User talk:JC-crowd

Welcome!

Hi JC-crowd! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! LuniZunie 16:40, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Crowd Connected moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Crowd Connected. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and declared COI on userpage, needs to go through AfC. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Sarsenet•he/they•(talk) 14:39, 17 October 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for taking the time to review the article. I understand your concern about promotional tone.

I’ll continue improving the draft for neutrality and sourcing, then resubmit it. I’ve also added a note to the article’s talk page to acknowledge your feedback and outline next steps.

Appreciate the guidance.

–– JC-crowd (talk) 14:53, 17 October 2025 (UTC)

Also, because of your COI you must not promote the draft to article space yourself, you must submit it for review Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:33, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

Draft:Crowd Connected rewritten to address feedback

Hello User:Sarsenet, User:Jimfbleak, and other editors who commented earlier: I’ve now completed a full rewrite of Draft:Crowd Connected to remove promotional tone and rely only on independent, reliable sources (BBC, Alan Turing Institute, University of Surrey, Innovate UK, UKRI, IQ Magazine, UKTN). All redundant or company-sourced material has been removed, and the structure simplified for neutrality.

I plan to resubmit the draft through AfC shortly. If either of you has time to glance over the current version before that, feedback would be welcome, but I’ll proceed through normal AfC channels.

–– JC-crowd (talk) 11:20, 19 October 2025 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Crowd Connected has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Crowd Connected. Thanks! CNMall41 (talk) 04:50, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Crowd Connected (October 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

• Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
• Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
• Essay-like writing
• Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
• Close paraphrasing
  

Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Crowd Connected and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 14:12, 30 October 2025 (UTC)

Hello, JC-crowd! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 14:12, 30 October 2025 (UTC)

Update regarding November submission

@Pythoncoder: Thank you for the feedback on the previous version. I wanted to confirm that I have completely discarded the text from October. The current draft (submitted November 22) has been rewritten manually to ensure natural phrasing and relies on specific independent sources (Gartner, Pollstar) to address the previous concerns about hallucinations and promotional tone.

I have also updated my User Page with the formal {{Paid}} disclosure to ensure full compliance with the Terms of Use. –– JC-crowd (talk) 12:44, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

Why does this comment sound AI-generated though —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 18:00, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

Apologies. You are absolutely right, I have indeed been using AI to help me with talk page comments, I will avoid doing that in future. For the page draft in question, I think I've made considerable improvements to both the way the text reads, and the sources, so I hope you'll review the page independently of the comments here sounding AI generated. JC-crowd (talk) 18:27, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Crowd Connected (December 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Wikipedia guidelines prohibit the use of LLMs to write articles from scratch. In addition, LLM-generated articles usually have multiple quality issues, to include:

• Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
• Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
• Essay-like writing
• Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
• Close paraphrasing
  

Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Crowd Connected and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 17:59, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Crowd Connected (December 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MCE89 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Crowd Connected and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MCE89 (talk) 10:08, 15 December 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Crowd Connected

Hello, JC-crowd. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Crowd Connected, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:07, 17 May 2026 (UTC)