Ifore2010
|
February 2010
editWelcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Deaths in 2010 has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.nwemail.co.uk/news/former_barrow_mp_albert_booth_dies_at_81___tributes_1_670040?referrerPath=news/ (matching the regex rule \?referrer).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 14:38, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Deaths in 2010 do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.nwemail.co.uk/news/former_barrow_mp_albert_booth_dies_at_81___tributes_1_670040?referrerPath=news/ (matching the regex rule \?referrer).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 14:44, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page 2010. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Uncle Dick (talk) 22:05, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
Please do not attack other editors, as you did here: User:DerbyCountyinNZ. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Bongwarrior (talk) 00:05, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Nigger 11
edit
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Nigger 11, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. MuffledThud (talk) 16:25, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. MuffledThud (talk) 16:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 13:36, 20 February 2010 (UTC)March 2010
edit This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to List of channels on Sky Digital, you will be blocked from editing. - Jasmeet_181 (talk) 17:44, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
Weymouth
editNo probs, I made a similar mistake myself the other day :) Cheers, Bretonbanquet (talk) 18:14, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of James Forrest (footballer born 1991)
edit A tag has been placed on James Forrest (footballer born 1991) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ScottyBerg (talk) 22:57, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
May 2010
edit
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page United Kingdom general election, 2010 has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Katieh5584 (talk) 18:30, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Alex Salmond. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. TFOWRThis flag once was red 18:39, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User:GregJackP, you may be blocked from editing. If you wish to communicate with a user, please use their talk page. Vandalizing their user page is not productive. GregJackP (talk) 21:37, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to List of channels on Sky Digital, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - Jasmeet_181 (talk) 01:43, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Catalonia in the Eurovision Song Contest
edit A tag has been placed on Catalonia in the Eurovision Song Contest requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. — Timneu22 · talk 13:47, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
June 2010
edit Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ÅlandÖland (talk • contribs) 21:00, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
- Please dont put South Ossetia on the Eurovision Song Contest 2011 article until you have sources that confirms the Georgian territories participation.--ÅlandÖland (talk) 21:02, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of South Ossetia in the Eurovision Song Contest
edit Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as South Ossetia in the Eurovision Song Contest, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Porturology (talk) 13:08, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
The article Ana Galvão has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. The-Pope (talk) 14:41, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
The article Bob Bubka has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:01, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Stop adding this; you've already been asked to discuss on the Talk page, and if you add it again without doing so, you will be blocked. Having regard to your previous history, it is unlikely that this block would be temporary. Rodhullandemu 20:37, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Please read WP:YEARS, and WP:RY. Anniversaries are not listed in future year (decade, century, or millennium) articles unless there are present, verifiable, plans for commemoration. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 10:06, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Ana Galvão
edit You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
A tag has been placed on Ana Galvão requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 10:10, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
Vandalism
editIf you vandalise my user page again I will take it up with administration. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 22:01, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
Flag icons
editPlease do not insert flag icons to indicate places of birth, residence, or death, as you did to list of oldest living people by nation. See WP:FLAGBIO for further guidance. Thanks. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:46, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
Troubling edit to my talk page
editI'm having difficulty understanding the meaning of this edit. Its most obvious meaning is a demand (in quite unpleasant terms) that I take action contrary to my beliefs, because you require it of me. Yet, I'm unaware of any duty of loyalty or obedience I've got to you.
I'm perplexed by the phraseology, as well. "[D]o as I fucking say[sic]"
I'm left wondering "why?" And I'm flummoxed by use of the word "fuck" as an adverb modifying the word "say". I'm aware that fucking generally does involve insertion, but not of flag icons and not into lists. Can you please elaborate, but in somewhat less emphatic terms, and without resort to the use of the word fuck as an adverb whose meaning, I suppose, has more to do with vehemence than reproduction? Thanks. David in DC (talk) 14:22, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
The article Switzerland in the Eurovision Song Contest 2012 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Premature article that presently gives almost no more information than Eurovision Song Contest 2011. A confirmation of participation on its own with one source does not confer notability, and creating these articles just a few weeks after the previous content has finished has little precedent and is not usually appropriate. I have not found any other sources for Switzerland 2012.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CT Cooper · talk 14:17, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
June 2011
edit
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Eurovision Song Contest 2012, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. [[ axg ◉ talk ]] 22:37, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
Stewart Baillie AfD listing
editHi there, you appear to have had some problems with the Stewart Baillie AfD; you didn't complete the nomination, list it on the deletion log, or notify the article creator about the discussion - three essential steps. I have done this all for you now. Full details of how to properly nominate an article can be found at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion#How to list pages for deletion. Any questions, please feel free to ask. Regards, GiantSnowman 00:14, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
The article John Barnes (broadcaster) has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. TexasAndroid (talk) 16:54, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
AfD issues (again)
edit Hello. I noticed that you attempted to file a deletion discussion (on the article Idwal Robling) but did not complete the process. Please note that, when listing an article for deletion, a discussion page needs to be made for other users to discuss whether to keep or delete the article. This is typically done by following the steps listed here. Note that if you are editing as an unregistered user, you cannot create a discussion page. Please consider registering an account or asking another user to help you complete the process at Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion. Thank you. GiantSnowman 11:55, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
Cheers, thought I had problems. Ifore2010 (talk) 16:19, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
- No problems, if you need any help/have any questions then just post at my talk page and I'll come running as quickly as I can! GiantSnowman 20:17, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
July 2011
edit
Welcome to Wikipedia. The edit you made to User:AnemoneProjectors has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Your edit's seem quite rude and used inappropriate language. If you do want to talk to this user, tell him on his talk page. MayhemMario 14:26, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at News of the World, you may be blocked from editing. GregorB (talk) 21:22, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
This is your last warning; the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Andy Coulson, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. PatGallacher (talk) 23:39, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
The article Rab Kilgour has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 23:46, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
Cher Lloyd
editYour opinion on whether the article should be redirected or not is requested at Talk:Cher Lloyd. Warburton1368 (talk) 21:55, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
AfD problems III
editThis is simply not on, I have serious concerns about your competency with regards to opening AfDs. As I have previously advised you on two occasions, there are set steps you must follow. If you cannot properly do so, please cease opening AfDs - I am more than willing to help you learn/open them on your behalf, should you need. Regards, GiantSnowman 15:02, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
Kane Hemmings
editCan I interpret your comment here to mean that you wish to withdraw your nomination for deletion of Kane Hemmings? If so, I can close the deletion discussion. —KuyaBriBriTalk 14:58, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
- edit is unacceptable. You removed a legitimate comment (a violation of the talk page guidelines), and you removed the AfD header (improper procedure). Please familiarize yourself with appropriate guidelines such as the talk page guidelines, deletion policy, and Articles for deletion before diving into those areas of Wikipedia. —KuyaBriBriTalk 15:57, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
The article John Barnes (broadcaster) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- There are already two John Barnes on Wikipedia. One is a former footballer that does football commentary on BBC. Another is a BBC radio broadcaster in Northern England that also does sports. Reference given in article makes no mention about who John Barnes is, just that he is a commentator and nothing else. Is this a duplicate Barnes? Reliable sources are needed.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bgwhite (talk) 05:32, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
The article John Barnes (broadcaster) has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one reliable source that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:
- see also WP:ENTERTAINER for the notability standard for broadcasters.
If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. JohnCD (talk) 12:04, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
Censorship
editRegarding this recent edit - Wikipedia should not be censored, please familiairise yourself with WP:NOTCENSORED. Regards, GiantSnowman 16:56, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
Were you trying to make some sort of WP:POINT? Please don't do it again, or you know how it will end. Favonian (talk) 20:48, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
- Also, please stop adding people obviously failing the WP:RY criteria, such as Jessy Dixon and Adam Hunter under "Deaths". It's a little annoying having to constantly revert your edits. You can add them at the list of deaths in the current month - Deaths in October 2011 is the right address for this month. — Yerpo Eh? 20:24, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Julien Bailleul
edit
A tag has been placed on Julien Bailleul, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Intoronto1125TalkContributions 21:17, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
Happy Halloween!
edit |
Plarem has given you some caramel and a candy apple! Caramel and candy-coated apples are fun Halloween treats, and promote WikiLove on Halloween. Hopefully these have made your Halloween (and the proceeding days) much sweeter. Happy Halloween!
If Trick-or-treaters come your way, add {{subst:Halloween apples}} to their talkpage with a spoooooky message! |
 |
Happy Halloween! – Plarem (User talk contribs) 15:22, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
The article John Barnes (broadcaster) has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. noq (talk) 19:59, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
John Barnes (broadcaster)
editThis article has been previously deleted - at least twice - so you know it is not notable. Why do you continue to recreate it? That behaviour could be considered disruptive. GiantSnowman 23:13, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
Barnes is a well established member of the BBC Sport Scotland team.
- Then prove it. Also please sign your talk page posts with four tildes ~. GiantSnowman 23:16, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
- I have added a reference, but you really have to realise that these sorts of attempted deletion will continue until you are able to show that he meets the general notability guideline. This is actually quite easy to do - simply find an article, book, magazine etc that has 'significant coverage of him - ie not just a mention, not just a list, not just a story or interview by him on someone else, but actually about him - in an independent reliable source - so not by the BBC, not a blog or forum or other "user generated content", but most published newspapers, magazines or books, doesn't even have to be online. Given his common name, searching in google is difficult, but if you know of something in a Scottish newspaper or similar, then that is all you need. Good luck, and please reference all articles, especially any on living people. Cheers, The-Pope (talk) 15:11, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of John Barnes (broadcaster) for deletion
edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Barnes (broadcaster) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Barnes (broadcaster) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. GiantSnowman 15:08, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
editHi. When you recently edited Johnny Haddow, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page King's Park (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
February 2012
edit Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Jo Whiley, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. GiantSnowman 17:22, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
editHi. When you recently edited 1983 Scottish Cup Final, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page STV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
Copyright problems with Too Evil For Jail
edit
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Too Evil For Jail, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Killer+is+too+evil+for+jail.-a0136634681. As a copyright violation, Too Evil For Jail appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Too Evil For Jail has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:
- If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Too Evil For Jail and send an email with the message to permissions-en
wikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions. - If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Too Evil For Jail with a link to where we can find that note.
- If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en wikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Too Evil For Jail.
- If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Too Evil For Jail and send an email with the message to permissions-en
However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. De728631 (talk) 18:27, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of One Direction (American band) for deletion
edit A discussion is taking place as to whether the article One Direction (American band) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One Direction (American band) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 01:55, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 19
editHi. When you recently edited Velimir Habrun, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NK Varteks (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
The article Velimir Habrun has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- does not appear to be a notable person
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Joy [shallot] (talk) 14:14, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Velimir Habrun for deletion
edit A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Velimir Habrun is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Velimir Habrun until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 16:47, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
The article Pernilla Karlsson has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 21:48, 9 August 2012 (UTC)