User talk:Ich/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Ich. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
Classic Rock
Hello. I was wondering if you would like to participate in my classic rock survey. I'm trying to find the most like classic rock song. There is more information on my user page. Hope you participate! RENTASTRAWBERRY FOR LET? röck 02:13, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
Hallo, Ich.
Wie geht's Dir? Ich habe auch in D studiert (Stuttgart und Duesseldorf), wo bist Du denn? Gilliamjf 02:22, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
Userboxes
Adding some to my own user page I came across this
This user enjoys punk rock. |
Nice mohawk pic by the way. I thought you'd appreciate knowing. ;) --ImmortalGoddezz 03:22, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
- You need some ice for that burn? Scheisskopf. -Damien Vryce 16:17, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
Awesome hair
The Surreal Barnstar | ||
I, Sharkface217, hereby award you this Surreal Barnstar for your awesome, awesome upload of the picture of your hair. It is seriously cool. This barnstar, made for "wildcards" and those who make Wikipedia interesting, fits you perfectly. S h a r k f a c e 2 1 7 21:49, 14 January 2007 (UTC) |
Hello, Ich. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Billydeesign.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Ich. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 06:21, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
Rammstein Template is ready!
Code is
- Kızılsungur/rammstein
Danke schön bruder
Teşekkürler, iyi çalışmalar. XD kızılsungur 18:58, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Wizo-fuernarsch.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Wizo-fuernarsch.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:08, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Well, well, well
Look who it is. Never thought I'd find you HERE as well. Dr. eXtreme 23:28, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
Hello
Are you currently dating anyone?Becky Sayles (talk) 07:48, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
WOW
Muss ja sagen, dass ich nie gedacht hätte, dass es sowelche wie dich gibt ;9 Bin selbst Deutscher, recht kritisch dazu. Find's aber sehr cool, dass das du ein Logo der RAF hier hast ;) Du kannst dich ja mal gerne melden: Takeru-kun@web.de Ich komme übrigens aus Detmold, einer Stadt, direkt neben Bielefeld, der gewissen Stadt, die ja angeblich nicht existiert ;) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.20.200.37 (talk) 01:58, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
- ) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.20.200.37 (talk) 01:55, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
Super Iro!
Hey, echt cooler Iro! Sieht perfekt aus! Mary St. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.32.129.56 (talk) 18:12, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
Ah, a breath ...
Well, your dry comment at M&T led me to do this much, to follow up. Thought maybe it would make your day. ;-) Swliv (talk) 21:00, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bank War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Specie (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:29, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
Your wheat beer picture of the filtered / unfiltered beers
There's a book about beer called "Froth." Written by a guy named Mark Denny. Published in 2009. He uses your public domain picture of the two beers in his book. Happened to randomly stumble upon your page tonight after just having read the book last night. It's published by Johns Hopkins University Press. Unfortunate that a leading university puts out such a horribly inaccurate book on brewing, but I guess we all can't be perfect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.81.6.158 (talk) 05:07, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
Name changing
Hi. Dropping by because I suspect your name change re al-Awlaki didn't take into account, from what I can tell, that the more commonly used version of his name is with a k rather than a q. Am I correct? Thanks.--Epeefleche (talk) 08:24, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
- Hi, the justification for the name change was since that he was born in the United States and issued a birth certificate by the state of New Mexico, that is his legal name. The change was carried out in accordance with the discussion I found on the talk page at Talk:Anwar_al-Aulaqi#Spelling_of_Name. Actually, now that I look that up, I see someone has responded since the last time I viewed the talk page.
- Yes, the Arabic version of his name can be accurately transliterated into English as Awlaki but he was not born with an Arabic name. I'm not sold on the idea of changing away from his birth name because his legal name was clearly spelled out in the Roman alphabet at his birth. The transliteration rules listed in Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Arabic don't exactly apply, as his name isn't being transliterated, here; he was born and his name was spelled Aulaqi. For what it's worth, the spelling of Abdulrahman al-Aulaqi is consistent with Abdulrahman's birth certificate, which means that as recently as 1995, his father used that spelling for something.
- Anwar's father, Nasser al-Aulaqi apparently used the spelling Aulaqi when filing "Al-Aulaqi v. Panetta". I am uncertain where the line is when changing the spelling of someone's name, especially when they had a birth certificate and presumably passport with an oficial spelling, but I'm not convinced that threshold has been crossed. -Ich (talk) 10:14, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
- John K, the new poster, is absolutely correct. Though this isn't intuitive, his birth name is not determinative under wp policy. See wp:commonname.--Epeefleche (talk) 16:14, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
August 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to IV (Ton Steine Scherben album) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- Seidel - the group's first drummer - returned to play percussion under the pseudonym Wolf Sequenza); Klaus van Velzen played [[saxophone]]. A youth choir from Niebüll was also used for the song ''
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:54, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
DYK for Ermutigung
On 4 November 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ermutigung, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the song "Ermutigung" by Wolf Biermann, encouraging people not to become hardened in hard times, was written for Peter Huchel, then under house arrest? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ermutigung. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:44, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
It's now featured om Portal:Germany and linked to a few more pages because it's exactly what some - including me - needed ;) Danke auch fuers Fischbroetchen, lecker. (Spanische Tastatur ...) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:08, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited False friend, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Beamer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
March 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Flavor Aid may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- in connection with the Massacre, this factual error even spawning the figure of speech "to [[Drinking the Kool-Aid|drink the Kool-Aid". Film of Jonestown many months before the Massacre show
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:23, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Salt Pit, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page VOX. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
July 2015
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Pat Buchanan may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:17, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Renaming of templates
Please be aware that the name parameter of the template must match the name of the template itself. Otherwise you introduce a Wiki link error. MisterBee1966 (talk) 14:27, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Duly noted; I'll do some cleanup.-Ich (talk) 15:59, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bilevel rail car, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dwell time. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
License tagging for File:Jever (Bier) logo.svg
Thanks for uploading File:Jever (Bier) logo.svg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:05, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Helles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hofbräu. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
Says- "Unless a change to a category is non-controversial – e.g. prompted by vandalism or duplication – please do not amend or remove the category from pages before a decision has been made." For future reference you shouldn't remove a category from articles if the category happens to be at CFD at the time. Just letting you know. I supported merging....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 14:39, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Intercept screenshot - 2014-02-10.png
Thanks for uploading File:Intercept screenshot - 2014-02-10.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:41, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:TheInterceptLogo.png
Thanks for uploading File:TheInterceptLogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:02, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:14, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Steven G. Bradbury, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page War Crimes Act. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kleiner Tiergarten, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tiergarten. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Reference errors on 10 July
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Steven G. Bradbury page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Afrikanisches Viertel, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Congo and Tiergarten. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Precious
68 music
Thank you, Du with the Ich-related stub, for quality articles about ideal encouragement, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!
A year ago, you were the 654th recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, see also ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:52, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
I added, feel free to expand, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:20, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
Three years ago, you were recipient no. 654 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:19, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Ich. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Finding Molly: An Adventure In Catsitting Page
Hi Ich,
I saw that you were considering deleting the page. I would like to appeal by showing that I have provided copious links to sources and articles. I also linked to the company's wiki and creator bios. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Matsumune (talk • contribs) 23:11, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
- Hi, thanks for your note. I tagged it as review for deletion because it doesn't appear to fulfill the criteria outlined in Wikipedia:Notability. I couldn't find any good wp:rs reliable sources discussing the work - self-published works and the publisher's page are not independent sources. I welcome you to stick around at Wikipedia and get some practice editing other articles, or if you can find reliable sources that establish the notability of the webcomic to please add those to the article. If you have time, feel free to review some of the policies I linked to above about what kind of articles Wikipedia accepts.-Ich (talk) 23:26, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
A page you started (2nd Story Brewing Co.) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating 2nd Story Brewing Co., Ich!
Wikipedia editor Tymon.r just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Thanks!
To reply, leave a comment on Tymon.r's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Tymon.r Do you have any questions? 23:54, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of 2nd Story Brewing Company for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2nd Story Brewing Company is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2nd Story Brewing Company until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Largoplazo (talk) 00:55, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
Reference errors on 11 February
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Daniel Levin (attorney) page, your edit caused an archiveurl error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Um, yeah
....Elvis impersonater. -Killer Queen09
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Ich. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.
A page you started (2nd Story Brewing Co.) has been reviewed!
Third Reich and Nazi Germany
I see you have been replacing the former term with the latter. Is that something you have discussed with others, or is it just your own idea? I don't necessarily disagree with what you are doing, but I think a major, wide-ranging change like this needs to be discussed before enacting it. --John (talk) 10:21, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
- This is my own initiative and I have not seen any reverts or complaints aside from back-and-forth moves on Art of the Third Reich. I have been meaning to write an essay explaining my full reasons but haven't gotten around to it yet, so I guess this will do as a start. Outside of direct quotes, book titles, etc., I consider it improper to use as a synonym for "Nazi Germany".
- The term was adopted as propaganda to legitimize the Nazi Party's seizure of power. From a historical perspective, it is wrong to call the Nazi era a "third Reich": they did not create a new Reich, only seized the remains of the Weimar government, and didn't even bother to rename the country, which had been "German Reich" since Bismarck. The Nazis' historical continuity with the Kaiserreich or the Holy Roman Empire (other than sharing the territory) are debatable, so the term "third" implicitly accepts the Nazi historiography. (The Weimar Republic was referred to as the Zwischenreich - "Interim Reich", so they didn't have to count it as #3).
- The term "Drittes Reich" has fallen out of favor since the 80s in German academic circles for these and other reasons. de:Drittes Reich#Begriffsverwendung seit Kriegsende 1945 discusses this further. The term has ideological baggage, and was happily used by former Nazis as a neutral-sounding alternative to the "Nazi terror" or "Hitler dictatorship". (I could also make an admittedly rather weak argument using WP:EUPHEMISM here.)
- Aside from the ideological baggage, not all readers may be familiar with the term "Third Reich" but the terms "Nazi Germany", "Nazi era", or even just "Germany" are much more recognizable and emphasize the Nazi Party and government, not just an abstract "Third Reich". Many times, a section header can also be replaced with "German history 1933-1945" or similar. Given two options where one is clear and doesn't have ideological baggage, my choice is clear. Other than avoiding overusing the word "Nazi" in a sentence, I can't think of any good counterarguments in favor of the the term Third Reich. (I suspect the term is popular among authors because it sounds fancier.)
- This is something of a personal project for me of my own initiative, like that guy who has been trying to rid Wikipedia of the phrase "comprised of". I can't see any good reasons why "Third Reich" should be used uncritically on Wikipedia in lieu of clearer alternatives. If you see any places where this change reduces the quality of Wikipedia, I would be happy to rework the section. Thanks for noticing my project.-Ich (talk) 11:00, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
- First of all, thank you for caring about language enough to do this. Having thought about it for a few hours, I find I disagree with you though. Such issues are obviously very nuanced and it is important we do not err in either direction. I don't think this is as clear cut as you suggest. This link suggests that the Holocaust Museum in Washington DC uses Third Reich, then there is the famous William Shirer book which I have on my shelf, which uses both, Third Reich first. I think this subject should be the subject of an RFC and I request you to hold off making any more of these edits of this kind meantime. --John (talk) 16:53, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
- Hi John, I understand if you might not be totally convinced. As far as Risen and Fall... goes, Shirer's book was published in 1960, and while I definitely don't fault him for his choice of words, scholarship has progressed considerably since then: consider that the term "holocaust" as an unqualified noun only slowly came into use in the decades after the war. I'm also not trying to make "Third Reich" into a banned or even discouraged phrase on Wikipedia, but I do find the alternatives preferable. I think these changes still improve Wikipedia, even if I were to rely only on the argument of improved clarity. And, even if it's not an improvement and "Third Reich" is a truly interchangeable term, then at worst, I'm only wasting my own time.-Ich (talk) 20:36, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
- First of all, thank you for caring about language enough to do this. Having thought about it for a few hours, I find I disagree with you though. Such issues are obviously very nuanced and it is important we do not err in either direction. I don't think this is as clear cut as you suggest. This link suggests that the Holocaust Museum in Washington DC uses Third Reich, then there is the famous William Shirer book which I have on my shelf, which uses both, Third Reich first. I think this subject should be the subject of an RFC and I request you to hold off making any more of these edits of this kind meantime. --John (talk) 16:53, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
A page you started (Freeh (disambiguation)) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Freeh (disambiguation), Ich!
Wikipedia editor Elliot321 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Thank you for creating this useful disambiguation page!
To reply, leave a comment on Elliot321's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Closing CFDs
Hi, I noticed that you implemented the majority view for a discussion in which you had participated, without formally closing it, at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2017_May_11#Category:Eastern_Orthodox_Christians_opposed_to_the_Third_Reich. This is not good practice. In this case I do not disagree with the result, but in future please wait for an independent editor to close the discussion. – Fayenatic London 21:13, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
- Fayenatic Apologies, I wasn't sure how to close the discussion. I will avoid doing this in the future.-Ich (talk) 21:24, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
Barings edits
Thanks for your feedback. Can you please take a look at the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Baring_Asset_Management page for review?
Thanks
Dr.300stryon (talk) 13:18, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
Can you take another look at the edits to Barings? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr.300stryon (talk • contribs) 19:40, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
Precious four years!
Four years! |
---|
Stalkr ref 17107: Possibly licensing one of your photos for commercial use?
Stalkr ref 17107: Possibly licensing one of your photos for commercial use? | |
Hi Ich, I'm calling from Stalkr. www.stalkr.com We'd like to possibly license your image https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3AMasskruege.jpg for a commercial project. It would be great if you could get back to me asap to discuss further. I can be reached on vicileggett@stalkr.com Many thanks. 5talkr (talk) 13:03, 21 November 2017 (UTC) |
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Ich. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Happy Holidays
Happy Holidays | |
Wishing you a happy holiday season! Times flies and 2018 is around the corner. Thank you for your contributions. ~ K.e.coffman (talk) 00:24, 21 December 2017 (UTC) |
A goat for you!
Thanks for your good work at Steven Engel, especially the much-needed new picture!
Marquardtika (talk) 22:10, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
- @Marquardtika: Thanks for the goat! It's amazing how many people have appeared on CSPAN, and it always feels nice to provide PD photos of persons of public interest - I'm sure in your line of work as a former journalist (as per your user page) this came in handy. There's still plenty more work to do on the page, and I haven't even started digging through google news to find additional content.Ich (talk) 22:16, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Your signature
Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font>
tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.
You are encouraged to change
<font style="background:#00ffff" >'''''[[User:Ich|Ich]]'''''</font> <span style="font-size: 87%">([[User_talk:Ich|talk]])</span>
: Ich (talk)
to
<b style="background:#00ffff">''[[User:Ich|Ich]]''</b> <span style="font-size: 87%">([[User talk:Ich|talk]])</span>
: Ich (talk)
—Anomalocaris (talk) 19:29, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
@Anomalocaris: Done. Thanks!-Ich (talk) 20:45, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
- Great, thanks! —Anomalocaris (talk) 21:00, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kim Ji-hyun (singer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tara (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
Uploading files on Commons
Hello: when you upload files on Commons as you did with File:Robert M. Duncan Jr.jpg, please list the website's url in the source parameter so we can easily click access the page. This allows others times, and it allows us to verify it quicker. Thanks, Corky 04:42, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Corkythehornetfan: Hi Corky, thanks for the message and updating the source template. I actually didn't find his picture online (the link you added was updated after I uploaded the file); I requested it from the press contact for the US Attorney's Office for Kentucky (East) who confirmed that it was his official portrait (taken by an employee of the federal government as part of that person's official duties) qualifying it for the pd-usgov license. The same is true for John Durham (lawyer) (except from USAOCT), although both of their bio pages were updated after I received a response from the DOJ press contacts for each office. I wasn't sure about how to represent "received via email from press contact" in the description template though. Thanks again for your note; I've seen you make a lot of good edits on US Govt pages and look forward to further collaborating with you.-Ich (talk) 08:22, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for the explanation! In most cases, though it seems to take them forever(!), the Justice Department will list the pictures on the biography pages. There are a few attorneys that would need contacted because they have not put them on the website, but most do. Your email must have forced them to put it on the website so it saves them time! 😉 Aside from taking it to OTRS (which really isn't needed), the way you had it formatted was fine in my opinion, as I don't think there is another way. I look forward to editing with you as well. Corky 14:19, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Small request
Dear Ich, I want to fix these link sources so; I can publish them in the Hong Kong article:
Hong Kong was under British control in the wake of the First Opium War (1839-1842), [1] and later became colony 19th century. In the 20th century, the city was invaded by the Japanese during the Pacific War, but Britain recovered it after the war and remained a British colony until 1997, when it was finally returned to China.[2][3] Hong Kong still enjoys a high independence and a political system that is different from mainland China, according to the principle of "one country, two systems" which enshrines the city's self-rule. [4]
Hong Kong is one of the world's leading economic centers with a booming economy based on low taxes and free trade. The city's currency the Hong Kong dollar is the eighth most traded currency in the world. [5][6] Due to the small size of the city and the large population, the need for an infrastructure that allows for greater population density has turned it into a economic modern center and made it the world's populist city. [7] which depends on public transport, [8] which the highest rate globally. Hong Kong also has advanced international standards, such as economic freedom, quality of life, anti-corruption, human development. [9][10]
Note: If you finish from that all, you can just copy paste it in my talk page. Zozr789 (talk) 08:54, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
Please, could you do these things from me because I need it very much. Zozr789 (talk) 10:33, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 7
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Garland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daisy chain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 24
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Enhanced interrogation techniques, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page This Week (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
Fraction
I appreciate the explanation, Ich-- I recognize that different people use different means. The markup shortcuts template at the bottom of every page (i.e., the box labeled "Insert" that allows one to instantly surround a reference with the "< ref > < /ref >" provided one option for symbols that aren't on all keyboards, such as the pound sterling sign (£) or the Spanish-language "tilda" (ñ instead of n) and "½" sign, but then would leave the "symbol" markup as the default and make it difficult to do the reference markup. Where the problem comes in with the template is that 2 1⁄2 is transformed into 21⁄2 without the space.... and "2 1/2" is the least usable of all. Ideally, both choices should be available for the Wikipedia editors. Thanks again. Mandsford 20:53, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Übersetzungen/ neue Seiten
Hallo Ich, Grüße aus Berlin nach Berlin! Danke, dass Du dich dem Volkspark am Weinberg angenommen hast. Ich habe eine grundsätzliche Frage: Wer entscheidet denn, wann und wie übersetzte oder neue Artikel von deutschen Wikipedianern in die englische Wikipedia überführt werden? Bzw. anders wie erreicht man den Status, dass es nicht mehr geprüft wird und einfach so wie in der deutschen Wikipedia online geht? Und wie geht es jetzt konkret mit dem Weinberg Artikel weiter? VG! --Neomicro (talk) 11:56, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Neomicro: Das entscheidest am besten du selber; wenn dir das Verfahren vertraut vorkommt, dann mach's :) . Ich mache das seit langer Zeit und bin immer de:WP:MUTIG und erstelle die Artikel direkt, ohne Drafts zu machen und bisher hat sich keiner beschwert (Beispiele siehst du auf meiner Nutzerseite). Wie ich schon auf de:Benuter:Neomicro sehe hast du dich in die dewiki schon eingearbeitet und wer das kann sollte schon problemlos in enwiki arbeiten können. (dewiki kam mir immer viel stringenter vor: de:Steven G. Bradbury war für mich sehr viel Review bis es Artikelreif war.) Ich schiebe Weinbergpark in Mainspace und damit sollte die Sache geklärt sein. Wenn Notability schon in dewiki etabliert ist, dann sollte es kein Problem sein, dies in enwiki auch zu rechtfertigen. -Ich (talk) 12:27, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
- Danke @Ich: Bisher war es mir nicht möglich in enwiki neue Artikel und Übersetzungen zu erstellen - immer mit der Nachricht nur bestimmte User dürfen dies. Ich werde jetzt aber einfach einmal weitermachen und schauen ob es irgendwann klappt. Sonst melde ich mich noch einmal :) Danke für die Hilfe!--Neomicro (talk) 12:33, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 18
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kavanagh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Justice Kavanagh (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Zoetler-logo.png
Thank you for uploading File:Zoetler-logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
Five years! |
---|
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:03, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Bellsbrewery.png
Thanks for uploading File:Bellsbrewery.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:22, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:05, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Re: Ranma ½
My apologies for being hard-headed. However, I was only going by what the official Japanese & English translations used. From what I've viewed thus far, most English translations used "Ranma ½" or "Ranma 1/2", and the Japanese translation of the name commonly used "らんま 1/2". Despite that, the logo does stylize it as "らんま 1/2". I only reverted it for consistency with whatever official English/Japanese translations may exist. However, if you must (in accordance with MOS:FRAC), go ahead and revert.--Loyalmoonie (talk) 02:57, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bloomberg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 1
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Spaghetti with meatballs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wired (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
"no ISBN"
re: this edit, it piqued my curiosity, so I followed that book. Amazon ebooks just get amazon IDs, but the dead-tree version has an actual ISBN. It can be seen on isbn.nu too. Says it was published by "R2P", which is "romney readiness project", so .. still basically self-published. Not disagreeing with you, just showing the thread I followed. tedder (talk) 23:50, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Tedder: Cool - I also did google it at the time, but I'm usually suspicious about citations with an Amazon link that doesn't have an ISBN. Thanks for confirming my gut feeling.-Ich (talk) 06:56, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 1
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Spaghetti with meatballs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wired (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
"no ISBN"
re: this edit, it piqued my curiosity, so I followed that book. Amazon ebooks just get amazon IDs, but the dead-tree version has an actual ISBN. It can be seen on isbn.nu too. Says it was published by "R2P", which is "romney readiness project", so .. still basically self-published. Not disagreeing with you, just showing the thread I followed. tedder (talk) 23:50, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Tedder: Cool - I also did google it at the time, but I'm usually suspicious about citations with an Amazon link that doesn't have an ISBN. Thanks for confirming my gut feeling.-Ich (talk) 06:56, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 20
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Edward Snowden, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wired (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:38, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 27
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Spring Break Lawyer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sean Murray (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:02, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
:)
(It's my first time I've got thanked :) )
Precious anniversary
Six years! |
---|
Deprecated: disp=flip
Re your edit at Template:Convert/doc, please do not use disp=flip! That was deprecated a long time ago and order=flip should be used now. Thanks. Johnuniq (talk) 22:37, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- ^ name="CarrollEarlyHistory">Carroll 2007, pp. 15–21
- ^ "Joint Declaration of the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Government of the People's Republic of China on the Question of Hong Kong". Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Bureau, Hong Kong Government. 4 October 2010.
The Government of the People's Republic of China declares that to recover the Hong Kong area (including Hong Kong Island, Kowloon and the New Territories, hereinafter referred to as Hong Kong) is the common aspiration of the entire Chinese people, and that it has decided to resume the exercise of sovereignty over Hong Kong with effect from 1 July 1997.
{{cite web}}
: Missing or empty|url=
(help); Unknown parameter|DUPLICATE-date=
ignored (help); Unknown parameter|web=
ignored (help) - ^ "On This Day: 1997: Hong Kong handed over to Chinese control". BBC News. 1 July 1997.
{{cite web}}
: Unknown parameter|DUPLICATE-date=
ignored (help) - ^ So, Dudley L.; Lin, Nan; Poston (2001). The Chinese Triangle of Mainland China, Taiwan and Hong Kong. Greenwood Publishing. pp. 13–29. ISBN 0-313-30869-1.
- ^ "Country Comparison: Exports". The World Factbook. Central Intelligence Agency. Retrieved 26 December 2017.
- ^ "Country Comparison: Imports". The World Factbook. Central Intelligence Agency. Retrieved 26 December 2017.
- ^ . Skyscraper Museum. 14 July 2008 http://skyscraper.org/home.htm.
{{cite book}}
: Missing or empty|title=
(help) - ^ Lam, William H. K.; Bell, Michael G. H. (2003). Advanced Modeling for Transit Operations and Service Planning. Emerald Group Publishing. p. 231. ISBN 978-0-08-044206-8.
- ^ "Global Competitiveness Index 2012–2013" (PDF). 8 June 2013.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|year=
/|date=
mismatch (help) - ^ "Corruption Perceptions Index 2012". Transparency International. 8 June 2013.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|year=
/|date=
mismatch (help)