JournalmanManila

Welcome

Hello, JournalmanManila, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Gestrid (talk) 03:18, 10 August 2016 (UTC) Getting started Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Help directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, JournalmanManila. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Gestrid (talk) 03:19, 10 August 2016 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Warning

The navbox Template:Southeast Asian leaders should only contain links to leaders of Southeast Asian countries that held the position of Head of State and Head of Government. Let me remind you that the monarchs of individual fragmented pre-colonial states did not represent or head the nation of the Philippines except their own little islands/regions. See also Heads of state and government of the Philippines and similar lists for Southeast Asian countries.--RioHondo (talk) 13:54, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

• I see Philippine history had a complicated part Specially on this matter they are fragmented pre-colonial states, But Although they are many individual fragmented pre-colonial states ,these societies that scattered in the islands would be later become the Philippines, That means They are inside the Philippine archipelago, they are Philippines nor part of the Philippines history, What makes the Philippines today is because We had been started from these states and barangays etc..(except for its name which given by Magellan by looking the Philippines article), And does your message or the message of any members here are allowed to be remove?(JournalmanManila (talk) 03:31, 11 August 2016 (UTC))

Irrelevant. That is like saying the emperors and Dalai Lamas of Tibet were leaders or heads of state/government of China. Or that the British Governors of Hong Kong, the Portuguese Governors of Macau or Islamic leaders of Xinjiang were also leaders of China just because they existed within the present-day territory of the People's Republic of China. You have a skewed view of history just like User:Philipandrew2.--RioHondo (talk) 05:02, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Alright take it easy , i got what you trying to say, let it be this time Happy editing! (JournalmanManila (talk) 05:54, 11 August 2016 (UTC))

Disambiguation link notification for August 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Religion in pre-colonial Philippines, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nandi. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

• Done (JournalmanManila (talk) 09:25, 11 August 2016 (UTC))

Disambiguation link notification for September 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Timeline of Philippine history, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kalinga. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into Tondo (historical state). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 17:22, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

• • I see, thank you for your advise, i will review my edits.(JournalmanManila (talk) 01:44, 6 September 2016 (UTC))
    • I see you are still not adding the required attribution, as required under the terms of the CC-by-SA license. Please have a look at this edit summary as an example of how it is done. Please let me know if you still don't understand what to do or why we have to do it. Thanks, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 23:22, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
    • I see you are still not adding the required attribution, as required under the terms of the CC-by-SA license. Copying from one article another without providing the required attribution is a copyright violation. Please begin fulfilling this mandatory legal requirement, or you risk being blocked from editing. Thanks, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:32, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Timeline of Philippine history, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages San Agustin Church and Aetas. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Philippine Revolutionary Army

added links pointing to Amigo and El Presidente

Tondo (historical state)

added a link pointing to Tondo

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

September 2016

Hello, I'm Escape Orbit. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Hypocrisy have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 20:52, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

History of the Philippines

added a link pointing to Ayutthaya

Philippines

added a link pointing to Ayutthaya

Tondo (historical state)

added a link pointing to Ayutthaya

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello JournalmanManila, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Tondo (historical state) has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. /wiae /tlk 15:17, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Mandala (political model)

added a link pointing to Laguna

Timeline of Philippine sovereignty

added a link pointing to Kalinga

Tondo (historical state)

added a link pointing to Balut

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of empires, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tondo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

October 2016

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Olongapo into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. It looks like you've copied content from Olongapo, Don (honorific) and possibly other pages into Filipino styles and honorifics. While it's alright to do so, please remember that you have to attribute the text for copyright purposes. The sample attribution in the boilerplate text above suffices for this purpose.

Thanks, /wiae /tlk 14:02, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Invitation from Wikipedia Asian Month

Wikipedia Asian Month

Based on your interests here on Wikipedia, you've been invited to join Wikipedia Asian Month!

Wikipedia Asian Month is an annual online edit-a-thon aimed at enhancing the understanding among Asian Wikipedia communities. Taking place through November 2016, the purpose of Asian Month on the English Wikipedia is to improve the quantity and quality of articles about Asian countries and regions. Last year, over 7,000 articles were contributed in 43 languages in Wikipedia Asian Month.

As a symbol of friendship between Wikipedia's Asian communities, each participant who create at least Four (4) articles that fulfill the criteria will receive a special designed Wikipedia postcard from Asian participating countries.

Wikipedians who create the most articles on each Wikipedia will be honored as "Wikipedia Asian Ambassadors".

Sign up now

Thank you for considering! AddisWang (talk) 17:19, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Speculation and Sources

Hi JournalmanManila.

First of all, thank you for you interest in Wikipedia. You've been doing a lot of editing, and that's a good thing. We could use the help. That said, I feel that since we keep running into each other on Philippine Pre-history and Proto-history articles, I need to express some concerns about the accuracy and verifiability of some of your edits.

I have two major reminders

1 Please make sure all your facts are supported by sources. The wikipedia policies relevant to this are Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:No original research. As much as possible, please do this for EVERY fact, because sometimes a difference of a single letter can spark controversy. A good guide is Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources

2 Please be very very careful to never engage in speculation. I've noticed that you like to "complete" articles by adding as much information as possible, using interpretations of the facts based on what seems to make sense (what might seem like "logical conclusions"). I understand the appeal of having answers to questions (how big was Tondo's territory? What did its flag look like?). It's WHY I'm on wikipedia, myself; because these questions are begging for answers. But the answers have to be scholarly, or we might be misleading researchers, especially those just beginning in a field. The relevant guidelines for this are in Wikipedia:No_original_research#Synthesis_of_published_material and Wikipedia:Fringe theories.

• A good example of this is a map. My expertise is the southern banks of Laguna de Bay so I'll use that. In ancient times, the territory called "Mainit" was once a territory (Sheniak, David & Anita Feleo, "Rizal and Laguna: Lakeside Sister Provinces", in Alejandro, Reyndaldo Gamboa, Laguna de Bay: The Living Lake. 2002) of the ancient town of Vahi (Jocano, F.L., Filipino Worldview. 2001.), circa 1500. Today, Mainit is known as "Los Baños." (Ibid.) But the "Mainit" described in literature was a small area on the shores of the Dampalit river; the modern town of Los Baños is a much bigger entity. If you make a map shows that all of the Barangays in modern Los Baños were a part of Mainit, some of that may not be accurate. If someone finds a hoard of artifacts in Barangay Lalakay and dates it back to 1500, and looks at your map, he may conclude that the artifacts must have belonged to someone associated with Bay. Except we aren't ABSOLUTELY sure about that. For all we know, Barangay Lalakay could once have been under the administration of Calamba. Or even Biñan, depending on the era. Just because Lalakay is part of modern day LB doesn't mean it was definitely under Mainit, and therefore under Bay. The person doing the research will find NO OTHER SOURCE claiming otherwise, and will therefore tend to attribute the find to the people of protohistoric Bay, when in fact, it could have just as easily been artifacts from protohistoric Biñan. (Er, if you know the area, this is sorta moot, since Lalakay is a walking distance from the Dampalit River in Barangay Anos. But the point is, WE CAN'T SPECULATE.) - Alternativity (talk) 04:11, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

• Also, please take note that even if this discussion is just on your TALK PAGE, I looked up two references (not to mention I spent YEARS trying to acquire a copy of the Alejandro book) , consulted three maps (a contemporary political one, a geographical gradient map from NAMRIA, and google earth), and agonized over what constitutes "walking distance." It took me an entire hour to write that paragraph; I must reiterate the request for similar thoroughness.

3. My last note isn't a reminder in the strict sense, because it's a very specific appliction of Wikipedia:Neutral point of view: to avoid distorting anthropologically estabilsh-able facts, is it possible for us to try NOT to view historical details through a modern lens? This is why this is important to me: because I'm writing a novel I've spent the last fifteen years trying to piece together an idea of what day-to-day life was like in prehistoric (Pre-700AD) Southern Tagalog. (Which means I have to look at proto-historic [700-1560s] descriptions/sources. And I'm trying to undo pre-concieved notions of, say, the powers of a "king", or the obligations of a "slave." That's as important to my plot as knowing that there were no Guava trees in pre-colonial Philippines (I don't use the term "pre-colonial" lightly) and therefore protohistoric warriors could not have used Guava leaves as an antiseptic. Now, don't get me wrong: Wikipedia shouldn't be written like a technical journal. But all I ask is that articles NOT contain anything that is NOT TRUE, or NOT PROVABLE. I think Wikipedia:Neutral point of view and Wikipedia:Verifiability support my position there.

So.... there. This note has taken me four hours to write. Please, can we come to an agreement about the importance of precision and accuracy?

Thank you! - Alternativity (talk) 04:11, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, JournalmanManila. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 19:25, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

References

Original research again

I've reverted you at Laguna Copperplate Inscription. I see you've been told about this before. Please read WP: VERIFY before adding more text to articles. This is fundamental policy. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 07:40, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

The material was copied directly from another website, and thus was a copyright violation. Please don't add copyright material to this wiki. You've received previous warnings, so please don't do it any more, or you risk being blocked. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 23:44, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Warnings for adding unsourced material

Repeating warnings to comply with Wikipedia policies to always cite sources, something you have not been doing in multiple edits to Ma-i, Kingdom of Namayan, and Kingdom of Tondo, among others. Thank you. Alternativity (talk) 08:29, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

• Thanks for your concern, I making sure of All things are clear of Unsourced Matterials i doing a Fix checking for these files make sure these are supported with references . I.E. Clean up

(Tondo is not just a polity (tribes) but a Kingdom Indianized Kingdom (JournalmanManila (talk) 08:41, 30 January 2017 (UTC)) further more Mai-Might Disputable , unlike Tondo and Namayan namayan is cited as an Indianized Kingdom (or a Mandala) in sanskrit terminologies , Not the Popularized term as a bunch of Tribes in a small communities , so it was a kingdom (In Reference to the LCI). its sourced by references (JournalmanManila (talk) 08:58, 30 January 2017 (UTC))

Some Helpful Links

Hi! Considering concerns that have been raised so far, I thought it might be a good idea to give you a set of links that you can study, so that you don't face any more issues regarding Verifiability, Original Research , and Sources.

• To understand why sources are needed, see the core content policy at Wikipedia:Verifiability
• To understand why not including sources is bad, see the core content policy at Wikipedia:No Original Research
• Some sources are more reliable than others. For help in identifying reliable sources, see Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources

If I may quote the Wikipedia:No Original Research's section on Verifiability, because it's relevant:

...Even if you're sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it. The policy says that all material challenged or likely to be challenged, and all quotations, needs a reliable source; what counts as a reliable source is described here

.

Thanks and happy editing in the future! - Alternativity (talk) 10:08, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

• • this is gonna be helpful , thanks (JournalmanManila (talk) 10:16, 30 January 2017 (UTC))

Removal of Cleanup Templates

Please stop continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Kindgom of Namayan, without resolving the problem that the template refers to. This may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. (Also Kingdom of Tondo. This has been undone on Ma-i via extensive reference cleanup.)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 08:25, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of Pre-colonial Filipino Consorts

added links pointing to Queen, Sultana, Hadji and Jawi

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of Philippine money, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Chinese, Shell and Laguna. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

March 2017

Your addition to History of Philippine money has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please also note that legal action may be taken for severe copyright violations. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:55, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Culture of the Philippines, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Malays. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

March 2017

Your addition to Culture of the Philippines has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. This is your final warning. Further copyright violations will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 23:11, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

April 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted.

Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:16, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

I have blocked your account, because in spite of repeated warnings, you have continued to copy material from one article to another without providing the legally required attribution. Failing to provide the legally required attribution when copying from one Wikipedia article is a copyright violation and a violation of the terms of use of this website. I also recently found one instance where you copied material from another website. You cannot resume editing until you provide a clear statement that demonstrates that you have read and understand our copyright policy and intend to follow it in the future. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:19, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JournalmanManila (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Since i had been blocked and warned numerous times , I understand now clear the wikipedia about the CC/Copyright policy" content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. "(i just previously doing the WP:copyediting as copy editing is allowed). I hope you consider me to be unblock , despite of numerous warnings i should have a chance to edit again the reason; how do i supposed to edit or clean up my field under the copyright policy if i had been blocked ? Please take a consideration thank you (JournalmanManila (talk) 02:36, 3 April 2017 (UTC))

Decline reason:

You didn't address the concerns with attribution at all, nor the issue with images. Nor is it necessarily sufficient simply to reword content. You are welcome to request another unblock review, but at the moment, it looks like you've only spent a couple of minutes and are just trying to get unblocked rather than to understand WP:COPYRIGHT and WP:FU. Yamla (talk) 11:19, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.