User talk:Justsayib
Add topicWikipedia and copyright
[edit]
Hello Justsayib! Your additions to Lemba people have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license—to request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:
- Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
- Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
- Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
- Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
- Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § Licensing.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sumanuil. (talk to me) 03:47, 30 September 2025 (UTC)
October 2025
[edit]
Hello, I'm Jessicapierce. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Punta, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 01:00, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Jessicapierce Okay, can I fix it at least? Justsayib (talk) 20:03, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Punta, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 01:00, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Roatán, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it.
It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 01:00, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Jessicapierce yeah I know... Justsayib (talk) 20:01, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
Hello! any questions?
[edit]Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Garifuna Conflict
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Draft:Garifuna Conflict to request its speedy deletion, as it exhibits signs of having been generated by an AI model with no clear human review. Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia and output must be carefully checked. For further information, see the section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find it difficult, please ask for help at the Teahouse. NicheSports (talk) 03:32, 21 November 2025 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
- @Izno
Justsayib (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)
Request reason:
My reason is... If we're realistically basing it off of sockpuppetry and not my edits then go ahead, mind you all of these edits I have made or helped are severely outdated and undersearched, especially when these people in fact are getting delineated and removed of their toes, EX: Calling a popular Garifuna politician, Belizean, Honduran, Nicaraguan. Even if they were separatists or primarily worked only with the Garinagu.
- 1. I Provide high and academic source; secondly I provide wide range sources
- 2. Nonsense theories like Mansa musa brother traveling and supposedly founded the Caribbean which is completely speculative.
- 3. If you want me to apologize, then yes I'm sorry but you can't genuinely be this ignorant and say that I didn't contribute to new sources.
- 4. I also contributed to the Miskito & Lemba people, although ntpaf is primarily the helper for the Mosquito Coast.
Decline reason:
Yes, it's sockpuppetry. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 03:56, 25 November 2025 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Justsayib (talk) 02:30, 25 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Izno @Jpgordon alright how do I get this annoying shi off my profile then so I can revert and make edits. Justsayib (talk) 03:54, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Izno
Justsayib (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)
Request reason:
Soooo can I get unblocked now? what's my next step
Decline reason:
I suggest you take the standard offer and re-apply in 6 months time with no more abuse of multiple accounts. PhilKnight (talk) 16:10, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Appeal of Block, Standard offer
[edit]Unblock request / Appeal
[edit]
Justsayib (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)
Request reason:
Although I still do not formally agree with the Original administrator's ruling to label me as a sockpuppet due to me using a public IP address alongside with the area I am in having a lot of people with I guess similar interests (although it wasn't really similar in terms of specific ethnic / racial groups.)
I formally promise to avoid the behavior that led to the block on my accountNotes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=It has been well over six months, Dear Adminstrators, I am writing to formally appeal the block on my account, Justsayib. Although I still do not formally agree with the Original administrator's ruling to label me as a sockpuppet due to me using a public IP address alongside with the area I am in having a lot of people with I guess similar interests (although it wasn't really similar in terms of specific ethnic / racial groups.) I formally promise to avoid the behavior that led to the block on my account |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=It has been well over six months, Dear Adminstrators, I am writing to formally appeal the block on my account, Justsayib. Although I still do not formally agree with the Original administrator's ruling to label me as a sockpuppet due to me using a public IP address alongside with the area I am in having a lot of people with I guess similar interests (although it wasn't really similar in terms of specific ethnic / racial groups.) I formally promise to avoid the behavior that led to the block on my account |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=It has been well over six months, Dear Adminstrators, I am writing to formally appeal the block on my account, Justsayib. Although I still do not formally agree with the Original administrator's ruling to label me as a sockpuppet due to me using a public IP address alongside with the area I am in having a lot of people with I guess similar interests (although it wasn't really similar in terms of specific ethnic / racial groups.) I formally promise to avoid the behavior that led to the block on my account |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
Justsayib (talk) 00:26, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
WP:CHECKUSER evidence is not helpful in this case. The range is too noisy. I argue that the block has to be determined on behavioural grounds in this case (even though it's a checkuser block). --Yamla (talk) 00:37, 29 July 2026 (UTC)