User talk:Keith Okamoto/Archive 3

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

WWE PPV dates and locations

Bro, those dates are official, there in the calendar, if you don't believe me, then check your self, or contact the WWE — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.81.43.137 (talk) 16:27, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

WWE Raw

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to WWE Raw. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. 11coolguy12 (talk) 03:17, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

• Due to your continuous, unsourced edit made on the mentioned article, I have taken up the matter with Wikipedia's dispute resolution noticeboard. 11coolguy12 (talk) 06:28, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

I've closed the WP:DRN thread, because you need to talk about this on the article talk page first. Also, I advise you to stop edit warring on the article, as I think admins will probably take a dim view of any more reverts. All the best — Mr. Stradivarius ^♫ 08:12, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

It seems as though the situation is resolved. I decided to be the bigger person here and find an actual reference to support the claim. Thanks for your... umm... help. 11coolguy12 (talk) 08:54, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

Re: Survivor: One World Note

Re your message: I think that is fine. There has been precedence for inclusion of castaway notes in previous seasons. I just try to clear out things like this in the season tables in Survivor (U.S. TV series) because it needlessly clutters that particular table. It is fine in the main article though. I would reuse the existing reference on the page. Just name it and re-use it in second paragraph. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:22, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

I broke it out into another paragraph and added in another article connected player. Feel free to make changes. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:01, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

Archive fix notice

Hey I was stopping by to leave you a message when I notice a lot of really old topics that should have been archived under the parameters that I originally set up for you when I set up the archive for you talk page, I hope that you dont mind that I fixed it real quick for you.--Dcheagle 06:29, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

March 1

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for extremely disruptive combative page-move warring, as you did at Primo & Epico. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:10, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Keith Okamoto (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I'm sorry for what I did, but I was just doing what I am supposed to do. All I was doing was reverting vandalism on the Primo & Epico page when User:WWEJobber was renaming the page to Epico & Primo and stated my reasoning for restoring back on the page. I'll take this punishment if this is denied. I'm truly sorry for warring. Mikeymike2001 (talk) 23:27, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Accept reason:

I am unblocking not on the basis of what you say in this unblock request, but rather on the basis of what you say below. There seems to be a genuine good-faith disagreement over the title of the title of the article, and I see no evidence that the change was vandalism, so your statement "All I was doing was reverting vandalism" is not valid. However, you have undertaken not to continue the same action, and I am willing to unblock on that condition. Please start a discussion on the article's talk page, if you still think the title issue is important enough to bother about, and read WP:Dispute resolution if you think it worth further effort and time. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:02, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

The idea is not to punish you, but to end the disruption that results from a page being moved back and forth because two editors can't agree what its title should be. Once you can show that you understand that that kind of thing is disruptive, and you can give credible assurances that it won't happen again, I might well unblock you (and I'm happy for the next passing admin to d so if you can satisfy them before I return). HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:29, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Oh, so that's what you're talking about. Ok. It was disruptive and very immature of me and WWEJobber to do. I promise not to fight over a silly name change ever again and will alert my fellow project members on the Pro Wrestling project talk page and admins the next time a change like that happens again. I am really sorry. Mikeymike2001 (talk) 00:38, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 19

Hi. When you recently edited List of WWE pay-per-view events, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Money in the Bank (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:03, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Removal of others' comments from an article talk page

Please see this protection request, which includes a complaint about your removal of others' comments from an article talk page. You removed the IP's comment here. If this continues it is blockable, so I hope the removal was inadvertent. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 22:15, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you

		The Modest Barnstar
		Thanks for your recent contributions! 66.87.2.142 (talk) 14:56, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Incorrect Information

Please don't add incorrect infomation as you did in List of WWE personnel. --SCWA Ladies Champion (talk) 01:10, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Your edits on several pages are incorrect and unless you have sources and proof for these edits please don't add them. --SCWA Ladies Champion (talk) 01:03, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

1) You have to stop to revert user's contributions without a reason. A lot of people dislike you because of this. Just look on your own archives. The majority of problems that involves you started because of this.

2) Do not edit war. Every time you get warned and blocked because of this. You want to play by the rules, you have to follow them.

3) If you do not know if the information added is correct, do some Google search before revert it.

4) If a lot of websites publish the same information there is a great chance of it be a real fact. Do not go by the "reliable sources" thing every time. Sometimes you have to use your own reason and good sense.

--SCWA Ladies Champion (talk) 01:05, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Why?! NXT

Were's your proof of this, let me see the proof and it has aired yet soooo.....you think about it. --SCWA Ladies Champion (talk) 18:32, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

July 2012

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring, as you did at List of current champions in WWE. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. — foxj 08:18, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

WWE roster

I've been thinking about it, and before I had said no due to wanting to make sure that they wouldn't all of a sudden reinforce the brand extension. But because it's now apparent that the "supershow" format is here for the long haul, I think it would be a good idea to combine the roster, since anybody can appear on any show. Just add a small addition to each wrestler's info box indicating brand (either Raw or SD) Vjmlhds 23:56, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Nice job! Vjmlhds 02:05, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

I just hope they don't suddenly decide to reinforce the brand extension tommorow. Vjmlhds 02:12, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Kaitlyn

What is your reason for reverting Kaitlyn's page constantly? You are deleting over twenty cited resources for the page and that actually counts for vandalizing the page. I am going to ask you this one time to leave the page the way it is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hemmeband17 (talk • contribs) 21:48, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

NXT/FCW

NXT originally was just the name of the TV show, FCW was the actual developmental territory.

Sounds to me that FCW just merely took the NXT name, deactivated the FCW titles, and established the new NXT Title.

For the NXT article, I'd say that the show was cancelled on whatever the day the final taping from the arena prior to the SD taping took place.

And on the FCW article, state that upon the show NXT's cancellation, FCW took the NXT name, and deactivated/activated the titles as stated above.

Hope that helps at least somewhat.

Vjmlhds 04:19, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Keith Okamoto. You have new messages at Dcheagle's talk page.
Message added 04:22, 18 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Dcheagle | GO TEAM USA 04:22, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Keith Okamoto. You have new messages at Dcheagle's talk page.
Message added 04:39, 18 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Dcheagle | GO TEAM USA 04:39, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

August 2012

Your recent editing history at Vortexx shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Powergate92Talk 01:43, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Megaforce

No, because Samurai Cast is not a reliable source and never will be.—Ryulong (琉竜) 03:02, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Instead of discussing this on 4 different talk pages, I think we should all discuss this in the discussion that was started at WP:Notability/Noticeboard#Power Rangers Megaforce back in June. Powergate92Talk 06:34, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Response to deletion of my addition to WWE '13

Please don't delete people's contributions without stating a reason, besides it being rude (like that other guy said) it makes people not like you. I am currently in the midst of fixing your mistake. Kane (talk) 08:14, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Truce?

Hows about you stop editing my articles and we leave each other be? I'd like to call a truce? Or something less cheesy. You stay outta my way and I'll stay out of your, OK? Kane (talk) 18:48, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Djjazzyb

FYI, I and Dennis Brown each gave Djjazzyb a final warning. Hopefully, he will stop attacking you. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 19:44, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

I have no problems with the message if he is letting off steam at me. However, should Djjazzyb attack other users, he will most likely be blocked from editing. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 21:29, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Edit Warring

Your recent editing history at List of WWE personnel shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. --Dcheagle | ^{Join the Fight!} 00:31, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Keith Okamoto. You have new messages at Dcheagle's talk page.
Message added 00:42, 13 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Dcheagle | ^{Join the Fight!} 00:42, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

SCWA Ladies Champion

Hi, Mikey. Can we banned SCWA Ladies Champion from wikipedia? I saw that Ribbon Salminen reverted a lot of him editions, you too. Also, he has upload a lot of Copyright photos. I think that he don't know how to use Wikipedia. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 20:13, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Do it. Now, SCWA is banned. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 21:02, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Cool. Thanks. But I think that his wars with, for example, Ribbon is a bigger problem. But it's ok. Thanks for your help. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 21:09, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

WWEJobber

I sent a message to WWEJobber telling him to stop with the double listings of Vince and HHH. Hopefully he'll get the picture. If not I'll look to get him blocked. Vjmlhds 23:43, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Stop crying. You're not the owners of the article. There is no double list of Vince. Pay attention.WWEJobber (talk) 00:08, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Looks like someone beat us to the punch regarding WWEJobber...he's been blocked for 2 weeks. Vjmlhds 21:45, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Pwizzle12

You have nominated this new editor on AIV as a vandalism-only editor. I see only two edits, neither of which are overt vandalism. You have been on wikipedia for some five years, and presumably know what you are doing. What can you see here tha I cannot see?--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 19:52, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Robbie Brookside IS WORKING with WWE

http://www.pwmania.com/robbie-brookside-working-wwe-developmental-meet-cm-punk-todays-wwe-sms http://www.wrestling-news.net/legend-robbie-brookside-wwe-developmental/15959/ And here is a photo of the NXT crew: http://img.viame-cdn.com/photos/0c57daa0-ed94-012f-5424-1231381a6f54/r600x600.jpg Robbie Brookside is between Joey Mercury and William Regal. As for the other edits, they are made because the information was far from updated and corrected. WWEJobber (talk) 18:52, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Moving citations.

Any reason for this edit? The citations make much more sense next to the thing they're backing up than next to whatever anyone puts in the notes column. InedibleHulk (talk) 22:34, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

I replied at my page, if you were expecting it here. Hadn't noticed my screwup, thanks for pointing it out. InedibleHulk (talk) 22:47, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

NXT Articles

Seeing as there is no further interest regarding the NXT articles within the WP:PW project members...I guess it's up to us. I'd like to suggest leave NXT Wrestling as the FCW/new NXT page, and combine WWE NXT and History of WWE NXT to form the Season 1-5 page. Your thoughts? Starship.paint (talk) 00:12, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

I think there are two options. Option A (I prefer this): we can leave the combined article as 'WWE NXT' and the developmental article as 'NXT Wrestling'. Option B: name the combined article WWE NXT (2010-2012) and the developmental article WWE NXT (2012)? But the option B would need to be updated each year? Starship.paint (talk) 03:55, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

OK. I'll probably work on the articles during the weekend. Starship.paint (talk) 03:27, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Argh. I merged the articles, but the page is now Wikipedia:WWE NXT. I need an admin to move it to WWE NXT and I made a request already. Starship.paint (talk) 10:06, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Alright, we'll need to take it to the WP:PW portal again. Starship.paint (talk) 03:17, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Now at Talk:NXT Wrestling#Merge NXT articles together. Looking for your support of my proposal in the green text. Starship.paint (talk) 13:05, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

J Bronson

The NXTWrestling website was revised and updated yesterday and his profile did not change. For developmental wrestlers is better to stick with the Fcwwrestling.info version. WWEJobber (talk) 04:59, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Just a mispelling. Like the "." in Bronson's name. WWEJobber (talk) 05:11, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

NXT articles

The three articles style that Starship sugests is not "more acceptable to wiki standards". It will throw away all the FCW developmental history to focus just on the actual season of the TV show. And it will recognise the actual season as a separate TV show and it is not the case. WWE recognises the actual format as just another season of the NXT TV show, not something different. Think about it. Thanks for your attention. WWEJobber (talk) 18:45, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

NXT wrestlers on PPV

As I said remember Brett DiBiase before doing such a move. The guy helped Randy Orton against John Cena in 2009's Summerslam and appeared the following night on Raw, but never debuted on the main roster. Now, your post on my talk page:

"WWE execs have been talking about bringing back NXT to american television screens"

Where are the sources? Have you ever been in an executives' reunion to know what they really talk about?

"since NXT changed their format."

NXT changed the TV show format, but never its essence. It was always a TV show to developmental roster wrestlers appear to general public. It changed to a more wrestle show during season 5 (Redemption), not now.

"Tonight started what I believe is that."

You are editing an article with information that you believe? Really?

"They first start an invasion angle of NXT superstars, with Seth Rollins, Dean Ambrose and Roman Reigns demanding that WWE should expose more of the NXT roster after being relegated to international/online broadcasting."

First of all, I believe the you are right in the storyline fact, but it was not proven yet, so we will have to wait. Second, even if they appeared to expose the NXT roster, they will continue to be developmental wrestlers, like the NXT rookies were.

"If this is correct, then what I've done on List of WWE personnel should remain."

So you edited before even know it is a correct information? WWEJobber (talk) 04:27, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

I understand your point. What I said is that even if they appear on Raw or Smackdown they will continue to be developmental wrestlers. An appearance in a main roster show does not mean that they are not in developmental anymore. As I said before, 2009's Summerslam was not the last time we saw Brett DiBiase, but even with him appearing on Raw he never made the cut to the main roster.

"What we are seeing is a invasion angle of mostly top NXT stars appearing on Raw and SmackDown in the coming weeks or months,"

Really? I want to believe. Where are the sources?

"I believe that NXT superstar TAC was giving out hints of this storyline during his twitter rant yesterday."

So still you believe. WWEJobber (talk) 04:46, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Man, if they still developmental and you are putting they on the main roster you are not updating anything, because you are giving an informantion that is not right at the moment. You have to understand it and wait. Do not be flustered. They will be part of the main rost just when WWE acknowledge then on the main roster page (http://www.wwe.com/superstars). And they will not be in developmental anymore just when they are not showed on the NXT roster page (http://www.fcwwrestling.info/NXT-Wrestling-Superstars.html). To follow this is to keep the article updated. WWEJobber (talk) 05:01, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for understand. And help me to prevent others to do the same. WWEJobber (talk) 05:10, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Like I said, others users are going to do the same thing (Vjmlhds for example). Can you help me to explain the situation without this create a problem please?

Johnny Curtis/Fandango

It is not the same case on El Local. In fact it looks like that WWE scrapped the idea. They stopped airing the promos without a reason for nearly one month. He is wrestling on NXT under his real name yet. His profile was not updated on WWE.com. Even on house shows when he uses this gimmick he goes by the ring name Johnny Curtis. It is really strange but these are the facts until this moment. And I was expecting his redebut. WWEJobber (talk) 06:42, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

I did not watch it. Maybe it happened when I went to the toilet. But he did not debuted yet right? It is better to wait in my humble opinion. WWEJobber (talk) 06:55, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

TLC: Tables, Ladders & Chairs (2012)

Hi. I saw you removed some of the content I wrote for TLC: Tables, Ladders & Chairs (2012). I started a discussion about your removal of the content on the article's talk page and would appreciate your input there. Thank you. --Odie5533 (talk) 19:07, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Template:WWE NXT Rookies

I renamed the template to show the Season 1-5 Rookies, not the current ones. The current ones should be shown at Template:WWE personnel. Starship.paint (talk) 01:46, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

It's okay, apology accepted. You're just too fast heh Starship.paint (talk) 02:05, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

WWE '13

Hi Keith. Just wanted to know why you had deleted my entry in the said article. It's properly attributed. Would appreciate if you could let me know. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jackcyj (talk • contribs) 02:28, 5 December 2012 (UTC)Jackcyj (talk) 02:31, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

PR is vague but

Move it to whatever was agreed upon in that discussion. So... WWE (video game series) I guess. « Ryūkotsusei » 07:22, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

The New Adventures of Nanoboy

http://tvlistings.zap2it.com/tv/the-new-adventures-of-nanoboy/EP01104023 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.81.130.146 (talk) 00:33, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

RuPaul's Drag Race S5

Hello! I was the one who removed the sortable aspect in the table for the contestants because i felt it wasn't necessary. But I saw you reapplied it. I just wanted to know why we should keep it because it doesn't appear that useful to me. In any other kind of reality TV show, we don't see the contestant table be sortable... Anyways, I just wanted your opinion! ─ Fabzzz _talk 19:34, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Article notability notification

Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote recently, Team Rhodes Scholars, has been tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: "Team Rhodes Scholars" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 02:46, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Aces & Eights

Ah, sorry - checking the edit history I see that I had inadvertently restored a nonsense edit. Sorry for this - thanks for catching my mistake. McPhail (talk) 19:50, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

America's Next Top Model

I want to know why did you delete my article. I have linked enough and I want that it stays.

Greetings Matze-bepy123 (talk) 19:03, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Edit warring

You have been edit warring in multiple articles: WWE Raw, List of current champions in WWE, and WWE SmackDown. If you persist, you risk being blocked.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:58, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

April 2013

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  Bbb23 (talk) 23:39, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Keith Okamoto (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

All I was doing was undoing vandalism made by User:Jake1244. Keith Okamoto (talk) 00:34, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Accept reason:

Unblocked per conditions below. Bbb23 (talk) 01:41, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

*I can't say what your intention was, but in this edit, you reverted Jake and User:DachshundsRule.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:40, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Sorry. My intention was to undo Jake's actions, didn't meant to undo Dachshunds as well. Keith Okamoto (talk) 00:46, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Okay. I'm willing to unblock you but only if you agree not to edit the three articles (in my warning in the section above this one) for five days. I'm willing to give you an exemption for reverting vandalism, but only if it's so obvious that even someone who knows nothing about professional wrestling (me, for example), would know it's vandalism. Let me know what you want to do.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:51, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

I agree to your terms. I hope DachshundsRule does the same. Keith Okamoto (talk) 00:55, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. DachsundsRule was blocked before you for the same time frame. They haven't requested an unblock. As soon as I post this, I will unblock you.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:40, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Team Rhodes Scholars for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Team Rhodes Scholars is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Team Rhodes Scholars until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Qwerty Binary (talk) 04:13, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Titus O'Neil and Darren Young listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Titus O'Neil and Darren Young. Since you had some involvement with the Titus O'Neil and Darren Young redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 03:48, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Blue Pants

Hello there! I've provided a citation that explicitly states that Blue Pants is not under contract with WWE. Regarding the female competitors of NXT, only a handful of them are contractually tied with the company right now. Other wrestlers, such as Peyton Royce and Billie Kay, also perform on television. Although, same as Blue Pants, they are not contracted talent. I understand that Blue Pants was recently part of a storyline, but that does not change the fact that she is not under contract, as opposed to assigned Divas, such as Dana Brooke, Carmella, Alexa Bliss and Bayley. Cheers! DantODB (talk) 21:50, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

I would like to correct myself and say that after a lot of research, Peyton Royce and Billie Kay are actually under contract with WWE. But until their official debuts under these ring names (because on television, they have only been enhancement talents), they should not be put under the NXT roster. Additionally, they are not listed on the WWE website as of now. Nia Jax is actually a full-time competitor, as she was indeed signed. She just has not debuted on television yet. Blue Pants, on the other hand, is not under contract. Regardless of having official merchandise and being part of a storyline, I don't see a report on WWE signing Blue Pants to a contract as of now. Also, it is still unclear whether she would still be appearing on NXT after losing to Alexa Bliss. Wait for an official report. DantODB (talk) 06:40, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Template

Well, I saw Paint made the work with the user. I was waiting to a level 3 warning. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 15:42, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Disruption/Vandalism on List of WWE Divas Champions

Hi there.

As you can see, there is lots of disruption to the List of WWE Divas Champions Page.

Also, the pictures at the bottom of AJ, Eve and Nikki have been removed and I cannot get them back.

Anyway you could revert the editing and restore them?

Kind regards

80.192.130.85 (talk) 03:52, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Template:WWE personnel unprotection

Hello Keith. You may have noticed that I have unprotected Template:WWE personnel. This is because the protection wasn't having the intended effect of getting all the parties involved to discuss their edits on the talk page. Instead, I'm going to keep the page on my watchlist, and I will first warn and then block editors who simply revert without discussing their edits. So please bear this in mind when editing the template, and always discuss your edits at Template talk:WWE personnel if there is any doubt about whether there is a consensus for them. Best — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 09:18, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

ROH personnel

Dalton Castle's real name is Brett Giehl. Cheeseburger's is Brandel Littlejohn. Do some research before you start reversing the edits I'm making. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.0.108.190 (talk) 15:49, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Vandalism

I saw it. As the admin. said, the battlefield is Here . --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 17:41, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Looks like i'm lost in the 3RR. However, User:Antinate has some problems with the user. Maybe, you can talk with an administrator about Funatastic, because all his behavior was unaceptable. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 00:53, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

WWE US Championship

Uhh that was an impulse edit, I will change it back. Rewind Wrestling (talk) 00:23, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

November 2015

Hello, I'm Electricburst1996. I noticed that you made a change to an article, 2016 in American television, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ElectricBurst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 21:35, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Recent edit to Dash and Dawson

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you removed some content from Dash and Dawson without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 01:47, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Keith!

(Charles R. Knight, 1922)

Keith, I wish you and those dear to you golden days of love and joy in a Happy New Year 2016! Best regards, Sam Sailor Talk! 01:53, 2 January 2016 (UTC) Pass on! Send this greeting by adding {{subst:User:Sam Sailor/Templates/HappyNewYear}} to user talk pages. Automatic level-2 heading and auto-signing included.

(Unknown artist, Norway, 1916)

Re: The Shield page vandalized again

Yeah, I saw it. Now I reverted it again. I think that it would be a great idea to contact an administrator in case the IP launches an edit war. Thanks for the heads up.--EdgarCabreraFariña (talk) 23:02, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

There you go; the IP reverted it again, alleging that "they're The Shield, expect that they don't use the name"(?!). The IP now opened a discussion in the talk page of The Shield page.--EdgarCabreraFariña (talk) 01:57, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Establish consensus against. Enforce consensus. If disruption, contact dispute resolution.--WillC 23:15, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Discussion resulted with many opposes, yet the IP just now changed a lot of the info on the Shield article towards Reigns and Ambrose. Heytherehowsitgoin (talk) 07:18, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Shinsuke Nakamura

He IS working for NJPW. He has a match tomorrow and his final match on the 30th. His contract runs out the following day. Yesterday, WWE announced he is working the NXT event in April. He has stated in interviews that he will sign with WWE, but definitely has not done so yet. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen)(ZOOM) 21:08, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Dash and Dawson to The Revival (professional wrestling)

I don't know. I don't really follow NXT. I guess I would ask just to be sure. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen)(ZOOM) 19:32, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Keith Okamoto. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Wrong Edits

Can you please stop reverting the edits to the Money in the Bank Ladder Match page. I am changing the Tombstone Piledriver so it links to the page about Piledrivers and how can the wrestlers have lost a match they haven't even participated in? Wait until the matches have happened, THEN update the list. Finally I am adding the names of Big Show and Mark Henry so it is clear who they are. What if a new fan who has just started watching wrestling looks at the page? They would think that there are wrestlers called Show and Henry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:2588:7000:9855:C715:4038:3281 (talk) 19:33, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

=

.

Jeet Rama

Hemant Dabral^Talk 06:35, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Marti Bell

Three Words. Look it Up — Preceding unsigned comment added by TEAMNXT (talk • contribs) 00:44, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Unexplained Removing Kennadi Brink in Referees

You can explain why about removing it was debut of NXT I've found it. Also you did it ~ Junior5a (Talk) Cont 13:03, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Keith Okamoto. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Super Sentai

Why do my edits keep getting reverted?. 109.150.162.73 (talk) 15:49, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Simple, they're unneeded.--Keith Okamoto (talk) 15:52, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

How so?. 109.150.162.73 (talk) 15:55, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

GRR title

How about instead of edit warring you actually join the conversation on the talk page and explain your position. Crazy idea, right? - Galatz^Talk 02:46, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

UpupDowndown

Why is this indormation necessary in List of WWE personnel if it doesn't matter in WWE? Haseo596 (talk) 22:53, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

General sanctions

Professional wrestling on Wikipedia is now under general sanctions. Edits you are making such as this [1] do not support what you are claiming they are. You stated "But still, it's their official WWE.com profiles. Sure they don't mention NXT UK yet, but it's important to keep them" is completely inaccurate. The purpose of a reference is to fulfill WP:V, everything on Wikipedia must be verifiable. Adding references simply for the purpose of linking to their profile is not the purpose of a reference. References are used to support what is written. As you are clearly stating, these do not support that these are member of NXT UK, and therefore should not be included. Adding misleading references like this can lead to you being banned from editing professional wrestling on wikipedia, under the general sanctions. - Galatz גאליץ^{שיחה Talk} 18:38, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Keith Okamoto. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

List of WWE personnel

Hi there. May I ask why you reverted my edit comprising the correction of Taynara's ring name along with its source as well as the filling of citations? Thanks. KyleJoan^talk 03:14, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Last time we saw Taynara, she still had a last name. Yes, Taynara Conti lost her last name, it seems. Her makeup and hair were different but it’s been so long since I saw her, I don’t know how they were different. Sounds like a shortening of the name, as WWE has done to lots of Superstars before her. Mind you, both sources are reliable per WP:PW/RS as well. Aside from that, can you explain the revert on completing citations? KyleJoan^talk 05:32, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

All good! WWE.com's usually slow in updating things like that, as we've seen in the past. I guess we'll wait until they update it to make the change. KyleJoan^talk 20:24, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

I'm amused that you removed Mustafa Ali from the Smackdown section because of something you saw on PWInsider, yet you haven't bothered to update the Mustafa Ali page on Wikipedia page which still lists him as being on Smackdown--as does his WWE profile page. Until he actually shows up on Raw or there is some sort of WWE acknowledgment of him being on Raw, he's still attached to Smackdown.

Oney lorcan

Oney lorcan on wwe.com is on 205 live he is on 205 live every week please stop moving him. WWE and NFL superfan (talk) 18:13, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

October 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Amazing Race 32. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 19:30, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Please do not include non-notable names in the casting section. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 19:31, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Fixed your talk page archiving

Hi! I took the liberty of fixing the auto-archiving settings at the top of this page. --rchard2scout (talk) 08:14, 6 May 2021 (UTC)