JimD

Hi JimD, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Since you're no stranger to the wiki phenomenon, I'll dispense with the standard barrage of tutorial links (it's all covered under that welcome link anyway); I'm sure you're already quite at home. :)

Nice work with the playdium and lodgepole pine resurrections! I hope you decide to stay with us for some time to come. Cheers, -- Hadal 04:34, 6 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Oh, yes.. even users get their own talk pages. :) The convention is to append new comments at the end of such pages, unless otherwise instructed to by the user concerned.

Also, you can easily sign your name by typing three or four tildes after your text; ~~~ will display just your username, whilst ~~~~ will display both your username and the date and time of the edit. If you've any more questions, you need only to ask. :) -- Hadal 10:51, 6 Mar 2004 (UTC)

---

Jim, excellent work at the Reference Desk! Thanks for your responses there -- many days there are only a handful of us checking in over there, and we often don't have the expertise necessary, so I'm always glad to see someone new dropping by! Hope you're enjoying it here, and that you stick around, Jwrosenzweig 21:15, 9 Mar 2004 (UTC)

---

Hi, I've noticed you've made many great contributions, but one thing puzzles me. You've marked the vast majority of your edits as minor (including every single article edit since 4/22), even though a number of them (I haven't done a thorough search, so I don't know how many), are actually fairly substantial, such as Role-playing game and List of idioms in the English language. Both seem quite far from minor as defined at Wikipedia:Minor_edit. As a comparison, your Dorothy Parker and Leap year edits are excellent examples of minor edits (helpful improvements without really changing the content). There is, of course a gray area; this edit by another user to Father Damien on it's face isn't minor per the guideline, but, since it is really just clarifying that Hawaii was a kingdom at the time, not yet the state, marking it minor is probably OK, even tho' not everyone would. Anyway, that's my two cents--happy editting. Niteowlneils 19:25, 23 May 2004 (UTC)

DESQview

Hi, as you probably noticed, another user just merged the article you wrote earlier this month, DESQView, with one I wrote last fall, DESQview. I assure you: it happens to us all, and is entirely due to the fact that the Wiki system does not have its own search engine (actually it does, only it has been disabled for ages for performance reasons. I've used it during short periods when it has been available and it makes all the difference.) -- Viajero 09:26, 25 May 2004 (UTC)

Wikicode

I just noticed the Wikipedia:WikiCode stuff and really like the idea. I hope to review the dynamically generated list of articles containing wikicode and write python implementations of each of them to post on my sysadmoin Wiki/MoinMoin pages. I'll also scour the rest of Wikipedia to find other articles about algorithms (like the one on the Luhn algorithm that I already modified) and add wikicode examples to each of them.

(I should learn quite a bit from both of these exercises as my core CS background is pretty weak despite my experience in scripting and programming)

Pity that this was apparently removed from the Wikipedia standards track and has been relegated to a historical note on Derek Coetzee's talk page.JimD 00:28, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

Linux Kernel event?

Is it on tonight? I haven't seen anything on the mailing lists... -- Prove It ^(talk) 16:47, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Your Edit to Duck Typing

It is messy (your edit in the middle of the criticism doesn't 'flow'). Could you tidy it up?

Thanks --Paddy (talk) 14:24, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Pin the Tail on the Donkey

I have nominated Pin the Tail on the Donkey, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pin the Tail on the Donkey. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? --SeinHenker (talk) 18:34, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

I created it specifically to explain a common cultural reference and the resulting idiom. It's of similar significance to other childhood games such as Tag (game), Kick the Can, Dodgeball and Hide and Seek. Practically every American knows these games and would understand references to them (and many of them date back to England and have their counterparts in other cultures). Including them in Wikipedia makes these cultural references accessible to a broader audience and encourages comparison to the analogous (sometimes historically related) games from other cultures. I don't have any strong opinion on whether this article should be deleted, but I do recall looking for similar content (such as the other games I listed) and basing my decision to create it on their existence. The point is, of course, now moot as the vote as clearly favored keeping it. JimD (talk) 07:17, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

The debate was closed as speedy keep. SeinHenker appears to be from Austria, and didn't have the common courtesy to do a simple google search. 75.66.233.162 (talk) 17:17, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:About/Subpage

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Wikipedia talk:About/Subpage, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Wikipedia talk:About/Subpage is a test page.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Wikipedia talk:About/Subpage, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 16:10, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 18:44, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Joseph Dennis (mathematician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gainesville (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Carmelo Zito

Hello, JimD. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Carmelo Zito, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Wgolf (talk) 00:59, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:OrlyAtomics logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:OrlyAtomics logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:16, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited SPOJ, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Erlang. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, JimD. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, JimD. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, JimD. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, JimD. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)