User talk:JakobSteenberg/Archives/1

Latest comment: 26 days ago by MediaWiki message delivery in topic The Signpost: 6 November 2024


hi!

 
Hello! JakobSteenberg, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse, an awesome place to meet people, ask questions, and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! --Rosiestep (talk) 02:25, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Those hairy Latins

Good call. Latin has many words for hair, it seems. It all rather depends what type of hair it is.

Badly laid out, from Google Translate:

caesaries hair, curls, locks, long hair, hair of the beard

capillus - hair, beard, wool, hair of the beard

crinis = hair, long hair, tentacle, tail

capillatura - hair, false hair

coma - hair, coma, lock, plume, mane, aigrette

pilus - hair, trifle

saeta - thick, hair, bristle, coarse, brush

seta - thick, hair, bristle, coarse, brush

villus - hair, shaggy hair, nap of clothes

umbra - ghost, shade, shadow, dark, darkness, hair

plantaria - sets, slips, hair, cuttings

capillatio - hair

From this list I have no idea which one to choose Fiddle Faddle (talk) 13:40, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Infobox location

Hi, thanks for tweaking anatomy articles. However, I noticed that your are systematically placing infoboxes above dablinks and maintenance tags. WP:LEAD recommends the opposite. Is there a good reason for changing this in anatomy articles? --Fama Clamosa (talk) 06:36, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

OK. I thought those edits had something to do with the information on your user page: "users of Nomina Anatomica have easy access to information on wikipedia". I'm not going to revert you, but someone will sooner or later because most editors conform to the WP:MoS guidelines. Happy editing! --Fama Clamosa (talk) 14:41, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

R from alternative language

  Hello. You have a new message at Wdchk's talk page. – Wdchk (talk) 01:47, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

A page you started has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Anterior surface of the heart, JakobSteenberg!

Wikipedia editor Senator2029 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

When creating a redirect, please categorize it too. See Template:R template index for a list of templates to use.

To reply, leave a comment on Senator2029's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Thanks

Thanks for posting at WP:MED2013GA. Great choice. Let me know if you need any assistance! Best. Biosthmors (talk) 00:00, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

No problem! I'll try to rephrase that a bit. =) Thanks for your work on anatomy articles. Do you want to bring any of those up to GA status? If so, feel free to list there still. Do you have any particular targets? No worries about feeling "unqualified". I brought DVT up to GA without a M.D. (I'm pre-med also). Thankfully, some M.D.s have given me feedback (see Wikipedia:Peer_review/Deep_vein_thrombosis/archive3). I'd like to get it to become a featured article relatively soon. Best! Biosthmors (talk) 00:21, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

I'll try to push it on someone! What if I tried to push human anatomy on you?! ;-) I could help out with that one. I should read up on that subject for myself anyways. Interested? Biosthmors (talk) 00:38, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

It seems like the whole Approaches section should be mostly meaningful prose instead of being a list in line with WP:PROSE and WP:SS. So section(s)/paragraph(s) should exist to summarize the human nervous system, etc. That's the biggest opportunity I see for improvement. Human body gets a lot of views too. I'm not sure why separate articles are really needed at this point, but whatever. Biosthmors (talk) 04:21, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Translation request

Hi Jakob, is it possible for you to translate this page to Danish? ●Mehran Debate12:46, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Sure. I will post a first draft below later along with a question or two. Before I start, you use the term reader, is it okay if I translate this to browser (That is the term used in Danish as well)?
But when I am done you might want to throw it by another native Danish speaker since some of the terms like Portable Pre-indexed ZIM is hard to make a proper translation of without making it sound like a machine translation. --JakobSteenberg (talk) 12:55, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
Thank you very much buddy. This is excellent and adequate for me. So quick and nice job :) ●Mehran Debate15:07, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

I submitted your translation here. There is an article named Kiwix and it doesn't have a Danish version. It would be good if you can create this article in your Wikipedia too, you can do that in your free time and there is no rush! Thanks again and best wishes ●Mehran Debate05:23, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Tibia

I was going through tibia and I noticed a fair amount of overlinking so I recommend trying the script at Wikipedia:Highlight duplicate links to spot these! I ordered some textbooks but it will be a while before they arrive. Not so much in time for February! Do you have an idea for what kind of anatomy article you might want to work on in March? I'd like for it to be something that lists at the WP:5000 consistently from being so popular. Best. Biosthmors (talk) 01:32, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, I will look into it. Hmm... I was planning on doing more work on the leg and since arteries and veins have been suggested on Anatomy project then starting on femoral artery and working my way down through out march. I have not found anything on the top5000 that really cought my interest, but I only got to 3000-and-something... any suggestions since you ask? --JakobSteenberg (talk) 10:01, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Article Feedback deployment

Hey JakobSteenberg; I'm dropping you this note because you've used the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 22:30, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

 
Hello, JakobSteenberg. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Media_copyright_questions#Creative_Commons_Attribution-Noncommercial_3.0_United_States_License.
Message added SPhilbrick(Talk) 14:28, 11 March 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

The Signpost: 18 March 2013

The Signpost: 25 March 2013

The Signpost: 01 April 2013

The Signpost: 08 April 2013

Fascial spaces of the head and neck

Hi again. Work is ongoing on these articles. So far we have these which I have either created or reworked:

Wouldn't mind you taking a look at one of the pages I have reworked or created and pointing out any style errors, as I usually don't make anatomy articles. Thanks. There are also several more that need to be created or reworked I feel... will get around to these in the coming days:

Lesion (talk) 13:53, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for feedback. I have altered the current headings of these facial space spaces to reflect the MEDMOS, but I don't have content to fill some of the others, other animals etc.
A category I think would be good. Re a template, option is either to stick these new pages onto a template that already exists (maybe Template:Mouth anatomy or Template:Digestive tract- which already has a few pharyngeal fascial spaces listed) or create a new one. Not sure of best way to proceed with regards templates. There is no rush, it will take me a while to rework all the articles of this topic anyway. Lesion (talk) 10:55, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
Not sure if fascial spaces have a ==function==, it is just connective tissue filling a space. Maybe you could say that fascia is to lubricate muscles so they can move a bit within the surrounding tissues...but I'm not sure the fascial spaces have a purpose. Lesion (talk) 12:54, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for creating that category. I have added 2 more pages to it, canine space and infratemporal space. I have thought more about what template(s) are best. Some of these spaces are not immediately adjacent to the mouth (and therefore also the digestive tract). Perhaps this would make the inclusion of some of them (e.g. superficial temporal space) on the templates for mouth anatomy and for digestive system anatomy inappropriate? I think a new template would be good. I might be able to copy an existing template with minimal changes. Thanks gain for your help and advice. Lesion (talk) 18:19, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 April 2013

new article: dorsal nexus

Hello we are working on a new article about dorsal nexus for our project, it would be nice if you check our advances in this sandbox. ¨User:Thelmadatter/Sandboxes_Group_1/Dorsal_Nexus Thanks --Kenshinb (talk) 16:12, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 April 2013

The Signpost: 29 April 2013

The Signpost: 06 May 2013


Eng. WP s.v. Ulna

Hello JakobSteenberg,

There is no etymology section s.v. Ulna. I think it is relevant for the reader to know that Latin ulna means both “elbow” and “forearm” – and so does Classical Greek ὠλένη. In fact, the primary meaning is “elbow”, cf. the root *elei-, “to bow”.

In Danish you can’t possibly use albue if you intend to say underarm – at least not today. The same obtains for English. In French it is a bit mixed-up, and French WP doesn’t really clear up things, see French WP s.v. Ulna, a word which has taken over “a part of” Latin ulna, so to say, i.e. the bigger bone of the forearm. The headword Ulna should therefore be changed to Cubitus. Even Modern Greek, when resuscitating the term ὠλένη (which is a purely medical term today), they adopted the semantic content from French.

I happen to be a classical scholar – at least I was until I proceeded in other directions – I bowed my arm, if you like. :- )

Best greetings from Hirpex (talk) 22:02, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 May 2013

The Signpost: 20 May 2013

The Signpost: 27 May 2013

The Signpost: 05 June 2013

The Signpost: 12 June 2013

June 2013

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Buck's fascia may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:32, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Lobes of thyroid gland may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • [[cricoid cartilage]]s, the [[Vertebrate trachea|trachea]], the [constrictor pharyngis inferior]] and posterior part of the [[cricothyreoideus]] muscles, the [[esophagus]] (particularly on the

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:19, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library now offering accounts from Cochrane Collaboration (sign up!)

The Wikipedia Library gets Wikipedia editors free access to reliable sources that are behind paywalls. Because you are signed on as a medical editor, I thought you'd want to know about our most recent donation from Cochrane Collaboration.

  • Cochrane Collaboration is an independent medical nonprofit organization that conducts systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials of health-care interventions, which it then publishes in the Cochrane Library.
  • Cochrane has generously agreed to give free, full-access accounts to 100 medical editors. Individual access would otherwise cost between $300 and $800 per account.
  • If you are still active as a medical editor, come and sign up :)

Cheers, Ocaasi t | c 20:12, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Redirects

Dear Jakob,

I will create redirects later this day regarding the nomenclatorial changes I have made in some articles (editing with an iPad is not that easy at all). By the way, I try to make multiple redirects as you have seen, that take into account multiple versions and guidelines of the Nomina Anatomica, Nomina Histologica, Nomina Embryologica, and the Terminologia Anatomica and Terminologia Histologica. And the orthography changes all the time, e.g. anulus->annulus->anulus, oesophagus->esophagus->oesophagus,aquaeductus->aqueductus->aquaeductus(in TH or Terminologia Embryologica). And of course the textbooks and atlases that use corrected forms, e.g. glandula parotis. By the way, by categorizing these redirects, they are beautifully alphabetically ordered on the category:stub-class page. Thanks for the good work, with kind regards, Wimpus (talk) 08:53, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Dear Jakob, I have made a start with the redirects. Tomorrow more redirects. With kind regards, Wimpus (talk) 21:06, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
I have to do a lot more redirects. By the way, thank you for the redirect of discus proliger. You can find that form on google books. In Latin there are a few endings that loses the -us for the masculine form of the adjective, e.g. -fer, -ger. With kind regards, Wimpus (talk) 20:53, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 June 2013

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Oval window, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tympanum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 June 2013

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Posterior septal branches of sphenopalatine artery, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ethmoidal arteries (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:10, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 03 July 2013

Sciatic Nerve

In reference to your addition for sciatic nerve. The jewish population constitutes less than 0.2% of the world population. And of that tiny group, a vast majority of jewish people do not keep kosher. So you have entered a cultural reference that is very obscure. It is also based on religious dietary restrictions, which should be kept to a separate page.

While interesting to some, there are plenty of better venues to discuss Jewish Law than on an anatomy page. And in reference to your assertion that this is not an anatomy page, I disagree. The vast majority of data on this page is factual anatomic information. Please refrain from adding unneeded material.

The sciatic nerve entry is a page within the Category: Nerves of the lower limb and lower torso. And this is a subset of Category:Lower limb anatomy. So this page is in an Anatomy section.

There is a separate entry for sciatic nerve associated with Jewish Law. A link to this page has been added under See Also.

A beer for you!

  Thanks for reverting vandalism on mu user page - Enjoy!! Denisarona (talk) 10:54, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 July 2013

The Signpost: 17 July 2013

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Carpal tunnel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palm (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 July 2013

Advice requested

Hi Jakob,

I ask for some advice regarding a potential COI with a user who has been making many edits to head and neck anatomy pages, but from the same source. Please see User_talk:PeggyDoll#Fehrenbach. Thanks, Lesion (talk) 11:15, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for getting back to me. I will try to follow your good advice in future, always to remember that what seems like a problem editor initially may turn into a good editor ... assume good faith as always I suppose. Anyway, the user in question is now not using the same source, but using a variety of sources. I have not reverted any edit they have done, they all appear to be constructive, apart from small things which appear to be accidental such as removing infoboxes... possibly due to visual editor bugs, who knows. By the way, congratulations on the semester abroad, sounds great. Lesion (talk) 02:37, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 July 2013

The Signpost: 07 August 2013

August 2013

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Pectineus muscle may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Origin = [[Pectineal line (pubis)|Pectineal line]] of the]] [[pubis (bone)|pubic bone]] |

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:46, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 August 2013

The Signpost: 21 August 2013

The Signpost: 28 August 2013

The Signpost: 04 September 2013

The Signpost: 11 September 2013

The Signpost: 18 September 2013

The Signpost: 25 September 2013

The Signpost: 02 October 2013

The Signpost: 09 October 2013

The Signpost: 16 October 2013

The Signpost: 23 October 2013

The Signpost: 30 October 2013

The Signpost: 06 November 2013

The Signpost: 13 November 2013

The Signpost: 20 November 2013

The Signpost: 04 December 2013

Merge discussion for Superciliary arches

 

An article that you have been involved in editing, Superciliary arches, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Petter Bøckman (talk) 13:25, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 December 2013

WP:Anatomy quarterly update (#1)

WP:Anatomy quarterly update (#1)

Next
Released: Fourth quarter, 2013
Editor: LT910001

Hello WP:ANATOMY user! This is the first of what I hope will be ongoing quarterlies, documenting the current state of WP:ANATOMY, current projects and items of interest, and any relevant news. I'd greatly value feedback on this, and if you think I've missed something, or don't wish to receive this again, please leave a note on my talkpage

What's new
What's going on
How can I contribute?
Quarterly focus - GA nominations

I would like to take some time on this first quarterly to evaluate the state of the project. We have the benefit of having a relatively-small group of articles that are, for the most part, relatively non-controversial. Additionally, for the majority of our articles, it may indeed be possible to create an article that reflects a significant proportion of the published literature. This is quite distinct from other projects.

However, it appears we only have 5 GAs (Anatomy, Brain, Clitoris, Human tooth, and Leonardo da Vinci) and 4 FAs (Immune system, Hippocampus, Cerebellum, and Resurrectionists in the United Kingdom), none of which relate to purely anatomical items, which constitute most of our mass. By 'anatomical items' I mean muscles, nerves, bones, blood vessels, veins, foramina, and so on, that constitute the vast majority of our articles. In fact, we only have one 'system' (Immune system) at FA class, and none at GA class. We indeed only have 70 articles out over 4,000 at B-class. This scarcity is, I believe, for the following reasons: (1) lack of model articles (2) lack of appropriate guidelines, and (3) general sparsity of sourcing on many articles. How may these be addressed?

  1. Nominating good articles. In addition to suspensory muscle of the duodenum I will be working on Mylohyoid muscle, Genioglossus, Foramen spinosum and an as-yet undecided article.
  2. Revamping the MEDMOS guidelines for Anatomical articles to make them more appropriate. That discussion is here.
  3. Using books as sources. Books are readily available in libraries and have the superb quality of being able to aggregate information, which can be used to source thousands of anatomical articles.
  4. Collateralising sourcing. Anatomical sources often refer to several structures in a single source. Therefore an editor on one article could quickly add a source to another two articles in a related topic. This incremental approach will hopefully accrue for future editors
  5. Tagging articles for cleanup, to let future editors know to use sources
  6. Templates, which will soon be available, to post on the wall of new editors thanking them for their edits and encouraging the use of sources.

I hope that we are able to revitalise this project. Wikipedia has the capacity to become an excellent resource for anatomical information. I again welcome feedback on this quarterly or any aspects therein on the talk page for the quarterly, on my talkpage, or on the WP Anatomy talk page here. Kind regards, LT910001 (talk)

  • This has been transcluded to the talk pages of all active WP:ANATOMY users.

The Signpost: 18 December 2013

The Signpost: 25 December 2013

The Signpost: 01 January 2014

The Signpost: 08 January 2014

The Signpost: 15 January 2014

The Signpost: 22 January 2014

The Signpost: 29 January 2014

The Signpost: 29 January 2014

The Signpost: 12 February 2014

February 2014

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sphenoparietal suture may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • }}

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:05, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 February 2014

The Signpost: 26 February 2014

A barnstar for you!

  The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
Watchlist has been bespeckled with your reverts of vandalism in our anatomy articles, thanks for the tireless work. Please don't hesitate to request page protection if necessary. LT910001 (talk) 02:18, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the bling. It it always nice when people notice and appreciate what you do. Thanks. Kind regards JakobSteenberg (talk) 09:14, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

(test) The Signpost: 05 March 2014

The Signpost: 12 March 2014

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Knee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vastus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 March 2014

The Signpost: 26 March 2014

WikiProject Anatomy quarterly newsletter

WP:Anatomy quarterly update (#2)

Previous -- Next
Released: First quarter, 2014
Updated cleanup listing and recent changes list in third quarter, 2014
Editor: LT910001

Hello WP:ANATOMY participant! This is the second quarterly update of goings-on in WP:ANATOMY, documenting the current state of WP:ANATOMY, current projects and items of interest, and any relevant news. I'd greatly value feedback on this, and if you think I've missed something, or don't wish to receive this again, please leave a note on my talkpage or remove your name from the mailing list

What's new
What's going on
How can I contribute?
  • Reword anatomical jargon: jargon is widespread and not helpful to lay readers.
  • Contribute on our talk page
  • Continue to add sources, content, and improve anatomical articles!
  • Replace images with better images from Wikipedia commons, or if there are too many images, remove some low-quality ones
Quarterly focus - Where to edit?
 
One of our two new featured images! (Also featured on the Signpost)

On any given week we have at least 4-10 editors making significant contributions to our articles, with probably more than double this making minor edits. As an editor, I am often wondering: with so many articles, where to start? There is so much to be done (as always, on Wikipedia!), and I aim here to provide a comprehensive list of venues within our project. If I've missed any, please let us know on the WikiProject Anatomy talk page.

An editor might edit:

  • By importance. A user can use our assessment table to view articles by their importance and class. The vital articles project provides a list of designated 'Vital articles' for Wikipedia.
  • By popularity. One way to edit is to edit the most popular pages -- the majority of these need help, and editing is sure to bring benefit to many users.
  • By need. There is always cleanup that needs to be done, whether commenting on mergers, adding infoboxes or adding images. A cleanup list of all tagged articles is now available here: [1]
  • By interest. A series of inter-project categories has been developed to help facilitate inter-Wiki and inter-professional collaboration. These categories sort our articles into organs, system, gross anatomy, neuroanatomy, and several other categories. This should offer a buffet of articles for any interested editors! See here for more details.
  • By topic. Wikipedia's anatomical categories may provide impetus, as may editing a suite of related-articles, using a parent article such as ear for direction. A collection of series are slowly being rolled-out, including one for epithelia and for articles about the gastrointestinal wall, which also act as groups of topics. Templates, as documented on our main page, provide a similar categorisation.
  • By demand. Discussions relating to Anatomy are frequent occurrences on the talk pages for WPMED and WP:ANATOMY. Such topics almost always cry out for more editing.
  • By recent changes. One way to choose a destination for editing is to check the recent changes, revert vandalism, integrate/source edits, or generally collaborate in improving articles that are receiving contributions from other editors. This can be found in the here.
  • By chance. A user is always welcome to improve articles that they randomly 'bump into' by Wiki-surfing or by having bumped for other reasons into a particular article or topic that needs improvement

Delivered on behalf of WikiProject Anatomy by User:Mdann52, using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 07:35, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 02 April 2014

Sorry

Hi Jakob, I forgot to create new redirects after altering the Latin terms in the infobox. Currently I have listed in the etymology part of sternum, xiphoid process, thyroid cartilage and thyroid numerous Latin and English synonyms. How many Latin (and Englis) terms do we have to include in the anatomy infobox? Thank you for your response, with kind regards, Wimpus (talk) 22:37, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Category:Hip bone

Category:Hip bone, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mschamberlain (talk) 18:04, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 09 April 2014

The Signpost: 23 April 2014

Invitation join the new Physiology Wikiproject!

 
Physiology gives us an understanding of how and why things in the field of medicine happen. Together, let us jumpstart the project and get it going. Our energy is all it needs.

Based on the long felt gap for categorization and improvization of WP:MED articles relating to the field of physiology, the new WikiProject Physiology has been created. WikiProject Physiology is still in its infancy and needs your help. On behalf of a group of editors striving to improve the quality of physiology articles here on Wikipedia, I would like to invite you to come on board and participate in the betterment of physiology related articles. Help us to jumpstart this WikiProject.

  • Feel free to leave us a message at any time on the WikiProkect Physiology talk page. If you are interested in joining the project yourself, there is a participant list where you can sign up. Please leave a message on the talk page if you have any problems, suggestions, would like review of an article, need suggestions for articles to edit, or would like some collaboration when editing!
  • You can tag the talk pages of relevant articles with {{WikiProject Physiology|class=|importance=}} with your assessment of the article class and importance alongwith. Please note that WP:Physiology, WP:Physio, WP:Phy can be used interchangeably.
  • You will make a big difference to the quality of information by adding reliable sources. Sourcing physiology articles is essential and makes a big difference to the quality of articles. And, while you're at it, why not use a book to source information, which can source multiple articles at once!
  • We try and use a standard way of arranging the content in each article. That layout is here. These headings let us have a standard way of presenting the information in anatomical articles, indicate what information may have been forgotten, and save angst when trying to decide how to organise an article. That said, this might not suit every article. If in doubt, be bold!
  • Why not try and strive to create a good article! Physiology related articles are often small in scope, have available sources, and only a limited amount of research available that is readily presentable!
  • Your contributions to the WikiProject page, related categories and templates is also welcome.
  • To invite other editors to this WikiProject, copy and past this template (with the signature):
  • To welcome editors of physiology articles, copy and past this template (with the signature):
  • You can feel free to contact us on the WikiProkect Physiology talk page if you have any problems, or wish to join us. You can also put your suggestions there and discuss the scope of participation.

Hoping for your cooperation! DiptanshuTalk 12:20, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 April 2014

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors!

please help translate this message into the local language
  The Cure Award
In 2013 you were one of the top 300 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you so much for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date medical information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do!

We are wondering about the educational background of our top medical editors. Would you please complete a quick 5-question survey? (please only fill this out if you received the award)

Thanks again :) --Ocaasi, Doc James and the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation

The Signpost: 07 May 2014

The Signpost: 14 May 2014

The Signpost: 21 May 2014

The Signpost: 28 May 2014

The Pulse (WP:MED newsletter) June 2014

The first edition of The Pulse has been released. The Pulse will be a regular newsletter documenting the goings-on at WPMED, including ongoing collaborations, discussions, articles, and each edition will have a special focus. That newsletter is here.

The newsletter has been sent to the talk pages of WP:MED members bearing the {{User WPMed}} template. To opt-out, please leave a message here or simply remove your name from the mailing list. Because this is the first issue, we are still finding out feet. Things like the layout and content may change in subsequent editions. Please let us know what you think, and if you have any ideas for the future, by leaving a message here.

Posted by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:24, 5 June 2014 (UTC) on behalf of WikiProject Medicine.

The Signpost: 04 June 2014

BMJ offering 25 free accounts to Wikipedia medical editors

Neat news: BMJ is offering 25 free, full-access accounts to their prestigious medical journal through The Wikipedia Library and Wiki Project Med Foundation (like we did with Cochrane). Please sign up this week: Wikipedia:BMJ --Cheers, Ocaasi via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:14, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 June 2014

The Signpost: 18 June 2014

The Signpost: 25 June 2014

The Signpost: 02 July 2014

The Signpost: 09 July 2014

Medical Translation Newsletter


 

Wikiproject Medicine; Translation Taskforce

 

Medical Translation Newsletter
Issue 1, June/July 2014
by CFCF, Doc James

sign up for monthly delivery


 
 

This is the first of a series of newsletters for Wikiproject Medicine's Translation Task Force. Our goal is to make all the medical knowledge on Wikipedia available to the world, in the language of your choice.

note: you will not receive future editions of this newsletter unless you *sign up*; you received this version because you identify as a member of WikiProject Medicine

Spotlight - Simplified article translation


Wikiproject Medicine started translating simplified articles in February 2014. We now have 45 simplified articles ready for translation, of which the first on African trypanosomiasis or sleeping sickness has been translated into 46 out of ~100 languages. This list does not include the 33 additional articles that are available in both full and simple versions.

Our goal is to eventually translate 1,000 simplified articles. This includes:

We are looking for subject area leads to both create articles and recruit further editors. We need people with basic medical knowledge who are willing to help out. This includes to write, translate and especially integrate medical articles.

What's happening?


IEG grant
 
CFCF - "IEG beneficiary" and editor of this newsletter.

I've (CFCF) taken on the role of community organizer for this project, and will be working with this until December. The goals and timeline can be found here, and are focused on getting the project on a firm footing and to enable me to work near full-time over the summer, and part-time during the rest of the year. This means I will be available for questions and ideas, and you can best reach me by mail or on my talk page.

Wikimania 2014

For those going to London in a month's time (or those already nearby) there will be at least one event for all medical editors, on Thursday August 7th. See the event page, which also summarizes medicine-related presentations in the main conference. Please pass the word on to your local medical editors.

Integration progress

There has previously been some resistance against translation into certain languages with strong Wikipedia presence, such as Dutch, Polish, and Swedish.
What was found is that thre is hardly any negative opinion about the the project itself; and any such critique has focused on the ways that articles have being integrated. For an article to be usefully translated into a target-Wiki it needs to be properly Wiki-linked, carry proper citations and use the formatting of the chosen target language as well as being properly proof-read. Certain large Wikis such as the Polish and Dutch Wikis have strong traditions of medical content, with their own editorial system, own templates and different ideas about what constitutes a good medical article. For example, there are not MEDRS (Polish,German,Romanian,Persian) guidelines present on other Wikis, and some Wikis have a stronger background of country-specific content.

  • Swedish
    Translation into Swedish has been difficult in part because of the amount of free, high quality sources out there already: patient info, for professionals. The same can be said for English, but has really given us all the more reason to try and create an unbiased and free encyclopedia of medical content. We want Wikipedia to act as an alternative to commercial sources, and preferably a really good one at that.
    Through extensive collaborative work and by respecting links and Sweden specific content the last unintegrated Swedish translation went live in May.
  • Dutch
    Dutch translation carries with it special difficulties, in part due to the premises in which the Dutch Wikipedia is built upon. There is great respect for what previous editors have created, and deleting or replacing old content can be frowned upon. In spite of this there are success stories: Anafylaxie.
  • Polish
    Translation and integration into Polish also comes with its own unique set of challenges. The Polish Wikipedia has long been independent and works very hard to create high quality contentfor Polish audience. Previous translation trouble has lead to use of unique templates with unique formatting, not least among citations. Add to this that the Polish Wikipedia does not allow template redirects and a large body of work is required for each article.
    (This is somewhat alleviated by a commissioned Template bot - to be released). - List of articles for integration
  • Arabic
    The Arabic Wikipedia community has been informed of the efforts to integrate content through both the general talk-page as well as through one of the major Arabic Wikipedia facebook-groups: مجتمع ويكيبيديا العربي, something that has been heralded with great enthusiasm.
Integration guides

Integration is the next step after any translation. Despite this it is by no means trivial, and it comes with its own hardships and challenges. Previously each new integrator has needed to dive into the fray with little help from previous integrations. Therefore we are creating guides for specific Wikis that make integration simple and straightforward, with guides for specific languages, and for integrating on small Wikis.

Instructions on how to integrate an article may be found here [4]

News in short


To come
  • Medical editor census - Medical editors on different Wikis have been without proper means of communication. A preliminary list of projects is available here.
  • Proofreading drives

Further reading



Thanks for reading! To receive a monthly talk page update about new issues of the Medical Translation Newsletter, please add your name to the subscriber's list. To suggest items for the next issue, please contact the editor, CFCF (talk · contribs) at Wikipedia:Wikiproject Medicine/Translation Taskforce/Newsletter/Suggestions.
Want to help out manage the newsletter? Get in touch with me CFCF (talk · contribs)
For the newsletter from Wikiproject Medicine, see The Pulse

If you are receiving this newsletter without having signed up, it is because you have signed up as a member of the Translation Taskforce, or Wiki Project Med on meta. 22:33, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 July 2014

The Signpost: 23 July 2014

The Signpost: 30 July 2014

The Signpost: 06 August 2014

The Signpost: 13 August 2014

The Signpost: 20 August 2014

The Signpost: 27 August 2014

The Signpost: 03 September 2014

The Signpost: 10 September 2014

The Signpost: 17 September 2014

The Signpost: 17 September 2014

Medical Translation Newsletter Aug./Sept. 2014

 
 

Medical Translation Newsletter
Issue 2, Aug./Sept. 2014
by CFCF

sign up for monthly delivery

 
 

Feature – Ebola articles

 
Electron micrograph of an Ebola virus virion

During August we have translated Disease and it is now live in more than 60 different languages! To help us focus on African languages Rubric has donated a large number of articles in languages we haven't previously reached–so a shout out them, and Ian Henderson from Rubric who's joined us here at Wikipedia. We're very happy for our continued collaboration with both Rubric and Translators without Borders!

Just some of our over 60 translations:
New roles and guides!

At Wikimania there were so many enthusiastic people jumping at the chance to help out the Medical Translation Project, but unfortunately not all of them knew how to get started. That is why we've been spending considerable time writing and improving guides! They are finally live, and you can find them at our home-page!

New sign up page!

We're proud to announce a new sign up page at WP:MTSIGNUP! The old page was getting cluttered and didn't allow you to speficy a role. The new page should be easier to sign up to, and easier to navigate so that we can reach you when you're needed!

Style guides for translations

Translations are of both full articles and shorter articles continues. The process where short articles are chosen for translation hasn't been fully transparent. In the coming months we hope to have a first guide, so that anyone who writes medical or health articles knows how to get their articles to a standard where they can be translated! That's why we're currently working on medical good lede criteria! The idea is to have a similar peer review process to good article nominations, but only for ledes.

Some more stats
Further reading


-- CFCF 🍌 (email) 13:09, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 September 2014

The Signpost: 01 October 2014

The Signpost: 08 October 2014

The Signpost: 08 October 2014

The Signpost: 08 October 2014

The Signpost: 08 October 2014

The Signpost: 15 October 2014

The Signpost: 29 October 2014

WikiProject Anatomy Newsletter

WP:Anatomy quarterly update (#3)

Previous -- Next
Released: 1 November, 2014
Editor: Tom (LT)

Hello WP:Anatomy participant! This is the third quarterly update, documenting what's going on in WikiProkect Anatomy, news, current projects and other items of interest. I'd greatly value feedback on this, and if you think I've missed something, or don't wish to receive this again, please leave a note on my talkpage or remove your name from the mailing list

What's new
What's going on
  • We fly past 10,000 articles (now already up to 10,150). Why is this important? Articles under our scope are automatically included in popular pages, the cleanup list, and will be included as the recent changes list is updated.
  • A discussion about the formatting of infoboxes.
  • A lot of editing on the heart article -- can it make it to GA?
  • The medical newsletter, WP:PULSE finds its feet, and Anatomy and Physiology are featured as a subsection!
  • A new WP:WikiProject Animal anatomy (WP:ANAN) is created to focus on animal anatomy.
How can I contribute?
  • Welcome new editors! We have a constant stream of new editors who are often eager to work on certain articles.
  • We are always looking to collaborate! If you're looking for editors to collaborate with, let us know on our talk page!
  • Continue to add high-class reliable sources
  • Browse images on WikiCommons to improve the quality of images we use on many articles.
Quarterly focus - Anatomical terminology

Anatomical terminology is an essential component to all our articles. It is necessary to describe structures accurately and without ambiguity. It can also be extremely confusing and, let's face it, it's likely you too were confused too before you knew what was going on ("It's all Greek to me!" you may have said, fairly accurately).

In the opinion of this editor, it's very important that we try hard to describe anatomy in a way that is both technically accurate and accessible. The majority of our readers are lay readers and will not be fluent in terminology. Anatomy is a thoroughly interesting discipline, but it shouldn't be 'locked away' only to those who are fluent in the lingo – exploring anatomy should not be limited by education, technical-level English fluency, or unfamiliarity with its jargon. Anatomical terminology is one barrier to anatomical literacy.

Here are four ways that we can help improve the readability of our anatomical articles.

  1. Substitute. Use words readers are familiar with -- there is no need to use anatomical terminology unless necessary!
    Innervated by
    The nerve that supplies X is...
  2. Explain. When using terminology, remember readers will likely not understand what you mean, so consider adding an explanation and providing context. Use wikilinks for terms that a reader may not know.
    "The triceps extends the arm" may not be readily understood. A small addition may help the reader:
    "The triceps extends the arm, straightening it". Consider:
  3. Separate. Do not use long, complicated sentences. Don't write discursive, long comparisons unless needed. Start with simple information first, then get progressively more complex. Separate information by paragraph and subsection. Bite-sized information is much more easier to digest for readers who don't have a solid anatomical foundation
  4. Eliminate. Not all information is necessary on every article. Hatnotes are a simple and effective way to direct readers to another article. Don't provide long lists of synonyms of names for structures that an article isn't about. If a sentence has been paraphrased to the hilt, consider that several editors are indicating it may need to be simplified.
    "The other branches of the trigeminal nerve are the opthalmic nerve (nervus opthalmicus) and mandibular nerve (nervus mandibularis)"
    "The other branches of the trigeminal nerve are the opthalmic nerve and mandibular nerve" is much more easily digestible

This essay is provided in full on WP:ANATSIMPLIFY.

This has been transcluded to the talk pages of all active WP:ANATOMY users. To opt-out, leave a message on the talkpage of Tom (LT) or remove your name from the mailing list

The Signpost: 05 November 2014

The Signpost: 12 November 2014

Ways to improve Simplified Airway Risk Index

Hi, I'm SBaker43. JakobSteenberg, thanks for creating Simplified Airway Risk Index!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This topic needs links from related topics; Thyromental distance and Mallampati score are obvious articles. There should be others in the EMS area. Thanks for adding this.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. SBaker43 (talk) 06:26, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 November 2014

The Signpost: 03 December 2014

The Signpost: 10 December 2014

The Signpost: 17 December 2014

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Blind insertion airway device, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aspiration. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Moving content around

When you split content into sub articles please indicate in the edit summary where it came from. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 09:30, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 December 2014

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Basic airway management
added a link pointing to Aspiration
Osteoblast
added a link pointing to Nuclei

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Basic airway management, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aspiration. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 December 2014

The Signpost: 07 January 2015

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Long posterior ciliary arteries, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Iris. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 January 2015

The Signpost: 21 January 2015

The Signpost: 28 January 2015

The Signpost: 04 February 2015

The Signpost: 11 February 2015

Dorsal digital arteries of hand

 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Dorsal digital arteries of hand, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Dorsal digital arteries. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:12, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Antvorskov barrack, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barrack. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Partial title matches and disambiguation

Hi there. I've noticed you creating a lot of medical/anatomical disambiguation (dab) pages for what seem to be partial title matches or search indexes. For instance, Branchial Buccopharyngeal and Proper artery. I wonder if a dab page (as opposed to a glossary, index, etc) is the best way to do this: e.g. is a Branchial membrane actually ever referred to as a "Branchial", or merely informally, when it's already been established that one is referring to membrane? We don't normally make dab pages for everything that follows a given adjective. If this series of dab pages has already been discussed and okayed by WikiProject Anatomy or WikiProject Medicine then I'm satisfied, but just wanted to make sure your page creations are in line with guidelines, with some oversight by other experts, to ensure that they serve the most good with the least amount of confusion. Cheers, --Animalparty-- (talk) 03:03, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 February 2015

Autopatrolled

Hello, I notice that you're creating a lot of new disambiguation pages. As a new page patroller, it would be helpful if you would get WP:Autopatrolled rights at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled so that they don't all come up as unpatrolled pages at Special:NewPages. Thanks,  Liam987(talk) 00:29, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

I'll nominate you for it, if you don't object. Didn't mean to sound like I was trying to give you more things to do, in case it came off that way.  Liam987(talk) 00:39, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
I'll give your current project as rationale, then. I'm sure the 50 non-disambiguation thing isn't absolute. Liam987(talk) 00:52, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
I've nominated you.  Liam987(talk) 01:01, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
FYI, I've approved the request at permissions, so you are now autopatrolled. This feature will have no effect on your editing and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Keep editing! Swarm X 22:51, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 February 2015

The Signpost: 25 February 2015

The Signpost: 04 March 2015

The Signpost: 11 March 2015

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Kudpung. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Metatarsal ligaments, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:26, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Kudpung. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Longitudinal fasciculus, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:26, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited First dorsal metatarsal artery, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Interosseous dorsalis muscle. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 March 2015

.

Continuous Liquid Interface Production has been nominated for Did You Know

thanks

Jakob

Your kind response and suggestions were really helpful. I really thought editing would be simple, but the wikipedia syntax is very convoluted and not intutitive. But I have gotten through most of the Help pages and have a pretty good idea now of at least how to do basic editing. Many of the references cited in the articles are really not the best. So I hope to improve that among other tasks. And someone posted a long list of anatomy articles that need editing so I am working on the first, common flexor tendon. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anatomyczar (talkcontribs) 11:55, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

references

Jakob:

I have just edited the page for "common flexor tendon." I am confused about references. I added a reference but it is coming up as a window rather than within a reference section. Is this correct. Also how does the text seem? And I should have an image that actually shows the common flexor tendon. I am working on that. Also, now that there is a reference how do I eliminate the icon that says the article needs a reference. Thanks. Joel Anatomyczar (talk) 14:38, 25 March 2015 (UTC)Anatomyczar

got it

Jakob:

I see now what was needed to make the reference section work. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anatomyczar (talkcontribs) 16:22, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

singular/plural

Jakob: I of course will change the singular/plural material but I am not sure I really understand what you are doing. Please give me a page where you have made the changes so I can see what you have done. And I certainly did notice that you did some additional work on the common flexor tendon page. I am still working on a better image for that page. Also will work on the infobox. thanks. Anatomyczar (talk) 21:44, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Abductor digiti minimi muscle of hand
added links pointing to Palm, Palmar, Medial and Ulnar

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

plural redirects

Jakob:

I understand now in concept what you are doing. It will take me a bit of time to put it into practice. And thanks for saying that editing Wikipedia is not easy. I am fairly computer literate and I found editing very confusing. Fortunately, I had some exposure to HTML years ago so at least I have some idea of what is going on. But for someone with no prior exposure, editing would be very confusing. So I have plenty to do in my retirement.

I just got a great image for common flexor tendon.  I will label it and figure out how to insert it and remove the old Gray's anatomy image.  

JoelAnatomyczar (talk) 11:37, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

more quesitons

Jakob: Firstly, that infobox seems more for muscles than for this tendon. See if you agree. More importantly, I have a new and much better image to insert but I don't see where the code is for the images on the current page. I want to delete the gray's image and put in mine. Also I took a look at the upper limb template at the bottom of the page. It is really confusing and has errors and terms that are not used. Should I fix it and if so how? Where do I find it? I now see how working on these pages is infinite. Thanks. JoelAnatomyczar (talk) 20:15, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost – Volume 11, Issue 12 – 25 March 2015

images

Jakob:

I do understand about loading images and copyright. Let me play with getting the mages onto the page and then I may have some more questions! Thanks. JoelAnatomyczar (talk) 15:28, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

image

Jakob:

I put a new image on the common flexor tendon page. I think I am done with this one for now and will likely do common extensor tendon next and then move on to some more complicated pages.Anatomyczar (talk) 13:25, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Issue with kevinpmcgowan

JakobSteenberg, I am sorry to have offended you. My intentions are not to spam nor to adversely affect "listing at Google." My intention is to add references to a resource with no banner ads or space filled with supplement/steroid/Viagra promotions. From my perspective, these Wikipedia articles, especially the articles on specific exercises lack at times good quality before/after photos and detailed videos that may assist someone exploring these exercises. With that being said, I will not add these references in the future to the muscle group pages. I can see that some individuals may find it helpful and some may not based on the parent guidelines of these articles. Does Wikipedia provide any guidelines for this purpose?

While I am sure you deal with many spammers, I would ask you to please provide others that you talk to for the first time with a little more professional than you afforded me. I personally felt very threatened by your email, and I do not think that your salutation of "kinds regards" is appropriate for a letter with such a tone. In the article you provided me the guidelines for the first email read as follows:

"Hello, I'm UserName. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added, because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you.

As I said, please respond and let's have an open discussion. If you still believe that the external links are inappropriate for the muscle groups please let me know, and I will take them down. No need for you to spend your time taking them down. Also, if you need someone else to weigh in on this issue, please reach out to an appropriate Wikipedia editor. I'm not familiar enough with the community.

Best, Kevin — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kevinpmcgowan (talkcontribs) 00:08, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the response. I appreciate your tone this time. I agree, based on the guidelines of the WikiAnatomy project, the links in the anatomy are not appropriate.

However, I am quite discouraged by this process. During our conversation User:CFCF removed every single link that I contributed. Again, I would have been perfectly willing to remove these myself. My problem with the exercise contributions is external links to t-nation and other sites (supplement/pseudosteroid sites still exist) but all links to site with no ads/supplements/steroids is removed. The editor process is important. An editor should be able to remove spam, but again contact that individual and ask whether that person really cares about the topic or is trying to make a big buck. Right now, it just looks like CFCF is trying to be a vigilante by removing all links without any discussion while leaving much more questionable links. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kevinpmcgowan (talkcontribs) 13:28, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Rest assured I will not add any more external links nor will I interfere with any of your efforts. My intent was never to interfere with this community. I appreciate the quality discussion that this has turned into. After reading through the long-list of rules, I do believe you were justified in asking for these links to be removed. With that being said, I am discouraged that the enforcers of these rules at times fail to follow their own prescribed rules during enforcement. I am also discouraged that the rules were selectively enforced on me but not similar links. The same moderation should be taken with all links on these pages. After all, I used these initial links as proxy for what was or was not appropriate for these exercise articles. With that I sign off wikipedia. Good luck with your studies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 45.37.112.40 (talk) 23:11, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

gluteal muscles

Jakob, thanks for the support. I have to do a little more on common extensor tendon and then will work on gluteal muscles. You are correct. The article needs work and should be fun to do. JoelAnatomyczar (talk) 11:17, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Continuous Liquid Interface Production

Allen3 talk 12:05, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost, 1 April 2015

gluteal muscles

Jakob: I spent time on the gluteal muscles article today (just reading it). It is basically wrong and pretty useless. Much of the discussion pertains to the gluteus region and not the gluteal muscles. The fat layer that is referred to, panicles adiposa, is not found in humans. Honestly, I am not sure why an article on gluteal muscles would need anymore than a single sentence stating the three gluteal muscles with redirects to them. Not sure how to proceed here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anatomyczar (talkcontribs) 13:31, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

gluteal region

Jakob: I really appreciate your comments. I will work on the page. Currently working on the extensor compartments of wrist page. This one is very straightforward but needed some minor corrections, editing and some images.Anatomyczar (talk) 12:52, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 01 April 2015

Femoral-tibial angle

 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Femoral-tibial angle, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://what-is-this.net/en/define/femur.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 12:37, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mylohyoid muscle, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages CT and Median raphe. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

article for Clinical Anatomy

Jakob:

I have been asked to write an editorial on Anatomy and Wikipedia for the journal Clinical Anatomy. I am almost done with it but because I am so new at this I could really use an experienced Wiki editor to check it. Would you be willing to do that. If so, please email me directly at vilensk@ipfw.edu. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anatomyczar (talkcontribs) 14:13, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 08 April 2015

The Signpost: 08 April 2015

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Epigastric vessels, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Epigastric arteries and Epigastric veins. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 April 2015

The Signpost: 22 April 2015

The Signpost: 29 April 2015

The Signpost: 06 May 2015

The Signpost: 13 May 2015

The Signpost: 20 May 2015

The Signpost: 27 May 2015

Reference errors on 4 June

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:26, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 03 June 2015

The Signpost: 10 June 2015

The Signpost: 17 June 2015

Barnstar for you

  The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
For your valuable contributions -- DreamSparrow talk 21:27, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 June 2015

study design

Jakob, thank you for your kind words at wt:med. Glad you appreciate the spirit of my input. I'm very sympathetic with both your intentions and your situation. If it's ok with you I'd like to continue to respond with a few suggestions on the wt:med thread (maybe after an arbitrary break?), because I think it's really good to have these sorts of conversations there. Kudos to you for going there! 5.80.198.100 (talk) 11:02, 29 June 2015 (UTC) [a long-term (logged-out) ip user]

WikiProject Anatomy Newsletter #4

WikiProject Anatomy Newsletter #4

Previous
Released: 1 July, 2015
Editor: Tom (LT)

Hello WikiProject Anatomy participant! This is the fourth update, documenting what's going on in WikiProject Anatomy, news, current projects and other items of interest. We've had a quiet time over the last half-year or so, so I've slowed down the release of this newsletter and will probably release the next one around the end of the year. If you'd like to provide some feedback, if you think I've missed something, or don't wish to receive this again, please leave a note on my talkpage or remove your name from the mailing list

What's new
What's going on
 
The vermiform appendix, seen in the bottom left and the cause of much anguish when inflammed, stirs up an interesting discussion.
  • Should Vermiform appendix be retitled to its more common name (Appendix)? The discussion continues!
  • A large number of "back end" changes are made, and integration with Wikidata continues -- see the focus for more.
  • Our set of cranial nerve-related articles receive a review by a subject expert
How can I contribute?
 
Our articles on the 13 12 cranial nerves receive a review from a subject expert
Issue focus - technical changes

This issue was originally going to focus on how far we've come as a project. However, that encouraging news can wait until next issue, as there are simply too many changes going on at the "back end" of our project not to write about. What do I mean by "back end"? I mean changes that are not necessarily visible to readers, but may have a significant impact on the way we edit or on future edits.

Templates

A number of visible changes have been made to our templates. Firstly, the way our templates have been linked together has changed. Previously, this was a small bar with single-letter links. This has been replaced by a light-coloured box contained within all our templates with fully-worded links, which provides links to relevant anatomy and medical templates. This should make life a lot easier, particularly for students and other readers who are struggling with the vastness of anatomical systems and their related diseases and treatments.

As part of this, almost all our templates have been reviewed and cleaned up. The previously confusing colour scheme has been removed and colour standardised. The titles have been simplified. References to "identifiers" in the titles of navigation boxes (such as Gray's Anatomy and Terminologia Anatomica numbers) have been removed. Where possible, the wiki-code of templates has been updated to give a cleaner, more standardised, format that is hopefully more friendly to new editors. The cleanup continues , please feel free to contribute or propose templates which need attention.

Anatomy infobox

Most of our articles have an infobox. Previously, there were 11 separate infoboxes for different fields, such as muscles, nerves and embryology. These have been united so that at the "back end", every template will take formatting directly from the main anatomy infobox -- however at the "front end", there is little difference for readers. This will make future changes much easier -- including adding new fields, formatting, and reordering the contents. Several changes have already been made: infoboxes now link to a relevant anatomical terminology article; contents are now divided into 'Identifiers' and 'Details' headings, making it easier to grasp content for new readers; and new fields have been added, including Greek and UBERON, with several more under discussion.

External links

An editor has reviewed all our template-based external links. These are the links that often fill the "External links" category, and sometimes used as citations. At least thirty different links sets, with the number of links stretching into the thousands, have been fixed, and if not functioning, deleted. A number of non-functioning dead links (with no archived websites available), and one or two others, have been deleted. This helps keep our 'external links' section relevant and functioning for those readers who want extra information about articles.

Wikidata

Perhaps our most important change has been integration with Wikidata. This is because of both its current uses and potential future uses. Wikidata is a service related to Wikipedia focusing on storing information. Data relating to a Wikipedia item (such as a muscle or bone, or even a template) can have related "structured" infomation stored systematically alongside it. For example, a muscle can have information about its embryological origin, nerve supply, and the relevant sections of Terminologica Anatomica (TA) stored alongside it. Much information that was stored within articles on infoboxes is now stored on Wikidata, including the TA, TH, and TE fields. An immediate benefit is that Wikipedias in every language will (as they update their own infoboxes, be able to automatically include this information. New data can be entered in a much easier format, and data can be batch entered by bots making future updates much easier Future uses include data visualisation. I personally am looking forward to the day when a reader can view a wikidata-based "tree", clicking mesoderm and seeing all of the derived structures, then selecting the intermediate mesoderm, then Pronephric duct, mesonephric duct and vas deferens. The possibilities of using Wikidata for data visualisation are really quite encouraging!

Our next issue will focus on how far WikiProject Anatomy has come in the past 2 years.

This has been transcluded to the talk pages of all active WP:ANATOMY users. To opt-out, leave a message on the talkpage of Tom (LT) or remove your name from the mailing list
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:25, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 01 July 2015

The Signpost: 08 July 2015

The Signpost: 15 July 2015

The Signpost: 22 July 2015

The Signpost: 29 July 2015

The Signpost: 05 August 2015

The Signpost: 12 August 2015

The Signpost: 19 August 2015

The Signpost: 26 August 2015

The Signpost: 02 September 2015

The Signpost: 09 September 2015

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Muscles of the hand, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Fingers and Pointing. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Large intestine
added a link pointing to Iliac artery
Muscles of the hand
added a link pointing to Fingers

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:38, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 September 2015

The Signpost: 23 September 2015

Cutaneous nerves of thighs

Hi JakobSteenberg. I noticed that you created the page Cutaneous nerves of thighs as a redirect to itself. I assume this was unintentional, so I'm letting you know so that you can edit the page to redirect wherever it was supposed to. Thank you! —Granger (talk · contribs) 00:49, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 September 2015

The Signpost: 07 October 2015

The Signpost: 14 October 2015

The Signpost: 21 October 2015

Just to ask why you did delete my part in the Article in: Foreign body In Veterinary medicine often Endoscopy method is not the prefered one for foreign body. So the small hartmann is produced up to 1 m to extract foreign bodies. You do it under radiology control. Maybee you decide to refert back or like to give me arguments. regards--Arztde (talk) 03:26, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 October 2015

The Signpost: 04 November 2015

The Signpost: 11 November 2015

The Signpost: 18 November 2015

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 November 2015

The Signpost: 02 December 2015

The Signpost: 09 December 2015

The Signpost: 16 December 2015

The Signpost: 30 December 2015

The Signpost: 06 January 2016

The Signpost: 13 January 2016

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Crus fracture, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crus. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:07, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 January 2016

The Signpost: 27 January 2016

Multifidus spinae muscles

It's not a Talk page.Xx236 (talk) 09:54, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 03 February 2016

Pectinate

 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Pectinate, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.dictionary30.com/meaning/Pectinate.

It is possible that the bot was mistaken and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 00:30, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 February 2016

The Signpost: 17 February 2016

The Signpost: 24 February 2016

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Root canal, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages CT and Molar. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:13, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 02 March 2016

Speedy deletion nomination of Tactile perceptions

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Tactile perceptions requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. IagoQnsi (talk) 17:13, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tactile perception

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Tactile perception requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. IagoQnsi (talk) 17:13, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

  • Hi. I deleted these two because you put a WikiProject banner on the article page, not the talk page, and there was nothing else there. I'm not sure what you intended, but by all means start again. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 17:40, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 09 March 2016

The Signpost: 16 March 2016

The Signpost: 23 March 2016

The Signpost: 1 April 2016

The Signpost: 14 April 2016

The Signpost: 24 April 2016

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fascia iliaca block, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Aspiration, Cranial and Lateral cutaneous nerve. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:37, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 2 May 2016

The Signpost: 17 May 2016

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Biceps femoris muscle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sprinting. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 May 2016

The Signpost: 05 June 2016

The Signpost: 15 June 2016

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vasti, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lateral intermuscular septum. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 July 2016

Re rater tool

Hi JakobSteenberg thanks for your message about changing talk pages etc. I thought (think) that this was done by administrators and I just tried to install it and was told it was used by admins. ? Also I thought it gave those 'more in the know' a chance to overturn any. (I don't usually do that many changes at once). Thanks --Iztwoz (talk) 11:40, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 July 2016

The Signpost: 04 August 2016

The Signpost: 18 August 2016

The Signpost: 06 September 2016

hello dear JakobSteenberg

hello dear I want to talk with you about this edit I edit one link for helping users for searching about appendix so I edit this link appendix this link for users helping for appendix issue so can you tell me why you delete this edit link? thank you... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zubi12 (talkcontribs) 19:45, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 September 2016

The Signpost: 14 October 2016

Bioarchitecture

Hello,

 I have a new micro technology to deal with the cells and making new tissue with a specific guidelines,  my idea work with the architecture to build small building for cells and to make small human unit able to all experiments and cam try new drugs with full freedom. So please contact me and give me your email address to more details....

Ali Massoud Medical School of OIU ali.hhh.massoud@gmail.com

Ali Massoud (talk) 22:01, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 November 2016

WikiProject Anatomy newsletter #5

WP:Anatomy newsletter (#5)

Previous - Next
Released: November 2016
Editor: Tom (LT)

Hello WP:Anatomy participant! This is our fifth newsletter, documenting what's going on in WikiProject Anatomy, news, current projects and other items of interest. There hasn't been too much worthy of news, and I have less time to dedicate to this project, so I've slowed down the release of this newsletter.

I value feedback, and if you think I've missed something, or don't wish to receive this again, please leave a note on my talk page, or remove your name from the mailing list

What's new
How can I contribute?
  • Participate in discussions - a number of discussions such as those on our talk page or about our infobox would benefit from your opinion!
  • Continue to add content to our articles
  • Collaborate and discuss with other editors - many hands make light work!
Focus - how far we've come

How far have we come since our first newsletter... the answer is quite a lot! Here goes:

  • Hundreds to thousands of articles improved and standardised by many, many editors.
  • 14 new good articles created or added to our project [7]
  • Improved quality of our articles - subjectively and objectively. GAs quadrupled from 5 to 16, B-class articles doubles from 62 to 115, C-class article well on the way to trebling from 219 to 611, Start-class increased from 1,082 to 1,570.
  • Tens to hundreds of mergers performed between tiny, unedited articles - a remnant of our Gray's Anatomy (1918) heritage.
  • Layout guidelines changed and layout standardised for the majority of our articles
  • In the project space:
  • Active integration with wikidata in our infoboxes
  • Overhaul of all of our navboxes
  • Review and integration of all of our templates
  • External link templates reviewed to ensure they all work
  • To help improve anatomical literacy:

These are substantial improvements and my thanks go out to our many editors who played a part in this. These improvements are almost always the result of consensus, compromise, collaboration and discussion between multiple editors.

I hope we can continue to improve in the future. How can you help? Continue to edit, add content, and create a welcoming atmosphere so that new editors will join us.

Well done to us all, and the many anonymous editors who've helped along the way!

This has been transcluded to the talk pages of all active WP:ANATOMY users. To opt-out, leave a message on the talkpage of Tom (LT) or remove your name from the mailing list

Message delivered on behalf of WikiProject Anatomy by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:21, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, JakobSteenberg. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 November 2016

The Signpost: 22 December 2016

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

The Signpost: 17 January 2017

The Signpost: 6 February 2017

WikiProject Genealogy - newsletter No.1

Newsletter Nr 1 for WikiProject Genealogy (and Wikimedia genealogy project on Meta)
 

Participation:

This is the very first newsletter sent by mass mail to members in Wikipedia:WikiProject Genealogy, to everyone who voted a support for establishing a potential Wikimedia genealogy project on meta, and anyone who during the years showed an interest in genealogy on talk pages and likewise.

(To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, see below)

Progress report:

Since the Projects very first edit 9 december 2002 by User:Dan Koehl, which eventually became the WikiProject Genealogy, different templates were developed, and the portal Portal:Genealogy was founded by User:Michael A. White in 2008. Over the years a number of articles has been written, with more or less association to genealogy. And, very exciting, there is a proposal made on Meta by User:Another Believer to found a new Wikimedia Genealogy Project, read more at Meta; Wikimedia genealogy project where you also can support the creation with your vote, in case you havnt done so already.

Future:

The future of the Genealogy project on the English Wikipedia, and a potential creation of a new Wikimedia Genealogy Project, is something where you can make a an input.

You can

Cheers from your WikiProject Genealogy founder and coordinator Dan Koehl

To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery Dan Koehl (talk) 22:28, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

The Signpost: 27 February 2017

WikiProject Genealogy - newsletter No.2

Newsletter Nr 2 for WikiProject Genealogy (and Wikimedia genealogy project on Meta)
 

Participation:

This is the second newsletter sent by mass mail to members in Wikipedia:WikiProject Genealogy, to everyone who voted a support for establishing a potential Wikimedia genealogy project on meta, and anyone who during the years showed an interest in genealogy on talk pages and likewise.

(To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please see below)

Progress report:

In order to improve communication between genealogy interested wikipedians, as well talking in chat mode about the potential new wiki, a new irc channel has been setup, and you are welcome to visit and try it out at: #wikimedia-genealogy connect

(In case you are not familiar with IRC, or would prefer some info and intro, please see Wikipedias IRC tutorial)

At m:Talk:Wikimedia_genealogy_project#Wikimedia_user_group is discussed the possibility of creating a genealogy-related Wikimedia user group: please submit comments and suggestions, and whether you would like to be a member in such a group. Prime goal for the group is the creation of a new, free, genealogy wiki, but there is also a discussion weather we should propose a new project or support the adoption of an existing project?

Read more at Meta; Wikimedia genealogy project where you also can support the creation with your vote, in case you haven't done so already.

Future:

The future of the Genealogy project, and creation of a new Wikimedia Genealogy Project, is something where you can make a an input.

You can

Don't want newsletters? If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page.

Cheers from your WikiProject Genealogy coordinator Dan Koehl.

To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery

Genealogy project need your vote for creation of an email list

Newsletter Nr 3 for WikiProject Genealogy (and Wikimedia genealogy project on Meta)
 

Participation:

This is the third newsletter sent by mass mail to members in Wikipedia:WikiProject Genealogy, to everyone who voted a support for establishing a potential Wikimedia genealogy project on meta, and anyone who during the years showed an interest in genealogy on talk pages and likewise.

(To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please see below)

Request:

In order to improve communication between genealogy interested wikipedians, as well as taking new, important steps towards a creation of a new project site, we need to make communication between the users easier and more effective.

At Mail list on meta is discussed the possibility of creating a genealogy-related Wikimedia email list. In order to request the creation of such a list, we need your voice and your vote.

In order to create a new list, we need to put a request it in Phabricator, and add a link to reasoning/explanation of purpose, and link to community consensus. Therefore we need your vote for this now, so we can request the creation of the mail list.

Read more about this email list at Meta; Wikimedia genealogy project mail list where you can support the creation of the mail list with your vote, in case you haven't done so already.

Future:

Don't want newsletters? If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page.

Cheers from your WikiProject Genealogy coordinator Dan Koehl.

To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery

WikiProject Genealogy - newsletter No.4: Mail list created!

Newsletter Nr 4, 2017-03-24, for WikiProject Genealogy (and Wikimedia genealogy project on Meta)
 

Participation:

This is the fourth newsletter sent by mass mail to members in Wikipedia:WikiProject Genealogy, to everyone who voted a support for establishing a potential Wikimedia genealogy project on meta, and anyone who during the years showed an interest in genealogy on talk pages and likewise.

(To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please see below)

Mail list is created:

The project email list is now created and ready to use!

Please feel free to subscribe at https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-genealogy

Future:

Don't want newsletters? If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page.

Cheers from your WikiProject Genealogy coordinator Dan Koehl.

To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Condensing osteitis
added links pointing to Immunity, Sclerotic and Pulp
Central odontogenic fibroma
added a link pointing to Stroma

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alar plate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Caudal. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors!

please help translate this message into your local language via meta
  The 2016 Cure Award
In 2016 you were one of the top ~200 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you from Wiki Project Med Foundation for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a user group whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs.

Thanks again :-) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 18:08, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 9 June 2017

Wikiprojects for enzymes

Hi, Thank you so much for all your work rating articles! Just in case it is useful, I think that enzyme articles (basically anything ending in '-ase') don't need to be in WP:CHEMS. Thanks again! T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk 06:15, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 June 2017

The Signpost: 15 July 2017

The Signpost: 5 August 2017

The Signpost: 6 September 2017

The Signpost: 25 September 2017

Speedy deletion nomination of Neer classification

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Neer classification requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://radiopaedia.org/articles/neer-classification-of-proximal-humeral-fractures-1. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:40, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 October 2017

Rating anatomy articles

Firstly, thank you for rating so many of our anatomy articles. This is really helpful! (I alone use this ever 1-2 days)...

I have been having a look at our categorisation by field (specifically Category:Anatomy articles about systems) and have realised that most of the entries are redirects. I think the most useful way we can use our interproject field is to only list articles. The idea being that a WikiProject anatomy editor who is interested in, say, microanatomy can pull up straight away a list of relevant articles they can edit. I find (could just be me) that having lots of redirects is fairly messy and takes up some time when one is trying to work out which are the editable articles. What do you think about this idea? (as in - fields just for articles)? --Tom (LT) (talk) 22:59, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 November 2017

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, JakobSteenberg. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 December 2017

WikiProject Genealogy - newsletter No.5 -2017

Newsletter Nr 5, 2017-12-30, for WikiProject Genealogy (and Wikimedia genealogy project on Meta)
 

Participation:

This is the fifth newsletter sent by mass mail to members in Wikipedia:WikiProject Genealogy, to everyone who voted a support for establishing a potential Wikimedia genealogy project on meta, and anyone who during the years showed an interest in genealogy on talk pages and likewise.

(To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please see below)

A demo wiki is up and running!

Dear members of WikiProject Genealogy, this will be the last newsletter for 2017, but maybe the most important one!

You can already now try out the demo for a genealogy wiki at https://tools.wmflabs.org/genealogy/wiki/Main_Page and try out the functions. You will find parts of the 18th Pharao dynasty and other records submitted by the 7 first users, and it would be great if you would add some records.

And with those great news we want to wish you a creative New Year 2018!


Don't want newsletters? If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page.

Cheers from your WikiProject Genealogy coordinator Dan Koehl.

To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery

The Signpost: 16 January 2018

WikiProject Anatomy newsletter (#6)

Released January 2018  · Previous newsletter  · Next

Hello WikiProject Anatomy participant! This is our sixth newsletter, documenting what's going on in WikiProject Anatomy, news, current projects and other items of interest.

I value feedback, and if you think I've missed something, or don't wish to receive this again, please leave a note on my talk page, or remove your name from the mailing list.

Yours truly, --Tom (LT) (talk) 10:48, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

What's new

  new good articles since last newsletter include Thyroid, Hypoglossal nerve, Axillary arch, Human brain, Cerebrospinal fluid, Accessory nerve, Gallbladder, and Interventricular foramina (neuroanatomy)
  I write an Introduction to Anatomy on Wikipedia in the Journal of Anatomy [8]
  Vagina receives a lot of attention on its way to good article status.
  We reach two projects goals of 20 good articles, and less than half of our articles as stubs, in July 2017. [9]
  A discussion about two preferred section titles takes place here.

Introduction to WikiProject Anatomy and Anatomy on Wikipedia

 
We welcome all those interested in anatomy!

Seeing as we have so many new members, and a constant stream of new editors to our articles, I would like to write in this issue about how our project and articles are arranged.

The main page for WikiProject Anatomy is here. We are a WikiProject, which is a group of editors interested in editing and maintaining anatomy articles. Our editors come from all sorts of disciplines, from academically trained anatomists, students, and lay readers, to experienced Wikipedia editors. Based on previous discussions, members of our project have chosen to focus mainly on human anatomy ([10]), with a separate project for animal anatomy (WP:ANAN). A WikiProject has no specific rights or abilities on Wikipedia, however it does allow a central venue for discussion on different issues where interested editors can be asked to contribute, collaborate, and perhaps reach a consensus.

Project and article structure

Wikipedia has about 5,500,000 articles. Of these, about 20,000 fall under our project, about 5,000 of which are text-containing articles. Articles are manually assigned by editors as relating to our project (many using the rater tool). As well as articles, other Wikipedia pages in our project include, lists, disambiguation pages, and redirects. Our articles are improving over time, and you can have a look at our goals and progress, or last newsletter, to get a better idea about this.

Our articles are structured according to the manual of style, specifically here. The manual of style is a guideline, which "is a generally accepted standard that editors should attempt to follow, though it is best treated with common sense, and occasional exceptions may apply", and prescribes the layout of anatomy articles, most of which follow it.

Our articles are organised in a particular way. Most articles have a infobox in its lead, describing key characteristics about the article. Because we have so many articles, articles are often linked together in different ways. An article tends to focus on the primary topic it is written about. Further information can be linked like this, or piped (like this). We use navboxes, which are the boxes at the bottom of articles providing links to similar topics, as well as hatnotes. Typical hatnotes in articles include {{main}}, {{see also}} and {{further}}. This lets us link to relevant and related articles. The bottom of articles also shows categories, which store groups of related articles.

Tools

For interested editors, our project offers a number of additional tools to help edit our articles. On our main page appears a log of the most edited recent articles. An automatic list of recent changes to all our articles is here. We have a list of the most popular pages (WP:ANAT500). To keep abreast of news and discussions, it is best to monitor our talk page, newsletters, and our article alerts, which automatically lists deletion, good article, featured article, and move proposals. We also have a open tasks page for editors to create lists of tasks that other editors can collaborate with. Articles are also manually assigned to a "discipline", so interested editors in for example, gross anatomy, histology, or embryology can easily locate articles via here.

Our project has all sorts of smaller items that editors may or may not know about, including a barnstar, user box ({{User WPAnatomy}}), welcoming template ({{WPANATOMY welcome}}) and fairly comprehensive listing of templates (here).

Invitation

We are always happy to help out, and I invite new editors, or for those with any questions relating to how to get around the confusing environment that is Wikipedia, to post on our talk page or, for a kind introduction to questions, at the WP:TEAHOUSE.

How can I contribute?

  • Ask questions! Talk with other editors, collaborate - and if you need help, ask!
  • Continue to add content (and citations) to our articles
  • Collaborate and discuss with other editors - many hands make light work!
  • Find a space, task or type of article that you enjoy editing - there are lots of untended niches out there

This has been transcluded to the talk pages of all active WikiProject Anatomy users. To opt-out, leave a message on the talkpage of Tom (LT) or remove your name from the mailing list

The Signpost: 5 February 2018

The Signpost: 20 February 2018

Signpost issue 4 – 29 March 2018

The Signpost: 26 April 2018

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors!

please help translate this message into your local language via meta
  The 2017 Cure Award
In 2017 you were one of the top ~250 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you from Wiki Project Med Foundation for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a user group whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs.

Thanks again :-) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 02:54, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 May 2018

The Signpost: 29 June 2018

The Signpost: 31 July 2018

The Signpost: 30 August 2018

The Signpost: 1 October 2018

The Signpost: 28 October 2018

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, JakobSteenberg. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 December 2018

The Signpost: 24 December 2018

WikiProject Genealogy - newsletter No.6

Newsletter Nr 6, 2018-12-25, for WikiProject Genealogy (and Wikimedia genealogy project on Meta)
 

Participation:

This is the sixth newsletter sent by mass mail to members in Wikipedia:WikiProject Genealogy, to everyone who voted a support for establishing a potential Wikimedia genealogy project on meta, and anyone who during the years showed an interest in genealogy on talk pages and likewise.

(To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please see below)

Now 100 supporters

At 3 December 2018, the list of users who support the potential Wikimedia genealogy project, reached 100!

A demo wiki is up and running!

You can already now try out the demo for a genealogy wiki at https://tools.wmflabs.org/genealogy/wiki/Main_Page and try out the functions. You will find parts of the 18th Pharao dynasty and other records submitted by the 7 first users, and it would be great if you would add some records.

And with those great news we want to wish you a creative New Year 2019!


Don't want newsletters? If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page.

  Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019!

Hello JakobSteenberg, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019.
Happy editing,

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:53, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Cheers from your WikiProject Genealogy coordinator Dan Koehl.

To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery

The Signpost: 31 January 2019

The Signpost: 28 February 2019

The Signpost: 31 March 2019

The Signpost: 30 April 2019

The Signpost: 31 May 2019

Membership renewal

 

You have been a member of Wiki Project Med Foundation (WPMEDF) in the past. Your membership, however, appears to have expired. As such this is a friendly reminder encouraging you to officially rejoin WPMEDF. There are no associated costs. Membership gives you the right to vote in elections for the board. The current membership round ends in 2020.


Thanks again :-) The team at Wiki Project Med Foundation---Avicenno (talk) 05:34, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

The June 2019 Signpost is out!

The Signpost: 31 July 2019

The Signpost: 30 August 2019

The Signpost: 30 September 2019

The Signpost: 31 October 2019

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 November 2019

The Signpost: 27 December 2019

The Signpost: 27 January 2020

"Uncinate processes of pancreases" listed at Redirects for discussion

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Uncinate processes of pancreases. Since you had some involvement with the Uncinate processes of pancreases redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Tom (LT) (talk) 23:49, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 March 2020

The Signpost: 29 March 2020

"Xander's ligament" listed at Redirects for discussion

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirects Xander's ligament and Xander's ligaments. Since you had some involvement with the Xander's ligament redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. gobonobo + c 20:41, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 April 2020

The Signpost: 31 May 2020

The Signpost: 28 June 2020

A barnstar for you!

  The Brilliant Idea Barnstar
For your creation of plural redirects for anatomical structures. I didn't realise how useful that would be, but I feel like I'm using them every other edit. Thank you for your brilliant idea! Tom (LT) (talk) 04:40, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 2 August 2020

The Signpost: 30 August 2020

Wikiproject Anatomy newsletter #7

Released September 2020  · Previous newsletter

Hello WikiProject Anatomy participant! This is our seventh newsletter, documenting what's going on in WikiProject Anatomy, news, current projects and other items of interest.

I value feedback, and if you think I've missed something, or don't wish to receive this again, please leave a note on my talk page, or remove your name from the mailing list.

Yours truly, --Tom (LT) (talk) 07:24, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

What's new

 
Our new barnstar
  new good articles since last newsletter include Epiglottis, Human nose, Pancreas, Prostate, Thymus, Trachea, T tubule, Ureter and Vagina, with Anatomical terms of location also awaiting review
  A made-up eponymous term is used in our article that eventually makes it in to university anatomy teaching slides and a journal article
  We reach a project goal of 150 B-class articles in July 2020, increasing by about 50% over five years, and are one good article away from our goal of 40 GAs, doubling over the last five years
  In the real world, Terminologia Anatomica 2 and Terminologia Embryologica 2 are released ([11], [12]). Terminologia Anatomica 2 is now included in anatomy article infoboxes, and there is ongoing discussion about updating TE as well
  A beautiful new barnstar is released ({{subst:The Anatomist Barnstar}})
  Portal:Anatomy receives some attention, and two related portals are deleted (vale Human body and Cranial nerve portals)
  Some things left out from past newsletters - A large amount of redirects are created to help link plural structures, and Cerebellum ([13]) and Hippocampus ([14]) are published in Wikiversity.

I have been asked to write up something introducing the Featured article (FA) process to anatomy editors, but I took a more general approach to explaining why one might want to contribute featured content and the benefits to the editor and to Wikipedia. I also tried to address some misconceptions about the FA process, and give you a guide that is somewhat specific to health content should you decide to take the dive.

A vital purpose of Featured articles is to serve as examples for new and aspiring Wikipedia editors. FAs are often uniquely comprehensive for the Internet. They showcase some of our best articles, and can enhance Wikipedia's reputation if they are maintained to standard—but in an "anyone can edit" environment, they can easily fall out of standard if not maintained. Benefits to the writer include developing collaborative partnerships and learning new skills, while improving your writing and seeing it exposed to a broader audience—all that Wikipedia is about!

Looking more specifically at WP Anatomy's featured content, the Featured media is impressive and seems to be an Anatomy Project strength. The Anatomy WikiProject has tagged 4 FAs, 1 Featured list, and 30 Featured media. Working towards upgrading and maintaining older Featured articles could be a worthwhile goal. Immune system is a 2007 FA promotion, and bringing it up to date would make a nice collaboration between WikiProject Medicine and the Anatomy WikiProject. Hippocampus is another dated promotion that is almost 50% larger than when promoted, having taken on a bit of uncited text and new text that might benefit from a tune-up.

Whether tuning up an older FA at Featured article review, or attempting a new one to be reviewed at Featured article candidates, taking the plunge can be rewarding, and I hope the advice in my essay is helpful.

You can read the essay "Achieving excellence through featured content" here.

SandyGeorgia has been a regular FA reviewer at FAC and FAR since 2006, and has participated in thousands of nominations

How can I contribute?

  • Ask questions! Talk with other editors, collaborate - and if you need help, ask at our project page!
  • Continue to add content (and citations) to our articles
  • Collaborate and discuss with other editors - many hands make light work!
  • Find a space, task or type of article that you enjoy editing - there are lots of untended niches out there

This has been transcluded to the talk pages of all active WikiProject Anatomy users. To opt-out, remove your name from the mailing list

The Signpost: 27 September 2020

The Signpost: 27 September 2020

The Signpost: 1 November 2020

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 November 2020

The Signpost: 28 December 2020

Membership renewal of Wiki Project Med Foundation

Membership renewal

 

You have been a member of Wiki Project Med Foundation (WPMEDF) in the past. Your membership, however, appears to have expired. As such this is a friendly reminder encouraging you to officially rejoin WPMEDF. There are no associated costs. Membership gives you the right to vote in elections for the board. The current membership round ends in 2022.


Thanks again :-) The team at Wiki Project Med Foundation---Avicenno (talk), 2021.01

The Signpost: 31 January 2021

The Signpost: 28 February 2021

The Signpost: 28 March 2021

The Signpost: 25 April 2021

The Signpost: 25 April 2021

The Signpost: 27 June 2021

The Signpost: 25 July 2021

The Signpost: 29 August 2021

The Signpost: 26 September 2021

Nomination of Hamatum for deletion

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hamatum is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hamatum until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Narky Blert (talk) 14:14, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 October 2021

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 November 2021

The Signpost: 28 December 2021

The Signpost: 30 January 2022

The Signpost: 27 February 2022

"Triangulare" listed at Redirects for discussion

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Triangulare and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 17#Triangulare until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Ost (talk) 16:59, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 March 2022

The Signpost: 24 April 2022

The Signpost: 29 May 2022

The Signpost: 26 June 2022

The Signpost: 1 August 2022

The Signpost: 31 August 2022

The Signpost: 30 September 2022

The Signpost: 31 October 2022

The Signpost: 28 November 2022

The Signpost: 1 January 2023

The Signpost: 16 January 2023

The Signpost: 4 February 2023

The Signpost: 20 February 2023

The Signpost: 9 March 2023

The Signpost: 20 March 2023

The Signpost: 03 April 2023

The Signpost: 26 April 2023

The Signpost: 8 May 2023

The Signpost: 22 May 2023

The Signpost: 5 June 2023

The Signpost: 19 June 2023

The Signpost: 3 July 2023

The Signpost: 17 July 2023

The Signpost: 1 August 2023

The Signpost: 15 August 2023

The Signpost: 31 August 2023

The Signpost: 16 September 2023

The Signpost: 3 October 2023

The Signpost: 23 October 2023

The Signpost: 6 November 2023

The Signpost: 20 November 2023

The Signpost: 4 December 2023

The Signpost: 24 December 2023

The Signpost: 10 January 2024

The Signpost: 31 January 2024

The Signpost: 13 February 2024

The Signpost: 2 March 2024

The Signpost: 29 March 2024

The Signpost: 25 April 2024

The Signpost: 16 May 2024

The Signpost: 8 June 2024

The Signpost: 4 July 2024

The Signpost: 22 July 2024

Inactive WikiProject Anatomy participant

 

Hi JakobSteenberg, you're receiving this message because you were previously listed at WikiProject Anatomy as a participant, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 3 years.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the participant list, so that we stop spamming you with newsletters and have a better idea of who to contact for active discussions. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting here when you become active again.

Thank you, and all the best on your WikiVoyages! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:00, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 August 2024

The Signpost: 4 September 2024

The Signpost: 26 September 2024

The Signpost: 19 October 2024

"Canales semicirculares anterior" listed at Redirects for discussion

  The redirect Canales semicirculares anterior has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 26 § Canales semicirculares anterior until a consensus is reached. Duckmather (talk) 21:48, 26 October 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 November 2024

  1. ^ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. ^ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.