User talk:Jauerback/Archives/2021
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Jauerback. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
|
Archives
|
|
|
Administrators' newsletter – January 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2020).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Speedy deletion criterion T3 (duplication and hardcoded instances) has been repealed following a request for comment.
Technical news
- You can now put pages on your watchlist for a limited period of time.
Arbitration
- By motion, standard discretionary sanctions have been temporarily authorized
for all pages relating to the Horn of Africa (defined as including Ethiopia, Somalia, Eritrea, Djibouti, and adjoining areas if involved in related disputes)
. The effectiveness of the discretionary sanctions can be evaluated on the request by any editor after March 1, 2021 (or sooner if for a good reason). - Following the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: Barkeep49, BDD, Bradv, CaptainEek, L235, Maxim, Primefac.
- By motion, standard discretionary sanctions have been temporarily authorized
Inception-ggf is evading your block
They have created a new account Aurora-mng and has started editing on List of awards and nominations received by GFriend. Could you please block this user and semi protect the article. Thanks. EN-Jungwon 17:24, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Another account Double-Butt Team with the same edit summary is now editing. EN-Jungwon 17:37, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- EN-Jungwon, both blocked. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 18:10, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- I just saw the SPI case. All blocked per WP:DUCK. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 18:11, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
A barnstar for your efforts
|
The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar |
| Thank you for your continued service adding to Wikipedia throughout 2020. - Cdjp1 (talk) 12:08, 14 January 2021 (UTC) |
Yo Ho Ho
.jpg)
Donner60 (talk) is wishing a foaming mug of Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Christmas, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec20}} to your friends' talk pages.
About a vandal
Hi. An user that you've recently blocked vandalised their own talk page. Could you do a hard block for it?Ahmetlii (talk) 17:28, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
Oops! :-)
It looks like we both protected Robinhood (company) at the exact same time. I went with a three hour duration, as I think that people will give up and move on by then. If you think it should be longer, feel free to extend it. :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 14:16, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
- Oshwah, no problem at all. I would assume that three hours should fine. I just went with the Twinkle default when I protected it. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 14:18, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
- I figured as much. Cool deal! :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 14:21, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
I saw the filter log, and while those were not helpful attempts at edits, do you really think they alone merit a no-warning block? I'm certainly not one who is known to be soft on vandals, but two attempted edits in the space of less than a minute seems like a pretty pretty thin rationale for blocking the next day. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:59, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
- Beeblebrox, with the rash of edits like those that we've had lately, do you honestly believe that they are going to be constructive in the future? If so, feel free to unblock. I have no problem with that. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 22:13, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
IPv6 block
Hi Jauerback, when blocking IPv6s, it's worth checking the /64 range that contains the IP because the whole /64 is often allocated to the same user and you sometimes spot other examples of the same sort of vandalism in that range. In those cases, you probably will want to block the whole /64 range because they frequently hop IPs in the range. For 2001:14BB:420:2E11:C839:8B3C:5E6A:43CE, if you check contributions for 2001:14BB:420:2E11:0:0:0:0/64 you'll see a few more instances. I hope you don't mind, I've re-blocked the whole range to the same expiry date that you set. --RexxS (talk) 22:28, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
- RexxS, that's something I didn't know. I'll try to do that in the future. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 22:29, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
- The downside is that it's hard to leave a meaningful block notice because those sort of IP-hopping vandals will probably never see that talk page again. I usually block the range straight from the page where I checked the range's contributions (there's a 'block' link near the top). Then I use Twinkle to leave a notice on the single IP talk page, even though it's probably a waste of time. Twinkle is quite handy because it allows you to separate the blocking and the notifying. --RexxS (talk) 22:36, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
- Is there an easy way to get the /64 range? Jauerbackdude?/dude. 22:40, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
- Sure. Let me take an example of the 2001:14BB:420:2E11:C839:8B3C:5E6A:43CE vandal:
- First click the link to their contributions. You end up at Special:Contributions/2001:14BB:420:2E11:C839:8B3C:5E6A:43CE with four results.
- Then use the down arrow to open up the Search for contributions
- Next. edit the User box to remove the last four blocks from the IPV6 - so you get
2001:14BB:420:2E11: - Add another colon at the end (making two) and add /64 - so you get
2001:14BB:420:2E11::/64 - Then click Search and you'll see nine results.
- If you think they are the same vandal, you look at the line near the top beneath "From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia" and you'll see a link to block, which will take you straight to the Block page with the range filled in for you.
- Afterwards, you can go to their talk page and Use Twinkle to leave the block notice (for what it's worth) – just untick the first box 'Block user' as that's already done. Make sure you use the same settings! Cheers --RexxS (talk) 23:09, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks! Jauerbackdude?/dude. 23:10, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
- You get the same results even quicker when you just add /64 to the end of the IP address. See Special:Contributions/2001:14BB:420:2E11:C839:8B3C:5E6A:43CE/64. Widr (talk) 23:36, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks! Jauerbackdude?/dude. 23:10, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
- Sure. Let me take an example of the 2001:14BB:420:2E11:C839:8B3C:5E6A:43CE vandal:
- Is there an easy way to get the /64 range? Jauerbackdude?/dude. 22:40, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
- The downside is that it's hard to leave a meaningful block notice because those sort of IP-hopping vandals will probably never see that talk page again. I usually block the range straight from the page where I checked the range's contributions (there's a 'block' link near the top). Then I use Twinkle to leave a notice on the single IP talk page, even though it's probably a waste of time. Twinkle is quite handy because it allows you to separate the blocking and the notifying. --RexxS (talk) 22:36, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – February 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2021).
|
|
|
Arbitration
- The standard discretionary sanctions authorized for American Politics were amended by motion to cover
post-1992 politics of United States and closely related people
, replacing the 1932 cutoff.
- The standard discretionary sanctions authorized for American Politics were amended by motion to cover
Miscellaneous
- Voting in the 2021 Steward elections will begin on 05 February 2021, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 26 February 2021, 13:59 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
- Wikipedia has now been around for 20 years, and recently saw its billionth edit!
TPA
You might want to revoke talk page access for a user you recently blocked (WikiJohn1999). They removed the block notice from their talk page and replaced it with copied article content, which I reverted. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 13:43, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
You honorlesses stop to own the war what you lost
1676-1681 RUSSO TURKISH WAR!!!!!!! Karanlık544 (talk) 08:25, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
- Hi! Thanks for pointing out that you created a sock to evade your block. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 13:20, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
- Good afternoon. Are Karanlık544, Babayigit55 and Karakeçi24 the same person? Каракорум (talk) 16:35, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Chad Johnson
Please look at this: [1] I think this has gone way behind casual vandalism at this point. Not sure what to do. Wes sideman (talk) 16:11, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for you help. I have another question - this edit was just made to my talk page. I assume it's the same guy and he's attempting to make some sort of veiled threat to harass me. Is there any way to protect my talk page so that he can't just keep creating new accounts and threatening me? Wes sideman (talk) 17:09, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- User talk pages need extreme examples to get protected. We're not there, yet. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 17:12, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- Understood. What's a little unnerving is that in the edit summary that you subsequently hid (thanks for acting on that) he named a real-life person, and with that particular account name "UnitedRecording" he made a reference to the place that real person works. It's not me, but I googled it and that's how I found this out. There's a real-life guy who may end up being targeted by the guy making these edits, all because of the random name I chose for my wikipedia account. Wes sideman (talk) 17:34, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- User talk pages need extreme examples to get protected. We're not there, yet. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 17:12, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
Are we there yet now? [2] Wes sideman (talk) 17:31, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
- Don't think so, but you're more than welcome to make a request at WP:RPP. Please see here first: WP:PP#User talk pages, though. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 18:07, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
- okay, thank you again. If I am pestering you, please let me know. I'm reading through policies quite a bit over the last couple of hours. There's a lot to wade through and it's much easier to get help directly, although I am getting the impression that's not the preferred way. Wes sideman (talk) 19:01, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Admin Report Wes Sideman
You may want to report Wes Sideman again as he is continuing to make Vandalistic remarks on the page https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chad_Johnson_(television_personality). Mr Johnson was found innocent on all counts and Wes Sideman’s behavior as an editor is of extreme immaturity, and not the attitude one would expect of an admin able to edit pages. Darrenplz (talk) 18:21, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
- Darrenplz, Wes Sideman is not an admin. If you have issues with the article, you need to take it to the talk page. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 18:24, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
- isn't this yet another sock related to the whole mess at that article? Wes sideman (talk) 19:14, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
- The account was recently created and its only posts are this complaint here and two [3] [4] other places. WP:DUCK... --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 19:42, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
- Looks like the sock has been blocked. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 20:30, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Some stroopwafels for you!
|
Thanks for the full-calculator block and greetings from Kauerbim ;-) - DVdm (talk) 22:07, 3 February 2021 (UTC) |
112.198.167.35
Can user:112.198.167.35 please be blocked asap. CLCStudent (talk) 14:15, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
RevDel request
Hello admin, sorry to bother you but can you please revdelete this edit, someone's contact information shouldn't probably be on a public forum. Thank you. --Ashleyyoursmile! 16:00, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
- No problem. It's
Done. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 16:06, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
Strange
Hi Jauerback, I was wondering about this block. I really don't see any kind of vandalism in their edits — quite on the contrary, actually. With a proper edit summary I could have made these edits, specially the second one and the third one. Have I missed something somewhere? - DVdm (talk) 22:52, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
- This is what I missed, so never mind. - DVdm (talk) 10:51, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Links
Hi Jauerback, it looks like links of the type I placed are common and even curated on some page types. E.g. [5], AirNav, FlightAware are all similar to Zipcoder.
Gregizaaks (talk) 06:15, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
- Gregizaaks, no they are not. I'm sure you can find numerous examples of similar links that are on other articles, but those shouldn't be there, either. However, in the example you gave, I didn't see any spam links like your ZipCoder links. Find some other way of contributing to the encyclopedia besides adding links, otherwise your time here will be short. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 17:15, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Hey, if it's not allowed it's okay. No need to be rude and disrespectful.
Blocked user back with a new account
Hello admin, can you please take a look at BCNY2011isBack!? This is possibly a sock of blocked user BCNY2011 who is currently globally locked by Ponyo [6]. Self-confessed here and here. Also, confessed on their userpage "I made a new account for no reason lol I have a roblox name, BCNY2011..." --Ashleyyoursmile! 15:40, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Ashleyyoursmile, looks like they're already blocked as a sock. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 15:41, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Just noticed, sorry to bother you. --Ashleyyoursmile! 15:43, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- No bother at all. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 15:45, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Just noticed, sorry to bother you. --Ashleyyoursmile! 15:43, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Edit history of List of people from Passaic, New Jersey
From a COPYVIO standpoint, where is the editing history for List of people from Passaic, New Jersey? There were hundreds upon hundreds of edits to the parent article for which the history and provenance of the edits is not tracked here? Alansohn (talk) 19:40, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Alansohn, aaack. I completely forgot about that. Thanks for reminding me. It should all be fixed now. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 13:59, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
A Barnstar for you!
|
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
| Quick blocks go brrr OmegySock (talk) 15:16, 12 February 2021 (UTC) |
|
The Admin's Barnstar | |
| U have sonic speed OmegySock (talk) 15:16, 12 February 2021 (UTC) |
Administrators' newsletter – March 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2021).
Administrator changes
Interface administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
- A request for comment is open that proposes a process for the community to revoke administrative permissions. This follows a 2019 RfC in favor of creating one such a policy.
- A request for comment is in progress to remove F7 (invalid fair-use claim) subcriterion a, which covers immediate deletion of non-free media with invalid fair-use tags.
- A request for comment seeks to grant page movers the
delete-redirectuserright, which allows moving a page over a single-revision redirect, regardless of that redirect's target. The full proposal is at Wikipedia:Page mover/delete-redirect. - A request for comment asks if sysops may
place the General sanctions/Coronavirus disease 2019 editnotice template on pages in scope that do not have page-specific sanctions
? - There is a discussion in progress concerning automatic protection of each day's featured article with Pending Changes protection.
Technical news
- When blocking an IPv6 address with Twinkle, there is now a checkbox with the option to just block the /64 range. When doing so, you can still leave a block template on the initial, single IP address' talkpage.
- When protecting a page with Twinkle, you can now add a note if doing so was in response to a request at WP:RfPP, and even link to the specific revision.
- There have been a number of reported issues with Pending Changes. Most problems setting protection appear to have been resolved (phab:T273317) but other issues with autoaccepting edits persist (phab:T275322).
Arbitration
- By motion, the discretionary sanctions originally authorized under the GamerGate case are now authorized under a new Gender and sexuality case, with sanctions
authorized for all edits about, and all pages related to, any gender-related dispute or controversy and associated people.
Sanctions issued under GamerGate are now considered Gender and sexuality sanctions. - The Kurds and Kurdistan case was closed, authorizing standard discretionary sanctions for
the topics of Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed
.
- By motion, the discretionary sanctions originally authorized under the GamerGate case are now authorized under a new Gender and sexuality case, with sanctions
Miscellaneous
- Following the 2021 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: AmandaNP, Operator873, Stanglavine, Teles, and Wiki13.
Once the protection for this article had expired another "new user" reverted it back to what the sockpuppet Fire2456 had done. Would you be interested in protecting the article again? --Kansas Bear (talk) 12:52, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – April 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2021).
Administrator changes
Alexandria • Happyme22 • RexxS
Guideline and policy news
- Following a request for comment, F7 (invalid fair-use claim) subcriterion a has been deprecated; it covered immediate deletion of non-free media with invalid fair-use tags.
- Following a request for comment, page movers were granted the
delete-redirectuserright, which allows moving a page over a single-revision redirect, regardless of that redirect's target.
Technical news
- When you move a page that many editors have on their watchlist the history can be split and it might also not be possible to move it again for a while. This is because of a job queue problem. (T278350)
- Code to support some very old web browsers is being removed. This could cause issues in those browsers. (T277803)
Arbitration
- A community consultation on the Arbitration Committee discretionary sanctions procedure is open until April 25.
Happy First Edit Day!
Have a very happy first edit anniversary!
From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:44, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – May 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2021).
Administrator changes
Interface administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
- Following an RfC, consensus was found that third party appeals are allowed but discouraged.
- The 2021 Desysop Policy RfC was closed with no consensus. Consensus was found in a previous RfC for a community based desysop procedure, though the procedure proposed in the 2021 RfC did not gain consensus.
Technical news
- The user group
oversightwill be renamed tosuppress. This is for technical reasons. You can comment at T112147 if you have objections.
- The user group
Arbitration
- The community consultation on the Arbitration Committee discretionary sanctions procedure was closed, and an initial draft based on feedback from the now closed consultation is expected to be released in early June to early July for community review.
Administrators' newsletter – June 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2021).
Administrator changes
Ashleyyoursmile • Less Unless- Husond • MattWade • MJCdetroit • Carioca • Vague Rant • Kingboyk • Thunderboltz • Gwen Gale • AniMate • SlimVirgin (deceased)
Guideline and policy news
- Consensus was reached to deprecate Wikipedia:Editor assistance.
- Following a Request for Comment the Book namespace was deprecated.
Technical news
- Wikimedia previously used the IRC network Freenode. However, due to changes over who controlled the network with reports of a forceful takeover by several ex-staff members, the Wikimedia IRC Group Contacts decided to move to the new Libera Chat network. It has been reported that Wikimedia related channels on Freenode have been forcibly taken over if they pointed members to Libera. There is a migration guide and Wikimedia discussions about this.
Arbitration
- After a Clarification request, the Arbitration Committee modified Remedy 5 of the Antisemitism in Poland case. This means sourcing expectations are a discretionary sanction instead of being present on all articles. It also details using the talk page or the Reliable Sources Noticeboard to discuss disputed sources.
Daps166 Edit Summary
Might want to suppress the edit summary here Special:Diff/1027867933 for plain incivility etc. {{u|SamStrongTalks}} (Talk) 13:47, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
- I saw that, but I personally don't think that's worth it to delete. If you disagree, you are always free to ask another admin. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 14:48, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
- Fair enough, thanks for looking. {{u|SamStrongTalks}} (Talk) 14:49, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
Vandalism on Steven Tyler
Hi! You blocked 12.208.128.102 today for vandalism on the Steven Tyler article. Apparently the editor has hopped to 2600:1700:4100:8340:d47c:bf5e:d796:99d2 and is continuing to vandalize, and has restored their BLP violations at least 5 times so far under the new IP. I think this new IP needs to be blocked, and perhaps the page protected as well? Thanks, CodeTalker (talk) 22:17, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – July 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2021).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Consensus has been reached to delete all books in the book namespace. There was rough consensus that the deleted books should still be available on request at WP:REFUND even after the namespace is removed.
- An RfC is open to discuss the next steps following a trial which automatically applied pending changes to TFAs.
Technical news
- IP addresses of unregistered users are to be hidden from everyone. There is a rough draft of how IP addresses may be shown to users who need to see them. This currently details allowing administrators, checkusers, stewards and those with a new usergroup to view the full IP address of unregistered users. Editors with at least 500 edits and an account over a year old will be able to see all but the end of the IP address in the proposal. The ability to see the IP addresses hidden behind the mask would be dependent on agreeing to not share the parts of the IP address they can see with those who do not have access to the same information. Accessing part of or the full IP address of a masked editor would also be logged. Comments on the draft are being welcomed at the talk page.
Arbitration
- The community authorised COVID-19 general sanctions have been superseded by the COVID-19 discretionary sanctions following a motion at a case request. Alerts given and sanctions placed under the community authorised general sanctions are now considered alerts for and sanctions under the new discretionary sanctions.
Thank you for participating in my RFA
Seeing your datestamp among my first supporters helped my confidence. I hope I honor your trust. Please let me know if I can be useful, or if I disappoint. BusterD (talk) 21:28, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
Unblock Request
Hi, would you be able to unblock the user account, User:Pereportabella. This user has confirmed, via their agent (ID card attachment), that they are the actual well-known person. I am an OTRS volunteer (Wikibooks admin). Feel free to contact me via email or via Wikibooks if you need to confirm.--XANIA - ЗAНИAWikipedia talk | Wikibooks talk 11:36, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
- Additionally, the ID provided does show a date of birth of 1927 (not 1929) which is what the user originally wanted to change on their Wikipedia article page.XANIA - ЗAНИAWikipedia talk | Wikibooks talk 11:38, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
- Xania, they can fill out an unblock request on their talk page. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 13:04, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- They have gone through the trouble of dealing with OTRS and sending the necessary documentation. Whats the point in adding extra lays of red tape? Message me via Wikibooks if you need some kind of evidence but there's no point in making them jump through even more hoops.XANIA - ЗAНИAWikipedia talk | Wikibooks talk 11:55, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Xania, they can fill out an unblock request on their talk page. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 13:04, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – July 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2021).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- An RfC is open to add a delay of one week from nomination to deletion for G13 speedy deletions.
Technical news
- Last week all wikis were very slow or not accessible for 30 minutes. This was due to server lag caused by regenerating dynamic lists on the Russian Wikinews after a large bulk import. (T287380)
Arbitration
- Following an amendment request, the committee has clarified that the Talk page exception to the 500/30 rule in remedy 5 of the Palestine-Israel articles 4 case does not apply to requested move discussions.
Miscellaneous
- You can vote for candidates in the 2021 Board of Trustees elections from 4 August to 17 August. Four community elected seats are up for election.
Misrepresenting
I asked you how to report you for misrepresenting policies and edits. Cryogenicity (talk) 00:22, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
- Cryogenicity, I'm not misrepresenting polices and edits. Feel free to "report me", but I'm not sure what result you hope it will achieve. Best of luck. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 02:11, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
- Cryogenicity, maybe you should read this: WP:UNSOURCED. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 02:52, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
DYK for Dale Snodgrass
On 24 August 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Dale Snodgrass, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 1985, Captain Dale Snodgrass was chosen as "Fighter Pilot of the Year" and was called the real "Maverick" from Top Gun? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Dale Snodgrass. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Dale Snodgrass), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Hi Jauerback
Hi Jauerback, I’m reaching out for help in getting this page straightened out. There have been constant attacks by one or two conflicted persons with whom I am in litigation with in real life. These people put the “lawsuit” section there in the first place. Their purpose is only to use it to promote their own real life cause, not because their content is really important to my bio. None of what they post on my page (yes, not “my” page but the page about me) is ever neutral or complete, but without fail is biased, misrepresentation, cherry picked or out and out false. I’ve read many of the WP rules applicable to biography of a living person and controversial matters that might be defamatory are extremely disfavored as are edits by COI persons involved with the subject in real life controversy (controversy made and perpetuated by these COIs). Please have a look at the creation and history of edits. Who are the two persons who come to WP only to edit my page and focus mostly on the “lawsuits” section or try by innuendo to undermine the basic story of my round the world flight. I’m happy actually that the page is protected but it’s been reverted to a version that has the heavy hand of these COI and sockpuppet persons. I’m very transparent, disclosing who I am and not hiding behind a pseudonym. I was in the middle of an extensive edit then found I was blocked when I tried to publish it. I’m happy to have guidance from a neutral and experienced WP editor like yourself and if you look over my talk page I have refrained from editing myself and asked for help on many occasions, with only limited success. I’m also not so particularly sensitive to writing on the subject of litigation I’m involved in. Actually, civil lawsuits are fairly boring but I won’t tolerate these few people repeatedly vandalizing my page with half-truths and distortions, that make it seem like My around the world record is being challenged. I think you may get it and help with a viable solution that serves the interests of WPs audience. Thank you, Julie Wang AthenaMT (talk) 23:23, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- AthenaMT, it looks like you've asked this question to others and have received responses. I would definitely suggest avoiding any edits to the article and only use the talk page to suggest edits. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 16:22, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – September 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2021).
Administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
- Feedback is requested on the Universal Code of Conduct enforcement draft by the Universal Code of Conduct Phase 2 drafting committee.
- A RfC is open on whether to allow administrators to use extended confirmed protection on high-risk templates.
- A discussion is open to decide when, if ever, should discord logs be eligible for removal when posted onwiki (including whether to oversight them)
- A RfC on the next steps after the trial of pending changes on TFAs has resulted in a 30 day trial of automatic semi protection for TFAs.
Technical news
- The Score extension has been re-enabled on public wikis. It has been updated, but has been placed in safe mode to address unresolved security issues. Further information on the security issues can be found on the mediawiki page.
Arbitration
- A request for comment is in progress to provide an opportunity to amend the structure, rules, and procedures of the Arbitration Committee election and resolve any issues not covered by existing rules. Comments and new proposals are welcome.
Miscellaneous
- The 2021 RfA review is now open for comments.
Troll
this troll whom you just blocked may also need talk page access removed, as they've tripped an edit filter for "Talk Page Abuse" three times as of writing since being blocked. The filter is private so I don't know exactly what it was blocking, but probably worth keeping an eye on. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 18:32, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
Question regarding Sharon Tate's page
I noticed some info was deleted info from her info box. Partners section. Her page listed 2 partners. If you look at the revisions you can see they were deleted. Jay Sebring has the partners section on his page and considering they used to date. Can this section. Please be added back? To her page? I was gonna undo the edit. But I don't want any kind of trouble. Please do what you can. And sorry if I bothered you. I'm just not sure what to do here. 2601:245:4102:DB80:0:0:0:1D9F (talk) 00:19, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
- I would suggest starting a discussion on the talk page about it. No admin needed to do that. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 00:25, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Thank you. For your help. I really appreciate it. I will start a discussion about this. As soon as I can. 2601:245:4102:DB80:0:0:0:1D9F (talk) 00:52, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Why block user:Wagermary?
Blocked indefinitely after two edits, one an improvement, the other a prank. Why? Yappy2bhere (talk) 17:48, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
- There is also their edit filter log with edits that they tried to make. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 17:49, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
- You mean "edit", there's only one, and "used only for vandalism" was simply wrong as already noted. Seriously, you're indeffing new users for edits that never made it to article space, and three days ex post facto at that? I see you indeffed a user with no edit history at all who hit the filter twice 1047226423. Are you guided by a WP policy here? Yappy2bhere (talk) 18:14, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
- Sure is. The blocks are in place to prevent further disruption. See WP:BLOCKPREVENTATIVE. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 18:18, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
- You mean "edit", there's only one, and "used only for vandalism" was simply wrong as already noted. Seriously, you're indeffing new users for edits that never made it to article space, and three days ex post facto at that? I see you indeffed a user with no edit history at all who hit the filter twice 1047226423. Are you guided by a WP policy here? Yappy2bhere (talk) 18:14, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
Please don't block me MR 12345679 (talk) 15:53, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – October 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2021).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Following an RfC, extended confirmed protection may be used preemptively on certain high-risk templates.
- Following a discussion at the Village Pump, there is consensus to treat discord logs the same as IRC logs. This means that discord logs will be oversighted if posted onwiki.
Technical news
- DiscussionTools has superseded Enterprisey's reply-link script. Editors may switch using the "Discussion tools" checkbox under Preferences → Beta features.
Arbitration
- A motion has standardised the 500/30 (extended confirmed) restrictions placed by the Arbitration Committee. The standardised restriction is now listed in the Arbitration Committee's procedures.
- Following the closure of the Iranian politics case, standard discretionary sanctions are authorized for all edits about, and all pages related to, post-1978 Iranian politics, broadly construed.
- The Arbitration Committee encourages uninvolved administrators to use the discretionary sanctions procedure in topic areas where it is authorised to facilitate consensus in RfCs. This includes, but is not limited to, enforcing sectioned comments, word/diff limits and moratoriums on a particular topic from being brought in an RfC for up to a year.
Miscellaneous
- Editors have approved expanding the trial of Growth Features from 2% of new accounts to 25%, and the share of newcomers getting mentorship from 2% to 5%. Experienced editors are invited to add themselves to the mentor list.
- The community consultation phase of the 2021 CheckUser and Oversight appointments process is open for editors to provide comments and ask questions to candidates.
Spin-off / byproduct / clone ...
... or whatever. I see that you blocked this one, thanks. I wondered if you might like also to look at their obvious subsidiary here please. Your call, obvs, but just thought you might like to look. Cheers DBaK (talk) 20:28, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered, thanks for letting me know. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 20:31, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- V v welcome and thank you for the rapid action. Best wishes DBaK (talk) 20:33, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Vandal
Hello.
Can you, please, also hide all his Куявіус (talk · contribs) contribution? I'm not very happy to read it. --Mykola7 (talk) 21:07, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Architizer
Hi, I simply want to give Architizer its own page rather than having it as a redirect from Marc Kushner. Archdaily has a wikipedia page so it seems fair for Architizer, a similarly prominent page, to have its own page. I am working on citations and removing all references that might be regarded as promotional. Can you give me time to fully update this page without reverting it? This is meaning my edits are not being recognized. paulkeskeys Paulkeskeys (talk) 13:19, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- Paulkeskeys, no, you are being disruptive in trying to advertise for your company. Continuing to do so will get you and your friend blocked from editing Wikipedia altogether. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 13:23, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
I'm sorry I'm confused - who is 'my friend'? Also, can someone not create a page that is purely informational like Archdaily's? I simply want to create the page so that it does not redirect to Marc Kushner, since he is no longer associated with the company as CEO so the redirect is out of date. Paulkeskeys (talk) 13:26, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- Paulkeskeys, you lost any creditibiliy with me by not knowing what I meant by "your friend". Jauerbackdude?/dude. 13:28, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
I'm sorry, I really do not understand! I am trying to follow the guidance (non-promotional, adding citations etc.) - If you would allow me to create a new draft of the page then you can approve it or not. Paulkeskeys (talk) 13:31, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- Paulkeskeys, so, you're actually claiming that you know nothing about this editor who showed up three minutes after you to make almost the exact same edit that you are trying to make? Bullshit. You also conveniently ignored the messages that I left on your talk page until I locked the page from further editing. I would suggest just leaving the article alone as you have a clear WP:COI as a simple Google search shows. Wikipedia is not a place to promote your company. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 13:36, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
I'm sorry — I had asked my colleague how to add an image on a wiki page since I haven't done this before, and I didn't realize that he tried to go in to the page and add it himself. He just informed me of that. I don't totally understand how talk pages work since I am getting familiar with wikipedia editing so I didn't see a message from you (only these ones). I wasn't aware that I couldn't add a page for a company that I am associated with, but thanks for clarifying. It is true that the redirect is out of date, so I hope you will consider allowing a page that is the equivalent of Archdaily's - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ArchDaily - for Architizer. Paulkeskeys (talk) 13:44, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- Paulkeskeys, I'll be more than happy to redirect your article somewhere else, but if it's notable enough, someone will create the article itself in due time. There's no deadline to get it created. However, since it looks like Mark created the company, it doesn't seem like a bad redirect. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 13:51, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- You can try submitting a draft via WP:AFC, but you're going to need to prove that it's indeed notable enough to warrant it's own article with reliable sources that doesn't read like an advertisement for the company. Good luck. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 14:00, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for the clarification, I appreciate it. Paulkeskeys (talk) 14:01, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Wikipedia administrators notice board
The reason I mentioned the reply In his complaint was - 1. I find the “ adding a discussion or report a reply “ a bit difficult to work with. 2. I really wanted it to be answered as soon as possible. 3. The statements I made were not incorrect. I can guarantee that. 4. Wikipedia shouldn’t be used as a website that posts what news channels say. On the contrary it should mention the whole case study with truth. If found unjust by law. Should also mention that unjust work is unjust Reflexa9 (talk) 15:47, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
- Reflexa9, I don't think you understand. Instead of just replying to the comment above yours, you inserted your reply right in the middle of his comment, which made it very confusing on who was saying what. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 15:50, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Oh. Thank you. Reflexa9 (talk) 15:52, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – November 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2021).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Phase 2 of the 2021 RfA review has commenced which will discuss potential solutions to address the 8 issues found in Phase 1. Proposed solutions that achieve consensus will be implemented and you may propose solutions till 07 November 2021.
Technical news
- Toolhub is a catalogue of tools which can be used on Wikimedia wikis. It is at https://toolhub.wikimedia.org/.
Arbitration
- GeneralNotability, Mz7 and Cyberpower678 have been appointed to the Electoral Commission for the 2021 Arbitration Committee Elections. Ivanvector and John M Wolfson are reserve commissioners.
- Eligible editors are invited to self-nominate themselves to stand in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections from 07 November 2021 until 16 November 2021.
Miscellaneous
- The 2021 CheckUser and Oversight appointments process has concluded with the appointment of five new CheckUsers and two new Oversighters.
Your thread has been archived
|
Hi Jauerback! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
Recently blocked editor continuing to vandalize while logged out
Yesterday, you blocked BigMan090 (talk · contribs), presumably for their vandalism of Henderson State University. They have continued to vandalize the article while logged out as 2600:387:f:b13::8 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) and that IP address needs to be blocked, too. Thanks! ElKevbo (talk) 23:43, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
A Barnstar for you! (or maybe 2)
|
|
The Admin's Barnstar | |
| Im bored Lopbunny69 (talk) 15:19, 19 November 2021 (UTC) |
|
The Recent Changes Barnstar | |
| so here Lopbunny69 (talk) 15:19, 19 November 2021 (UTC) |
- lol Thanks. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 15:23, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
| | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Administrators' newsletter – December 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2021).
Administrator changes
Technical news
- Unregistered editors using the mobile website are now able to receive notices to indicate they have talk page messages. The notice looks similar to what is already present on desktop, and will be displayed on when viewing any page except mainspace and when editing any page. (T284642)
- The limit on the number of emails a user can send per day has been made global instead of per-wiki to help prevent abuse. (T293866)
Arbitration
- Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee Elections is open until 23:59, 06 December 2021 (UTC).
- The already authorized standard discretionary sanctions for all pages relating to the Horn of Africa (defined as including Ethiopia, Somalia, Eritrea, Djibouti, and adjoining areas if involved in related disputes), broadly construed, have been made permanent.
Administrators will no longer be autopatrolled
A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Wrong
Lots of film sections have discrepancy sections and not it's not from IMDB, it's from actually watching the film, which is something you should do before taking such careless actions as this rv, and yes there are sources for it but I don't feel like getting into an argument with another petulant, arrogant, selfimportant such as yourself right now. Seven Pandas (talk) 12:36, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
- Seven Pandas, oh, you mean you're doing original research? That's not allowed, either. Nor are personal attacks. Regardless, sourced or not, we don't add useless "trivia" to articles. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 14:01, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
Merchandise giveaway nomination
|
A token of thanks
Hi Jauerback/Archives! I've nominated you (along with all other active admins) to receive a solstice season gift from the WMF. Talk page stalkers are invited to comment at the nomination. Enjoy! Cheers, {{u|Sdkb}} talk ~~~~~
|
 |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:50, 31 December 2021 (UTC)