Wikipedia

User talk:Juliancolton/Archive 33

< User talk:Juliancolton
Latest comment: 11 years ago by EdwardsBot in topic The Signpost: 04 March 2013
Archive 30Archive 31Archive 32Archive 33Archive 34Archive 35→Archive 38

The Signpost: 03 September 2012

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Wikipedia:Editor review/TheGeneralUser (2) Your review is required and will be greatly appreciated :)

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi Juliancolton  ! I have started my second editor review at Wikipedia:Editor review/TheGeneralUser (2). I will be greatly delighted, thankful and valued to have your review for me regarding my editing and possible candidate for Adminship. I see you also evaluate possible candidates for Adminship as you had chosen to do so on Wikipedia:Request an RfA nomination, so do evaluate me too! As you are a experienced and long term Wikipedian so i have asked for your kind review. Take your time to review my editing and give the best review that you can :). Feel free to ask me any questions you would like to on the review page itself. It will be a great honor to have you review me for which I will truly feel appreciated and helpful! I always work to improve Wikipedia and make it a more better place to be for Everyone :). Regards and Happy Editing! TheGeneralUser (talk) 19:33, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Military history coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject has started its 2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the current coordinators on their talk page. This message was delivered here because you are a member of the Military history WikiProject. – Military history coordinators (about the project • what coordinators do) 09:19, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 September 2012

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion


Request for an RfA nomination

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I would like to know what I can do, so I can become an Administrator. Also I would like to know if you think I am ready. I would like to also to get suggestions from you so I can help my chances of getting the Adminship. Thanks, --Clarkcj12 (talk) 00:59, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Hey,

I don't edit much around here right now (might change at some point, but who knows), so I'm not likely to be the best person to present your case. I can't see anything that tells me you shouldn't be trusted, but I'm not by any means up to date with RfA standards. Also, for what it's worth, adminship is the sort of thing that shouldn't be seen as a goal, so I wouldn't worry about bending over backwards just to the end of being promoted. Take it from me, it's not as glamorous as you would think! Best of luck with whatever you feel though. Juliancolton (talk) 01:09, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 September 2012

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

WikiProject Good articles (Participant Clean-Up)

Hello, you are receiving this message because you are currently a participant of WikiProject Good articles. Since the creation of the WikiProject, over 200 user's have joined to help review good article nominations and contribute to other sections of the WikiProject. Over the years, several of these users have stopped reviewing articles and/or have become inactive with the project but are still listed as participates. In order to improve communications with other participants and get newsletters sent out faster (newsletters will begin to be sent out monthly starting in October) all participants that are no longer active with the WikiProject will be removed from the participants list.

If you are still interested in being a participant for this WikiProject, please sign your user name here and please help review some articles so we can reduce the size of the backlog. If you are no longer interested, you do not need to sign your name anywhere and your name will be removed from the participants list after the deadline. Remember that even if you are not interested at this time, you can always re-add your name to the list whenever you want. The deadline to sign your name on the page above will be November 1, 2012. Thank-you. 13:28, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Update for: WikiProject Good articles (Participant Clean-Up)

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Sorry for having to send out a second message but a user has brought to my attention that a point mentioned in the first message should be clarified. If user's don't sign on this page, they will be moved to an "Inactive Participants" list rather then be being removed from the entire WikiProject. Sorry for any confusion.--Dom497 (talk)15:18, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

FYI

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Interesting on how opinions difer... http://newswatch.nationalgeographic.com/2012/08/28/how-can-a-drought-this-big-sneak-up-on-us/ Regards, --tomascastelazo (talk) 05:03, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 September 2012

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

WikiCup 2012 September newsletter

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

We're over half way through the final, and so it is less than a month until we know for certain our 2012 WikiCup champion.   Grapple X (submissions) currently leads, followed by   Sasata (submissions),   Cwmhiraeth (submissions) and   Casliber (submissions). However, we have no one resembling a breakaway leader, and so the competition is a long way from over. Next month's newsletter will feature a list of our winners (who are not necessarily only the finalists) and keep your eyes open for an article on the WikiCup in a future edition of The Signpost. The leaders are already on a par with last year's winners, but a long way from the huge scores seen in 2010. That said, a repeat of the competition from 2010 seems unlikely.

It is good to see that three-quarters of our finalists have already scored bonus points this round. This shows that, contrary to criticism that the WikiCup has received in the past, the competition does not merely incentivise the writing of trivial articles; instead, our top competitors are still spending their time contributing to high-importance articles, and bringing them to a high standard. This does a great service to the encyclopedia and its readers. Thank you, and good work!

The planning for next year's WikiCup is ongoing. Some straw polls have been opened concerning the scoring, and you can now sign up for next year's competition. As ever, if you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) J Milburn (talk) 19:56, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 01 October 2012

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter - October 2012

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Delivered October 3, 2012 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive this newsletter any longer, please remove your name from this list.

→ Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page.
→ Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 05:38, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

GOCE September 2012 drive wrap-up

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Guild of Copy Editors September 2012 backlog elimination drive wrap-up
 

Participation: Out of 41 people who signed up this drive, 28 copy-edited at least one article. Thanks to all who participated! Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here.

Progress report: We achieved our primary goal of clearing July, August, September and October 2011 from the backlog. This means that, for the first time since the drives began, the backlog is less than a year. At least 677 tagged articles were copy edited, although 365 new ones were added during the month. The total backlog at the end of the month was 2341 articles, down from 8323 when we started out over two years ago. We completed all 54 requests outstanding before September 2012 as well as eight of those made in September.

Copy Edit of the Month: Voting is now over for the August 2012 competition, and prizes will be issued soon. The September 2012 contest is closed for submissions and open for voting. The October 2012 contest is now open for submissions. Everyone is welcome to submit entries and to vote.

– Your drive coordinators: Stfg, Allens, and Torchiest.

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 23:41, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

You're invited: Ada Lovelace, STEM women edit-a-thon at Harvard

U.S. Ada Lovelace Day 2012 edit-a-thon, Harvard University - You are invited!
Now in its fourth year, Ada Lovelace Day is an international celebration of women in science, technology, engineering, mathematics (STEM), and related fields. Participants from around New England are invited to gather together at Harvard Law School to edit and create Wikipedia entries on women who have made significant contributions to the STEM fields.
Register to attend or sign up to participate remotely - visit this page to do either.
00:27, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXVIII, September 2012

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project and/or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Nick-D (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 20:43, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 08 October 2012

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Responce

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

STO, I think it's an excellent idea for you to take the night off. You've done pretty well for yourself by avoiding a block, which certainly would have been justified—you're being disruptive by all counts. You disclose on your userpage that you're 14, and your behavior is about on par with what I'd expect from a young teenager. You could probably regain some respect by simply distancing yourself from the issue at hand, but if nothing else, try not to get blocked. ~Juliancolton (talk) 00:18, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

My Responce (October 14, 2012)

I understand that your an administrator and all, and I see what your trying to tell me. The only problem I have with your response is the fact that you (and others) think I'm being disruptive. How? I'm just simply stating my User rights. Wikipedia is a free editing community and I'm free to edit this page (right?). And another thing, I don't like how you judge my age with my personality. This world is very judgmental, I know that. Even though people try to not judge someone, they kind of do judge on the inside. I think that many adults look at the word "teenager" and say "Oh, teenagers cause problems and aren't very smart", I find that opinion from adults very offensive. I don't think that is what your meant to say, but that is the way I'm reading it. Also, I stopped editing a debate a few hours ago because we rather reached a consensus, or it got to "violent". But, I appreciate you boldly telling me what you think I'm doing wrong. ~STO12 (talk) 00:34, 14 October 2012 (UTC) STO12 (talk) 23:47, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 October 2012

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

GOCE fall newsletter

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Fall Events from the Guild of Copy Editors
 

The Guild of Copy Editors invites you to participate in its events:

  • The October 2012 Copy Edit of the Month Contest is currently in the submissions stage. Submit your best October copy edit there before the end of the month. Submissions end, and discussion and voting begin, on November 1 at 00:00 (UTC).
  • Voting is in progress for the September 2012 Copy Edit of the Month Contest. Everyone is welcome to vote, whether they have entered the contest or not.
  • NEW!! In the week from Sunday 21 October to Saturday 27 October, we are holding a Project Blitz, in which we will copy edit articles tagged with {{copyedit}} belonging to selected project(s). For the first blitz, we'll start with WikiProject Olympics and WikiProject Albums and add more Projects to the blitz as we clear them. The blitz works much like our bimonthly drives, but a bit simpler. Everyone is welcome to take part, and barnstars will be awarded.
  • November 2012 Backlog elimination drive is a month-long effort to reduce the size of the copy edit backlog. The drive begins on November 1 at 00:00 (UTC) and ends on November 30 at 23:59 (UTC). Our goals are to copy edit all articles tagged in 2011 and to complete all requests placed before the end of October. Barnstars will be awarded to anyone who copy edits at least one article, and special awards will be given to the top five in the following categories: "Number of articles", "Number of words", "Number of articles of over 5,000 words", "Number of articles tagged in 2011", and "Longest article". We hope to see you there! – Your drive coordinators: Stfg, Allens, and Torchiest.
>>> Blitz sign-up <<<         >>> Drive sign-up <<<

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Message delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 19:17, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXIX, October 2012

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Nick-D (talk) and Ian Rose (talk) 02:40, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 October 2012

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

fungi

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

hello there! just saw you're a participant in the fungi project. i created a few stubs recently, and was wondering if the project needed some assistance in that regard. i hope you can let me know. cheers! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 20:33, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Interstate 75 in Michigan

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

The article has been expanded at least 5x (was 838 words on October 14 and 4230 words now before I expand the lead). Go ahead and nominate it as we discussed. Imzadi 1979 → 02:54, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Oh, there are some DYK hook suggestions with photo possibilities on the P:USRD DYK suggestion page. Imzadi 1979 → 02:55, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 October 2012

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

WikiCup 2012 October newsletter

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

The 2012 WikiCup has come to a close; congratulations to   Cwmhiraeth (submissions), our 2012 champion! Cwmhiraeth joins our exclusive club of previous winners: Dreamafter (2007), jj137 (2008), Durova (2009), Sturmvogel 66 (2010) and Hurricanehink (2011). Our final standings were as follows:

  1.   Cwmhiraeth (submissions)
  2.   Sasata (submissions)
  3.   Grapple X (submissions)
  4.   Casliber (submissions)
  5.   Muboshgu (submissions)
  6.   Miyagawa (submissions)
  7.   Ruby2010 (submissions)
  8.   Dana Boomer (submissions)

Prizes for first, second, third and fourth will be awarded, as will prizes for all those who reached the final eight. Every participant who scored in the competition will receive a ribbon of participation. In addition to the prizes based on placement, the following special prizes will be awarded based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, the prize is awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round.

Awards will be handed out in the coming days; please bear with us! This year's competition also saw fantastic contributions in all rounds, from newer Wikipedians contributing their first good or featured articles, right up to highly experienced Wikipedians chasing high scores and contributing to topics outside of their usual comfort zones. It would be impossible to name all of the participants who have achieved things to be proud of, but well done to all of you, and thanks! Wikipedia has certainly benefited from the work of this year's WikiCup participants.

Next year's WikiCup will begin in January. Currently, discussions and polls are open, and all contributions are welcome. You can also sign up for next year's competition. There will be no further newsletters this year, although brief notes may be sent out in December to remind everyone about the upcoming competition. It's been a pleasure to work with you all, and we hope to see you all in January! J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 00:30, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Interstate 75 in Michigan

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 05 November 2012

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Signpost: 12 November 2012

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

GOCE November 2012 copy edit drive update

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Guild of Copy Editors November 2012 backlog elimination drive mid-drive newsletter
 
  • Participation: Out of 31 people signed up for this drive so far, 22 have copy-edited at least one article. If you've signed up but haven't yet copy-edited any articles, every bit helps; if you haven't signed up yet, it's not too late. Join us!
  • Progress report: We're on track to meet our targets for the drive. We have reduced our target group of articles—November and December 2011—by over 50%, and 34 of the the 56 requests made in September and October this year have already been fulfilled. However, the rate of tagging for copy edit has increased, and this month we are just keeping the size of the backlog stable. So, all you copy editors, please do come along and help us!
  • The September 2012 Copy Edit of the Month Contest was won by Baffle gab1978 for his copy edit of Expulsion of the Acadians. Runner up was Gareth Griffith-Jones for his edit of I Could Fall in Love. Congratulations to both.
  • The October 2012 Copy Edit of the Month Contest is in the discussion and voting stage until midnight November 30 (UTC). You don't have to make a submission to vote!
  • November 2012 Copy Edit of the Month Contest is in the submissions stage until midnight November 30 (UTC), when discussion and voting begin.
  • Seasonal oversight: We had a slight fall from grace in the title of our last newletter, which mentioned the season in the northern hemisphere and thus got it wrong for the southern. Fortunately an observant GOCE member was ready to spring into action to advise us. Thanks! In future we'll stay meteorologically neutral.
>>> Sign up now <<<

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 19:48, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

JSTOR

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi there. You're one of the first 100 people to sign up for a free JSTOR account via the requests page. We're ready to start handing out accounts, if you'd still like one.

JSTOR will provide you access via an email invitation, so to get your account, please email me (swalling wikimedia.org) with...

  • the subject line "JSTOR"
  • your English Wikipedia username
  • your preferred email address for a JSTOR account

The above information will be given to JSTOR to provide you with your account, but will otherwise remain private. Please do so by November 30th or drop me a message to say you don't want/need an account any longer. If you don't meet that deadline, we will assume you have lost interest, and will provide an account to the next person in the rather long waitlist.

Thank you! Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 21:01, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 November 2012

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Signpost: 26 November 2012

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Bugle: Issue LXXX, November 2012

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 01:22, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia Goes to the Movies in NYC this Saturday Dec 1

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Wikipedia Goes to the Movies in NYC

You are invited to Wikipedia Goes to the Movies in NYC, an editathon, Wikipedia meet-up and workshops focused on film and the performing arts that will be held on Saturday, December 1, 2012, at the New York Public Library for the Performing Arts (at Lincoln Center), as part of the Wikipedia Loves Libraries events being held across the USA.

All are welcome, sign up on the wiki and at meetup.com!--Pharos (talk) 07:22, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia Loves Libraries Seattle

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Decemmber 8 - Wikipedia Loves Libraries Seattle - You're invited
 
Seattle Public Library
  • Date Saturday, December 8, 2012
  • Time 10 a.m. – 3 p.m.
  • Location Seattle Public Library Meeting Room 1 on Level 4, Central Library, 1000 4th Avenue, Seattle WA, 98104
  • Event An editathon on Seattle-related Wikipedia articles with Wikipedia tutorials and Librarian assistance on hand.
  • Hashtag #wikiloveslib or #glamwiki.
  • Registration http://wll-seattle.eventbrite.com or use on-wiki regsistration.

Yours, Maximilianklein (talk) 03:01, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Most roadworthy triple crown....

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
I hereby award Juliancolton with this most excellent roadworthy WikiProject U.S. Roads triple crown. Keep up the good work! Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 09:19, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

GOCE November drive wrap-up

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Guild of Copy Editors November 2012 backlog elimination drive wrap-up
 

Participation: Thanks to all who participated! Out of 38 people who signed up this drive, 33 copy-edited at least one article. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. All the barnstars have now been distributed.

Progress report: We achieved our primary goal of clearing November and December 2011 from the backlog. For the first time since the drives began, the backlog consists only of articles tagged in the current year. The total backlog at the end of the month was 2690 articles, down from 8323 when we started out over two years ago. We completed all 56 requests outstanding before November 2012 as well as eight of those made in November.

Copy Edit of the Month: Voting is now over for the October 2012 competition, and prizes have been issued. The November 2012 contest is closed for submissions and open for voting. The December 2012 contest is now open for submissions. Everyone is welcome to submit entries and to vote.

 

Coodinator election: The six-month term for our fourth tranche of Guild coordinators will expire at the end of December. Nominations are open for the fifth tranche of coordinators, who will serve from 1 January to 30 June 2013. For complete information, please have a look at the election page.

– Your drive coordinators: Stfg, Allens, and Torchiest.

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 20:35, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 03 December 2012

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Signpost: 10 December 2012

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

GOCE mid-December newsletter

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
End of Year Events from the Guild of Copy Editors
 

The Guild of Copy Editors invites you to participate in its events:

  • The December 2012 Copy Edit of the Month Contest is currently in the submissions stage. Submit your best December copy edit there before the end of the month. Submissions end, and discussion and voting begin, on January 1 at 00:00 (UTC).
  • Voting is in progress for the November 2012 Copy Edit of the Month Contest. Everyone is welcome to vote, whether they have entered the contest or not.
  • From Sunday 16 December to Saturday 22 December, we are holding a Project Blitz, in which we will copy edit articles tagged with {{copyedit}} from January 2012. The blitz works much like our bimonthly drives, but a bit simpler. Everyone is welcome to take part, and barnstars will be awarded.
  • January 2013 Backlog elimination drive is a month-long effort to reduce the size of the copy edit backlog. The drive begins on January 1 at 00:00 (UTC) and ends on January 31 at 23:59 (UTC). Our goals are to copy edit all articles tagged in January, February, and March 2012 and complete all requests placed before the end of 2012. Barnstars will be awarded to anyone who copy edits at least one article, and special awards will be given to the top five in the following categories: "Number of articles", "Number of words", "Number of articles of over 5,000 words", "Number of articles tagged in January, February, and March 2012", and "Longest article". We hope to see you there! – Your drive coordinators: Stfg, Allens, and Torchiest.
 

Coodinator election: Nominations are open for candidates to serve as GOCE coordinators from 1 January to 30 June 2013. Nominations close on December 15 at 23:59 UTC, after which voting will run until the end of December. For complete information, please have a look at the election page.

>>> Blitz sign-up <<<         >>> Drive sign-up <<<

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Message delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 23:59, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 December 2012

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Deletion review for Christian Weston Chandler

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Christian Weston Chandler. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. 68.50.128.91 (talk) 09:14, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXI, December 2012

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:02, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

'Tis that season again...

Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
  Happy Holidays!
Hope you and your family are enjoying the holiday season, Julian! Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 06:04, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
  Happy Holidays and Merry Christmas 2012!

Happy New Year and all the best in 2013!

Thanks for all you do here,

and best wishes for the year to come.
Ruhrfisch ><>°° 17:03, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
Thanks both, a very merry Christmas to you as well. I look forward to chatting and working with you folks in the new year! reJuliancolton (talk) 17:46, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 December 2012

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

WikiCup 2013 starting soon

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi there; you're receiving this message because you have previously shown interest in the WikiCup. This is just to remind you that the 2013 WikiCup will be starting on 1 January, and that signups will remain open throughout January. Old and new Wikipedians and WikiCup participants are warmly invited to take part in this year's competition. (Though, as a note to the more experienced participants, there have been a few small rules changes in the last few months.) If you have already signed up, let this be a reminder; you will receive a message with your submissions' page soon. Please direct any questions to the WikiCup talk page. Thanks! J Milburn 19:19, 30 December 2012 (UTC)


GOCE 2012 Annual Report

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Guild of Copy Editors 2012 Annual Report
 

The GOCE has wrapped up another successful year of operations!

Our 2012 Annual Report is now ready for review.

– Your project coordinators: Torchiest, BDD, and Miniapolis

Sign up for the January drive! To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 00:20, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia Day Celebration and Mini-Conference in NYC Saturday Feb 23

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Doing the "Open Space" thing at one of our earlier NYC Wiki-Conferences.

You are invited to celebrate Wikipedia Day and the 12th anniversary (!) of the founding of the site at Wikipedia Day NYC on Saturday February 23, 2013 at New York University; sign up for Wikipedia Day NYC here, or at bit.ly/wikidaynyu. Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues!

We especially encourage folks to add your 5-minute lightning talks to our roster, and otherwise join in the "open space" experience!--Pharos (talk) 02:25, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 December 2012

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The WikiProject: Good Articles Newsletter (January 2013)

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
The WikiProject Good articles Newsletter
Volume IV, No. 1 – January 2013

For past newsletters click here

In This Issue


This newsletter was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 14:32, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Belated Happy New Year with a Toast!

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

Here's a toast to the host
Of those who edit wiki near and far,
To a friend we send a message, "keep the data up to par".
We drink to those who wrote a lot of prose,
And then they whacked a vandal several dozen blows.
A toast to the host of those who boast, the Wikipedians!
- From {{subst:TheGeneralUser}}

 

~TheGeneralUser (talk) has bought you a whisky! Sharing a whisky is a great way to bond with other editors after a day of hard work. Spread the WikiLove by buying someone else a whisky, whether it be someone with whom you have collaborated or had disagreements. Enjoy!


Spread the good cheer and camaraderie by adding {{WikiScotch}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Message received at ~~~~~
 


~TheGeneralUser (talk) — is wishing you a Happy New Year! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{subst:New Year 1}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

A Very Happy (belated) New Year to you Juliancolton! Enjoy the Whisky   ~TheGeneralUser (talk) 23:52, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

2012 Christmas tornado outbreak

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I made several edits to try to improve the article. Could you please take a look at it again to see what further work (other than NCDC) needs to be done. Thanks, United States Man (talk) 06:50, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 07 January 2013

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Signpost: 14 January 2013

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

GOCE mid-drive newsletter, January 2013

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Guild of Copy Editors January 2013 backlog elimination drive mid-drive newsletter
 

We are halfway through our January backlog elimination drive.

The mid-drive newsletter is now ready for review.

– Your project coordinators: Torchiest, BDD, and Miniapolis

Sign up for the January drive! To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 00:24, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Welcome to the 2013 WikiCup!

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, Juliancolton, and welcome to the 2013 WikiCup! Your submissions' page is here. The competition begins at midnight UTC. The first round will last until the end of February, at which point the top 64 scorers will advance to the second round. We will be in touch at the end of every month, and signups are going to remain open until the end of January; if you know of anyone else who may like to take part, please let them know! A few reminders:

  • The rules can be found here. There have been a few changes from last year, which are listed on that page.
  • Anything you submit must have been nominated and promoted in 2013, and you need to have completed significant work upon it in 2013. (The articles you review at good article reviews does not need to have been nominated in 2013, but you do need to have started the review in 2013.) We will be checking.
  • If you feel that another competitor is breaking the rules or abusing the competition in some way, please let a judge know. Please do not remove entries from the submissions' pages of others yourself.
  • Don't worry about calculating precisely how many points everything is worth. The bot will do that. The bot may occasionally get something wrong- let a judge know, or post on the WikiCup talk page if that happens.
  • Please try to be prompt in updating submissions' pages so that they can be double-checked.

Overall, however, don't worry, and have fun. It doesn't matter if you make the odd mistake; these things happen. Questions can be asked on the WikiCup talk page. Good luck! J Milburn and The ed17 19:55, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXII, January 2013

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:57, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 January 2013

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

WP:USRDCUP

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello! As a past participant in the U.S. portion of the USRD Cup, you may be interested to know that we are doing it again this year! Signups are at the above page and the contest will begin February 1. --Rschen7754 10:09, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

2012 Christmas tornado outbreak

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I made several edits to try to improve the article. Could you please take a look at it again to see what further work (other than NCDC) needs to be done. Thanks, United States Man (talk) 06:50, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

I highly recommend waiting until the NCDC data is released before nominating it for GA again...all data is considered preliminary until the final data is released by the NCDC. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 00:40, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

The King and I is at FAC

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi, Julian. The King and I has been nominated for FAC. I know that you have reviewed articles in the musical theatre area before. It would be great if you could take a look at the article and give comments at the FAC. Thanks for any time you could spare! -- Ssilvers (talk) 00:28, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 January 2013

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

WikiCup 2013 January newsletter

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

Signups are now closed; we have our final 127 contestants for this year's competition. 64 contestants will make it to the next round at the end of February, but we're already seeing strong scoring compared to previous years.   Sturmvogel_66 (submissions) currently leads, with 358 points. At this stage in 2012, the leader (  Grapple X (submissions)) had 342 points, while in 2011, the leader had 228 points. We also have a large number of scorers when compared with this stage in previous years.   12george1 (submissions) was the first competitor to score this year, as he was last year, with a detailed good article review. Some other firsts:

Featured articles, portals and topics, as well as good topics, are yet to feature in the competition.

This year, the bonus points system has been reworked, with bonus points on offer for old articles prepared for did you know, and "multiplier" points reworked to become more linear. For details, please see Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring. There have been some teething problems as the bot has worked its way around the new system, but issues should mostly be ironed out- please report any problems to the WikiCup talk page. Here are some participants worthy of note with regards to the bonus points:

  •   Ed! (submissions) was the first to score bonus points, with Portland-class cruiser, a good article.
  •   Hawkeye7 (submissions) has the highest overall bonus points, as well as the highest scoring article, thanks to his work on Enrico Fermi, now a good article. The biography of such a significant figure to the history of science warrants nearly five times the normal score.
  •   HueSatLum (submissions) claimed bonus points for René Vautier and Nicolas de Fer, articles that did not exist on the English Wikipedia at the start of the year; a first for the WikiCup. The articles were eligible for bonus points because of fact they were both covered on a number of other Wikipedias.

Also, a quick mention of   The C of E (submissions), who may well have already written the oddest article of the WikiCup this year: did you know that the Fucking mayor objected to Fucking Hell on the grounds that there was no Fucking brewery? The gauntlet has been thrown down; can anyone beat it?

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 00:58, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hurricane Elena, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Landfall (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:51, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 February 2013

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Signpost: 11 February 2013

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

GOCE February 2013 newsletter

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Guild of Copy Editors February 2013 events newsletter
 

We are preparing to start our February requests blitz and March backlog elimination drive.

The February 2013 newsletter is now ready for review.

– Your project coordinators: Torchiest, BDD, and Miniapolis

Sign up for the February blitz and March drive! To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 22:53, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Removal of my comment on User talk:TropicalAnalystwx13

Latest comment: 11 years ago17 comments3 people in discussion

Even if you disagreed with my notice posting on User talk:TropicalAnalystwx13, what was your basis for removing it? I don't think there was any basis for you to have removed it. Inks.LWC (talk) 04:04, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

WP:DTTR, mainly. The user didn't really misuse the interface as blatantly as your template would suggest, so I found it unfair for their talkpage to be spammed with notices spawned by perfectly constructive edits. It's far better to leave a brief, hand-typed note; I think most people are more likely to take notice for it. Juliancolton (talk) 20:19, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
You used an essay to trump a guideline? "didn't really", "unfair" and "far better" aren't exactly very objective clear-cut phrases... none of which fit anything under WP:TPO. The better thing to do would have been to ask me to remove it; as an admin, it's pretty concerning that you took the course of action you did without even notifying me that you removed it. And it's even more concerning that your reasoning was the use of an essay to trump a guideline. Furthermore, nowhere in the essay does it say anything about removing the template. It says, "The editor using the template ... may not themselves consider the template use rude." And that's what happened here. The essay ends with "Take the template as a reminder and/or constructive criticism and move on." The user did misuse the minor edit feature, something that has been an increasing problem in the project recently, so I used the template. I typically use the template because it's the same format for everyone, so it avoids coming across as too harsh on one person, since it's the same for everyone. Inks.LWC (talk) 02:36, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
I won't lose sleep if you spam the user's page with the template again for good measure if that's what you're wondering. Sorry if I'm being blunt, but if there's one thing I grew to hate over my five or six years of editing, it's autotagged warnings for anybody except blatant vandals or really clueless newbies. Juliancolton (talk) 03:06, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
I'm not spamming anybody's page. You may hate autotagged warnings, but that is a personal preference, and one that does not override a guideline. That you're not seeming to think you did something against the guidelines is a bit concerning. Inks.LWC (talk) 03:11, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
Concerning to who? What are you concerned is going to happen? Juliancolton (talk) 03:13, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
It's concerning because you are trumping a guideline with an essay, and as an admin you should know better. People generally view admins' actions as having more weight, especially on talk pages, so if others see you engaging in such behavior, they may think it is acceptable. Inks.LWC (talk) 03:16, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
I'm not trumping anything. Feel free to revert. Juliancolton (talk) 03:21, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
And that's the problem - it shouldn't be my place to have to revert anything. The guideline is clear that comments on talk pages should only be removed on rare occasions, and the reason of "I don't like it" isn't one of those reasons. Inks.LWC (talk) 03:26, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
← Honestly, I guess it just strikes me as woefully condescending to tell off people on the internet because they removed a couple superfluous words and marked the changes as "minor", even though a minor edit is really only for syntax changes and not for tweaking content because that's what The GuidelineTM says. Can you please just step back and ask yourself why you care so much? I could explain how the user's edits were extremely inconsequential and thus very compatible with WP:MINOR from a couple different angles if you'd like. Juliancolton (talk) 03:32, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
Again, what strikes you as woefully condescending may not strike others (like myself) as such, and at best, even if you are correct, the template would be uncivil, which the guideline clearly states is not a reason to edit/remove another's comments. But as I explained, I have a reason for preferring the use of templates, because it's more objective and avoids the subjectivity that so frequently leads to misunderstandings and misconstruing of the purpose of the template. Removing "non-convective" changes the meaning of the sentence. Whether or not there is convection in a cyclone's remnants deals with the very structure and inner workings of the system. There is absolutely no way it was compatible with WP:MINOR, as their removal changed the meaning of the sentence. Inks.LWC (talk) 03:44, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
Not at all. The words I removed added redundancy to begin with. TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 04:16, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
How so? You can have TC remnants and still have convection. Inks.LWC (talk) 05:24, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
Indeed you can; that's probably why the term "non-convective" was removed to start with. The old wording was inaccurate and constituted subtle original research, as the TCRs either never specified whether the remnant lows were still producing thunderstorms, or used various wording ("lack of deep convection) that is not consistent with "non-convective". Indeed, "non-convective" opens up several cans of atmospheric dynamic worms, such as whether all thermodynamic processes were really shut down, or if there was just limited thunderstorm generation. So from both meteorological and linguistic standpoints, the changes in question were of a minor nature by any and all accounts. The infinitely helpful Help:Minor edit page says factual errors are well within the realm of minor adjustments, and I'm sure you'll agree that increasing Wikipedia's accuracy and credibility within a field of science is in our best interests, and surely not worth giving people grief over. Juliancolton (talk) 13:17, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
I agree that the edit should have been done, but again, you are wrong about WO:MINOR. It says, "Obvious factual errors (e.g., changing "Nixon resigned in 1874" to "Nixon resigned in 1974")". If all fixing of factual errors were minor edits, a lot more edits would be considered "minor" than they are now. Here, the change was not an "obvious" factual error. So while the edit was a good edit, it should not have been marked minor. And it's clear that the change was not "obvious", because you and TropicalAnalystwx13 gave different reasons for why the change was made. He said that "non-convective remnant" was redundant, while you are saying that there may or may not have been convection still going on. The fact that there could be such a disagreement shows that it should not have been marked "minor". Inks.LWC (talk) 21:28, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
I'll agree it was redundant for most intents, but inaccurate at a very technical level. I don't think there's much more for either of us to say, except I ask that you allow me to recommend avoiding warning templates for relatively long-standing and constructive users. If being an admin makes that suggestion carry more weight in your eyes then that's my official administrative opinion. Juliancolton (talk) 22:07, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
Something can't be redundant and inaccurate. It is either redundant or inaccurate. If it was redundant, then marking it minor was fine. If it was inaccurate, then it was not. And here, I do not see any evidence that it was redundant. I'm fine with you recommending that, but it is inappropriate for you to remove such a template that another editor places on someone's talk page. Inks.LWC (talk) 22:47, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 February 2013

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Precious

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

hurricanes
Thank you for quality articles on hurricanes, writing, collaborating, copy-editing, such as 1910 Cuba hurricane 1941 Florida hurricane, Typhoon Chataan ..., and for "your efforts to extend and improve the communication levels of Wikipedia", - repeating: you are an awesome Wikipedian (4 February 2009, 23 March 2009, 1 April 2009)!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:16, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

GOCE news: February 2013

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Guild of Copy Editors Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Blitzes/February 2013 wrap-up
 

Participation: Out of 19 people who signed up for this blitz, 9 copy-edited at least one article. Thanks to all who participated! Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here.

Progress report: During the six-day blitz, we removed over twenty articles from the requests queue. Hope to see you at the March drive in a few days! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Torchiest, BDD and Miniapolis.

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 21:00, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXIII, February 2013

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 07:12, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 February 2013

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

WikiCup 2013 February newsletter

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Round 1 is now over. The top 64 scorers have progressed to round 2, where they have been randomly split into eight pools of eight. At the end of April, the top two from each pool, as well as the 16 highest scorers from those remaining, will progress to round 3. Commiserations to those eliminated; if you're interested in still being involved in the WikiCup, able and willing reviewers will always be needed, and if you're interested in getting involved with other collaborative projects, take a look at the WikiWomen's Month discussed below.

Round 1 saw 21 competitors with over 100 points, which is fantastic; that suggests that this year's competition is going to be highly competative. Our lower scores indicate this, too: A score of 19 was required to reach round 2, which was significantly higher than the 11 points required in 2012 and 8 points required in 2011. The score needed to reach round 3 will be higher, and may depend on pool groupings. In 2011, 41 points secured a round 3 place, while in 2012, 65 was needed. Our top three scorers in round 1 were:

  1.   Sturmvogel_66 (submissions), primarily for an array of warship GAs.
  2.   Miyagawa (submissions), primarily for an array of did you knows and good articles, some of which were awarded bonus points.
  3.   Casliber (submissions), due in no small part to Canis Minor, a featured article awarded a total of 340 points. A joint submission with   Keilana (submissions), this is the highest scoring single article yet submitted in this year's competition.

Other contributors of note include:

Featured topics have still played no part in this year's competition, but once again, a curious contribution has been offered by   The C of E (submissions): did you know that there is a Shit Brook in Shropshire? With April Fools' Day during the next round, there will probably be a good chance of more unusual articles...

March sees the WikiWomen's History Month, a series of collaborative efforts to aid the women's history WikiProject to coincide with Women's History Month and International Women's Day. A number of WikiCup participants have already started to take part. The project has a to-do list of articles needing work on the topic of women's history. Those interested in helping out with the project can find articles in need of attention there, or, alternatively, add articles to the list. Those interested in collaborating on articles on women's history are also welcome to use the WikiCup talk page to find others willing to lend a helping hand. Another collaboration currently running is an an effort from WikiCup participants to coordinate a number of Easter-themed did you know articles. Contributions are welcome!

A few final administrative issues. From now on, submission pages will need only a link to the article and a link to the nomination page, or, in the case of good article reviews, a link to the review only. See your submissions' page for details. This will hopefully make updating submission pages a little less tedious. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) J Milburn (talk) 01:18, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles - Participant Clean-up (Second Call)

style="background-color: #F0FFEC; border: 4px solid #107020; width:100%" cellpadding="5"

|

 

You are reciving this message because you have not added your name to the list of active WikiProject Good Articles participants. Though you may have recived the first message sent out in September, some users may have had that message archived before coming online to read it and therefore never saw it. If you are deeming yourself inactive with the WikiProject please disregard this message as your name will be moved to an "inactive participant" list at the end of the clean-up. If you are still active with the WikiProject, please be sure to include your name on this list. The current deadline to add your name to the list (if you are still active) is November 1, 2012. A third and final message will be sent out during the last week of the clean-up before the deadline. Thank-you.--EdwardsBot


WikiProject Good Articles - Participant Clean-up (Final Call)

style="background-color: #F0FFEC; border: 4px solid #107020; width:100%" cellpadding="5"

|

 

You are receiving this message because you have not added your name to the list of active WikiProject Good Articles participants. Though you may have recived the past two messages sent out in September and October, some users may have had that message archived before coming online to read it and therefore never saw it. If you are deeming yourself inactive with the WikiProject please disregard this message as your name will be moved to an "inactive participant" list at the end of the clean-up. If you are still active with the WikiProject, please be sure to include your name on this list. The deadline to add your name to the list (if you are still active) is November 1, 2012. This will be the last message sent out before the deadline which is in 2 days. Thank-you.--EdwardsBot


The GAN Newsletter (November 2012)

 
The WikiProject Good articles Newsletter
Volume III, No. 2 – November 2012

For past newsletters click here

In This Issue


The WikiProject: Good Articles Newsletter (December 2012)

 
The WikiProject Good articles Newsletter
Volume III, No. 3 – December 2012

For past newsletters click here

In This Issue


Holiday cheer

  Holiday Cheer
Michael Q. Schmidt talkback is wishing you Season's Greetings! This message celebrates the holiday season, promotes WikiLove, and hopefully makes your day a little better. Spread the seasonal good cheer by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be a newbie, a good friend, someone you have had disagreements with in the past, or just some random person. Share the good feelings. - MQS

WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter - February 2013

 
The WikiProject Good articles Newsletter
Volume IV, No. 2 – February 2013

For past newsletters click here

In This Issue


WikiProject:REHAB update

You signed up for WikiProject User Rehab

Hi there, I'm RDN1F. It's come to my attention that you've signed up for WikiProject Rehab, but since that time the project has retired. I've decided to take it upon myself to rejuvenate the project - but I could do with your help. If you are still willing to help mentor (or even give me a hand in bringing this project back!) leave a message on my talk page
RDN1F TALK 16:32, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Maido Pakk

Hi! The issue is:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Maido_Pakk&action=edit&redlink=1

Deleted because the player hadn't played in a fully professional league. Pakk has since been capped for FC Haka in the Finnish Veikkausliiga.

http://int.soccerway.com/matches/2009/10/04/finland/veikkausliiga/ff-jaro-js-pietarsaari--jakobstad/football-club-haka-valkeakoski/744357/

The Signpost: 04 March 2013

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Juliancolton/Archive_33&oldid=1254590679"