ILAnhisM
| This is ILAnhisM's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Hello, Jamestop9, and Welcome to Wikipedia!
Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking 
or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 09:46, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
- Introduction
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
- Frequently asked questions
- Cheatsheet
- Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
- The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
- Help pages
- Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
August 2023
edit
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Bahari Ibaadat—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 00:16, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
Blocked
edit
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Graham87 13:21, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
- Dear Administrator,
- I sincerely apologize for any actions that may have led to my current block. After reviewing the concerns raised regarding my editing patterns, I can assure you that my intentions have always been to contribute positively and genuinely to Wikipedia. I understand the importance of maintaining the integrity and quality of its content, and I'm committed to abiding by Wikipedia's guidelines.
- If my edits came across as automated or suspicious, it was not intentional. I'm willing to clarify any specific edits or actions that led to this perception. Furthermore, I would appreciate any guidance or feedback to help me better align with Wikipedia's expectations.
- I value being a part of the Wikipedia community and am keen to continue contributing in a constructive manner. I hope you will consider this appeal and provide me with a second chance to demonstrate my commitment.
- Thank you for taking the time to review my request.
- Kind regards, ILAnhisM (talk) 19:36, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
- Dear Yamla,
- {{unblock|reason=
- First and foremost, I'd like to thank you for taking the time to review my unblock request. I genuinely apologize for any actions or behaviors that may have appeared as deceptive or in violation of Wikipedia's guidelines.
- Regarding the WP:LOUTSOCK concern, I would like to clarify [provide any explanations or reasons you have for the perceived sockpuppet behavior, such as sharing an IP address with someone else or any other innocent explanations].
- I understand my previous unblock request might have lacked detail or might not have directly addressed the concerns. I assure you that my primary intention is to contribute positively to Wikipedia and abide by its policies. I would appreciate any guidance or specific areas of concern you might have, so I can better address them and demonstrate my genuine commitment to the Wikipedia community.
- Thank you for your understanding and consideration.
- Of course. Here's the unblock request exactly as you've provided, with the inclusion of the block notice you received: ILAnhisM (talk) 19:45, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
ILAnhisM (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I believe I was blocked in error. I've taken the time to review Wikipedia's guidelines and understand the reasons behind my block. I'm committed to contributing positively and ensuring that I adhere to Wikipedia's standards going forward. Thank you for considering my appeal. ILAnhisM (talk) 19:16, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Confirmed WP:LOUTSOCK. Additionally, this unblock request is essentially free of meaningful content. Yamla (talk) 19:29, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Your editing pattern is highly suspicious and it appears that you are using automated or semi-automated editing tools. Graham87 13:21, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
- Hi Graham87,
- I appreciate your vigilance in ensuring the quality of Wikipedia edits. I'd like to clarify that while I strive for efficiency and consistency in my edits, I am not using any automated or semi-automated tools. My intentions are solely to contribute positively to the platform. I'm open to any feedback on how I can make my editing pattern less suspicious, and I'd be happy to cooperate in any way to alleviate concerns. Thanks for reaching out.
- Best regards,
- [ilAnhisM] ILAnhisM (talk) 19:25, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
- ---
ILAnhisM (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Dear Yamla, ::First and foremost, I'd like to thank you for taking the time to review my unblock request. I genuinely apologize for any actions or behaviors that may have appeared as deceptive or in violation of Wikipedia's guidelines. ::Regarding the WP:LOUTSOCK concern, I would like to clarify [provide any explanations or reasons you have for the perceived sockpuppet behavior, such as sharing an IP address with someone else or any other innocent explanations]. ::I understand my previous unblock request might have lacked detail or might not have directly addressed the concerns. I assure you that my primary intention is to contribute positively to Wikipedia and abide by its policies. I would appreciate any guidance or specific areas of concern you might have, so I can better address them and demonstrate my genuine commitment to the Wikipedia community. ::Thank you for your understanding and consideration. ::[ilAnhisM]
Decline reason:
You appear to be using half-completed templates that have been provided to you, either by your employer, or by a LLM. Similar to your first edit, where you left some stray template language at the bottom. Since you're not able to communicate with us without using ChatGPT or some other LLM, I've disabled this page. Sam Kuru (talk) 22:55, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
"Regarding the WP:LOUTSOCK concern, I would like to clarify [provide any explanations or reasons you have for the perceived sockpuppet behavior, such as sharing an IP address with someone else or any other innocent explanations]." Ah ha. Yeah, let's definitely leave you blocked. We can do without you pulling this sort of garbage. --Yamla (talk) 21:38, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
is closed. Same drivel as on talk page. I begin to question competence to edit Wikipedia. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:19, 27 August 2023 (UTC)