Kalaboomsky

Nomination of The Jack Logan Show for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Jack Logan Show is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Jack Logan Show until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 14:45, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of CJ Santos for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article CJ Santos is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CJ Santos until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 14:47, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

August 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at The Jack Logan Show, you may be blocked from editing. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 15:07, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at CJ Santos. Stop removing the AFD template - it must remain in place for 7 days until the discussion is closed. Anything you wish to add you may do so in the discussion. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 15:08, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

I understand. I am simply improving the page. Bear with me.

File:The Jack Logan Show Team Logan.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:14, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Jack Logan Show Team Logan.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Jack Logan Show Team Logan.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

• Comment can you please help me how to upload this properly. I own all these images but i would like this to be free on Wikipedia. What should i do and how do i upload without problem?

File:CJ Santos at the SM North EDSA Skydome.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:CJ Santos at the SM North EDSA Skydome.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 17:55, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: CJ Santos (December 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:CJ Santos and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:CJ Santos, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:39, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Kalaboomsky! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:39, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:The Jack Logan Show

Hello, Kalaboomsky. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Jack Logan Show".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk • contribs) 11:41, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Ang Luha at Lualhati ni Jeronima Movie Poster.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ang Luha at Lualhati ni Jeronima Movie Poster.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 13:42, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

A page you started (Ang Luha at Lualhati ni Jeronima) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Ang Luha at Lualhati ni Jeronima.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thank you for your new article on the film "Ang Luha at Lualhati ni Jeronima". Note that the article is currently an "Orphan", meaning that no other Wikipedia articles link TO it. This makes the article tough to find for interested readers. See WP:DE-ORPHAN for pointers.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 15:11, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 12 Days to Destiny

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on 12 Days to Destiny, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Praxidicae (talk) 20:38, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Blade Auto Center

Hello Kalaboomsky,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Blade Auto Center for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Willbb234^Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 09:33, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Conflict of interest

Hello, Kalaboomsky. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.

• See also User talk:Blade Auto Center.

– Athaenara ✉ 20:49, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

– Athaenara ✉ 20:49, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kalaboomsky (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I admit to have commited a mistake 4 years ago. I would like to seek you consideration to help me continue with my WikiPedia journey as an editor. Thank you. Kalaboomsky (talk) 17:35, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Procedural decline; user subsequently opened up another unblock request. Yamla (talk) 20:34, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You might want to get rid of that ping. Athaenara was blocked indefinitely about eight months ago. Another admin will have to consider your request. Daniel Case (talk) 06:32, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

I removed the ping. Thank you and hoping for your kind consideration. Kalaboomsky (talk) 11:41, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Xian Gaza for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Xian Gaza is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xian Gaza until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 04:18, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

Discussion at Xian Gaza

 You are invited to join the discussion at Xian Gaza. Allenjambalaya (talk) 12:12, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kalaboomsky (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I'm sorry if some admins here feel like im advertising or uploading unnecessary articles here on this site. I know in my heart that they/its all notable but i must admit that i am wrong. This is a lesson for me and I would be very careful next time. Please help me remove my block. I would like to continue my Wikipedia experience. I understand that what I did was inappropriate for this site, and confirm that I won't do it again.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. Yamla (talk) 11:13, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What will you edit about if unblocked? Do you work in the music or broadcasting industries? 331dot (talk) 19:39, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

I'm a writer and designer by profession. I would like to contribute to articles related to current events, people, histoty and films. I also direct digital films from time to time. NO, i don't work in music and broadcasting industries. Kalaboomsky (talk) 15:45, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

Please let me know what can i do to remove this block. I am more than happy to comply. I really wish to continue my Wikipedia experience.

Unblock request June 2023

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Kalaboomsky (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I admit to have commited a mistake 4 years ago. I would like to seek you consideration to help me continue with my WikiPedia journey as an editor. Thank you. Kalaboomsky (talk) 17:35, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

Accept reason:

As a condition of this unblock, Kalaboomsky is topic banned from editing any articles regarding Filipino culture, broadly construed. I look forward to Kalaboomsky's successful edits on Wikipedia. Z1720 (talk) 02:05, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

Kalaboomsky (talk) 17:35, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

You might want to get rid of that ping. Athaenara was blocked indefinitely about eight months ago. Another admin will have to consider your request. Daniel Case (talk) 06:32, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

I removed the ping. Thank you and hoping for your kind consideration. Kalaboomsky (talk) 11:41, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

I moved the unblock request to the bottom of the talk page so it is easier for admin to find and review the information. I have a few questions for you below:

1. What actions led to your block, and why were they against Wikipedia policies and guidelines?
2. On Wikipedia, when is an editor considered to have a conflict of interest? What should editors do if they have a conflict of interest with an article topic? (WP:COI and WP:COIE have more information about this.)
3. How can editors avoid promotional language? (WP:NOTPROMO has information about this).
4. If unblocked, what articles are you interested in editing?

Thanks, Z1720 (talk) 17:08, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

Thank you @Z1720, many years ago, i was blocked for creating a Wikipedia page for a very well known company here in the Philippines and was tagged for promotion. I understand that an editor should not create Wikipedia articles about me or my friends, family or company as well as self promotion, marketing, publicity, or public relations.

I was blocked for many many years and i now understand the policies. I would like to contribute to editing articles about Philippine history, culture and people. If there is any article which i think will conflict my interest, i will consult you or any other administrators for consultation, i hope that would be okay? Thank you and i look forward to your consideration.

PS: If unblocked, is there a way to have to clean my talk page so i can restart this new journey? Please let me know. Kalaboomsky (talk) 03:38, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for your response. Can you please respond to questions 2 and 3? Z1720 (talk) 13:54, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

Hi @Z1720! An editor will be considered to have conflict of interest if they are contributing to Wikipedia about self, family, friends, clients, employers, or financial and other relationships. They should disclose COI when involved in affected articles and are discouraged from editing affected articles directly. They can also propose changes on talk pages by posting a note at the COI noticeboard for review. Additionally, they should put new articles through the Articles for Creation (AfC) process instead of creating them directly.

To avoid promotional language, editors must avoid advertising and showcasing including advocacy, propaganda, or recruitment of any kind: commercial, political, scientific, religious, national, sports-related, or otherwise. Wikipedia is also not for opinion pieces, scandal mongering, self promotion, advertising, marketing, publicity, or public relations. Thank you very much! Kalaboomsky (talk) 04:34, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for your responses. FYI, COI editors can request changes by using the Request Edit Wizard, which in my opinion is more appropriate than the COI noticeboard (which is more about reporting users and finding non-COI editors to fix articles with concerns.) Looking through your contributions, you edited a lot of articles about the entertainment industry in the Philippines. Without going into detail, do you have a professional or personal connection to the Filipino entertainment industry? Of the articles you have contributed to, which ones do you have a COI with, and were you paid to edit any of those articles? Z1720 (talk) 19:34, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for the tip on using Request Edit Wizard. I will have it bookmarked. Yes, i have a professional and personal connection to the Filipino entertainment industry. All articles that i have contributed about 4 years ago have a connection to myself and though i tried to adhere to the notability requirements, i got blocked because of the COI and NO, i was not paid by anyone whatsoever. I guess that is one big lesson to me, i love the experience of writing and contributing to this community and is what i missed so much. That is also one of the reason why i also asked if there is a way to start anew or maybe archive this talk page to also help protect my identity. Please advice. Kalaboomsky (talk) 03:06, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

If unblocked, you are able to archive or remove the unblock requests from your talk page. Instructions on how to do that are here. I am willing to unblock you with the restriction that you will not be able to edit any articles related to Filipino culture. This includes but is not limited to: biographies, companies, products, or anything connected with the Filipino entertainment industry including music, film, television, Internet personalities, theatre, live-action productions and the artistic community in the past or present. Do you understand and accept this condition?

Since the blocking admin cannot reply to this, I am going to WP:IAR the discussion with the blocking admin. I will give a day for other admins to comment if they have concerns with this. @Daniel Case: since this admin commented above, though they are welcome to ignore if they wish. Z1720 (talk) 18:20, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for your consideration. Please at least help me contribute to histories, places, culture and traditions. Im really good with that. I would assume that the restriction is probationary? I mean, if i demonstrated a good behaviour, will be able to contribute to current events as well? Thank your for the tip in archiving my old talk page entry. Will follow that through. Kalaboomsky (talk) 09:55, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

The restriction can be appealed after a few months, but you would have to demonstrate some need to lift the restriction; since you have a COI I don't think this would be the best idea. As for current events, if it is not connected to the entertainment industry (political events, natural disasters, etc.) then it should be OK for you to edit, but I suggest that you look for articles that are not connected to the Philippines. If an admin thinks there is a hint of a connection then it will be grounds to reblock you without warning, which you will want to avoid. Z1720 (talk) 16:38, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Thank you very much for considering my request. I appreciate it. Kalaboomsky (talk) 02:37, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

TarnishedPath^talk 01:03, 4 August 2024 (UTC)