User talk:Jens Lallensack/Archive 2
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Jens Lallensack. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
Your GA nomination of Ohmdenosaurus
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ohmdenosaurus you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 15:20, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
Styracosaurus
Would you be able to update the Styracosaurus article with these papers [1][2] [3]?
- Not at the moment, since I have a lot of review to do. But I will keep this in mind! --Jens Lallensack (talk) 11:48, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
GAN Backlog Drive – January 2022
Good article nominations | January 2022 Backlog Drive | |
January 2022 Backlog Drive:
| |
Other ways to participate: | |
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive.
Click here and remove your username from the mailing list to opt out of any future messages. |
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles at 21:18, 31 December 2021 (UTC).
GAN backlog drive
Jens Lallensack, just a reminder that the drive doesn't officially start for another 30 minutes, at midnight UTC. I'd imagine that those running the drive will be willing to AGF if you meant your new reviews to be part of the drive, but you might want to hold off starting any more reviews until then. Thanks for participating! BlueMoonset (talk) 23:30, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks, I didn't think about the fact that it starts at UTC. Be assured that I still haven't start reviewing that article. --Jens Lallensack (talk) 11:51, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
Jens Lallensack, I noticed your doing/have done some reviews for GA, I've managed to have this [4] copyedited by the Guild of copyeditors, any help is appreciated, thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 19:52, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks, I'm sure somebody, if not myself, will come to it soon, but I should focus on the older nominations first. At first sight, I would worry a bit about oversplitting of sections and short paragraphs, especially single-sentence paragraphs, which we should avoid per MOS:LINEBREAKS. Fixing this would certainly make the article more attractive to reviewers! --Jens Lallensack (talk) 20:11, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
- thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 20:15, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
Hundred Years' War, 1345–1347
Hi Jens. Thanks again for the input to Lancaster's chevauchée of 1346. Just in case you actually meant "Hoping to see further pieces of your series." the current state of play is below. That was the last of the Gascon five, but Battle of Caen (1346) is at ACR if tou feel like dropping by. Gog the Mild (talk) 21:50, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
- Hi Gog, thanks, thats an impressive achievement already! I put the Caen article is on my reviewing list. --Jens Lallensack (talk) 21:58, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
- It keeps me off the streets. Thanks. Similarly, if you have any reviewing or copy editing that needs doing, give me a shout. Gog the Mild (talk) 22:02, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
- Great, I will certainly come back to that! --Jens Lallensack (talk) 22:04, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
- It keeps me off the streets. Thanks. Similarly, if you have any reviewing or copy editing that needs doing, give me a shout. Gog the Mild (talk) 22:02, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
Ha! I accidently stumbled across this and realised that all of the articles are now FAs, bar Hundred Years' War, 1345–1347, which wasn't even an article then and is now a FAC waiting for the last reviewer to come back before, I hope, being promoted and completing the set. Thanks for your help in levering the whole mess over the bar. Gog the Mild (talk) 19:37, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- Congratulations, and thank you for all this great work – I really love this series! --Jens Lallensack (talk) 19:41, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
In appreciation
The Premium Reviewer Barnstar | ||
By the authority vested in me by myself it gives me great pleasure to present you with this barnstar in recognition of the vast number of thorough, detailed and actionable reviews you have carried and are carrying out. No one gets an easy pass from Jens, which is just how it should be. Your work is very much appreciated. Gog the Mild (talk) 19:32, 3 January 2022 (UTC) |
- Thanks a lot, Gog, much appreciated! --Jens Lallensack (talk) 19:37, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Environmental DNA review
Hi Jens. I have developed a medical condition which leaves me currently unable to participate further in the GA review for Environmental DNA. Would you please fail the review. I hope to recover, and renominate the article, and that you might be willing to pick up the review again so it can be completed. In the meantime, thank you very much for the input you have already offered. Regards. — Epipelagic (talk) 03:40, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
- Hi, thanks for the note. And sure, feel free to ping me once you renominate the article. All the best, --Jens Lallensack (talk) 11:03, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
Amazing reviewer
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
For devoting your time to reviewing three articles and politely advising them about the content. Thank you! 2001:4455:1A9:E100:2DC3:ED1C:9D14:9C66 (talk) 10:14, 8 January 2022 (UTC) |
- Thank you, you are welcome, and please let me know if there is anything I can help you with! --Jens Lallensack (talk) 10:22, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Thinopus you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 13:01, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
The article Thinopus you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Thinopus for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 14:01, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Ohmdenosaurus
The article Ohmdenosaurus you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ohmdenosaurus for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 17:01, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Your Review of the Battle of the Wilderness
@Jens Lallensack: - Thank you so much for reviewing the Battle of the Wilderness. The article is a rewrite of the B-class version originally written by Hal Jesperson User:Hlj, who is mostly retired. I was concerned enough about changing an article with 20,000 to 30,000 views per month that I consulted with others, including Hal, before making changes. In addition to the Peer Review, there is a "Pre-Peer Review" currently on my talk page. Many of the charts were done by Hal, and much of the wording is his. I added info about the cavalry, removed some junk that had accumulated over the years, and altered text in some cases to fit the citations. There are 23 footnotes, mostly to keep from getting off-task and to present alternate views. I'm sorry the article is so long, but it is a High Importance and Vital article on an important battle that was complicated. Thanks again TwoScars (talk) 16:50, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Sure! I'm looking forward to reviewing it! I might need two or three days. Thanks, --Jens Lallensack (talk) 18:20, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Hi Jens Lallensack - Thank you for your patience. It is great to work with someone with so many accomplishments. Sometimes I push back a little, please don't be offended. Hopefully the images help clarify a huge and complicated battle. TwoScars (talk) 17:46, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
- No worries, all good – I only make suggestions that may go into the wrong direction, and I'm not very experienced with milhist articles! --Jens Lallensack (talk) 16:25, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you so much for all your time, effort, and patience. I recently did a peer review for an article on a topic for which I was totally unfamiliar, and it was difficult for me. You reviewed a long article of 100k bytes—very impressive. Some day, but not in the immediate future, I may try to get an article up to Featured Article. How close or far is Battle of the Wilderness? Thanks TwoScars (talk) 19:15, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
- You are welcome. Concerning your question, I would recommend you to submit it to Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/A-Class review, which is somewhere in-between GA and FA level. And after it passes there, I would definitely send it to FAC. --Jens Lallensack (talk) 19:25, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you so much for all your time, effort, and patience. I recently did a peer review for an article on a topic for which I was totally unfamiliar, and it was difficult for me. You reviewed a long article of 100k bytes—very impressive. Some day, but not in the immediate future, I may try to get an article up to Featured Article. How close or far is Battle of the Wilderness? Thanks TwoScars (talk) 19:15, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
- No worries, all good – I only make suggestions that may go into the wrong direction, and I'm not very experienced with milhist articles! --Jens Lallensack (talk) 16:25, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
- Hi Jens Lallensack - Thank you for your patience. It is great to work with someone with so many accomplishments. Sometimes I push back a little, please don't be offended. Hopefully the images help clarify a huge and complicated battle. TwoScars (talk) 17:46, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Red panda peer review
Would you be able to peer review the red panda article? Thanks. LittleJerry (talk) 18:16, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
- I'm very occupied at the moment. That looks interesting though. I will try to get to it the next days, but can't promise anything right now. --Jens Lallensack (talk) 18:19, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
You are invited to URFA/2020, a working group reviewing featured articles promoted between 2004 and 2015. An article that you nominated for FA status, Opisthocoelicaudia, has been marked as "Satisfactory" by two editors, meaning that they believe the article meets the featured article criteria. Can you check the article and determine if the article meets the FA criteria? If it does, please mark it as "Satisfactory" on WP:URFA/2020B. If you have concerns about the article, we hope that you will fix it up or post your concerns on the article's talk page. If you have any questions, please go to the URFA/2020 talk page or ping me. Thanks for your help and happy editing! Z1720 (talk) 02:13, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Jens Lallensack, it looks like the nominator has responded to your review queries. I hope you'll be able to return to the review soon. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:35, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks, finished now. --Jens Lallensack (talk) 00:09, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
WikiProject Tree of Life Newsletter – 018
- February 2022—Issue 018
- Tree of Life
- Welcome to the Tree of Life newsletter!
Black-and-yellow broadbill by AryKun |
Queen angelfish by LittleJerry |
News at a glance
|
|
February DYKs
|
|
You are receiving this because you added your name to the subscribers list of the WikiProject Tree of Life. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.
Hey Lens, you kindly had some input to the Peer review of this, and attempted a GAR—for that thank you. You did say you were going to format some of the feedback into actional improvements. Is this still the case? I think it is already improved some way.
I would understand if you wanted to avoid the heat the topic generates, Norfolkbigfish (talk) 07:46, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
The article Thinopus you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Thinopus for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 20:41, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
WikiProject Tree of Life/Newsletter/019
- March 2022—Issue 019
- Tree of Life
- Welcome to the Tree of Life newsletter!
Queen angelfish by LittleJerry |
White-headed fruit dove by AryKun |
News at a glance
|
|
March DYKs
|
|
You are receiving this because you added your name to the subscribers list of the WikiProject Tree of Life. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
Five years! |
---|
Precious anniversary
WikiProject Tree of Life Newsletter – 020
- April 2022—Issue 020
- Tree of Life
- Welcome to the Tree of Life newsletter!
Red panda by LittleJerry and BhagyaMani |
News at a glance
|
|
April DYKs
|
|
You are receiving this because you added your name to the subscribers list of the WikiProject Tree of Life. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.
A barnstar for you!
The Good Article Reviewer's Medal of Merit | ||
For reviewing at least 40 points worth of articles during the January 2022 GAN Backlog Drive, I hereby present you with this barnstar in my capacity as coordinator. You were number 1 in score out of all the participants, congratulations! Trainsandotherthings (talk) 04:04, 15 May 2022 (UTC) |
June 2022 Good Article Nominations backlog drive
Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive | |
| |
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. |
Request for input
Hi Jens, If that’s not too much to ask, could you please take a look at this FA nomination? I only got one review and the nomination will be shelved if it doesn’t receive more attention. You have reviewed one of my previous FA nominations and I am asking if you could be so kind to do it again. el.ziade (talkallam) 20:25, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- Hi Elias, that looks like a very interesting article. I will try to review, but hope I am not over-committing here as I am very short on time. --Jens Lallensack (talk) 20:30, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- I'm veeerrrry grateful to you, thank you so much! el.ziade (talkallam) 20:45, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Content Review Medal of Merit | ||
For achieving the highest score out of all participants in the January 2022 GAN Backlog Drive, I hereby present you with this barnstar in my capacity as coordinator. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 04:05, 15 May 2022 (UTC) |
If you can recall, way back at the beginning of the year, Homo antecessor was at FAC but I became inactive and have been since then. I finally have some time so I may try to restart it in the coming days, but you still had some unresolved comments before I left which I want to make sure are resolved beforehand. Your remaining comments revolve around the cladogram which I believe I've addressed now Dunkleosteus77 (talk) 01:57, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- Good to see you are back! Article looks good now. The last thing I am worried about is that you turned the Stringer diagram into a cladogram, which I think is problematic because 1) it is not a cladogram, 2) it does not precisely reflect the source, and 3) is WP:Synth. Just keeping the original image is better imo. Apart from that, I would be ready to support once you submit the article. --Jens Lallensack (talk) 07:09, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- I remember you had a problem with the image because it shows Neanderthals and modern humans splitting off far after the H. antecessor branch which you found confusing with "probably one branching off just before the modern human/Neanderthal split" Dunkleosteus77 (talk) 19:10, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- I merely was concerned that the image was not well integrated into the text; but Stringer is mentioned now, so no issue anymore. Jens Lallensack (talk) 22:52, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- Regarding synth in cladograms, we just had a gigantic discussion on it while you were away: [5]. --Jens Lallensack (talk) 22:55, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- I remember you had a problem with the image because it shows Neanderthals and modern humans splitting off far after the H. antecessor branch which you found confusing with "probably one branching off just before the modern human/Neanderthal split" Dunkleosteus77 (talk) 19:10, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- Also while I have you here, I remember your main problem with Paranthropus robustus was there was no background section. Could you enumerate what you’d like to see in a background section? Dunkleosteus77 (talk) 01:10, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I've seen that you are a frequent article reviewer, I will be nominating the above article for GA (I had done so in December of last year but was told it was too early). I'm interested if you could help, the pandemic is winding down per [6] and I'm in no rush, I realize your time is valuable, thank you, Ozzie--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 15:19, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
- Hi, thanks for working on this important article. Unfortunately I will be travelling starting this weekend and won't have time. However, I had a quick look and can give you a few pointers:
- make sure all sentences end with inline citations
- avoid single-sentenced paragraphs. Make sure there always is a coherent text and a logical flow of information. The problem is especially evident in the "2022" section, which looks like a random collection of facts.
- Worth mentioning that there is no scientific evidence that hand washing/desinfection reduces the risk of infection? --Jens Lallensack (talk) 19:01, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
- thank you will work to improve the article based on your recommendations, --Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 02:04, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
FAC request
Saw that you reviewed another FAC. Would you be so kind as to offer a review for this article? Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/Texas_A&M_University/archive3? Buffs (talk) 16:43, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
Phosphatodraco
Hello, would you be able to review Phosphatodraco at FAC? LittleJerry (talk) 14:31, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, I will leave my comments shortly. --Jens Lallensack (talk) 15:39, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
- Could you review South Asian river dolphin for GA? LittleJerry (talk) 19:28, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
- Ok, I free some time. Let me finish one review at FAC, and I am there. --Jens Lallensack (talk) 20:44, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
- Could you review South Asian river dolphin for GA? LittleJerry (talk) 19:28, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Ai-Khanoum
Hi Jens, just wanted to ask if you had any more comments for Ai-Khanoum at FAC? ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 16:01, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Diprotodon
Would you be able to review Diprotodon at FAC? LittleJerry (talk) 20:53, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for the hint, I will try to, but likely not within the next few days as I am buried in work at the moment. I have it on my list. --Jens Lallensack (talk) 11:16, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
Europasaurus in German Wikipedia
Hello! Would you be able to review Europasaurus in German Wikipedia?
Many greetings from Germany --Vive la France2 (talk) 21:03, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Continuation War; FAC Request
Hello, I saw that in 2018 you extensively contributed to a review of the Winter War article, which was eventually promoted to a FA. I wish to again have your advice in peer reviewing the successor to that war, the Continuation War, before nominating this article to go from GA to FA.
Many thanks! - JumbledPasta (talk) 04:17, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
Six years! |
---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:58, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you! --Jens Lallensack (talk) 21:42, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive
Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive | |
August 2023 Backlog Drive:
| |
Other ways to participate: | |
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. |
WikiProject Tree of Life Newsletter Issue 21
- August 2023—Issue 021
- Tree of Life
- Welcome to the Tree of Life newsletter!
Australiformis by Mattximus |
Ohmdenosaurus by Jens Lallensack |
New contest!
|
This month has seen an incredible amount of activity creating high quality content, with 3 FAs, 3 FACs, and a veritable flood of GAs and GANs, not to mention the FLs and FLCs. To help maintain this high level of activity going forward, WikiProject Tree of Life is starting a new monthly rolling contest, inspired by the contest run by WikiProject Military History. This contest should hopefully help incentivize editors to contribute in ways that are less daunting than writing articles that are GA and FA-quality. Even improving articles from stub to start class, or helping other editors by reviewing their work at GAN, FAC, or FLC, gets you points, with bonus points for articles with especially high page views. Make sure to participate in any way you can, and help improve the 'pedia while having fun and winning Barnstars! |
August DYKs
|
|
You are receiving this because you added your name to the subscribers list of the WikiProject Tree of Life. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.
Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:14, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
Contest?
Hello, I noticed you've been working a lot on Tree of Life related articles in the past month; maybe you'd like to note your contributions at the Tree of Life Contest? Even reviews at GAN and FAC are eligible for points, and you've been doing a fair few of them, so thought I'd just let you know. AryKun (talk) 12:57, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Promotion of Ohmdenosaurus
Ohmdenosaurus description (Wild, 1978)
Hi, congratulations on getting Ohmdenosaurus to featured status! I was wondering if you had access to Wild's original 1978 description paper ("Ein Sauropoden-Rest (Reptilia, Saurischia) aus dem Posidonienschiefer (Lias, Toarcium) von Holzmaden"). I've found it quite difficult to access his publications in the past. If you do, is there a way you could share it? Thanks, -SlvrHwk (talk) 07:17, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
WikiProject Tree of Life Newsletter Issue 22
- September 2023—Issue 022
- Tree of Life
- Welcome to the Tree of Life newsletter!
List of cercopithecoids by PresN |
Mountain pigeon by AryKun |
Contest results
|
The first edition of our new monthly contest had perhaps a little less participation than I hoped for, but it still resulted in a huge amount of content work, mainly focussed on de-stubbing articles on little-known species, although we did also see two GAs for Holozoa and Hypericum perforatum. Overall, over 60 articles were improved, with most going from stubs or redlinks to fully fleshed out articles. The winner this month was Simongraham, who improved 21 articles about spiders, mainly to B and C class, and racked up 70 points, over twice the next highest. Hopefully, we'll continue to see such great work next month, with even more participants and even more articles improved.
|
September DYKs
|
|
You are receiving this because you added your name to the subscribers list of the WikiProject Tree of Life. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:23, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 9 December 2023. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/December 2023, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/December 2023. Please keep an eye on that page, as comments regarding the draft blurb may be left there by user:dying, who assists the coordinators by making suggestions on the blurbs, or by others. I also suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from two days before the article appears on the Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work!—Wehwalt (talk) 21:29, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Happy Halloween
Knowledgegatherer23 has given you some caramel and a candy apple! Caramel and candy-coated apples are fun Halloween treats, and promote WikiLove on Halloween. Hopefully these have made your Halloween (and the preceding days) much sweeter. Happy Halloween!
'"On Psych, A USA Network TV series Episode 8, The Tao of Gus, Season 6, Shawn refers to pumpkins as "Halloween Apples" because he thinks all round fruits are a type of apple. Happy Halloween! Happy fall if you don't celebrate Halloween! If Trick-or-treaters come your way, add {{subst:Halloween apples}} to their talkpage with a spoooooky message! |
Knowledgegatherer23 (Say Hello) 17:58, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you very much, I wish you Happy Halloween too! --Jens Lallensack (talk) 23:33, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
WikiProject Tree of Life Newsletter Issue 23
- October 2023—Issue 023
- Tree of Life
- Welcome to the Tree of Life newsletter!
Mimodactylus by FunkMonk |
Contest results
|
The second edition of our monthly contest was even better than the last month, with 80 articles improved spanning the entire tree of life. The winner this month was Quetzal1964, who contributed to 47 articles, mainly relating to marine fish, and racked up 81 points in the process. In second place was simongraham, who got 60 points from 14 articles on various species of jumping spiders. simongraham is still at the top of our overall standings, with 130 points, and Quetzal1964's close behind on 108. The November edition of the contest is now open: feel free to drop by and participate if you work on any TOL-related articles this month. |
October DYKs
|
|
You are receiving this because you added your name to the subscribers list of the WikiProject Tree of Life. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.
-MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:30, 2 November 2023 (UTC)