User talk:Jo-Jo Eumerus/Archive 10
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Jo-Jo Eumerus. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 5 | ← | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | → | Archive 15 |
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
Changes this week
- The history page can tell you if a page on your watchlist was updated since you last visited it. This now works the same way in Vector as in other skins. The change broke local designs on some wikis. This will be fixed this week. [3]
The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 7 June. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 8 June. It will be on all wikis from 9 June (calendar).
Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
20:51, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
The article El Laco you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:El Laco for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 10:01, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- Wikimedia wikis now use AuthManager. If you have new problems related to logging in or being logged in, report them. [4]
- Visiting Special:Notifications doesn't automatically mark notifications as read anymore. You can go between read, unread or all notifications on Special:Notifications. Notifications on Special:Notifications are grouped by day. You can mark every daily group as read individually. Notifications are displayed by groups of 50 on Special:Notifications and you can find former notifications by using navigation arrows. [5][6][7][8]
Changes this week
- You can filter user contributions to hide minor edits. [9]
- It will be easier to edit galleries with the visual editor. [10]
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 14 June. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 15 June. It will be on all wikis from 16 June (calendar).
Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
18:41, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
DYK nomination of El Laco
Hello! Your submission of El Laco at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 20:40, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
Incapillo
 | Hello, Jo-Jo Eumerus. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Incapillo at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! – Corinne (talk) 04:12, 13 June 2016 (UTC) |
Another good volcano article, Jo-Jo Eumerus. I just have a few questions:
1) In the second paragraph in the section Incapillo#Local, you use the word "shallow" as a verb:
- At the latitude of Incapillo, the Nazca plate subducting beneath the South America plate abruptly shallows towards the south.
This is followed by the gerund form (-ing form used as a noun), "shallowing". I could guess what the verb means, but I think a reader shouldn't have to guess. Can you link this to another article or section of an article so a reader can read more to understand the term?
2) In the third paragraph in the Incapillo#History section, you have several ranges. When you use "from", I'm pretty sure it should be followed by "to": from X to Y. If you don't want to use those two words, then you can use an en-dash, but I believe it should be without "from". Let me know which you prefer and I can change it. Jonesey95 Would you use an en-dash in a number range following the word "from", or would you use only either "from X to Y" or just "X–"Y (without "from")? I read MOS regarding number formatting carefully and could only find discussion of from...to regarding date ranges.
– Corinne (talk) 04:12, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
- Regarding "from" and "to", I just looked at the History section, and it looks great. I'm a big fan of the {{convert}} template, which is used heavily in this section. It uses the "X to Y" phrasing nicely. The MOS advice on ranges is scattered throughout WP:MOSNUM, but this section is most relevant to this discussion. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:41, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
- @Corinne: "Shallow" in this case means "becomes less steep", "becomes more shallow". Would that be a better formulation? As for "from"-"to" in ranges, I generally use the convert template - not sure what the stylistically preferred method here is.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:16, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for your reply, Jo-Jo Eumerus. I'm just thinking of an average reader here. For ease of discussion, I'm going to copy the sentence where "shallow" is used:
- At the latitude of Incapillo, the Nazca plate subducting beneath the South America plate abruptly shallows towards the south.
- If "shallow" (as a verb) is not something discussed in another geology article, then perhaps it would be all right to define it right here:
- At the latitude of Incapillo, the Nazca plate subducting beneath the South America plate abruptly shallows – becomes less steep – towards the south.
- Another alternative would be to be slightly more precise and say that the angle of the Nazca plate as it subducts (or is subducting) beneath the South American plate becomes abruptly shallower towards the south:
- At the latitude of Incapillo, the angle of the Nazca plate as it subducts beneath the South American plate becomes abruptly shallower towards the south.
- or:
- At the latitude of Incapillo, the angle of subduction of the Nazca plate as it moves below the South American plate becomes abruptly shallower towards the south.
- @Corinne: The angle version is probably the best.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:15, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
- O.K., but there are two versions with the word "angle" in them. Which do you prefer? – Corinne (talk) 03:16, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
- {replyto|Corinne}} Second one is probably better.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:30, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
- O.K., but there are two versions with the word "angle" in them. Which do you prefer? – Corinne (talk) 03:16, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
The Signpost: 15 June 2016
- News and notes: Clarifications on status and compensation of outgoing executive directors Sue Gardner and Lila Tretikov
- Special report: Wikiversity Journal—A new user group
- Featured content: From the crème de la crème
- In the media: Biography disputes; Craig Newmark donation; PR editing
- Traffic report: Another one with sports; Knockout, brief candle
DYK for El Laco
On 17 June 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article El Laco, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the El Laco volcano in Chile has erupted enigmatic iron-rich lava flows? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/El Laco. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, El Laco), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- Notifications were not always marked as read when you followed a link from an email notification. This will now happen. [11]
Changes this week
- The list of other languages an article is available in will be shorter on small Wikipedias and non-Wikipedia projects. This is to make it easier to find the most relevant languages for each user. You will still be able to see the other languages. [12][13]
- Alerts (the red badge) will not be automatically marked as read when you open the Notifications popup. [14]
- When you get several thanks you can see them as one notification. This is instead of one notification for each thanks. [15]
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 21 June. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 22 June. It will be on all wikis from 23 June (calendar).
Meetings
You can join the next meeting with the Architecture committee. The topic this week is develop Markdown support strategy for MediaWiki. The meeting will be on 22 June at 21:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
19:14, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
DYK for Jotabeche
On 21 June 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Jotabeche, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that there is a shrine on Jotabeche, a volcano last active about five million years ago? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jotabeche. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Jotabeche), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:01, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Incapillo you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 07:21, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
The article Incapillo you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Incapillo for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 10:01, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
DYK for Kari-Kari (caldera)
On 24 June 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Kari-Kari (caldera), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Bolivian city of Potosí is located close to, or even inside, the Miocene Kari-Kari caldera? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kari-Kari (caldera). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Kari-Kari (caldera)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
DYK for Jom-Bolok volcanic field
On 24 June 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Jom-Bolok volcanic field, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that one eruption in the Jom-Bolok volcanic field created a 70 kilometre- (43 mile-) long lava flow? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jom-Bolok volcanic field. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Jom-Bolok volcanic field), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
Could you check what was the intended end of the sentence
- ... and it propagated by a process named sheet inflation where
There is nothing after the word 'where' ! Shenme (talk) 02:09, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
- @Shenme: Expanded the sentence a little.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:49, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
| | Hello, Jo-Jo Eumerus. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Irruputuncu at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 04:00, 26 June 2016 (UTC) |
DYK for Kimsachata (Canchis)
On 26 June 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Kimsachata (Canchis), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kimsachata (Canchis). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Kimsachata (Canchis)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Incapillo DYK nomination
Congratulations on receiving approval for the DYK for Incapillo, Jo-Jo Eumerus. I spotted a typo in it, but I thought it would be better if you fixed it. It says "sill" where I believe it should be "still". – Corinne (talk) 20:00, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
- @Corinne: Fixed, thanks! Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:05, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Taryatu-Chulutu
Hello! Your submission of Taryatu-Chulutu at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Borsoka (talk) 04:23, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- The ORES service has now moved to a new location. This should make it easier to use ORES. The ORES review service is now available as a beta feature on Wikidata and Persian Wikipedia. ORES is an artificial intelligence system for Wikimedia wikis to help editors. [16]
- The order of wikis in collapsed cross-wiki notifications was different than when the list was expanded. This is now fixed. [17]
- A new category for tracking pages with math errors was added: Category:Pages with math errors. [18]
Problems
- The Wikimedia Etherpad crashed on June 23. Some edits done that day have been lost. They can be found at etherpad-restore.wikimedia.org for another few days. [19][20]
Changes this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 28 June. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 29 June. It will be on all wikis from 30 June (calendar).
- The way to mark notifications as read or unread will be changed to be more clear. [21]
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 28 June at 19:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
- The Collaboration team at the Wikimedia Foundation will look at developing better tools for edit review. This is because research suggests we scare away newcomers who want to help. [22]
- An e-mail from the Editing Department explains the technical work that is planned and being researched for the future. Items include better wikitext and visual editing, prompts for edits, language improvements, annotations, and meta-data separation. [23]
- The sorting of Notifications into the two fly-out menus is going to change on July 5 to 7. Bundled notifications should be easier to explore and mark as read individually. [24][25][26]
- From 29 June git.wikimedia.org (running Gitblit) will redirect all requests to Phabricator. The vast majority of requests should be correctly redirected. [27]
- Catalan and Polish Wikipedias will have Wikidata descriptions added to articles in the mobile view by default. This is currently a beta option for the mobile versions. This might come to other wikis later. [28]
Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
15:42, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Irruputuncu
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Irruputuncu you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 08:00, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Good luck
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
- Remember to smile! It ain't over til the 'crat
ladyperson sings -- samtar talk or stalk 12:07, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
RfA
There seems incredibly strong support on the optional poll that you should be an administrator. If you are up for it, I can start the nomination form. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 07:25, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
- @Ritchie333: You can do so, but you may want to make an in-depth review beforehand. RfAs often fail because of some overlooked detail.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:31, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
- I've had a pretty thorough look over the last couple of hundred contributions (both live and deleted). Things that made me stop, but were okay include File:Cosmic Bat.jpg which was deleted, but only because you requested it be moved to Commons, only 53 AfDs (though I think that's enough to clearly show you understand deletion policy), KNEEMO Initial Training Network (you correctly tagged this for G12, reverted the tagger per policy, an admin deleted it and it was recreated), but otherwise you seem to pass User:Kudpung/RfA criteria. The one concern I have is, exactly how well do you know copyright rules? Can you point to an FFD discussion or something where people disagreed with you but you stood your ground and it turns out you were right? I see you had a disagreement with Stefan2 about file tags not too long ago, what was that all about? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:42, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
- The main strength I have in terms of copyright is to know how to spot files with iffy copyright status (see recent CSD and FFD nominations, also Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 February 29, and file deletion nominations on Commons, but I doubt they'd matter much in an enwiki RfA...) as well as well as spotting files that don't reach the Threshold of originality (e.g Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 January 24, Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2015 December 19, Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 January 27, Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 April 10 and Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 January 29). In non-file terms I also work in WP:SCV - when the bot is on, that is, which it recently hasn't been. For the more basic stuff, I am familiar with what makes images non-free or free and what the former kind of images typically requires to stay on, hence I answer queries on WP:MCQ and the former WP:NFCC. I'll admit though that I don't know about every little detail of copyright law, hence the use of "some" on the WP:ORCP page.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:52, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
- I've had a pretty thorough look over the last couple of hundred contributions (both live and deleted). Things that made me stop, but were okay include File:Cosmic Bat.jpg which was deleted, but only because you requested it be moved to Commons, only 53 AfDs (though I think that's enough to clearly show you understand deletion policy), KNEEMO Initial Training Network (you correctly tagged this for G12, reverted the tagger per policy, an admin deleted it and it was recreated), but otherwise you seem to pass User:Kudpung/RfA criteria. The one concern I have is, exactly how well do you know copyright rules? Can you point to an FFD discussion or something where people disagreed with you but you stood your ground and it turns out you were right? I see you had a disagreement with Stefan2 about file tags not too long ago, what was that all about? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:42, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
Okay. I have put together a draft RfA at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Jo-Jo Eumerus. As you probably know, you'll need to answer the three stock questions presented there. Questions 1 and 2 should be fairly straightforward, for Question 3 I found being honest without going into details was the best answer (indeed, anyone who writes "I haven't had any conflicts" automatically makes me think of opposing). I personally would like a co-nominator to sign off on this, so that the voting public can judge your suitability from two independent views. MelanieN (who passed RfA with about 97% support) has said she's happy to put something together. Once we have everything in place, and all the statements and answers have been double-checked, I will transclude it, at which point the RfA will become advertised to everyone.
The other advice I can give you now for RfA is once it is live, you only need to check it about once a day for questions, and I think a 24-hour turnaround on those is acceptable. I typed up my answers in batches every day, and then read the question and answer aloud to my other half, made a few changes, and then posted them. You will get questions on copyright, and be expected to answer them accurately, or perhaps to say "I don't know, it depends / expert opinions differ". Don't look at the voting sections, if an oppose vote is duff, there will be plenty of people supplying counter-arguments without you needing to lift a finger. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:24, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Jo-Jo! We haven't "met", but I have looked you over pretty thoroughly at Ritchie's suggestion, and I will be happy to co-nominate you when/as/if you decide to go for it. I certainly agree with Ritchie's advice to draft your answers offline, and review them carefully before posting them. I would add to Ritchie's comment about timing, that you should choose your time to transclude the nomination; pick a time period when you can be reliably available to respond to it every day for seven days. And maybe respond more than once on the first day; some people get impatient if early questions are not answered promptly. I believe the usual tradition is that the nominator (Ritchie) creates the nomination page, and the candidate (you) transclude it when you are ready, but I have also seen it transcluded by the nominator. One other thought: you do not have email enabled right now. Some people like to see that in administrators, but it's not a requirement so that's your choice. But I have found it is really helpful if you can communicate with your nominators by email, both before and during the RFA process. So if you prefer not to make your email publicly available, you might send emails to me and Ritchie, so that we can establish communication that way. --MelanieN (talk) 17:27, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
- I'll probably take any action tomorrow; this evening is a bit too late here in Switzerland. As for the email issue, my email address is not wholly private for family related reasons, so that may be a problem - I think some people have the expectation of EmailUser replies being wholly or in part private.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:04, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
- I still need to add my co-nom, and I'd like to see your answers to the "three questions" before I do; will that work out for you? About the email, no problem. Admins in particular have to be very sure no one else has access to their account (because of the tools attached to it) or their email. What some people do is to establish a g-mail account that they only use for wikipedia purposes. Also, most of us establish a second, non-admin account (mine is "MelanieN alt") to use whenever we are not on our home computer - so that the account with the tools attached is only used in a secure environment. --MelanieN (talk) 21:55, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
- I'll answer these questions tomorrow morning (Swiss time). The alt account issue will need some more consideration - I don't ever log in on devices I don't fully own.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:07, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
- OK, well, I'll add my co-nom now so as not to hold you up. Good luck to you! --MelanieN (talk) 22:29, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
- Oh, and in addition to the three questions, remember to say you accept the nomination! --MelanieN (talk) 22:39, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
- I'll answer these questions tomorrow morning (Swiss time). The alt account issue will need some more consideration - I don't ever log in on devices I don't fully own.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:07, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
- I still need to add my co-nom, and I'd like to see your answers to the "three questions" before I do; will that work out for you? About the email, no problem. Admins in particular have to be very sure no one else has access to their account (because of the tools attached to it) or their email. What some people do is to establish a g-mail account that they only use for wikipedia purposes. Also, most of us establish a second, non-admin account (mine is "MelanieN alt") to use whenever we are not on our home computer - so that the account with the tools attached is only used in a secure environment. --MelanieN (talk) 21:55, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
All right, you are off and running! While the RfA is running, you must not notify any individuals that you are running, that would be canvassing. But you can add this template to your userpage or talkpage if you wish: {{RfA-notice}} (filling in your own name where appropriate). --MelanieN (talk) 14:34, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Irruputuncu
The article Irruputuncu you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Irruputuncu for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 18:21, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
DYK for Incapillo
On 29 June 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Incapillo, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Incapillo (pictured) is the highest explosive caldera in the world and may still be hydrothermally active? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Incapillo. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Incapillo), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:45, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
DYK for Laguna Amarga
On 30 June 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Laguna Amarga, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Laguna Amarga caldera in Argentina is associated with an ignimbrite of 630 cubic kilometres (150 cu mi)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Laguna Amarga. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Laguna Amarga), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Admin-ship
Hi There,
Congratulations on your vote for being Admin. I wish you good Luck and all the Very best!
Denver| Thank you and Have a nice Day! (talk) 13:58, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
Exeter City FC.svg
Hi,
I reverted my changes to the Exeter City crest because I had changed it to a more accurate version without understanding how the copyright rules work on Wikipedia. I am slightly confused because the template stating that previous versions violated copyright rules was added before I reverted the file back to the original version uploaded in 2012.
Also, would it be alright for me to upload a low-resolution raster image of the crest and have that used on the club's Wikipedia page instead of the svg version?
Thanks, GarethTJennings (talk) 17:10, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
- Greetings. @GarethTJennings: I added the template because having unused versions of a non-free image violates policy. It isn't a problem specifically with your version of the crest, just general cleanup of unused non-free images. As for raster vs. SVG, while using rasters instead of SVGs has been discussed in the past for non-free logos we don't have any policy preferences so as long as general WP:NFCC policy is complied with. I personally would not bother.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 17:17, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for clarifying. So now that I've reverted back to original version, I assume the versions I uploaded on June 29th will be deleted when the time comes, which is what I'd prefer because those are probably too similar to the real thing and I'd rather not get in trouble for that. GarethTJennings (talk) 17:23, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
- With respect to logos, actually it's often useful to have them very similar (but at reduced size) to the originals so as not to misrepresent the logo.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 17:46, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for clarifying. So now that I've reverted back to original version, I assume the versions I uploaded on June 29th will be deleted when the time comes, which is what I'd prefer because those are probably too similar to the real thing and I'd rather not get in trouble for that. GarethTJennings (talk) 17:23, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
My question
Thank you for a thoughtful answer. Did you click on the image? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:51, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
- Um - no. Did it just now.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:59, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
- 2012 history, a content editor blocked without even a warning, for months to come, went on to write the featured article of 30 June that year. - One case without talk is at ARCA (but I didn't want to ask about about an ongoing thing), too many others came before, very often just from a misunderstanding. - Good luck! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:41, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
Sara Juli image
Hello Jo-Jo,
I see from the recent admin proposals that you know your way around potential file copyright issues. I, however, haven't got a clue, but think that an image on Sara Juli may be a copy from the article's subject's own. E.g. http://bellyflopmag.com/reviews/sara-juli-the-money-conversation says that the image is Sara Juli's. What, if anything, could I do to see if it is copyrighted?
Tia Icarusgeek (talk) 15:04, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
- I don't think we can reliably tell, but the previous publication raises some doubt. I've tagged the Commons file for discussion.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:15, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks Icarusgeek (talk) 16:47, 1 July 2016 (UTC)