May 2022

edit

  Hello, I'm RecycledPixels. An edit that you recently made to Pan Am Flight 7 seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! RecycledPixels (talk) 06:34, 29 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bhuvan Chopra (September 6)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Curb Safe Charmer were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 19:39, 6 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Katyayinii! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 19:39, 6 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bhuvan Chopra (November 5)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 17:59, 5 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bhuvan Chopra (November 7)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MarcGarver was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
MarcGarver (talk) 16:43, 7 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bhuvan Chopra (February 8)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by HitroMilanese were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Hitro talk 06:35, 8 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bhuvan Chopra (March 23)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LordVoldemort728 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
​​​​​​​𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️Let's Talk ! 08:10, 23 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Katyayinii

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Katyayinii requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CNMall41 (talk) 08:58, 28 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bhuvan Chopra (March 28)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
CNMall41 (talk) 08:59, 28 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
If you query Bhuvan Chopra who is a 50 yr old real actor and has been trying to re-instate his wikipedia page. Its not clear why consistently the real references to his acting in indian television serials, is deemed as unreliable by folks who dont have any background. To claim that a reviewer knows everything about every topic to sense what is unreliable, is highly unprofessional. As said his name has been referenced already by several wikipedia pages. So how come he is being deemed as unreliable sources. It makes the other pages which are pages of real television series , unreliable.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?go=Go&search=bhuvan+chopra&ns0=1 Katyayinii (talk) 09:22, 28 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
WP:CIR. Again, Wikipedia, IMDb, and YouTube are not reliable sources. Please see WP:RS if you wish to make changes to the draft and resubmit. --CNMall41 (talk) 04:24, 29 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bhuvan chopra (March 30)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 07:30, 30 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

March 2023

edit
 

Hello Katyayinii. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Katyayinii. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Katyayinii|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 07:32, 30 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Bhuvan Chopra

edit

  Hello, Katyayinii. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bhuvan Chopra, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:06, 2 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

February 2024

edit

  Hello, Katyayinii, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Nikotesslai (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 05:22, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

do you see any updates or edits for more than a year now? all edits were rejected and this draft is no longer of interest. the two ids are two different people working on the topic. but we were approached about getting stuff posted after paying someone. thats against our principles and understanding of use of Wikipedia. there are other pages of people with lesser body of work already published so the reasons provided for rejection are lip service. 115.98.234.153 (talk) 05:53, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply