Juniorcardenas30
Welcome!
|
I've deleted the WP:AFD nomination for this subject as it was malformed and did not include a deletion rationale. If you still think the article should be deleted, you need to include a reason to delete it. I'd also highly suggest using WP:TWINKLE to make the nomination. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:54, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Deletion tagging
editPlease stop tagging things for deletion until you understand the criteria. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 22:43, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Category:Monika Kørra has been nominated for discussion
edit
Category:Monika Kørra, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. —swpbT go beyond 22:41, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
January 2018
edit
Your addition to Meresha has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. NeilN talk to me 05:50, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
Wikipedia and copyright
edit
Hello Juniorcardenas30, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.
- You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
- Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
- Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
- If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
- In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
- Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 13:43, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
edit | This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Di1977 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:51, 30 January 2018 (UTC) |
Juniorcardenas30 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
My account is not a sock puppet. I want to edit Wikipedia, but I keep getting blocked because of others on the same network as me! juniorcardenas30 16:48, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
If you "keep getting blocked" and then continue to create new accounts, that is block evasion. You need to request an unblock from your first blocked account and provide a list of all of your blocked accounts if you would like an admin to consider an unblock appeal. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 18:31, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Juniorcardenas30 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
After reviewing my edits, I recognize that I ended up failing at this point, my account has been proven as a puppet of Di1977, but I guarantee that the use of the two was not intended to circumvent the system. For lack of attention I ended up being blocked, reconsider my request because I want to go back edit. This will not happen in the future! Thank you! juniorcardenas30 16:18, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 17:11, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Juniorcardenas30 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I recognize that I ended up failing at this point, my account has been proven as a puppet of Di1977, but I guarantee that the use of the two was not intended to circumvent the system. For lack of attention I ended up being blocked, reconsider my request because I want to go back edit. I understand that my account have been blocked for having created more than one profile on wikipedia using the same network or ip and I will not go continue to cause damage or disruption to encyclopedia making useful contributions for the community en english. This will not happen in the future!
Decline reason:
Since you admit that this account is a sock of Di1977, you must request to be unblocked from that account. This account, as a sock of a blocked editor, is not going to be unblocked. I am withdrawing talk page access from this account at this time as well. RickinBaltimore (talk) 21:17, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.