Sources', and WP:INLINECITE? At the moment, it appears to be an unreferenced biography of a living person. If you ping me when the issue is sorted, I'll tick the article off as reviewed, so it can be indexed by search engines. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 16:08, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

@Boleyn: Done. All of them are sourced. Hurrygane (talk) 16:27, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Hurrygane, that's wonderful, thanks for your prompt response. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 18:42, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Cristiano Ronaldo: The World at His Feet) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Cristiano Ronaldo: The World at His Feet, Hurrygane!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please do not use imdb as a source, it is specifically banned at WP:RELIABLESOURCES. Thanks for creating this and your other sources are fine.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 16:04, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for the clarification, @Boleyn. Hurrygane (talk) 19:03, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Cassius Götze) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Cassius Götze, Hurrygane!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

This redirect apepars to make no sense - Cassius is not mentioned on the surname page.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 16:11, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (European Sportsperson of the Year) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating European Sportsperson of the Year, Hurrygane!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

This has been tagged for one issue.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 18:41, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Óscar Rodríguez Arnaiz

Please stop recreating this page, his appearance in the Copa del Rey was against a team from a non-fully professionale league. He therefore does not pass WP:NFOOTY, therefore the decision at the last AfD still stands. Fenix down (talk) 22:53, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

@Fenix down: Óscar Rodríguez Arnaiz is similar to the article Francisco Feuillassier. I tried to place a tag on that page requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. My request didn't pass through. Instead, User:Boing! said Zebedee told me that "when a CSD has been declined I should not reinstate it". Hurrygane (talk) 13:46, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the ping. It's true that you shouldn't reinstate a CSD once it has been declined, but with two editors now pointing out that WP:NFOOTY is still not satisfied I'm now happy that the old AFD is still applicable, and I have deleted Francisco Feuillassier. I'll be happy to undelete it as soon as he does pass WP:NFOOTY. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:51, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

I understand my wrongdoing. Thank you for deleting the article. Hurrygane (talk) 14:00, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Don't worry about it - if he does play a game in a fully professional league, let me know and I'll be happy to restore the article. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:19, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Hurrygane. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Adidas Telstar 18 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adidas Telstar 18 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adidas Telstar 18 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

A page you started (Kinkomaa) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Kinkomaa, Hurrygane!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please add your sources.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 19:45, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

@Boleyn: I'll sort the issue right away! By the way, do you have time to review articles Football Paradise and These Football Times? They have been unreviewed much longer than the page in question (Kinkomaa) ever was. Hurrygane (talk) 17:12, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Hi Hurrygane, thanks for that. The other two on blogs are best left to someone who knows more than me on this area, which I suspect is why they haven't been reviewed yet - I'm not sure if the sourcing is strong enough as yet. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 19:03, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Template:Cite news - Reply

Hello there, from Portugal,

not sure I understand the guideline just with a quick glance at your message, but I will "study" the procedures properly. Thanks for the tip!

Best back, happy editing --Quite A Character (talk) 11:49, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

• Ah, I (think I can) see! I usually do so to differentiate (in display) between newspapers (their online versions or akin), shown in italics, and those there are not. I know, not a very technical reply, but I tried to be sincere as to where I'm coming from. Best again --Quite A Character (talk) 13:53, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Hannah Rae Wikipedia page.

Hello! I added information to this page. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hannah_Rae I hope you do not mind. I'm sorry for my English. I do not speak English. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaraatin (talk • contribs) 16:52, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Football Paradise

Hello, Hurrygane. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Football Paradise, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 22:50, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Playmaking

Playmaking is much more than assists, and it’s clear Ronaldo isn’t that. He’s a goalscorer. Just because you have 3 years’ worth of experience, doesn’t make you right. Since you decided to send me a link, let me send one your way: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Playmaker Wardrobedude (talk) 19:08, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

I have seen on the Cristiano Ronaldo page that there is a disagreement regarding the understanding of the term 'playmaking'. I have to agree with Wardrobedude, as I don't think anyone could seriously describe Ronaldo as a playmaker. If you are using the number of assists to decide he is a playmaker then you are mistaken, as this is very problematic when defining a playmaker. For example, If a midfielder plays a throughball which splits the defence and allows the striker a one on one with the keeper, but the striker plays it square to a team mate for a tap in, the assist goes to the striker, when in fact the play was made by the midfielder's pass. Also, think of Ronaldo's goal against Porto for United, despite him scoring an amazing goal from 30 yards, somebody passed the ball to him and that counts as an assist, which is nonsense. Statistics in football rarely tell the whole story and this is especially true with assist statistics. O'Flannery (talk) 09:23, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

@Wardrobedude and O'Flannery: Wasn't my point but I see where you're getting at. However, I don't like to build an article upon opinions—hence I added four objective sources claiming that Ronaldo's in fact a fine playmaker. Unfortunately, User:Ahecht undid my revision as "too many sources were cited, to the point that it broke the page by exceeding the template limit". Note that I'm not saying Ronaldo's a fantastic playmaker. That's a subjective opinion and it has no weight whatsoever in Wikipedia. Hurrygane (talk) 16:53, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

@Hurrygane: Feel free to add a source or two, but there are already way too many {{cite web}} templates on that page to the point that it is breaking things. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 19:42, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

cr7 edit

It's not about playing, it's about whether you're in the squad or not!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tonmay Saha Gourab (talk • contribs) 07:16, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

True. That's what I meant, as he was not named in the squad for the 2016 Super Cup. If you'd like to initiate a discussion of the topic, nevertheless, head over to the talk page. However, I'd like to remind you that this issue has been dealt with before. Hurrygane (talk) 16:18, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Edinson Cavani

Hi, could you explain this edit at Talk:Edinson Cavani, in which you removed the WikiProject quality scale ratings? Thanks, Mattythewhite (talk) 17:45, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

@Mattythewhite: Ah, of course. The article Edinson Cavani is well above start-class. Just thought it was quite comic that it was still judged "Start" on the assessment scales. Hurrygane (talk) 23:11, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Question

Hi, do you can help with vital arts (see at my last comment here: User talk:O'Flannery). Mybe you also can help? Cheers. Dawid2009 (talk) 21:45, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

We also need to add long section with criticism to Ballon d'or because it is unbelivable that some onpeoplee (I read in talk:cristiano ronaldo): first argumenting that CR7 has more ballon'dr than Muller, and then tha:t players is 50's and 60's there were not physical such like currently, so source that Messi in various rankings is among Pele is wrong source. We need to remember Jimmy Johnstone (1,58 m, not athlete player) had best result in ballon d'r voting as 2nd place while Clarence Seedorf (most propably best strong-athlete football player in history) never has been among 5 best. These two arguments there were trivial and there were self-denial each other. A propos criticism of 2010, I remember that Cruyff in 2010 said: "Messi is the best in the world but Ballon'dr should have Iniesta or Xavi". I know soure based on Cruyff said Messi is the best in 2010 (mybe not very realibe: https://sites.google.com/view/messiorronaldo/quotes-about-messi) but currently I can not found source with opinion about xavi and Iniesta Dawid2009 (talk) 11:15, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

I also suggest to remove Ronaldinho from article about greatest, because sourceas about Ronaldinho are trivial. I am also not sure José Manuel Moreno should staying. You need to remember that when Moreno was playing in south America, Stanley Matthews and Ernest Willimowski were playing in the same time, in Europe and they also were best players in the world. Cheers. Dawid2009 (talk) 05:24, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

What do you think about these swappings: [Socrates, Simonsen, Gascigone, Zanetti, Sarossi?, Boniek, Finney, N. Santos?/Didi? Dean?/Donovan?] -----> [Litmanen, Cubillas, Lineker, Deschamps, Greaves, Edwards, John, Patenaude, Kocsis?]. We need to 115 players on the list (with geographical diversive, time diversive, and more ephasis for English-language players). Moreno is listed in List of association football players considered the greatest of all time and he is not on Wikipedia:Vital articles/Level/5/People/Sports figures#Association football. It make nonsense. Dawid2009 (talk) 07:02, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Thinking about it more. Socrates and Didi should staying (they are more vital than N. Santos and Carlos alberto due to page views etc.), Dean should still staying, Donovan not (for Patenaude). Gascigone also can stay due to BBC Sports Personality of the Year. Thinking about it in my opinion we should add also: Gianni Rivera, (he has more achievements than Cruyff in the same era), Carlos Valderama (vital such like Falcao), Passarella (he hass two world cup with Argentina, while Batistuta nothing). Lucien Laurent also is not vital such like Leonidas da silva, Jose Leandro Andrade, who are from the same era. So actually I suggest:

[Simonsen, Zanetti, Sarossi, Boniek, Finney, N. Santos, Donovan, Laurent, Carlos Alberto, Batistuta] ------swaping for-----> [Jari Litmanen, Teofilo Cubillas, Gary Lineker, Didier Deschamps, Stern John, Bert Patenaude, Gianni Rivera, Jose Manuel Moreno, Passarella]. In this case we would have 115 ready articles. Cheers Dawid2009 (talk) 21:21, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Football players considered greatest of all time

Hi, do you can correct article based on my sandbox? I have sourced valiuabe informations. In my opinion we also should removed opinion about Ronaldinho that he is most talented/potencially the best because it is weasel word, due to fact fact we do not have Duncan Edwards on the list. I can not do it independently because of Enwiki's technical things are quite difficult for me and unfortunetly I do not have enaugh time. If you do it you can keep the co-authorship in the description of the changes. Cheers! Dawid2009 (talk) 12:34, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Alright, thank you for writing in. I'll have a look at some point. Hurrygane (talk) 22:26, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Ok. It seems to me we also should add to list woman players (such like Mia Hamm) and marked them such like teen players are marked in List of most expensive association football transfers#Highest fees. Dawid2009 (talk) 06:59, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

It seems to me we should try to found sources for Puskas (as Hungarian Football Federation) and for Eusebio (as club: Benfica). It is possible that exist. Cheers. Dawid2009 (talk) 21:19, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of association football players considered the greatest of all time, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Medium (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

November 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2018–19 Serie A. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. RafaelS1979 (talk) 13:14, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Hurrygane reported by User:RafaelS1979 (Result: ). Thank you. RafaelS1979 (talk) 13:37, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

Archive 1