Kabz15

Kabz15, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Kabz15! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hi Kabz15! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Firestar464 (talk) 11:32, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

April 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:34, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Capture of Tunis (1569)

When you use a reference more than once, please name it and re-use it - look at this article to see how to do it, as I've fixed the problem in this article.

But there's a more important problem. The ref "de Grammont, op, cit., 104" is meaningless, as you have not told us what the "work cited" is (that's what "op cit" means). This suggests that you may have imported the references, or even the whole article, from somewhere else. Please read WP:Copying within Wikipedia and Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources, and fix any problems, including fixing this inadequate reference. Have you stolen another writer's work from somewhere, either within Wikipedia or elsewhere? If so, you need to stop, right now. Thanks. PamD 17:34, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

The ref "De Haedo, Histoire, 152" is also useless: give us the author and title of the book, publisher and date. Have you actually consulted these sources yourself? If so, then add the reference details. If not, then please note that you should have seen and checked all your sources, not just copied someone else's work, when contributing to this encyclopedia. Thanks. PamD 17:46, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Correction

Hi, map with kingdom of ait (not beni) abbes and kuku should be corrected, because saadien kingdom doesn't fit to morocco. File:Kabyle Kingdoms in the Ottoman era at their height .jpg Pikachu5D (talk) 11:00, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Feel free to replace the files with the following: File:Map of Kabyle Kingdoms and Algiers.png File:Kingdom of Beni Abbas.jpg Kabz15 (talk) 18:36, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

October 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing.
1) Please make sure to cite proper sources. Primary sources, such as chronicles [or translations thereof], are not adequate for writing an encyclopedia

2) Please follow the sources adequately and do not fake content or include content which is not what is in the source ("When their raids increased, he moved against them during the year 544 [1149-50]. Hearing of this, all the Dukkala tribes congregated on the coast." (DS Richards, p. 226), and "The Dukkala had submitted to the Almohads before the fall of Marrakesh, but later apostatized and became allies of the rebellious Almoravid warlord al-Sahrawi." (Gordon et al, p. 151), is quite different from "In 1149/1150 Abd al-Mu’min learnt of an increasing amount of raids led by the tribesmen of Dukkala, there was an Almoravid warlord who had established himself amongst them."). This is an issue which is also present on other articles...

3) Please make sure to format your citations correctly. There is {{cite book}}, and you should use that, and make sure to include not only the book title/author, but also the relevant pages where the information was found (same as if you were citing the book in a paper: you need to give the precise location) RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 15:27, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

• What was not clear about the above? Almohad Expedition to Dukkala reinstates the same material which I removed, without addressing any of the three above issues... RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 21:20, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Almohad Expedition to Dukkala for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Almohad Expedition to Dukkala is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Almohad Expedition to Dukkala until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 21:18, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Do you even know who simiot Bernard is ?

Bernard Simiot, de son vrai nom Benjamin Simionesco, né le 1er octobre 1904 à Paris et mort dans cette même ville le 25 août 1996, est un écrivain français qui s'est spécialisé dans les romans historiques aka he writes fictional historian novels, i know you're trying to help but providing true information is important. Sl99dl (talk) 22:17, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Hello, thanks for the message. Yes I know who Bernard Simiot is, he is a historian as I have already mentioned.

• “The guest of honor on this occasion was Dr. Bernard Simiot , writer and award winning historian”
• “L'Histoire de France et :d'Angleterre est un ouvrage capital qui classe définitivement son auteur comme un très authentique :historien . Bernard SIMIOT”
• “L'écrivain et :historien Bernard Simiot, auteur d'une saga historique sur Saint-Malo, dont le volet le plus connu :s'intitule”
• “BERNARD :SIMIOT, historien et écrivain, est décédé dimanche 25 août à Paris.“

Hope this clears things up for you.

Regards, Kabz15 (talk) 01:03, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alp Arslan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bagrat IV. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Kabz15

Thank you for creating Battle of Sudak.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 22:14, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Kabz15

Thank you for creating Campaign of Trabzon (1510).

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 23:43, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Kabz15

Thank you for creating Battle of Erzincan (1507).

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 17:19, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Kabz15

Thank you for creating Georgian campaign (1064).

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 11:55, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Kabz15

Thank you for creating Battle of Ganja (1046).

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. I marked as reviewed. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 02:15, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Kabz15! Your additions to Battle of Rafaniyya have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 20:19, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

August 2022

Your edit to Battle of Kamaran has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 12:57, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Siege of Jeddah (1520) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Siege of Jeddah (1520) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siege of Jeddah (1520) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Wareno (talk) 01:14, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Battle of Ash-Shihr for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battle of Ash-Shihr is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Ash-Shihr (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Wareno (talk) 16:19, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Wareno (talk) 01:44, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Expedition to Kamaran for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Expedition to Kamaran is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Expedition to Kamaran until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

MaximumCruiser2 🚢 (talk) 17:53, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

October 2023

Please do not create, maintain or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at Expedition to Kamaran. If you are interested to know how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements already in Wikipedia – and, if possible, correct them. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Continued disruption will be met with sanctions, which could include a block from editing. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. MaximumCruiser2 🚢 (talk) 00:38, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Campaign of Trabzon (1505)

The article Campaign of Trabzon (1505) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article fails verifiability, not a single high quality source cited properly, none of the cited sources has a page number.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 16:26, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Battle of Erzincan (1507)

The article Battle of Erzincan (1507) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article fails verifiability, not a single source with page number.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 16:28, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Campaign of Trabzon (1510)

The article Campaign of Trabzon (1510) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article fails verifiability, not a single source with page number.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 16:31, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Capture of Bayburt (1514)

The article Capture of Bayburt (1514) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article fails verifiability, only one high quality source cited, with no page number, the other sources sound dodgy for the least.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 16:33, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Siege of Harput (1516)

The article Siege of Harput (1516) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article fails verifiability, not a single high quality source cited, not a single source cited properly.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 16:38, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Capture of Mosul (1517)

The article Capture of Mosul (1517) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article fails verifiability, two poor sources cited only, with no page numbers.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 18:23, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Capture of Harput (1465) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Capture of Harput (1465) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Capture of Harput (1465) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Aintabli (talk) 06:08, 9 February 2024 (UTC)