Wikipedia

User talk:L235/Archive 16

< User talk:L235
Latest comment: 2 years ago by MediaWiki message delivery in topic Administrators' newsletter – August 2022
Archive 10←Archive 14Archive 15Archive 16Archive 17Archive 18→Archive 20

Administrators' newsletter – November 2021

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2021).

  Guideline and policy news

  • Phase 2 of the 2021 RfA review has commenced which will discuss potential solutions to address the 8 issues found in Phase 1. Proposed solutions that achieve consensus will be implemented and you may propose solutions till 07 November 2021.

  Technical news

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:44, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 November 2021

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – December 2021

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2021).

 

  Administrator changes

  A Train • Berean Hunter • Epbr123 • GermanJoe • Sanchom • Mysid

  Technical news

  • Unregistered editors using the mobile website are now able to receive notices to indicate they have talk page messages. The notice looks similar to what is already present on desktop, and will be displayed on when viewing any page except mainspace and when editing any page. (T284642)
  • The limit on the number of emails a user can send per day has been made global instead of per-wiki to help prevent abuse. (T293866)

  Arbitration


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:24, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Administrators will no longer be autopatrolled

A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
~~~ Merry Christmas! ~~~
Joyeux Noël! ~ Buon Natale! ~ Vrolijk Kerstfeest! ~ Frohe Weihnachten!
¡Feliz Navidad! ~ Feliz Natal! ~ Καλά Χριστούγεννα! ~ Hyvää Joulua!
God Jul! ~ Glædelig Jul! ~ Linksmų Kalėdų! ~ Priecīgus Ziemassvētkus!
Häid Jõule! ~ Wesołych Świąt! ~ Boldog Karácsonyt! ~ Veselé Vánoce!
Veselé Vianoce! ~ Crăciun Fericit! ~ Sretan Božić! ~ С Рождеством!
শুভ বড়দিন! ~ 圣诞节快乐！~ メリークリスマス！~ 메리 크리스마스!
สุขสันต์วันคริสต์มาส! ~ Selamat Hari Natal! ~ Giáng sinh an lành!
Весела Коледа!

Hello, L235! Thank you for your work to maintain and improve Wikipedia! Wishing you a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!
CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 01:25, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove and leave other users this message by adding {{subst:Multi-language Season's Greetings}}

Reply to question raised

Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Greetings L235. Having missed my opportunity to reply to you and Barkeep49[1] in the now closed RfA, I offer my answer here. In my opinion, two options could have served the same collegial end. 1.) would have been the option I chose (and I suspect others may have as well) which was withholding my !vote until and if needed. Do note it was the "apparent rush to pile on" that engendered my ire; not the context of the opposition itself. Or 2.) which, as some did, would have been to thoughtfully express concerns in the "neutral" section as an impediment to support instead of reiterating well enumerated concerns as a good reason to pile on opposition. Sadly, several whom did oppose actually expressed their opposition as an inability to support in spite of the fact that the desired end could have been achieved from the neutral section except for a bit less sting. I simply do not understand why it seems irrelevant to so many good people that a real person, with real human frailty is being affected at RfA by what we do and how we do it, especially in this season and before the ink of RfA reform 2021 has even dried; where so many agreed that RfA toxicity was a real and present danger imperiling Wikipedia herself. In my opinion, we could have done better, and should have.--John Cline (talk) 19:26, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Addendum - I apologize if my answer appears directed to either of you in particular; I assure you, upon the bond of my word, it is not! My lament is, as stated, despair we collectively bear (as a community); desiring better yet helpless and satisfied with want. Merry Christmas and be well.--John Cline (talk) 21:00, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

Like you John I had chosen to with-hold my formal vote. But that only works to a point, doesn't it as if everyone withholds their vote then we don't get an accurate gauge of community trust in the candidate. Seeing an editor who done as much good as power go through that is not pleasant. But he seemed determined to show that a plan and strategic approach to RfA was unnecessary.Instead I think he's proven the opposite. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 21:43, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

My statement

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello L235. I am sorry, been drafting my statement for couple of days bit by bit, and haven't noticed the full protection & notice by the time it was too late.--Darwinek (talk) 01:57, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

Hey, no worries. Please feel free to email it to the committee if you believe that would be warranted. Best, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 02:39, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 December 2021

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:07, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

 

Nosebagbear (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas5}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

RFA 2021 Completed

The 2021 re-examination of RFA has been completed. 23 (plus 2 variants) ideas were proposed. Over 200 editors participated in this final phase. Three changes gained consensus and two proposals were identified by the closers as having the potential to gain consensus with some further discussion and iteration. Thanks to all who helped to close the discussion, and in particular Primefac, Lee Vilenski, and Ymblanter for closing the most difficult conversations and for TonyBallioni for closing the review of one of the closes.

The following proposals gained consensus and have all been implemented:

  1. Revision of standard question 1 to Why are you interested in becoming an administrator? Special thanks to xaosflux for help with implementation.
  2. A new process, Administrative Action Review (XRV) designed to review if an editor's specific use of an advanced permission, including the admin tools, is consistent with policy in a process similar to that of deletion review and move review. Thanks to all the editors who contributed (and are continuing to contribute) to the discussion of how to implement this proposal.
  3. Removal of autopatrol from the administrator's toolkit. Special thanks to Wugapodes and Seddon for their help with implementation.

The following proposals were identified by the closers as having the potential to gain consensus with some further discussion and iteration:

  1. An option for people to run for temporary adminship (proposal, discussion, & close)
  2. An optional election process (proposal & discussion and close review & re-close)

Editors who wish to discuss these ideas or other ideas on how to try to address any of the six issues identified during phase 1 for which no proposal gained are encouraged to do so at RFA's talk page or an appropriate village pump.

A final and huge thanks all those who participated in this effort to improve our RFA process over the last 4 months.

This is the final update with no further talk page messages planned.

01:46, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

Merchandise giveaway nomination

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
A token of thanks
Hi L235! I've nominated you (along with all other active admins) to receive a solstice season gift from the WMF. Talk page stalkers are invited to comment at the nomination. Enjoy! Cheers, {{u|Sdkb}} talk ~~~~~
 

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:50, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – January 2022

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2021).

  Guideline and policy news

  • Following consensus at the 2021 RfA review, the autopatrolled user right has been removed from the administrators user group; admins can grant themselves the autopatrolled permission if they wish to remain autopatrolled.

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous

  • The functionaries email list (functionaries-en lists.wikimedia.org) will no longer accept incoming emails apart from those sent by list members and WMF staff. Private concerns, apart from those requiring oversight, should be directly sent to the Arbitration Committee.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Happy New Year from Wikimedians of Los Angeles!

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Happy New Year from Wikimedians of Los Angeles!

 


We're beginning to plan in-person and virtual events for 2022, and your support is needed as we re-launch the LA User Group.
Please get involved! If you have ideas, or if you're interested in helping to lead the group, leave a note at Ideas for 2022 on our talk page.


Join our Facebook group here.

To opt out of future mailings about LA meetups, please remove your name from this list.

--JSFarman (talk) 02:08, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

How we will see unregistered users

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:14, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

LA to FA 2022

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
LA to FA 2022
 

Dear L235,

You're invited to a zoom call, taking place on February 11, with the goal of improving the article on Los Angeles to Featured article status! I often find it daunting to approach the Big Subjects on my own—so if you, like me, want a time to sit down with fellow dedicated editors and tackle something important and complex, this is the zoom for you! I, unfortunately, have no way to transmit snacks over zoom; but I trust you to exercise good judgement and discretion in selecting snacks of your own. Hope to see you there—if you're interested, add your name here!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/she) 00:19, 10 January 2022 (UTC) To opt out of future mailings about LA meetups, please remove your name from this list.

Latest comment: 2 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

Hello! I noticed that when you protected Talk:Minecraft, the permalink you provided to the RfPP doesn't appear to go to the right place as the RfPP for Talk:Minecraft isn't listed in the permalink you provided. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 15:00, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Hmmm that's strange, sorry about that. I know there was an RFPP but I can't seem to find it right now. KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 15:23, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
I'm able to find it in the archives, however I'm not willing to search through the history of RfPP to find the correct permalink. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 15:24, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Yeah I'm not too worried about it – most protection log entries don't link to RFPP. thanks for catching :-) KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 15:29, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
No problem! Just something I happened to notice while looking at my watchlist to see what happened to the pages I'm watching while I was asleep. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 15:35, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions topic area changes

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

In a process that began last year with WP:DS2021, the Arbitration Committee is evaluating Discretionary Sanctions (DS) in order to improve it. A larger package of reforms is slated for sometime this year. From the work done so far, it became clear a number of areas may no longer need DS or that some DS areas may be overly broad.

The topics proposed for revocation are:

  • Senkaku islands
  • Waldorf education
  • Ancient Egyptian race controversy
  • Scientology
  • Landmark worldwide

The topics proposed for a rewording of what is covered under DS are:

  • India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan
  • Armenia/Azerbaijan

Additionally any Article probation topics not already revoked are proposed for revocation.

Community feedback is invited and welcome at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Motions. --Barkeep49 (talk) 16:59, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions topic area changes

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

In a process that began last year with WP:DS2021, the Arbitration Committee is evaluating Discretionary Sanctions (DS) in order to improve it. A larger package of reforms is slated for sometime this year. From the work done so far, it became clear a number of areas may no longer need DS or that some DS areas may be overly broad.

The topics proposed for revocation are:

  • Senkaku islands
  • Waldorf education
  • Ancient Egyptian race controversy
  • Scientology
  • Landmark worldwide

The topics proposed for a rewording of what is covered under DS are:

  • India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan
  • Armenia/Azerbaijan

Additionally any Article probation topics not already revoked are proposed for revocation.

Community feedback is invited and welcome at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Motions. --Barkeep49 (talk) 04:36, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 January 2022

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:21, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – February 2022

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2022).

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • The user group oversight will be renamed suppress in around 3 weeks. This will not affect the name shown to users and is simply a change in the technical name of the user group. The change is being made for technical reasons. You can comment in Phabricator if you have objections.
  • The Reply Tool feature, which is a part of Discussion Tools, will be opt-out for everyone logged in or logged out starting 7 February 2022. Editors wishing to comment on this can do so in the relevant Village Pump discussion.

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:01, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Not super happy

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi. Not to be argumentative, but just wanting to make a statement: I can't really agree with you forcing me to redact my statement, no. I can't figure out a way to make my point if required to prevaricate, so I removed my entire contribution, and so that's a point of view you all needn't bother about anymore. As to your insult, I sort of don't consider that I'm here to meet your personal expectations? I suppose I could say that heavy-handed power plays that have the effect (tho not the intent I grant) of shutting up voices offering views alternative to the accepted wisdom doesn't meet my expectations for excellent editing, so I suppose we're even.

I do get passionate, yes. I care about the Wikipedia, a lot. I particularly get pissed when editors are harassed, often out of the project, by people who don't understand our founding principles... well, do understand maybe but don't necessarily agree with. New standards aren't necessarily always better standards. At least I get that impression from reading the news from Washington, for instance.

Anyway, "out of touch with current standards" does indicate there's been a sea change, which maybe means moving away from our founding principles. Does that mean it's an Eternal September type situation to some degree? Well, you could s... oh wait, it's not allowed to even suggest that even supposing it's true. At least not in public, right? It is OK to suggest that the members of the class of '05 are hopelessly "out of touch" (I've heard it before) but not the converse, right? I mean I'm kind of getting that impression. Not liking it. Herostratus (talk) 09:27, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Hi Herostratus. Thanks for writing. Look, I'm not trying to exclude you from the discussion. Doesn't your note here (the relevant parts at least) show you know how to generally stay on the right side of the line? You didn't have to call anyone a rigid drone (or insinuate that everyone wants those now), or accuse them of not knowing what "we're trying to do here", to make your point well. But you did, and you referenced specific individuals while doing so without supporting evidence. A simple statement that current standards are not necessarily better than old ones would have done fine – it certainly would've been more effective. Arbitration is tough enough on all involved without people gratuitously personalizing the dispute. As arbitrators, we owe participants a healthy environment free of personal attacks (indeed, the community expects it from us). Anyway, I wouldn't recommend posting what you wrote here on ARC verbatim, but you're more than welcome to make your point in a way consistent with the Committee's expectations for arbitration participants. Best, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 19:07, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Bah! Humbug!

Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I realized right after making that modification to AC/P that I didn't look at the edit notice before proceeding - and sure enough, I wasn't supposed to modify anything. I rolled back my edit... somehow it must not have applied or saved. Weird... Anyways, sorry about that, and thanks for cleaning up my mess! ;-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 04:13, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

No worries! and good to see your name :) KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 04:15, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
L235 - And to you as well! Always a pleasure speaking to you! :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 04:27, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

WP:AFC Helper News

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our AFC participants; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest.

  • AFCH will now show live previews of the comment to be left on a decline.
  • The template {{db-afc-move}} has been created - this template is similar to {{db-move}} when there is a redirect in the way of an acceptance, but specifically tells the patrolling admin to let you (the draft reviewer) take care of the actual move.

Short and sweet, but there's always more to discuss at WT:AFC. Stop on by, maybe review a draft on the way? Whether you're one of our top reviewers, or haven't reviewed in a while, I want to thank you for helping out in the past and in the future. Cheers, Primefac, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:00, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

uninvolved statements

Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hey, Kevin! So, you wrote Personally, the trend of every case request seeing a dozen-plus uninvolved statements no matter how straightforward baffles me a bit. My assumption was that the committee would want to know what the community was thinking. It sounds like perhaps I've made an incorrect assumption? valereee (talk) 14:42, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Heya Valereee, I've seen your message and will get back to you. Best, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 18:16, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
No urgency whatsoever! Just wanted to reach out. valereee (talk) 20:18, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 February 2022

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:20, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – March 2022

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2022).

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:46, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Question from Facezila (03:16, 21 March 2022)

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

hi i want add some content here but it deleting everytime. plz let me know --Facezila (talk) 03:16, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

Movement Strategy and Governance News – Issue 5

Latest comment: 2 years ago10 comments3 people in discussion

I'm sorry about the late delivery of this newsletter. Within the newsletter was material about an ongoing vote, which closes in under 20 hours.

Please share the information links with interested users: Project Overview • Universal Code of Conduct • Enforcement guidelines (proposed) • Voting • Voter information • Voting link

Xeno (WMF) (talk) 04:05, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Xeno (WMF). I have tried to vote five or six times and have received an error message each time saying that I need to be logged in to vote. But I am logged in and am editing and taking administrative actions normally. Is the problem that I am editing from a smartphone on the desktop site? Or is there some other problem that prevents me from voting? Cullen328 (talk) 04:13, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi Cullen328: the votewiki requires a jump from a local wiki where you are logged in; try: Special:SecurePoll/vote/802 or m:Special:SecurePoll/vote/391. (Oh, apropos of nothing, yet I thought you might find this interesting) Xeno (WMF) (talk) 04:32, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
If those don't work, log out and log in again. Modern browsers have defeated WMF's crosswiki login cookie (for good reason) and WMF hasn't figured out how to adjust what's there yet, so even if it says you're logged in everywhere you probably aren't. Izno (talk) 04:53, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
Xeno (WMF), I am not inexperienced and know how to read and follow clearly written instructions. I have "voted" successfully in many previous "elections". I have now tried at least seven times to participate in this one, and I get the same error message, which says You must log in to vote in this election - please try following the link from your Special:SecurePoll on your local Wikimedia site. This is despite the self-evident fact that I am logged in as can be seen by my valid signature. I also clicked on a link that you furnished and received the same error message. There is something seriously wrong here that calls the validity of this election into question. Cullen328 (talk) 05:05, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
Now I see that Izno is telling me to log out and log in again. Is that your advice too? That seems ridiculous. I prefer to stay logged in all the time. Is there any policy against that? Is the ability to vote in the election dependent on voters logging out and then logging in to be able to vote? If so, where is that explained in the documentation for the election? I have never had to log out and log in again for any previous elections. What is up with this? Cullen328 (talk) 05:05, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
Cullen328: I don't think it's required, though it might help. I'm not sure what it's not letting you - are you able to try a different browser? There is more information at m:Universal Code of Conduct/Enforcement guidelines/Voter information#Voting FAQ. Xeno (WMF) (talk) 05:20, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
Xeno (WMF), each comment you make leads me increasingly to the conclusion that the WMF is running an illegitimate election that disenfranchises eligible voters for no good reason other than a software glitch. I have edited for many years on standard unmodified Android smartphones using the standard unmodified Chrome browser. That is the world's most common hardware/software combination for internet access - by far. But you are arguing that I need to jump through an undocumented special "log out - log in" procedural hoop to cast a vote? How many other editors who don't know who to compain to are being disenfranchised? You have a serious software problem. Stop the election, solve the problem, and reschedule the election. This is not right. Cullen328 (talk) 05:42, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
Cullen328: Sorry you're having trouble accessing the poll. I have not heard of anyone else having this issue. I don't have further ideas, and I'm not the one who could deliver those remedies suggested. You could email ucocproject wikimedia.org or file a phabricator ticket to flag this to the right people. I think we might be over-staying our welcome on L235's talk page through, so feel free to reach out to me directly to reply. Xeno (WMF) (talk) 10:51, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

Movement Strategy and Governance News
Issue 5, January 2022Read the full newsletter

Welcome to the fifth issue of Movement Strategy and Governance News (formerly known as Universal Code of Conduct News)! This revamped newsletter distributes relevant news and events about the Movement Charter, Universal Code of Conduct, Movement Strategy Implementation grants, Board elections and other relevant MSG topics.

This Newsletter will be distributed quarterly, while more frequent Updates will also be delivered weekly or bi-weekly to subscribers. Please remember to subscribe here if you would like to receive these updates.

  • Call for Feedback about the Board elections - We invite you to give your feedback on the upcoming WMF Board of Trustees election. This call for feedback went live on 10th January 2022 and will be concluded on 16th February 2022. (continue reading)
  • Universal Code of Conduct Ratification - In 2021, the WMF asked communities about how to enforce the Universal Code of Conduct policy text. The revised draft of the enforcement guidelines should be ready for community vote in March. (continue reading)
  • Movement Strategy Implementation Grants - As we continue to review several interesting proposals, we encourage and welcome more proposals and ideas that target a specific initiative from the Movement Strategy recommendations. (continue reading)
  • The New Direction for the Newsletter - As the UCoC Newsletter transitions into MSG Newsletter, join the facilitation team in envisioning and deciding on the new directions for this newsletter. (continue reading)
  • Diff Blogs - Check out the most recent publications about MSG on Wikimedia Diff. (continue reading)

Xeno (WMF) (talk) 04:05, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

Mail

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Hello, L235. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:32, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 March 2022

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
  • Eyewitness Wikimedian, Vinnytsia, Ukraine: War diary
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:50, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – April 2022

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2022).

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • Access to Special:RevisionDelete has been expanded to include users who have the deletelogentry and deletedhistory rights. This means that those in the Researcher user group and Checkusers who are not administrators can now access Special:RevisionDelete. The users able to view the special page after this change are the 3 users in the Researcher group, as there are currently no checkusers who are not already administrators. (T301928)
  • When viewing deleted revisions or diffs on Special:Undelete a back link to the undelete page for the associated page is now present. (T284114)

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:13, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Movement Strategy and Governance News – Issue 6

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Movement Strategy and Governance News
Issue 6, April 2022Read the full newsletter

Welcome to the sixth issue of Movement Strategy and Governance News! This revamped newsletter distributes relevant news and events about the Movement Charter, Universal Code of Conduct, Movement Strategy Implementation grants, Board of trustees elections and other relevant MSG topics.

This Newsletter will be distributed quarterly, while the more frequent Updates will also be delivered weekly. Please remember to subscribe here if you would like to receive future issues of this newsletter.

  • Leadership Development - A Working Group is Forming! - The application to join the Leadership Development Working Group closed on April 10th, 2022, and up to 12 community members will be selected to participate in the working group. (continue reading)
  • Universal Code of Conduct Ratification Results are out! - The global decision process on the enforcement of the UCoC via SecurePoll was held from 7 to 21 March. Over 2,300 eligible voters from at least 128 different home projects submitted their opinions and comments. (continue reading)
  • Movement Discussions on Hubs - The Global Conversation event on Regional and Thematic Hubs was held on Saturday, March 12, and was attended by 84 diverse Wikimedians from across the movement. (continue reading)
  • Movement Strategy Grants Remain Open! - Since the start of the year, six proposals with a total value of about $80,000 USD have been approved. Do you have a movement strategy project idea? Reach out to us! (continue reading)
  • The Movement Charter Drafting Committee is All Set! - The Committee of fifteen members which was elected in October 2021, has agreed on the essential values and methods for its work, and has started to create the outline of the Movement Charter draft. (continue reading)
  • Introducing Movement Strategy Weekly - Contribute and Subscribe! - The MSG team have just launched the updates portal, which is connected to the various Movement Strategy pages on Meta-wiki. Subscriber to get up-to-date news about the various ongoing projects. (continue reading)
  • Diff Blogs - Check out the most recent publications about the UCoC on Wikimedia Diff. (continue reading)

Thanks for reading. Xeno (WMF) 02:23, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

New administrator activity requirement

The administrator policy has been updated with new activity requirements following a successful Request for Comment.

Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:

  1. Made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least a 12-month period OR
  2. Made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period

Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.

22:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Question from Darrowsworld (06:12, 19 April 2022)

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

How do I publish a page? I would like to add a page for Patoshi and the facts behind the name. --Darrowsworld (talk) 06:12, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 April 2022

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:41, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Question from Prakashmagare1234 (19:23, 26 April 2022)

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

how to upload photo --Prakashmagare1234 (talk) 19:23, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – May 2022

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2022).

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:34, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Question from KateCornellFord (20:56, 13 May 2022)

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi, I want to make a few corrections to the entry on Dey Street (in Manhattan). There are some errors on the history of the farm from the 1670s and the Dey family who were the original owners. How do I do it? --KateCornellFord (talk) 20:56, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 May 2022

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:46, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – June 2022

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2022).

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • Administrators using the mobile web interface can now access Special:Block directly from user pages. (T307341)
  • The IP Info feature has been deployed to all wikis as a Beta Feature. Any autoconfirmed user may enable the feature using the "IP info" checkbox under Preferences → Beta features. Autoconfirmed users will be able to access basic information about an IP address that includes the country and connection method. Those with advanced privileges (admin, bureaucrat, checkuser) will have access to extra information that includes the Internet Service Provider and more specific location.

  Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:55, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Question from Jayrbautista932 (21:03, 6 June 2022)

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

San ba ako makapasok sa darkweb --Jayrbautista932 (talk) 21:03, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Question from Monicagoy (20:09, 7 June 2022)

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi Kevin, Thanks for your help! how can I change the language of the articles that I get suggested to Spanish? --Monicagoy (talk) 20:09, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Arbcom

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi Kevin. I saw your ping at me - "I think your statement would be helpful here". For info, I've finally got round to adding my statement. Apologies for the delay. Thanks. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 19:25, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 June 2022

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:31, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Ninth anniversary on Wikipedia

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
  Hey, L235. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!
Have a great day! Chris Troutman (talk) 23:13, 7 July 2022 (UTC) 		 
@Chris troutman: Thanks Chris! That's... that's quite a lot of years! KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 23:20, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – July 2022

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2022).

  Technical news

  • user_global_editcount is a new variable that can be used in abuse filters to avoid affecting globally active users. (T130439)

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous

  • The New Pages Patrol queue has around 10,000 articles to be reviewed. As all administrators have the patrol right, please consider helping out. The queue is here. For further information on the state of the project, see the latest NPP newsletter.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:29, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Precious
 
Four years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:36, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Thanks Gerda :) KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 23:08, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Movement Strategy and Governance News – Issue 7

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Movement Strategy and Governance News
Issue 7, July-September 2022Read the full newsletter

Welcome to the 7th issue of Movement Strategy and Governance News! The newsletter distributes relevant news and events about the implementation of Wikimedia's Movement Strategy recommendations, other relevant topics regarding Movement governance, as well as different projects and activities supported by the Movement Strategy and Governance (MSG) team of the Wikimedia Foundation.

The MSG Newsletter is delivered quarterly, while the more frequent Movement Strategy Weekly will be delivered weekly. Please remember to subscribe here if you would like to receive future issues of this newsletter.

  • Movement sustainability: Wikimedia Foundation's annual sustainability report has been published. (continue reading)
  • Improving user experience: recent improvements on the desktop interface for Wikimedia projects. (continue reading)
  • Safety and inclusion: updates on the revision process of the Universal Code of Conduct Enforcement Guidelines. (continue reading)
  • Equity in decisionmaking: reports from Hubs pilots conversations, recent progress from the Movement Charter Drafting Committee, and a new white paper for futures of participation in the Wikimedia movement. (continue reading)
  • Stakeholders coordination: launch of a helpdesk for Affiliates and volunteer communities working on content partnership. (continue reading)
  • Leadership development: updates on leadership projects by Wikimedia movement organizers in Brazil and Cape Verde. (continue reading)
  • Internal knowledge management: launch of a new portal for technical documentation and community resources. (continue reading)
  • Innovate in free knowledge: high-quality audiovisual resources for scientific experiments and a new toolkit to record oral transcripts. (continue reading)
  • Evaluate, iterate, and adapt: results from the Equity Landscape project pilot (continue reading)
  • Other news and updates: a new forum to discuss Movement Strategy implementation, upcoming Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees election, a new podcast to discuss Movement Strategy, and change of personnel for the Foundation's Movement Strategy and Governance team. (continue reading)

RamzyM (WMF) 01:39, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 August 2022

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Arbcom case

Latest comment: 2 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Kevin - hope you are well. I've seen your comment on the proposal for my ban, and I would like to draw your attention to my comments in particular the bit about cleaning up my stubs. This is something I would like to continue with, if a ban is not enforced. Hope it's OK to post this here and apologies if you've already seen/read this sub-section, but thought I'd raise it here just incase you hadn't seen it. Thanks. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 21:00, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Thanks Lugnuts, I'll take a look. I know some arbs aren't a fan of pings but I am – feel free to ping me on the talk page. Best, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 21:02, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Afternoon Kevin. I've just seen this comment by Sdrqaz, and can't help feel quite disappointed too, esp with you saying "I value Lugnuts as a person and as contributor and genuinely hope that I see them back on Wikipedia after a successful appeal" I'm probably wasting my time now in asking you to reconsider this, but at least wanted to state this somewhere. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 14:18, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for flagging this Lugnuts. I'm still writing my reply to Sdrqaz but I can say now that I have given a lot of thought to this and to the note and don't intend to change my vote. I'm sorry. Best, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 19:16, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
Bugger. Please tag me into your reply to them, if/when you write it. Thanks. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 12:10, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – August 2022

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2022).

 

  Administrator changes

  Valereee
  Anthony Appleyard (deceased) • Capitalistroadster • Samsara

  Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC has been closed with consensus to add javascript that will show edit notices for editors editing via a mobile device. This only works for users using a mobile browser, so iOS app editors will still not be able to see edit notices.
  • An RfC has been closed with the consensus that train stations are not inherently notable.

  Technical news

  • The Wikimania 2022 Hackathon will take place virtually from 11 August to 14 August.
  • Administrators will now see links on user pages for "Change block" and "Unblock user" instead of just "Block user" if the user is already blocked. (T308570)

  Arbitration

  • The arbitration case request Geschichte has been automatically closed after a 3 month suspension of the case.

  Miscellaneous

  • You can vote for candidates in the 2022 Board of Trustees elections from 16 August to 30 August. Two community elected seats are up for election.
  • Wikimania 2022 is taking place virtually from 11 August to 14 August. The schedule for wikimania is listed here. There are also a number of in-person events associated with Wikimania around the world.
  • Tech tip: When revision-deleting on desktop, hold ⇧ Shift between clicking two checkboxes to select every box in that range.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:44, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Invitation to Local Wikimania Event in San Francisco this Friday

Hi!

Wikimania is happening and hopefully you're enjoying the sessions. While it's fairly last minute, you're warmly invited to participate in the local Wikimania-themed meetup in the Wikimedia Foundation office this Friday (tomorrow!). You will have to register in advance, but we would love to see more people from the WikiSalon community participate! For more information and registration, please check out meta:Wikimania 2022/San Francisco Meetup.

The event will involve hacking, teaching, learning, and celebrating and we'll have snacks. We will have the opportunity to watch live sessions at Wikimania together in the afternoon. The rest of the day we'll have opportunity to participate in the hackathon, and we may have some on-demand workshops/learning sessions.

In case we run out of space, it's first-come-first-serve so let us know soon! Hope to see you there.

(Subscribe/Unsubscribe to this talk page notice here)

On behalf of the Bay Area Wiki Salon team and Bittakea, Effeietsanders

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:L235/Archive_16&oldid=1121301426"