Jithinrajtk

Speedy deletion nomination of C. Krishnan (CPI-M)

Hello Jithinrajtk,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged C. Krishnan (CPI-M) for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ubiquity (talk) 18:55, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Your article ലീല (ചലച്ചിത്രം)

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page ലീല (ചലച്ചിത്രം) to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(✉) 11:24, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Your contributed article, ലീല (ചലച്ചിത്രം)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, ലീല (ചലച്ചിത്രം). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Leela (2016 film). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Leela (2016 film) – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(✉) 11:36, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Jithinrajtk, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 12:20, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Kismath (2016 film)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Kismath (2016 film). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Kismath. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Kismath – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 18:55, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of U. R. Pradeep

Hello, Jithinrajtk. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, U. R. Pradeep, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want U. R. Pradeep to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, ubiquity (talk) 19:04, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Shyju Khalid

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Shyju Khalid requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. BangJan1999 17:00, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Shyju Khalid

The article Shyju Khalid has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. BangJan1999 19:42, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve Antony Varghese

Hi, I'm Domdeparis. Jithinrajtk, thanks for creating Antony Varghese!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. may not meet WP:NACTOR please read the criteria and add sources that prove he has had multiple rôles in significant films or one of the other criteria

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Domdeparis (talk) 14:40, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Vineeth Vishwam

Hello, Jithinrajtk. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Vineeth Vishwam, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

SamHolt6 (talk) 16:45, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Padmini (2018 film)

Hello, thanks for creating Padmini (2018 film), I have made a couple of minor changes. Thanks. --Tito Dutta (talk) 12:13, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Attivo Networks

The article Attivo Networks has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NCORP as coverage is only routine in relation to funding.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SmartSE (talk) 21:07, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Manohar Lal Tandon

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Manohar Lal Tandon, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GSS (talk|c|em) 11:22, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Conflict of interest, disclosure required

Hello Jithinrajtk. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Rahul Sasi, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Jithinrajtk. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Jithinrajtk|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. Thank you. GSS (talk|c|em) 08:07, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

He is a renowned hacker, that's why I created a page also he is a senior of my friend in the college. Jithinrajtk (talk) 08:35, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Saiju Sreedharan

The article Saiju Sreedharan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable individual lacking in-depth, non-trivial support. References are single line mentions.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. reddogsix (talk) 20:15, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

I have added one more reference link which is a youtube, it explains more. Jithinrajtk (talk) 03:07, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

July 2018

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Saiju Sreedharan, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. reddogsix (talk) 04:09, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Saiju Sreedharan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Saiju Sreedharan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saiju Sreedharan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. reddogsix (talk) 04:10, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

M Sajas listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect M Sajas. Since you had some involvement with the M Sajas redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:11, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zakariya Muhammed (July 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GSS was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zakariya Muhammed and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Zakariya Muhammed, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GSS (talk|c|em) 16:32, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Let me know the reason behind this? Jithinrajtk (talk) 03:11, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of M Sajas for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article M Sajas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/M Sajas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The editor whose username is Z0 13:33, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Syamdhar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Syamdhar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Syamdhar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ∯WBG^converse 08:32, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of C. V. Sarathi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article C. V. Sarathi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/C. V. Sarathi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ∯WBG^converse 08:36, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Vishnu Sarma (cinematographer)

The article Vishnu Sarma (cinematographer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NCREATIVE.No substantial coverage about the subject.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ∯WBG^converse 08:44, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Rohith V. S. for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rohith V. S. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rohith V. S. until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ∯WBG^converse 08:47, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

August 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  MER-C 12:41, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Entri for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Entri is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Entri until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ∯WBG^converse 13:07, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jithinrajtk (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am not doing any paid or advertisement works using wiki. I am creating 1 to 2 wiki articles in everyday. I am focusing on film industry that's why I'm creating pages of directors and movies. Since I am passionate about it I will do more and more contributions on movie wiki pages. And I have created the page of Entri, which is a great news in all the medias recently. It's a kochi based startup which helps people to achieve govt job exams. Kindly requesting to unblock me. Thanks Jithinrajtk (talk) 18:58, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This unblock request is not forthcoming. Your relationship is much closer than you've lead us to believe here and you have indeed been violating WP:COI, WP:PAID, and WP:PROMO based on my investigation. If you ever wish to be unblocked, now is the time to come clean. Yamla (talk) 19:07, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jithinrajtk (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

How can I prove that I'm not done any paid works for many people in the film industry? I am passionate about movies so that I'm doing all the wiki works for them. I used IMDb and Other National, International Medias to get the details about the same. Please unblock and I won't write any page without reference. I have done the works on various projects. MLA profiles are created on a wiki edit-a-thorn and the movie actor/cinematographers are created for adding new pages on the wiki, of course, it's not any freelance projects. Please unblock me or What are the procedures to do so? Jithinrajtk (talk) 02:33, 8 August 2018 (UTC) Jithinrajtk (talk) 04:53, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Maybe you should try Googling your username, to see why we don't believe you? Yunshui ^雲_水 07:53, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jithinrajtk (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I got it. Basically I was a freelancer, freelance digital marketing startegist, Video content creator. I used to do freelance jobs. Currently I'm working in a company. Now adays I am creating 1-2 wiki pages per day both in English and Malayalam wiki and I'm not getting paid for any wikipedia works. Anyway I'm requesting once more to prove my innocence. As you can see in Google, I was a freelancer and my Linkedin is not updated recently. I will remove all that if that would be a problem. Kindly requesting to unblock me. Jithinrajtk (talk) 09:58, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Some of them are promotional and definitely appear to be paid for work. When did you last do paid for work and which are paid for? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 00:46, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jithinrajtk (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I repeated the same for many time. From this I have stopped appealing for unblocking my profile. I will write more about movies and people in film industry. Jithinrajtk (talk) 06:18, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

No meanningful answer to Doc James' questions. Huon (talk) 20:22, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jithinrajtk (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I haven't done any paid Wikipedia works. I have already said that I'm crazy about movies and people related to movies. So that I create articles about directors actors etc day by day. I need to know, what is the current solution to be unblocked? How can I prove my innocence? I can't write an article only because of this blocking. Before that I wrote at least 4-5 articles per week, most of them are translations from English Wiki to Malayalam. If there is any possibility of being unblocked, please let me know. I am ready for any kind of test for proving that I haven't done anything for money using Wikipedia. At the starting time, I have written an article for my friend's company, which is got deleted within a week, then I wrote an article for my company which is also decided for deletion. I have attached all the media related links with every article that I have made. And I stopped writing an article for any renowned company, like BYJUS App's Malayalam wiki page, Entri's Malayalam wiki page etc. Then why is it taking as paid work? I haven't recived any money from anyone. Please consider my request for the last time. Jithinrajtk (talk) 12:24, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficiently convincing for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. Yamla (talk) 20:24, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nomination of Antony Varghese for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Antony Varghese is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antony Varghese until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. scope_creep (talk) 08:16, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Rahul Sasi

Hello, Jithinrajtk. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rahul Sasi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta (talk) 21:59, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Padmini 2018 film for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Padmini 2018 film is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Padmini 2018 film until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DareshMohan (talk) 21:46, 20 July 2023 (UTC)