User talk:Juliancolton/Archive 26

Archive 20

←

Archive 24

Archive 25

Archive 26

Archive 27

Archive 28

→

Archive 30

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Iowa State Cyclones head football coaches/archive1

Thank you for your comments on this FLC. With the recent crack down on stale FLCs, I would appreciate it if you could check in on this one and let me know if all your concerns have been addressed. Thank you.—NMajdan•talk 15:46, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Hi. I didn't read the list; I simply left a quick comment on the images. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 20:44, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

High-Tech Redneck (song)

Since you closed the afd, I thought you might be interested in a discussion on this an a similar article. Check here. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 17:36, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks –Juliancolton | ^Talk 20:48, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

1996 and 1997

Hi Juliancolton, you told me to slow down the articles, I kinda have to quit rapidly creating articles for the Atlantic hurricanes. You see I can't really continue because info on cyclones in 1996 and 1997 is scant. Basically, the only info is the TCRs of these cyclones. The NHC has not records other than that on these cyclones. No there are no archived public advisories, discussion, etc. You can't see them here, or at this link. It really seems like there is no reason for this because there is stuff like advisories and discussions from 1991-1995 and then 1998-2009. My original plan was to create an article for all named storms in the Atlantic from 1990-2009, I can't since 1996 and 1997 is going to be an obstacle. So for now, it will have to remain from complete from 1998-2009. --12george1 (talk) 18:40, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Well, not all named storms need articles. In any case, yeah, those years are pretty barren in terms of TC sources. You can probably scrape enough info off for an article using HURDAT and the prelim reports though –Juliancolton | ^Talk 20:45, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

ace?

heya, got my next project in mind, laura 1971, but theres something that caught my eye from the season article. "With an ACE of 8.61, Laura had the highest ACE of any Atlantic storm that did not reach hurricane strength". that sounded like a cool record, but i got no idea what it means, since i've never seen it b4. little help? thx --Viennaiswaiting (talk) 19:38, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Good choice... ACE (Accumulated Cyclone Energy) is, in essence, a "yardstick" for measuring a storm's intensity and duration. I'm not really sure what the equation is to find the ACE for a particular storm, but it's a pretty cool figure. Hurricane Ivan holds the record for the second- highest ACE, with 70.38. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 20:48, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

oo, kl, thx... is it legit, tho? i never heard of it, and no other articles have it. --Viennaiswaiting (talk) 21:23, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, it's useful and sourceable. Some articles have it, especially the ones where the ACE represents a significant record (like Laura '71). We decided a while back to only include ACE in those articles, and leave it out of standard storm entries. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 21:25, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

neat! im almost done my article, sooo how do i source it? lol, peace out --Viennaiswaiting (talk) 17:41, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Use the BT and a source that gives the calculation.Jason Rees (talk) 18:30, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

User:Viennaiswaiting/Sandbox1- now that lauras done, i'm finishing up my topic. i played around w the list article, nd found a link from an article that had depressions and the rest of the storms, so i added them. i also found another link here - http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/hurdat/metadata_master.html#1914_ - that has depressons too. think its cool to add them? --Viennaiswaiting (talk) 18:09, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost interview?

Previous request

Would you be interested in doing an interview for the Wikipedia Signpost on behalf of WikiProject Severe Weather? The interview would be featured as the WikiProject report in the March 1st issue of the Signpost. If so, please answer the questions here by February 27-28th. Thanks in advance, Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. 22:59, 19 February 2010 (UTC) I think Runningonbrains (talk · contribs) or JForget (talk · contribs) would be more knowledgeable and provide more in-depth answers. –Juliancolton | Talk 01:45, 20 February 2010 (UTC) Already left a note on Runningonbrains' talk page, but I'll drop one on JForget's. Thanks anyway. Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. 01:58, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Per this previous request, I made requests to other people (User:JForget, User:Evolauxia, User:Runningonbrains, User:Cyclonebiskit, and User:CrazyC83), but I have had no limited luck so far (The majority of them seem to be inactive). Would you reconsider doing the interview? Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. 23:16, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Hmm...it appears CrazyC83 snuck some answers in when I wasn't paying attention...Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. 23:20, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

I finished mine, though my involvement with individual storm-specific articles has been extremely limited in the severe weather project. Thegreatdr (talk) 23:38, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Hurricane Doria (1967)

On February 27, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Hurricane Doria (1967), which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 06:19, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Hurricane Doria vandalism

Hi Julian, I happened to notice a good part of your article concerning Hurricane Doria got lost when a vandal deleted the Meteorological history section, and a few edits went in between. Rather than restoring it myself, I just wanted to drop you a note about it. Keep up the good work, I never got the chance to tell you how impressed I am with the amount of work you put into Wikipedia. Cheers, Numero4 (talk) 18:26, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Well, seems like Jason Rees beat me to it while I was still trying to figure out how to save things. Numero4 (talk) 18:34, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Possible DYK

Hi. Well after getting rid of all of these article about Coldplay songs that fail WP:NOTABILITY, Death and All His Friends was kept as it charted on the UK and Swedish charts. Now the article is over 1,500 characters and I've added alot to it so first off, is it still notable to even be kept and second, is it good enough for a DYK?--Coldplay Expért ^{Let's talk} 03:04, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

Cool NY 28 Catskills pic

Remember, a loooong time ago I told you about having taken this cool picture for the NY 28 article in the Catskills? Well, I finally got around to processing and uploading it and it's in the article now. Take a look ... I was able to keep it and a pic of Mount Tremper by using {{multiple image}}. Daniel Case (talk) 16:56, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

Sure, go ahead and add it to the portal. It could use some more Catskills pics anyway.

You want better pics of snow than that lame (;-) ... appreciate the irony?) one you took? I got some really good ones during a walk I took Friday, one or two that show the snow falling at its heaviest. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:26, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Request

Wikipedia:Today's featured article/March 1, 2010 – [[Smallville (season 1)]] → [[Smallville (season 1)|''Smallville'' (season 1)]] Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 17:09, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

 Done NW (Talk) 17:11, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

WikiCup 2010 February newsletter

Round one is over, and round two has begun! Congratulations to the 64 contestants who have made it through, but well done and thank you to all contestants who took part in our first round. A special well done goes to Sasata (submissions), our round one winner (1010 points), and to Hunter Kahn (submissions) and TonyTheTiger (submissions), who were second and third respectively (640 points/605 points). Sasata was awarded the most points for both good articles (300 points) and featured articles (600 points), and TonyTheTiger was awarded the most for featured topics (225 points), while Hunter Kahn claimed the most for good topics (70). Staxringold (submissions) claimed the most featured lists (240 points) and featured pictures (35 points), Geschichte (submissions) claimed the most for Did you know? entries (490 points), Jujutacular (submissions) claimed the most for featured sounds (70 points) and Candlewicke (submissions) claimed the most for In the news entries (40 points). No one claimed a featured portal or valued picture.

Credits awarded after the end of round one but before round two may be claimed in round two, but remember the rule that content must have been worked on in some significant way during 2010 by you for you to claim points. The groups for round two will be placed up shortly, and the submissions' pages will be blanked. This round will continue until 28 April, when the top two users from each group, as well as 16 wildcards, will progress to round three. Please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup; thank you to all doing this last round, and particularly to those helping at Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, by email or on IRC. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn, Fox, iMatthew and The ed17 Delivered by JCbot (talk) at 00:49, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Nominations for the March 2010 Military history Project Coordinator elections now open!

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 8 March 2010! More information on coordinatorship may be found on the coordinator academy course and in the responsibilities section on the coordinator page.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:49, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

RFA

It's March, the time when I was told to stick my head out and see what my chances are of being given the mop. I was wondering if you would either give me a full review or just tell me flat out what my chances are, since I know you likely have a life off of this. Thanks. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 20:33, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Sure, just give me a bit. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 20:37, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 March 2010

• Reference desk: Wikipedia Reference Desk quality analyzed

• News and notes: Usability, 15M articles, Vandalism research award, and more

• In the news: Idealizing the Star Spangled Banner, Curious Announcement, and more

• WikiProject report: WikiProject Severe Weather

• Features and admins: Approved this week

• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 23:56, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

IRC

heya, i remember u tellin me about some sort of chat. i think i'd like to talk to u all, maybe this weekend - how again do i do it? --Viennaiswaiting (talk) 16:19, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Sure, no problem... just go to http://webchat.freenode.net/ and enter #wiki-hurricanes as the channel. The nickname thing is self-explanatory. :) The best time to come on is during the evening, when more people are around. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 17:05, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

oops, sorry, k. Viennaiswaiting (talk) 18:06, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Priestnall School.

Julian, the thing was under mass vandalism attack. I was just about to restore a good version. Of course, now they'll need to find something else to do, tee hee. Dlohcierekim 21:06, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Hmm, I see. I've just restored it, feel free to look for a good revision. :) –Juliancolton | ^Talk 21:08, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Admin Coaching

Would you be willing to be my admin coach? I'm wanting to go for an RfA, but I'm not sure if I'm ready yet. I feel that after being coached, and being okayed by my coach, that I would be fully ready for an RfA. Thanks, Hamtechperson 21:49, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Warren Fischer

I just went to look up the biography of Warren Fischer and found his page was deleted because you felt he was a non-notable artist. Okay, the brain behind one of the most influential music groups of the last decade? Um, okay. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.233.11.154 (talk) 23:03, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

It was proposed for removal by another editor, and its nomination went uncontested for a week. Hence the deletion. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 23:30, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Another Possible DYK

If you could take a look at User:Coldplay Expert/Sandbox and find a possible hook for me that would be great. If you don't have the time, just don't want to, or you could'nt find anything then just let me know. Thanks.--Coldplay Expért ^{Let's talk} 01:36, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

...that the German submarine U-1065 sank only six days after being set at sea? –Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:39, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks Julian :)--Coldplay Expért ^{Let's talk} 01:45, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

The RfC on the Community de-Adminship proposal has begun

The RfC on the Community de-Adminship proposal was started on the 22nd Feb, and it runs for 28 days. Please note that the existing CDA proposal was (in the end) run as something of a working compromise, so CDA is still largely being floated as an idea.

Also note that, although the RfC is in 'poll format' (Support, Oppose, and Neutral, with Comments underneath), this RfC is still essentially a 'Request for Comment'. Currently, similar comments on CDA's value are being made under all three polls.

Whatever you vote, your vote is welcome!

Regards, Matt Lewis (talk) 10:35, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVIII (February 2010)

The February 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:41, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Hello, Juliancolton. You have new messages at RobertMfromLI's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Deleted Article IDBS

Hi Julian, Please restore the deleted article IDBS to my User space Many thanks Martin MartinMcRiley (talk) 11:18, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

 Done at User:MartinMcRiley/IDBS. Regards, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 13:21, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Restoration

Can you restore this Sandbox Please?Jason Rees (talk) 02:47, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

 Done –Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:51, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Requesting Reconsideration for David V. Johnson

Hi. I would like to have you review the David. V Johnson article that was deleted. I have written a new revision. You can see it on my userpage. I never saw the orig., so I don't know how different my version is. Thank you. 34pin6 (talk) 21:03, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

BLP sticky PROD

Hi Juliancolton/Archive 26!. Every attempt to rescue a Wikipedia article is a noble gesture. However, there may be occasions when, with the best will in the world, it is just not possible to accord even a minimum of notability to an article or stub, or find a proper source for it. Most regrettably, even the most dedicated inclusionists will have to concede that the article may have to go if the creator or major contributors cannot justify their work.
For new and recent unsourced BLPs, some users are now working at WT:BLP PROD TPL on the development of templates that are designed to encourage contributors to source new BLPs, without scaring away the newbies who might not be aware of the rules. This template is certainly not another a licence to kill for the deletionists, in fact the very idea of it is to ensure that you are not fighting a losing battle. It would be great if you could look in at the prgogress and maybe leave a word of encouragement. The workshop page is essentially a template development taskforce, and is not a place to engage in a hefty debate on incusion/deletion policy. See you at WT:BLP PROD TPL?--Kudpung (talk) 12:31, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Informal Request

Hai! :] I was just wondering if, despite it not being a particularly well documented phenomenon, nor my request being properly presented/sourced, you could find the heart to put the Odaxelagnia page back up? I miss it :( It makes me feel very unloved to no longer have it on wikipedia! :{ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.188.145.69 (talk) 15:09, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Do you plan to improve the article, particularly its lack of explicit notability? –Juliancolton | ^Talk 17:23, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Your argument is invalid RfD

Your argument is invalid, a redirect with you credited as the originator, has been nominated for deletion. Should you wish to participate in the deletion discussion, please feel free to do so at WP:Redirects for discussion. 147.70.242.54 (talk) 21:21, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

My RFA

Hello Juliancolton,

May you please close it as unsuccessful? (Admins can do it, right?) I don't see the point in prolonging it, as valid points were raised on how I should improve and I do not see any more coming up. I will leave a closing statement once it is closed. Thank you, Airplaneman ^talk 22:04, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

It looks like it has been closed by someone else. —Soap— 22:20, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Move request

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/National Anthem of Russia → Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/National Anthem of Russia/archive1. Don't delete the redirect, though. Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 22:46, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 March 2010

• News and notes: Financial statements, discussions, milestones

• In the news: Pentagon shooter used Wikipedia, soon iPhone OS will too

• WikiProject report: WikiProject Java

• Features and admins: Approved this week

• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:51, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/O Acaso do Erro

did you consider the weakness of the keep arguments? I am considering putting this up for deletion review. LibStar (talk) 02:56, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Yes. The arguments for deletion weren't particularly overwhelmingly strong either, which is why I couldn't find consensus. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:58, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

disagree, evidence is provided of lack of third party coverage. LibStar (talk) 03:10, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Well, the closing admin's job is to interpret the existing consensus (or lack thereof), not to embark on their own investigation. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:13, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

sufficient evidence is provided of lack of evidence. LibStar (talk) 03:17, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Deletion review for O Acaso do Erro

An editor has asked for a deletion review of O Acaso do Erro. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. LibStar (talk) 03:17, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

GTFO, on my user page.

I removed it from my page, I had it there because it was a play on a meme ("tits or GTFO"), sorry. C6541 (T↔C) 04:09, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Re: Doug Bremner page

Hi Julian:

  I was wondering why you deleted the Doug Bremner page that I just created. Is there something I did wrong? Please advise so I can recreate a Bremner page that passes muster with wikipedia. Thanks.

Ruthrbrager (talk) 17:35, 10 March 2010 (UTC)RuthRuthrbrager (talk) 17:35, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Hello. I had actually deleted a previous version of the article; it looks like Cobaltbluetony (talk · contribs) was the admin who deleted your version. It's probably best to inquire with him, then. Regards, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 17:46, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

AFD result of "Climate change denial"

Please reverse or correct me if I've made a formal mistake here as I just saw your edit on top of the page. Thanks, The Magnificent Clean-keeper (talk) 18:34, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

That's fine, thanks for the fix. I use an automated script to close AfDs, which is why I didn't notice earlier. Cheers, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 19:08, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

You mean I've fixed an edit made by a very knowledgable and respected editor? Makes me feel like jumping up and down for the next half hour or so. Although I won't really do so as I might hit the ceiling, outch XD. But more seriously, guess that the notice of the AFD closing at the top of the talk page could and should be removed. The Magnificent Clean-keeper (talk) 19:28, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

FYI: I've rm. the notice at the top.The Magnificent Clean-keeper (talk) 19:49, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Knowledgeable and respected? Must be at the wrong talk page! –Juliancolton | ^Talk 19:29, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Nope! I'm positive I hit the right one! The Magnificent Clean-keeper (talk) 19:35, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Having some green residue behind your ears [no offense meant, quite the opposite] doesn't mean shit when it comes to brains.The Magnificent Clean-keeper (talk) 19:39, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Premature?

Re this, do you think a WP:NOTNOW close of Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Ecw.technoid.dweeb (0/5/1 as I type this) would be premature now?  Frank  |  talk  02:47, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

It's hard to tell, to be honest. It's clearly not going to pass, but then there hasn't been a lot of constructive criticism as of yet. I wouldn't object to closing it at this point, but I think it might be a good idea to ask the candidate how they feel about it. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:49, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Admin coaching

Interested in taking on yours truly as a student? — BQZip01 — ^talk 04:57, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Sure, why not? A few things to keep in mind: my admin coaching is rather slow-paced, and I generally wait a bit before following up. Also, I try to avoid giving advice on how to pass RfA, since I believe contributions speak for themselves. If these are alright with you, go ahead and create a /Coaching subpage and I'll be right over... –Juliancolton | ^Talk 14:44, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Ready when you are. — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:14, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Tropical Storm Leslie FAC

Since you are/were a major contributor, I wanted you to know that the Tropical Storm Leslie article is up to the FAC--12george1 (talk) 14:36, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Well, thanks, but I'm not really a significant contributor. Hurricanehink (talk · contribs) wrote most of the content. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 14:39, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Hurricanehink has stated that he "retired" from wikipedia though. --12george1 (talk) 15:04, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

I have also checked the Dashboard, you are the second greatest contributor (behind me) because Hurricanehink is inactive. I know its only three edits though; you are also tied with RattleMan and Jason Rees. --12george1 (talk) 15:14, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Hurricanehink still checks in occasionally; I notified him of this FAC last night off-wiki. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 16:44, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

FYI

This and this. ÷seresin 19:34, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 19:44, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

nact?

Semi-protected for a period of nact. After nact the page will be automatically unprotected. ;o) They asked later what nact meant, so I've explained it. Just thought i'd let you know (giggle at your slight expense!). GedUK  10:59, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Heh, oops! –Juliancolton | ^Talk 14:04, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

References

When you are working on weather event articles, how do you present references to products such as Special Weather Statements or Public Information Statements that only get kept for 7 days? I know that VTEC products can be reverenced via this, but is there anywhere else that archives these non-VTEC products for referencing? Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. 17:31, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Use WebCite to archive dynamic urls. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 17:44, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Jim Markunas - Move to Sandbox

I'm working on articles related to Jim Markunas and CWG Magazine. Is there any way I could get the deleted page for Jim Markunas moved to my sandbox? Thank you. Archer Drezelan (talk) 19:54, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

NYC Wikipedia Meetup Sunday, March 21

New York City Meetup Next: Sunday March 21st, Columbia University area Last: 11/15/2009

In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, review the recent Wikipedia Day NYC, plan for the next stages of projects like Wikipedia at the Library and Lights Camera Wiki, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects, for example User:ScienceApologist will present on "climate change, alternative medicine, UFOs and Transcendental Meditation" (see the November meeting's minutes).

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and generally enjoy ourselves and kick back. And if the weather is good, we'll have a star party with the telescopes on the roof of Pupin Hall!

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 15:25, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

GA review of December 2000 nor'easter

Julian, I've opened this review. Since it sat so long before finding a volunteer, just letting you know here. Bradjamesbrown (talk) 10:41, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks! Replied. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 15:03, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

WP:Sock Applications

I just ran into User_talk:99.149.87.66, and after he pretty much said he's using multiple accounts I informed him of guidelines. However, he responded saying it's not against policy, and I quite honestly don't understand policy well enough to be of any help. What do you think? NativeForeigner ^Talk/_Contribs/^Vote! 05:07, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, it's generally acceptable to make logged out edits if they're not disruptive, especially if there is security-related need to do so. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 13:19, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Shawangunk panorama

Sorry to be so tardy in response. Yes, I do have the originals. However, I'd like to try to a better stitch myself as that one was done in Microsoft PhotoDraw, which I must be one of the few people who still have (at least until I begin replacing my computer later in the week), and basically wasn't so much a stitch as just putting the images together and blurring the edges a little bit. Photoshop has a wonderful automerge feature I've used ever since ... I'd like to try that. Daniel Case (talk) 05:30, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Works for me. Let me know when it's ready so I can take a look, and potentially add it to the portal. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 13:20, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs 1991 Pacific typhoon season Bay of Campeche 1992 Pacific typhoon season Leeward Islands 1972 Pacific typhoon season 1975 Pacific typhoon season 1921 Atlantic hurricane season Black Creek (New Jersey) Tropane Psilocybe weilii 1976 Pacific typhoon season Passion (emotion) Committee on Social Thought 1920 Atlantic hurricane season Backbone Entertainment 1977 Pacific typhoon season 1990 Pacific typhoon season National Severe Storms Laboratory 1998 Pacific typhoon season

Cleanup Hurricane Wilma Vostok Station Hurricane Adrian (2005) Merge Fly lure List of wars and disasters by death toll Preparations for Hurricane Katrina Add Sources Gale of 1878 Tailpiece 1970 Atlantic hurricane season Wikify Smart Battery Data Cyclone Justin Mandisa Expand Hurricane Allen 2001 Pacific typhoon season Tropical Storm Alberto (1994)

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 19:28, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

?

Not really. This is my first account. & Lack of exp...? got swagger?^Yup. 21:54, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Alright, I just noticed that among your first edits were creating userpages, which new users are usually unfamiliar with. I usually look for a few hundreds edits before granting rollback, and you really only have around 50. In any event, welcome to Wikipedia! –Juliancolton | ^Talk 21:56, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Whats wrong with creating subpages? Ive edited before with different IPs. got swagger?^Yup. 21:58, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Nothing, it just indicates a slightly experienced user (which is indeed a good thing!) –Juliancolton | ^Talk 22:00, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

So whats up with the welcome and lack of exp..? L.got swagger?^Yup. 22:02, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Pardon? –Juliancolton | ^Talk 22:04, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

@ WP:RFRB you stated that I have a lack of experience and so on. Then I got an welcome from you. And I Just got an "slightly experienced user". I dont see where this is going... got swagger?^Yup. 22:08, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Yes, you've only been editing for a few days, hence my welcome. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 22:08, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Yes, welcome. Sorry for butting in Julian. Hope you don't mind.--Coldplay Expért ^{Let's talk} 22:27, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Question for BQ

I cannot edit there. I see you can, so can you ask this for me please to BQ: start here----- As Military man, please answer question on Flag for me. Instructor tell me about respect to flag and lesson has certain things not to do here(sorry, I not shouting): UNITED STATES CODE TITLE 36 CHAPTER 10 then §176. Respect for flag here:(g) The flag should never have placed upon it, nor on any part of it, nor attached to it any mark, insignia, letter, word, figure, design, picture, or drawing of any nature. So why is globe thingy upon flag on your page? Is this not for internet, I do not understand? 87.119.79.235 (talk) 00:09, 16 March 2010 (UTC) end here----- thank you Mr. Colton for your help.

I'm really sorry, but I don't understand; could you please explain what page you want to ask your question on? –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:22, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

MrBQZip page. I cannot put note there. But you have note at bottom of his page. This means you can put note there for me I hope. It is not to important, but I would like to now about this flag on internet. 87.119.79.235 (talk) 00:43, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

 Done. Regards, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:47, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

1. On my user page is a link to a page for new users to respond. Please use that link in the future.
2. Your answer for your question regarding my user page and the Wikipedia logo on top of the American flag is that it wasn't always there. This image was originally set as the foreground image. There have been some minor changes to Wikipedia which puts this image in the background. That said, I don't necessarily see this as a problem as it is a background image, part of a larger image. It would be similar to this image: the wax figure of a firefighter is between the cameraman and the flag and appears in front of the flag. This is also a technical violation of the same law.
3. This law is unenforceable as it is an illegal regulation of free speech. Any attempted enforcement of said law will be thrown out in the Supreme Court unless an amendment is passed for the U.S. Constitution.
4. That said, you bring up an excellent point with regards to U.S. Code. I certainly want to show proper respect for the American flag. Perhaps there is a better way to display such an image of the flag on my user page. — BQZip01 — ^talk 04:38, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

BQ, You give me multiple choice, no? I choose number 4, that is the correct answer. You are the military man so I say this is best for you. (1 I do not know, 2 is not clear, cameraman take picture wherever he is, this is not disrespect. 3 that law is illegal is not clear, I am not lawmaker or jury). You fix now, that is best thing to do. 87.119.79.235 (talk) 17:54, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

WP:USRD/ACR

You commented on the NY 319 ACR, and the editor has made efforts to resolve your concerns. Would you mind taking another look at the article? --Rschen7754 04:57, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

LOCK UCI

Hello, this is Quintus314 here. Can you please lock the page User:Quintus314/UCI? It's got my UCI, and I don't want random people going and changing it. Thanks! Quintusπ ^talk 18:36, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Full protected or just semi'd? –Juliancolton | ^Talk 18:39, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

DRV

Please see Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2010_March_16#St._Anthony.27s_Senior_Secondary_School_Udaipur. Woogee (talk) 18:48, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

User:ZjarriRrethues

This user is teaming up with User:Kushtrim123 and placing this map from 1860 [1] in every article he can think of. The reason he does that, of course, is because it shows half of Greece as Albanian. That this is motivated by nothing other than national POV is evident from the way he places it at the very top of these articles, so as to maximize visibility, even though this is usually ends up placing the map rather incongruously in the "Ancient History" section, e.g. in History of Albania and History of Kosovo. These two, particularly Kushtrim123, are hard national-advocacy accounts with whom any discussion is futile before it has even begun. They are tag teaming and generally careful to avoid 3RR, which is rather odd for such new accounts. Athenean (talk) 21:49, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

What are you talking about? I never reverted to anyone's version if Kushtrim123 wants to edit those articles is his own problem not mine. And since we're talking about "tag-teaming" you have been following me around wikipedia and after you came User:Alexikoua. Please stop doing such a thing, and please stop accusing me for the 3rd time for being someone else. It was proven that I'm no one else except ZjarriRrethues so stop doing what you're doing.--— ZjarriRrethues — ^talk 22:16, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Athenean, if that's the case, there's no need to take matters into your own hands. At this point I think a civil discussion at a relevant talk page would be able to determine where consensus currently exists. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 22:22, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Typhoon Nida

if youre not too busy getting drunk :P. can u do a history merge of User:Jason Rees/Typhoon Nida (2009) and Typhoon Nida (2009) please. ThanksJason Rees (talk) 15:05, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

 Done, nicely done. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 15:52, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

'Private' re-listing

Thanks for tending to the matter surrounding the Private characters article. I don't entirely understand what's occurring there, I just know that the article should be deleted since it's in clear violation of several policies, and has been for over a year. -- James26 (talk) 20:06, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Hello. I relisted the discussion for a week, since consensus was not yet clear. It'll probably be closed once the relist expires (but there is a chance it'll be relisted again). –Juliancolton | ^Talk 20:08, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

I'm not certain what this will mean. I know that under the old deletion policy, an original research article (or another one that violated policies) would be removed if the issues weren't remedied. Since no one has even come close to remedying these issues in a year, it seems clear to me that the article is just going to remain a collection of plot summaries and OR if it's kept. In any case, I appreciate your involvement. -- James26 (talk) 23:34, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

It's not kept, though. Relisting is simply a procedural action taken if consensus is not yet clear. It may well still be deleted if deemed appropriate. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:57, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 March 2010

• News and notes: A Wikiversity controversy, Wikimedian-in-Residence, image donation, editing contest, WMF jobs

• In the news: Studies on collaboration and student usage, Main Page drives traffic to Time.com

• Dispatches: GA Sweeps end

• WikiProject report: WikiProject Ireland

• Features and admins: Approved this week

• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 21:31, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Happy St.Patrick's Day!

Happy St.Patrick's Day!

Dear Juliancolton, i want to wish you all the luck you can get on St.Patrick's Day & Remember to wear green so no one will bother to pinch you. ;-) Written by GeneralCheese

Hey, thanks! Yup, I wore green. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:56, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Coordinator elections have opened!

Voting for the Military history WikiProject coordinator elections has opened; all users are encouraged to participate in the elections. Voting will conclude 23:59 (UTC) on 28 March 2010.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:59, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Credo Reference

Hi Julian. If you are keen on sourcing, you might find this offer useful. - Pointillist (talk) 22:16, 18 March 010 (UTC)

Thank you for the note. Sounds neat! –Juliancolton | ^Talk 22:22, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Juliancolton. You have new messages at User:Hamtechperson/Admin coaching.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hamtechperson 03:58, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Just noting again. I know I told you on IRC. Hamtechperson 18:02, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Updating Admin Coaching

Hi, I see that you are listed as an active coach.

This is just a reminder to ask that you keep the entry at Wikipedia:Admin_coaching/Status up to date - if you take on a new student, or a student stops being coached, could you update your entry?

Please accept my apologies if you have been doing this - I'm sending this to everyone on the current active list, and not trying to track down what coaching is being done!

If you are no longer willing to coach, please remember to move your name to the "Former coaches" section!

Keeping the list up to date means that any potential coachees can clearly see what the current state of play is!

Thank you for your attention... and now, I'm off back to what I was doing before!

Regards, -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 08:17, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

 Done –Juliancolton | ^Talk 04:25, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Review for Angela (1989) has begun

I added the link for the HKO annual report which has more information on the system. This will allow you to add a preparations section, and add some more detail to impact on the Hong Kong area. Thegreatdr (talk) 18:17, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Great, thank you. I'll look at it tomorrow. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 04:25, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Coaching

Hi Julian, have you taken a look at my admin coaching answers yet? That's OK if you haven't, as I have been incredibly busy for the last month or two anyway. Thanks, Arctic Night 05:00, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

I completely forgot! I'm so sorry; I'll revisit tomorrow. My apologies... –Juliancolton | ^Talk 05:01, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

No problem :) Arctic Night 08:44, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

Keith Briffa deletion

Who requested that Keith Briffa's page be removed? I see it is a G7 request, and am assuming that Briffa wrote his own article. Dave Clewlow 84.9.50.8 (talk) 11:15, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

A regular Wikipedia editor created the article a while back, and then requested deletion because s/he was the page author. The article has since been restored and moved to another user's personal userspace, so they could work on the article; see User:Eastmain/Keith_Briffa. Best, JamieS93^❤ 12:44, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Shame on you!

Wikipedia is no place for common sense. Don't you realise that THE SKY IS FALLING AND WE'RE ALL GOING TO DIE? – iridescent 23:33, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

London record label

Hey there Julian,

Thanks for taking your time away to read this message. I have just today joined the huge world of which is Wikipedia after years of using it for research projects in the music industry. I would like to create an article for an established record label in London, UK, to which I have no affiliations, but would like to write an article on this fast growing company.

I see that someone else tried to write an article about this a while back, and it was rejected by yourself under term A7. Will I be able to write this article without it being deleted or was there a specific reason it was deleted last time which Im not aware of? Just didn't want to waste anybody's time you know! :)

Anyway thanks for reading and please reply soon

Chris —Preceding unsigned comment added by C1556INMG (talk • contribs) 16:06, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Hello Chris. I've reformatted your post a bit; hope you don't mind. While it would probably be acceptable to give it a shot, I'd be able to provide more specific advice if I knew the name of the article. Could you link me to the deleted page so I can take a look? –Juliancolton | ^Talk 16:41, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Re: My Rollback request

I replied to your deny of my RB request. You may want to check it out. Schfifty3 22:35, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

ADCO

Juliancolton, I have just requested to go into ADCO, and I know that you are a great editor and admin. I would like to request that you be my coach for the process. Thank you for your time. -- /MWOAP|Notify Me\ 00:22, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Hi MWOAP, thanks for your interest and kind words. I'm a pretty slow admin coach, and I often take a couple days to reply. I also have a few other coachees to tend to at the moment. If that's acceptable, sure, I'll help. Cheers. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:30, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Speaking of stuff like this, Julian, do you think that I've improved since you blocked me back in January? Do I need to continue the mentoring or am I on the right track?--White Shadows ^{you're breaking up} 00:46, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

I think you've improved quite a bit. It's good to see you're working on content more, and as Pedro says, your submarine DYKs are to be applauded. I noticed that recent... (isn't sure what to call it) – debacle? – on Malleus' talk page, and I still think you should make an effort to stay away from similar quarrels. Otherwise, just keep doing what you're doing and you should be good. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:51, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. I still have more talk page edits than mainspace though (the gap is about 100 edits though) And sorry for being a bit ignorant but can you point out the "debacle" that was on Malleus's talk page? You are right though, I need to spend less time getting involved in drama that has nothing to do with me and keep on working on German U-boats. Overall though, it's nice to know that I've improved from this to haveing 4 GA's (one of which I wrote) and 10 DKY's.--White Shadows ^{you're breaking up} 00:59, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

This. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:04, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks Juliancolton, that's fine. I like to keep up with my normal contribs anyway. Thank you. If you want a quick overview of me (admin related fields) I have a page where I have put my admin related contributions. Just an FYI. Thanks again. -- /MWOAP|Notify Me\ 01:09, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Ah, neat! Makes my job a bit easier. :) Just create User:MWOAP/Coaching or something and I'll be right over. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:16, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

(edit conflict)Oh, the copyright vio. I understand and I have learned my lession. I was lead to belive that is was PD since I had seen several other articles that had text copied from the site beforehand. Don't worry about that now, I've gotten into the habit of rewording all fo the infor from Uboat.net. Anyway, is there any other (not sure how to put it)...sectors of my editing habits that I still need work on?--White Shadows ^{you're breaking up} 01:09, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Well, as I said, just watch your step and stop worrying so much. The readers don't care who wrote their content and how "good" their contributions are, so long as the content is accurate and encyclopedic etc. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:16, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

True. I never thought about that to be honest. Many people here seem to edit for a personal gain (I do it because I like to see my work published. It gives you a sense of acomplishment if you know what I mean) It seems like many Wikipedians (admins or not) seem to forget that we are here to create a free encyclopedia.--White Shadows ^{you're breaking up} 01:19, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

It's fine to edit for personal gain so long as you're editing according to basic policies. Contributing to Wikipedia is a hobby for most people, and there is an endless number of motivations for getting involved. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:24, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

It just seems that many people (Malleus in particular) are very critical of "career admins" and editors. Yes, I know that there are endless reasons to edit. Not all of them are sinister but there do seem to be people out there who are not here to write or to make other constructive edits (DYK for example) I know that this seems like a hypocritical statement considering my past but you have to admit, it's true.--White Shadows ^{you're breaking up} 01:27, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Done @ User:MWOAP/ADCO. :) -- /MWOAP|Notify Me\ 01:40, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 March 2010

• Wikipedia-Books: Wikipedia-Books: Proposed deletion process extended, cleanup efforts

• News and notes: Explicit image featured on Wikipedia's main page

• In the news: Campaign for video, costs of crowdsourcing, iPhone app, brief headlines

• WikiProject report: Percy Jackson Task Force

• Features and admins: Approved this week

• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 18:53, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Proof read request

Would you mind giving Joseph H. Allen a proof read? I pretty much finished it (i.e. exhausted all available sources on an obscure guy from the 1850s). I'm going to see if I can bring this to GAN and be taken seriously. :) Thanks in advance! upstateNYer 22:30, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Looks good after a quck look-through. Can't see any major ssues, so thnk t should be good for GAN. Would do some copyedtng, f my keyboard weren't broken. :/ –Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:39, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

I bet it sucks not being able to refer to yourself ("I"!) :) upstateNYer 01:49, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Hehe, ndeed! –Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:57, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Resp requested

Hello, Juliancolton. You have new messages at User:BQZip01/Coaching.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

— BQZip01 — ^talk 04:06, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Note

I got another keyboard, so I'm able to type comprehensibly, but it still isn't fully operational. I might not be able to edit for a while. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 15:11, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Why's it so hard to type on a keyboard? Was your old keyboard like this and your new one like this? Gary King (talk) 15:27, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

It looked so good... –Juliancolton | ^Talk 15:32, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Need Help

Can you help me with my account? Pages have been blanked by my account without me even being on my computer, is there a way to change my password if my account has been hacked or is this just an editing glitch? My talk on the matter: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga#Blanked the page? It appears to have happened to another user in the past as well so I do not know if it is in fact a glitch or not. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 00:21, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for your help =). - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 00:54, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Juliancolton. You have new messages at User:MWOAP/ADCO.
Message added 21:05, 26 March 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I don't know if you want me to bother you with these tb's. Let me know if you watch it or want the tb's. -- /MWOAP|Notify Me\ 21:05, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Edit request

Wikipedia:Today's featured article/March 26, 2010 – Tarbosaurus needs italicizing, and same for American Beauty (film) in Wikipedia:Today's featured article/March 27, 2010. Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 23:27, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Done, along with the two previous occurences of Tarbosaurus, by a talk-page stalker. Olaf Davis (talk) 23:48, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Join the WP:USRDCUP 2010!

We're going to go ahead and try this again! The contest will begin April 1. It is a contest to encourage editors to improve teh quality of WP:USRD articles and participate in USRD. Precautions will be taken to make sure that people do not "game the system" and bring article quality down. Please sign up ASAP! Announcements regarding the contest will be made at WP:USRDCUP, Twitter, and/or IRC. --Rschen7754 06:51, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

Thank you

		The WikiProject Barnstar
		In gratitude of your service as a coordinator for the Military history Project from September 2009 to March 2010, I hereby award you this WikiProject Barnstar. TomStar81 (Talk) 00:19, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Not unreferenced not BLP

Hi [2] - the article was not unreferenced (sourced to the 1911 EB), and definately not a BLP. DuncanHill (talk) 01:02, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

My mistake, apologies. Thanks for fixing. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:05, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

No problem - to be fair it looks like you inherited the slip from someone else. Just tickled my fancy to see an EB1911 template and a BLP template on the same page. DuncanHill (talk) 01:11, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Portal Moscow

Hello, JulianColton, and firstly, It's official, your coord status has expired, so I suggest you add the word former to your userpage. Nextly, I'm here basically to ask you if you could review User:Buggie111/Portal Moscow and say if there are any gaps besides the fact that I still have not built some subpages. I'd like to know if a). This is broad enough b).If I should add articles like Battle of Borodino and Battle of Moscow to the selected article group and c). If POrtals like St. Petersburg and Berlin should be created. Besides that, the only fact that I think is barring me from getting this to FP is that there are so few DYK's, GA's and FA's in terms of Mosocw.

Best Wishes, Buggie111 (talk) 03:05, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Hi Buggie, thanks for the note. I've updated my userpage, and will take a look at the portal this afternoon. Regards, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 16:10, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks! I look forword to your comments. Buggie111 (talk) 23:36, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Ummmm..... I know you've got IB exams and no harm ment, but are you going to look at it? Buggie111 (talk) 16:21, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

What's an IB exam? Sorry, I'll take a look today. –Juliancolton | ^Talk

Coordinator election

Thank you for your support MisterBee1966 (talk) 14:44, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Congrats on the election and good luck! –Juliancolton | ^Talk 16:09, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Autoreviewer

Hi Juliancolton, just a quick note to acknowledge the addition of autoreviewer rights to my account. I am pleased and flattered - thank you. Should I display the 'ticked Wikiglobe' and, if so, how? Best wishes, Andy F (talk) 21:37, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

If you want to, just put "{{Autoreviewer}}" on your userpage. You're by no means obligated to however. Best, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 21:39, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thank you very much for your support on the coordinator elections. – Joe N 13:50, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 29 March 2010

• News and notes: Usability rollout, downtime, admin phishing, Wikimania scholarships and more

• In the news: Overdue correction, Critical Point of View conference, brief headlines

• Sister projects: A handful of happenings

• WikiProject report: The WikiProject Bulletin: news roundup and WikiProject Chicago feature

• Features and admins: Approved this week

• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 18:33, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

WikiCup 2010 March newsletter

We're half way through round two, and everything is running smoothly. Hunter Kahn (submissions) leads overall with 650 points this round, and heads pool B. TonyTheTiger (submissions) currently leads pool C, dubbed the "Group of Death", which has a only a single contestant yet to score this round (the fewest of any group), as well five contestants over 100 points (the most). With a month still to go, as well as 16 wildcard places, everything is still to play for. Anything you worry may not receive the necessary attention before the end of the round (such as outstanding GA or FA nominations) is welcome at Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews, and please remember to continue offering reviews yourself where possible. As always, the judges are available to contact via email, IRC or their talk pages, and general discussion about the Cup is welcome on the WikiCup talk page.

Although unrelated to the WikiCup, April sees a Good Article Nominations backlog elimination drive, formulated as a friendly competition with small awards, as the Cup is. Several WikiCup contestants and judges have already signed up, but regular reviewers and those who hope to do more reviewing are more than welcome to join at the drive page. If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn, Fox, iMatthew and The ed17 Delivered by JCbot (talk) 22:17, 31 March 2010 (UTC)